Soil and Plant Nutrition and its Affect on Giant Ragweed Growth and Proliferation

Progress report for FNC25-1467

Project Type: Farmer/Rancher
Funds awarded in 2025: $11,243.00
Projected End Date: 02/28/2026
Grant Recipient: JL Acres LLC
Region: North Central
State: Illinois
Project Coordinator:
Jacob Landis
JL Acres LLC
Expand All

Project Information

Description of operation:

I have been an organic farmer/operator for about 7 years. Prior to that I grew up helping my parents on their organic farm. I currently farm with my brothers, and together we manage about 1400ac of certified organic or transitioning land in addition to a 60 cow organic dairy. We have experience growing corn, soybeans (food and feed), wheat, oats, yellow field peas, sunflowers, hybrid rye, cereal rye, alfalfa and other forage crops in northern Illinois.
I have previously completed a SARE research grant (FRG045.21 - Double Crop Organic Sunflowers in Northern Illinois), and routinely conduct other small scale on-farm trials to discover what systems and practices work best in my context. Trials may be as simple as testing different hybrids of seed or seeding populations, to more complex trials such as different cover crop and tillage practices, or different sources of plant fertility.

Related to this research proposal, I have several years of experience working with sap tests and foliar fertilizers to address some in-season fertility concerns on a few of our fields, but I have never taken the time or resources to do a systematic research trial like the one I am proposing.

Summary:
In the farming world there are several weed species that are more prevalent and challenging than others. Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) is one of those challenging weed species. In some areas it has adapted to germinate all summer long, and it is becoming increasingly resistant to many herbicides. In the certified organic commodity crop world it presents unique challenges because of deep germination, rapid spring growth in cool weather, and in some places the ability to germinate all season long.   
 
It has often been conjectured that different weeds are triggered to grow during an excess of nutrients (to hold or bind them) or to accumulate nutrients that are deficient in the soil. For many weed species farmers have been able to verify anecdotally that this theory may be generally true. However, experience related to giant ragweed has not always fit the general information found in resources that try to match weeds with soil conditions.
 
This study seeks to understand if there are specific soil conditions that encourage giant ragweed growth, either from excess or deficient nutrients, and to determine if in season fertility treatments could assist in giant ragweed control. 
 
Project Objectives:
I will pick 3 fields with giant ragweed pressure, each with different soil types. At the beginning and end of the season Soil Tests will be taken in the chosen weedy spot and in a nearby area of the field without weeds growing. 
Throughout the season Sap Tests will be taken of the cash crop growing in a "clean" part of the field, cash crop growing in the weedy patch, and the giant ragweed itself. Sap tests are considered more accurate than tissue or soil tests for showing which nutrients the plants are actively taking up and using. Sap and Soil tests will be compared between fields to spot any patterns.
 
Working with a consultant, I will identify any nutrients that are accumulating differently within the ragweed or appear deficient or different in the cash crop within the weedy area. Any deficiencies or nutrients out of balance will be addressed by foliar applications of fertilizer. 
Sap tests and foliar applications will take place approximately every 4-5 weeks to monitor crop progress. 
 
Following is the pattern of testing and foliar applications:
1. Soil test in May
 
2. v2-3 Sap test (Late May-Early June.) 
    -cash crop in weedy area
    -cash crop outside of weedy area
    -giant ragweed
2a. Foliar feed half of the weedy area based on test results
 
3. Approximately 4 weeks later (late June-early July)
sap test:
    -cash crop in clean area
    -cash crop, no foliar applied
    -cash crop with foliar applied
    -ragweed with foliar applied
   -ragweed, no foliar applied
3a. Foliar feed based on test results within the fertilized area.
 
4. Approx 4 weeks later (Late July-early Aug)
Repeat step 3.
 
5. Approx 4 weeks later (Late Aug- early Sept)
One final sap test to determine any lingering imbalances. 
 
6. Soil Test (at a similar time as the final sap test)
    -Clean cash crop area 
    -Weedy area without treatment
    -Weedy area with foliar treatment
 
7. Measure and document final ragweed biomass, hand check cash crop yield to determine any difference in weed impact.
 
Objective: To discover if giant ragweed grows in certain soil conditions related to available soil nutrients, and to discover if in-season applications of specific fertility treatments can reduce giant ragweed vigor or prominence. Ragweed biomass and visual health will be cataloged at the end of the season to document differences in ragweed vigor after using targeted fertility treatments. Cash crop yield checks will be done to compare weedy cash crop without treatment to weedy cash crop with treatment.  
 
If giant ragweed is triggered to grow in soil conditions that have excess or are lacking in certain nutrients it should show up strongly on the sap test. Example: if giant ragweed sap tests read high in manganese, but the nearby cash crop reads low, a foliar application of manganese would be applied that would help the cash crop, and potentially overload the ragweed, or tell it that the deficiency that caused it to grow has been mitigated. 
Foliar applications that address these conditions within the plant may be able to stunt the ragweed growth or potentially even undermine the plant health, because the conditions that were ideal for the weed will have changed internally.
 
This research will look at multiple fields with different soil types (clay, loam, sand), to determine if there might be a common nutrient imbalance that triggers giant ragweed to flourish. 
 
Sustainable practices: foliar feeding to address short term, in-season imbalances, as opposed to dry fertilizer that might be more prone to leaching or runoff.  All fields will be certified organic and no herbicides will be used. 
 
  
  
 
 

Research

Materials and methods:

With the uncertainty of government funding we waited until we had the funds in hand before buying the supplies to begin the research. This ultimately led to a delay in getting the very first soil and sap samples taken and the overall structure of the research trial shifting slightly.

The original research proposal outlined 5 locations within a field where testing would take place, replicated over 3 fields. Sap samples were to be collected from: Weeds with treatment, weeds without treatment. Cash crop among weeds with treatment, and without, and a cash crop sample from a clean area of the field.

Soybean field with ragweed
Area of weed concentration in the foreground and "clean" area further back.

 

The theory was that strategic foliar applications might slow down the weeds ands stunt their growth. However, because the start of the research was delayed, the weeds were well established by the time the sample results were back and an application could be made.

Corn field with giant ragweed
"Marks East" field sample location at time of first sample.
Taking sap samples
Collecting sap samples.

Within a few weeks the weeds quickly shaded out the cash crop affecting the results of future leaf samples. By the end of the growing season the giant rag weed was +10ft tall and in some places the cash crop beneath had long died out from lack of sunshine. 

Corn killed out by aggressive giant ragweed
Corn killed out by aggressive giant ragweed at "Mark's East" field.

However, we were still able to collect valuable data!

By the middle of year 1 we pivoted to focus primarily on gathering data on what nutrients the giant ragweed was concentrating compared to the cash crop and forego doing different treatments until year 2. This allowed us to increase the number of fields that were sampled and increase the variety and robustness of the data.

From the 6 field systems that were sampled we compared the ragweed nutrient concentrations with those of the cash crops (organic corn, organic soybeans, and organic cover crop sunflowers). Across all of the fields a handful of nutritional differences between the cash crop and the ragweed became apparent.

In year 2 we will focus on collecting a few more sap samples as well as soil samples at the time of weed germination to compare soil fertility levels with sap samples. First, we will again test giant ragweed leaves for nutrient uptake with a goal of focusing on younger growth stages. These leaf results will be compared with soil tests taken in the spring to evaluate if the weeds are accumulating nutrients that show up low on soil tests from the same location. (This relates to an original hypothesis of this study.) Next, taking the information gathered from year 1, we will see if "overloading" the newly emerged weeds with certain nutrients through foliar sprays can slow or stop giant ragweed growth. We will target the nutrients noted in our samples over the growing season of year 1, and may adjust later foliar applications based on any additional findings in the early soil and leaf testing done in year 2. 

Research results and discussion:

Overall, the results show that giant ragweed does seem to be accumulating certain nutrients more efficiently than corn and soybeans.

Averaged across all locations, Magnesium1, Chlorine, Sulfur, and Boron showed the greatest and most consistent difference between cash crop and ragweed. Silicon and Copper also had greater than 40% average difference. Potassium, Calcium, Zinc, NH4, Aluminum, and Iron also show up when the differences are averaged, however the results are inconsistent across locations.

Giant ragweed is a known nutrient accumulator so variations across locations may be due to site specific nutrient availability. Further testing is required.  

While there were 2 fields that showed higher levels of ragweed calcium compared to the cash crop, the majority of fields showed higher calcium levels in the cash crop compared to the ragweed. This suggests that the "folklore" about giant ragweed growing in soils low on calcium availability is possibly false.

2025 Ragweed Cleaned Results - Jacob Landis

1. There was one field that showed the average of the cash crop magnesium being higher than the ragweed. However, the cash crop average is an average of the "clean" field location and the "weedy" field location. Comparing just the weedy cash crop sample shows the ragweed testing higher than the cash crop. This will be taken into effect as the data is organized and evaluated more fully. 

Participation summary
2 Farmers/Ranchers participating in research
1 Ag service providers participating in research

Educational & Outreach Activities

1 Online trainings
1 Tours

Participation summary:

Education/outreach description:

More to come in year 2. 

 

Learning Outcomes

Lessons Learned:

More information will be collected in year 2. Initial data indicated that giant ragweed does interact with soil nutrients differently than cash crops or corn and soybeans. Pending a 2nd year of testing and data collection, we will possibly use this information to guide fertility decisions in the future.

1 Farmers/Ranchers gained knowledge, skills and/or awareness

Project Outcomes

Success stories:

Will be completed in year 2

Recommendations:

Will consider more after year 2

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.