Forced Air Cooling for Moisture Control on Fresh Wild Blueberries

Progress report for FNE25-120

Project Type: Farmer
Funds awarded in 2025: $24,176.00
Projected End Date: 03/31/2027
Grant Recipient: Gwendolyn Brodis, dba Brodis Blueberries
Region: Northeast
State: Maine
Project Leader:
Ron Howard
Gwendolyn Brodis, dba Brodis Blueberries
Expand All

Project Information

Project Objectives:

The primary objective is to reduce moisture levels on the exterior of the wild blueberry to improve fruit quality and reduce food safety hazards.

Measurement of success will include measuring a variety of variables:

  •     Weight of berries going into the system and their weight coming out. This would be collected throughout the season with particular focus on extreme conditions to see how this project could lead growers to expand their best harvest windows into conditions with more berry dampness.
  •     Shelf life of berries that have gone through the tunnel (dry) will be compared to that of berries that have not gone through the tunnel.  This study will help guide growers in assessing whether utilizing it would open up markets requiring longer time between harvest and consumer consumption which is a major hurdle for wild blueberry growers.
  •     Finally and also as a berry quality consideration, we would take before and after pulp/bulk temperature readings to see how much evaporative cooling we may achieve. This would impact both shelf life but also possibly reduce energy consumption to cool the berries along the cold chain from farm to consumer.



Introduction:

Wild blueberries grow low to the ground and predominantly along the coastal regions of Maine making them very susceptible to wet conditions during harvest. Wet berries are not a great concern if they are going directly to a processor that will be immediately freezing them, but it is a major problem for farms that are selling freshly packed berries in quarts and pints directly to consumers. Damp berries are not attractive in their containers but even more importantly have a much shorter shelf life and are more likely to be a host for food safety concerns.

This past summer as Brodis Blueberries geared up with higher output packing and equipment and prepared to begin supplying Hannaford Grocery Stores with full pallets of pint boxes, the weather and thus berry conditions stopped us from shipping less than half of what we had planned. Even harvesting in our ideal window of late afternoon and evening was not possible on a number of days to do wet conditions, causing us to lose planned sales of $30,000. 

This problem was not just for Brodis Blueberries, but I have personally spoken to a half dozen growers who faced the same problems. Brodis Blueberries is one of a few farms in Maine that are participating in a University of Vermont (NECAFS) project through the FDA OARSA sampling for pathogens in fields and processing facilities. Preliminary results suggest that wetter conditions increased pathogen presence. As more growers begin ramping up their fresh pack sales, they cannot pick and choose short dry harvest windows as a very small farm can. Now we need to harvest in the rain to sell the quantity required.  

This is why a method of drying the berries is crucial for Maine’s wild blueberry growers. At Brodis, we have one of the more modern facilities with heat pumps cooling and dehumidifying our packing room but berries are still not drying to the extent needed.  According to Dr. Calderwood’s survey of fresh pack growers as part of a SARE Partnership Grant (# ONE20-359), growers indicated that fresh wild blueberry storage temperatures range from 40°F to 70°F, and airflow and humidity within the storage unit are not often considered. Our harvesting protocol is to harvest berries as dry and cool as possible and then store them in  our packing room overnight. This past year, we developed much greater markets and needed to harvest and store even more berries in our space which, compounded with the damp weather conditions, was not successful. We not only failed to pack and sell all we could have, the quality of those we did pack did not meet our typical expectations.

This proposal creates a unique space for the berries to be stored overnight, in better designed containers promoting air flow and fed by artificially dehumidified air to expedite the process. As designed, we expect to be able to not only improve the quality of the wild blueberries we typically sell but be afforded the opportunity we have never had to harvest in damper conditions. Especially in recent years we have experienced more diverse and extreme weather patterns. The addition of this drying system will benefit us in each extreme condition, because even in drought years, we have dew and damp days making harvest not possible.

Through the Cooperative Extension Wild Blueberry Specialist and the Wild Blueberry Commission of Maine, we have been sharing all that we have learned. Tours and workshops have shown other growers the value of the new “DH Harvesters” we have purchased and more and more growers are purchasing them. Two years ago we bought the first Optical Sorter to be used on wild blueberries here in Maine, which I shared at Dr. Calderwood’s Wild Blueberry Conference and Field Day in 2024. This summer 4 more growers tested similar optical sorters in their lines. We expect that this affordable drying system will greatly enable growers to expand both the window of time each day they can harvest and help them distribute a much higher quality product.

Adaptation of Forced Air Cooling

A common method used for precooling of packaged produce is forced air cooling (Callahan and Chamberlin 2018, Boyette & Rohrbach, 1993).  In this approach, airflow is preferentially forced in one direction through palletized cartons with the aim of ensuring intimate contact between the air and the product. This results in a higher coefficient of heat transfer when compared to “room cooling”, i.e. leaving a pallet of cartons sitting in a cooler with relatively still air. Forced air cooling reduces the pulp temperature of produce more quickly, thus reducing the respiration rate more quickly and initiating the cold chain. Project partner Callahan has developed small scale forced air cooling designs under a former NE-SARE funder project (#LNE16-347) and project partner Calderwood has adapted these designs to wild blueberry (Callahan and Chamberlin 2018 and Calderwood 2022). In this project the team will aim to adapt the forced air cooling methods to provide a combination of cooling and surface moisture removal from the berries.

Rolling carts or U-Boats will be the primary structure used to stack harvest bins of berries and to form the framing for the forced air cooler. The team plans to construct a “tunnel” using two rows of carts stacked with harvest bins of berries with approximately 16-24” of open space between them. On one end of this tunnel, a blower will be mounted to draw suction from the tunnel and blow air out into the room to be cooled and dehumidified by the existing heat pumps in the space. A light dimmer will be used to provide inexpensive speed (airflow) control of the blower. Coated tarpaulins will be used to cover half of the harvest bin / rolling cart width going outward from the center of the open tunnel and also the far end of the tunnel away from the suction blower. Additional blocking material will be used to ensure the airflow moves through the harvest bins to ensure intimate contact of air with berries.





Cooperators

Click linked name(s) to expand/collapse or show everyone's info
  • Chris Callahan - Technical Advisor
  • Dr. Lily Calderwood (Educator and Researcher)

Research

Materials and methods:

Forced Air Cooler Unit Construction

A forced-air cooling tunnel was constructed within Brodis Blueberries’ existing packing facility using a plywood plenum and rolling carts (U-boats) as the primary structural support. Harvest bins containing freshly harvested wild blueberries were stacked in two parallel rows on the carts, creating a central airflow tunnel approximately 16–24 inches wide. The tunnel was enclosed a large with vinyl-coated tarp and pool noodles to  minimize air leakage and ensure that airflow was directed through the ventilated harvest bins.

A suction blower rated up to 7,500 CFM was mounted at one end of the tunnel to draw air through the stacked bins and exhaust it into the packing room. Airflow was regulated using a 20-amp light dimmer to achieve a target flow rate of 1–3 cubic feet per minute (CFM) per pound of berries, with a minimum static pressure of 0.5 inches of water column, consistent with published forced-air cooling guidelines. The blower plenum was constructed from plywood and dimensional lumber and sealed with coated foam rubber to minimize air bypass.

The packing room was conditioned using two existing wall-mounted heat pump units capable of both cooling and dehumidification. Each unit provided approximately 14,500 BTU hr⁻¹ of cooling capacity and removed an estimated 4 pints of moisture per hour. Heat pump settings were set at 65⁰F throughout the harvest season.

Forced Air cooling unit
Completed forced air cooler where cool air comes in through bin slats and warm, moist air comes out of the fan. The back side opposite the fan is sealed with a tarp.

Data Collection

On harvest days the berries were harvested into ventilated bins and brought to the packinghouse.  There, they were placed on rolling U-boats with a capacity of 13 bins tall by 3 bins wide for a total of 39 bins per U-boat. Each bin averaged 13.4 lbs of wet berries upon entering.  The cooling/drying plenum was constructed to allow four U-boats to be butted up against it and up to two U-boats to extend out from the plenum.  This was designed to allow for up to 8 U-boats (4,181 lbs wet berries) to be cooled and dried at a time overnight. U-boats and tarp were put in place and the fan was turned on between 7:00 and 9:00pm and turned off at between 6:00 and 7:00am.

Thermocouples were placed at six sampling points throughout the berry mass bring cooled and set up with a computer to continuously collect temperature data. These were labeled as Fan/Low, Fan/High, Mid/Mid, Store/High, and Store/Low to capture temperatures close to the fan, mid way from the fan, and far away from the fan in addition to low, mid, and high heights throughout the forced air cooler. Airflow measurements were taken with a thermal anemometer.

The first trial was conducted on 7/19/25 for a full load with 8 U-boats containing 39 bins each in a 2x2 arrangement (Figure 5).

Picture of forced air cooler with 8 uboats
Image showing the set up of 8 U-boats on July 19, 2025 for trial #1 filling this forced air cooler to capacity with approximately 4,000 lbs of fruit.

A second trial was conducted the following day, 7/20/25, with 4 U-boats in a 2x4 arrangement. The team worked to better seal the large gaps noted around the plenum/U-boat connections.  The intent was to maximize the air flow through the vent slats of the harvest bins and, thus, through the berries. Boxboard and 6 mil poly film were used to seal open gaps.

Pictuer of forced air cooler with only 4 u boats and better sealing
Image showing the setup for Trial #2 at half capacity on July 20, 2026.

Moisture removal was also quantified by weighing the mass of 10 harvest bins before and after passage through the forced-air cooler using a digital receiving scale with a resolution of 0.05 g and a capacity of 220 lbs. Changes in bin mass were attributed primarily to surface moisture removal.

In Table 1, the materials used to make the this forced air cooler are listed. Full building plans are described on the University of Vermont Extension site (https://blog.uvm.edu/cwcallah/).

 

Table showing costs to make this forced air cooler
Table showing materials to construct a FAC system.

 

 

Research results and discussion:

This season exhibited dry conditions during harvest. The project met and exceeded our expectations regarding the conditioning of our wild blueberries. Given that the Brodis Blueberry harvest runs from late July to mid August, we experience high daily temperatures and the cooling of the berries quickly to room temperature of our packing room is critical.

Results showed that we were able to reduce the temperature of the berries to room temperature in less than 2 hours. Bin weights, as an indication of water weight lost in the forced air cooler, indicated that each bin lost an average of 0.73 lbs of water. The speed of air movement through different parts of the forced air cooler are shown in table 2. Covering gaps in the shell of the forced air cooler funneled air effectively through the berry bins.

Table showing air velocity in both trials
Air velocity at different locations within the forced air cooler. Results presented are the average of six readings taken at each location.

Temperature

Mid/Mid temperatures on both sides of the cooler started higher than the other locations. This makes sense since the mid/mid bins would have the least exterior surface area for ventilation and cooling while waiting for the cooler fan to startup. The starting temperatures on both sides of the cooler followed the same pattern (from highest to lowest). Mid/Mid was warmest to start, then Store/South end was next warmest, and Fan/North end is coolest to start. One of two heat pumps was directly over the fan (north side) of the forced air cooler so that end may have had more exposure to cooler air. Window/East side of the cooler started at higher temperatures compared to the Room/West side of the cooler even though the loading was done symmetrically. The last carts added were in the center, which were not instrumented.

 

The maximum temperature difference observed between room air temperature (inlet) and outlet temperature (fan exhaust) was 4.1 °F. With a blower flow rate of 7,000 CFM (0.07 lb/ft3, 0.24 BTU/lb-°F), this  equates to 29,000 BTU/hr of heat removal which matches the cooling duty of the heat pumps well.

The South/Store side of the cooler seems to cool more quickly than the other locations. This may be due to sealing of the tarp on the far end of the cooler. Air flow leakage was not sampled there, specifically.

Measured berry/bin temperatures dropped 2.5 °F below the inlet room temperature within 1 hour of starting the test.  This is due to evaporative cooling of the berries (moisture on the berries is evaporated into the relatively dry air and this reduces the temperature of the berry and environment. The measured location temperatures were within 0.6 °F of each other within 1 hour of starting the test.

Line graph showing temperatures decline over time
Temperature plot from Trial #1 on July 19, 2025. Room air remained around 65⁰F while berry bins dropped from 80⁰F to room temp of 65⁰F within two hours.
Research conclusions:

The moisture removed from the berries also contributed to a higher quality end product compared to prior years. Weight loss in bins within the cooling and drying system as compared to bins in a “control” was clear and it showed visually upon inspection of our end product. 

An extra benefit realized was that the system allowed us to extend our normal harvesting window. Prior to having this system we would be limited to harvesting for our fresh pack berries later in the evening when the temperatures were cooler and finish before the dew would start to set. Because we were able to rapidly reduce the field temperature we were able to start harvesting earlier than ever and one day continued to harvest even after a light mist began which we never would have been able to do previously. It is also expected that in the future we will be able to harvest in the morning as we could potentially start before all the dew has dried off and if so, easily double the ideal harvest window available to us.

Still yet another advantage has been the amount of floor space saved by implementing this system. Previously the best way to reduce temperature and moisture from the berries was to spread the partially loaded bins out in the room as much as possible. This system requires that we pack the fully loaded bins as tightly as possible so that the air is forced to be drawn through the berries as opposed to across them. The new system uses about 25% of the floor space that would otherwise be needed. 

Participation summary
1 Farmers/Ranchers participating in research
2 Ag service providers participating in research

Education & outreach activities and participation summary

1 Published press articles, newsletters
2 Tours
2 Webinars / talks / presentations
1 Workshop field days

Participation summary:

30 Others
Education/outreach description:

In 2025, we hosted the wild blueberry legislative tour. This is a group of 30 State of Maine representatives who may or may not know a lot about ag.  We were one stop of the day and showed them this forced air cooler and talk about this project with them.

Learning Outcomes

2 Agricultural service providers gained knowledge, skills and/or awareness

Project Outcomes

1 Farmers/Ranchers changed or adopted a practice
Project outcomes:

This worked so well for us! We are big fans of forced air cooling now thanks to this project. We strongly encourage fresh pack operations to implement forced air cooling to reduce the temperature and therefore surface moisture on fresh wild blueberries. Next season we will host the field meeting as planned to share this design and findings. 

Assessment of Project Approach and Areas of Further Study:

We need to improve out data collection methods for next year. Our crew didn't have time to weight as many bins as we wanted.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.