Final Report for ENC05-087
Project Information
Cooperators
Education & Outreach Initiatives
Structured Technical Training
Growing Power did not create a separate training structure for the NCR-SARE project. It instead chose to mesh the SARE project execution into its core training structure, a yearly series of two-day weekend workshops, titled Growing Together: From the Ground Up. These workshops are scheduled monthly from January through May (a total of 5). As they serve as Growing Power’s primary training vehicle, the Growing Together workshops bring together participants representing various separately-funded projects, such as NCR-SARE, or individuals using their own resources to attend. Thus it is possible for an experienced SARE state coordinator to be attending a training on, for example, vermiculture, with a representative from USDA Risk Management Agency, a young person from an inner-city Chicago neighborhood, a college student from Kansas, a teacher from a Milwaukee grade school, or a recent Wisconsin retiree looking for a new activity to learn.
The basic Growing Together training line-up includes workshops on these topics;
• Vermiculture
• Aquaculture/Aquaponics
• Food Production Living Systems
• Community Food System Project Planning
In addition, a typical weekend will add other workshop offerings on Product Marketing, Livestock Keeping, Beekeeping, and Hoophouse Construction. Following a general introductory tour of the entire Growing Power facility on Saturday morning, each workshop usually lasts 3-4 hours, requiring participants to choose two to attend; one each on Saturday and Sunday. (A desire to learn more than can be gained in a single weekend results in a number of participants returning for later trainings; meaning that the Growing Together trainings have a built-in incentive for repeat visits.) Thus several workshops are occurring simultaneously across the site. Combined with the frequent presence of Growing Power volunteers working on other tasks, this results in a vibrant learning environment.
Friday Dismantling Racism Training
In the last two years, Growing Power has seen the need to expand the monthly workshop weekends from two to three days, adding Fridays as a training day for specific groups. The NCR-SARE project intended to use Fridays as the day for focused training on social justice and diversity training for SARE state coordinators and associates. The plan then called for attendance at the regular Saturday/Sunday workshops.
The day of dismantling racism training for NCR-SARE participants began with a morning visit to America’s Black Holocaust Museum (see above). The afternoon saw a return to Growing Power, and a structured, facilitated session that reviewed the concept of racism, covered different types of racist practice within organizations, and asked participants to explore and share their personal attitudes about the subject. Structured anti-racism training run by trained facilitators can be as short as one-half day or as long as 2-3 days. With the context provided by the visit to the Black Holocaust Museum, the NCR-SARE trainings at Growing Power lasted 3-4 hours. This represents enough time to properly introduce the issue, and for participants to start identifying the presence of discrimination and racism in their work. Yet, it did not grant an adequate amount of time to go in depth on an issue that requires individuals to think through, discuss and share personal attitudes, and the creation of professional approaches that incorporate the insights gained.
Informal Interactions
The third activity is not structured: the several informal opportunities to informally meet with fellow participants to trade information and network among those with similar interests. These are incorporated into the schedule as meals and periods before and after meals. The rather tight confines of the Growing Power greenhouses tend to force people outside on nice days, and that is where much of these informal interactions occur.
Summary: Project Activities
Growing Power maintains a consistent approach in carrying out its trainings, that of “training the trainer” – the idea that those who participate are then able (to a degree) to take the new knowledge back to their communities, and pass on to others what was learned. In reality, the technical aspects of vermicomposting, aquaponics, etc. are best learned through trial-and-error, a fact that Growing Power staff educators do not ignore. The thinking behind the NCR-SARE project objectives was that – as a professional development exercise – state coordinators and associates would integrate the insights gained at Growing Power to the specific characteristics of their work with local farmers and ranchers. The benefits would be particularly important for those working extensively with disadvantaged producers: immigrant farmers, inner-city farmers and Native American tribes.
The opportunity for North Central SARE state coordinators, educators and associates to participate in the three-day Building a Diverse Food Web trainings at Growing Power was promoted by NCR-SARE and Growing Power, with NCR-SARE making some travel money available as a sanctioned professional development activity. In general, participation across the 12-state region was low during the period covered by the SARE grant. Thus, the outcomes of the entire Building a Diverse Food Web project proposed by Growing Power were compromised.
Given the low level of interest during 2006, state coordinators were contacted directly by the author of this evaluation during February and March 2007, in the expectation that a personal invitation from a Growing Power representative would be appreciated. By that point, Growing Power had decided to designate one or both of the two Spring workshops in mid-April or mid-May as the dedicated NCR-SARE training for 2007.
A total of 11 state coordinators were contacted in order to gauge interest in one of the Spring 2007 weekends; two coordinators had attended in 2006, and were not contacted. Of these eleven, the author actually spoke with nine. Three stated outright that they would not attend, while six said they would consider going. Of these, two attended the May training.
Conversations with the nine coordinators during their invitations or follow-up calls revealed a consensus that the intentions of the Building a Diverse Food Web project were somewhat appropriate to their work (several North Central state coordinators were themselves persons of color). They also revealed the following reasons why their attending would be problematic:
• The general problem of adding any multi-day events, including travel time, to an already-busy Spring schedule for farmers and ranchers.
• Not enough advance word was given in order to decide whether to attend.
• Scheduling conflicts with already-set Spring events.
• A lack of clarity among coordinators on how their professional training at Growing Power was separate and distinct from the open trainings for all being conducted simultaneously.
• Difficulty in prioritizing attendance at a Growing Power workshop over other demands.
• Questions of why a three-day commitment at Growing Power was necessary, when the anti-racism training was just one day.
• Had already done a Growing Power training, and failed to see the need to go again.
• Already works with persons of color, and was not sure special training was needed.
• Needed further clarification of the availability of SARE professional development travel funding.
• Was soon retiring from SARE, and was not sure of how much benefit the training would be.
• Some (unspecified) tension between Growing Power and one state extension agency.
The above reasons aside, there was a general interest among several state coordinators in investigating whether any of their associates would be interested in attending, and hoped that SARE travel funds would support their travel to Milwaukee. One of these associates did attend the April training.
In summary, the biggest obstacles to attending a NCR-SARE sponsored training at Growing Power were an inability to prioritize it among other demands, the likelihood of conflict given the time of year, and the short advance notice that state coordinators received. It is also likely that the value of diversity and anti-racism training – as an optional, not mandatory, activity – was not apparent enough to make a commitment.