Final report for FNE19-916
Project Information
This project sought to determine if spraying mushroom blocks with electrolyzed water would reduce contamination, thereby improving yields. In this experiment, the control group was sprayed daily with regular water and the test group was sprayed daily with electrolyzed water. The results indicated no difference in contamination rates or yields between the two groups. As a result of the lack of conclusive findings, the community outreach was cancelled.
This project seeks to determine if new, affordable technology to produce Electrolyzed Water will result in a product effective for reducing contamination on mushrooms for small scale producers. Like other small-scale producers, the weather has a significant impact on production so the test will be repeated 8 times to account for variation in outside temperature and humidity.
In addition to testing the effectiveness of Electrolyzed Water, we will also evaluate three new systems for producing single-stream Electrolyzed Water. They vary in required inputs and consistency of output. These will be evaluated for ease of use, cost effectiveness, and reliability.
This project will also evaluate equipment for applying the water. Excess water sitting on mushrooms can cause deterioration so this project will review electrostatic sprayers which produce an ultrafine mist that thoroughly coats the surface while also evaporating quickly. Sprayers will be evaluated for ease of use, cost effectiveness, and reliability.
Finally, this information will be shared with other mushroom producers through a special event with the Toxics Use Reduction Institute and Lowell Center for Sustainable Production. While the equipment is being tested on mushrooms, Electrolyzed Water and electrostatic sprayers may have other applications for produce farmers.
"Organic mushroom production is particularly susceptible to attack by fungal and bacterial diseases and by fly infestations. These pests cause reductions in yield, quality and shelf life of the crop and seriously affect the economic viability of organic mushroom production." David Beyer, Professor of Plant Pathology at Penn State University.
Mushrooms grow in a warm, humid environment which is also an ideal environment for numerous contaminants. The nutrient-rich grow blocks contain sawdust and grain, ideal hosts for competing molds and fungi. Clean blocks, free from contamination, are essential to high-yields, salable crops, and profitable production. Focus for addressing contamination issues has been at the stage of making the sawdust blocks. The next stage is keeping them free of contamination during the fruiting process. Preventing contamination is important because once a contaminant colonizes and sporulates on a grow block, it is difficult to completely eliminate the contaminant from the growing room. Contamination also reduces yields as the contaminant competes for resources.
As with all crops, the limitations imposed by organic standards reduce the options for preventative and curative treatments. Small-scale producers are further limited by their budget, so a low-tech, reliable, and inexpensive solution is ideal.
There is a movement in the Northeast to incorporate mushrooms into diversified vegetable farms. In order to do this successfully, farmers need affordable solutions to common challenges. Contamination is one of those challenges.
Research into contamination has focused on the pasteurization of grow medium prior to inoculation. Numerous studies explore steam, hot water, and cold pasteurization techniques. That is essential, but once clean grow blocks are open to the fresh air to induce fruit body production, they are susceptible to contamination. Finding a solution to contamination during production would be unique. In this experiment we will test the preventative treatment of exposed surfaces of grow blocks with a daily application of Electrolyzed Water (EW).
Electrolyzed water, also known as electrolyzed oxidizing water, is an OMRI-approved sanitizer approved for food contact. Electrolyzed water is generated on-site with a specially designed device that applies an electrical current to a solution of table salt, water, and vinegar (vinegar is optional, depending on desired solution.) According to OMRI “The resulting solution can be acidic, neutral or basic depending on the design of the specific generating device, and it contains an equilibrium of hypochlorous acid and hypochlorite ions. It is the presence of hypochlorous acid and hypochlorite ions that gives electrolyzed water solutions many of their sanitizing properties.”
In the article Electrolyzed Water as a Novel Sanitizer in the Food Industry: Current Trends and Future Perspectives Rahman discusses the chemistry of electrolyzed water and the numerous, diverse studies, all with favorable results. According to Rahman, “The application of EW is a sustainable and green concept and has several advantages over traditional cleaning systems including cost effectiveness, ease of application, effective disinfection, on-the-spot production, and safety for human beings and the environment. These features make it an appropriate sanitizing and cleaning system for use in… food processing environments.”
Examples of EW in agricultural applications:
- Foliar application on bedding plants to work as a fungicide in a greenhouse setting. Fungal diseases were reduced and plants were unharmed by the use of Electrolyzed Water.
- Reduction in E.Coli on sprouts
Examples of EW in mushroom production:
- Ding et al reported reduced bacterial loads from the application of Low Concentration Electrolyzed Water on oyster mushrooms.
- In 2003 Chikthimmah reported the findings of research to reduce contamination in mushrooms by irrigating with acidic electrolyzed water. This research reached a positive conclusion with the added benefit of an extended shelf life.
While the research to date has indicated Electrolyzed Water will yield favorable results, the application of it has been hindered by complexity and cost. In the aforementioned article by Rahman, it is stated “With recent technological advances, EW has gained popularity. Owing to these advantages, better equipment for producing EW is now available and EW has become a promising nonthermal disinfectant.”
In the past, low cost equipment yielded unpredictable results. If too much salt was added, the result was a solution with residual salt that damaged the mushrooms. If the concentration of a buffer was too low or non-existent, sodium hypochlorite (bleach) was produced, which would be equally damaging to the mushrooms.
More reliable devices created two streams (acidic electrolyzed water and basic electrolyzed water) and cost ten thousand dollars or more, meaning they were out of the price range of small producers.
Recently, new technology has been introduced that combines the two outputs into one product with both hypochlorous acid (disinfectant) and sodium hydroxide (cleaner.) This technology is reliable and affordable.
This proposal is to study the equipment that produces one stream (with hypochlorous acid and sodium hydroxide) to determine if this is an affordable, appropriately sized machine that provides a solution to reduce contamination for small-scale mushroom producers
CITATION LIST
What are common contaminants of the mushroom culture? Retrieved from http://en.psilosophy.info/what_are_common_contaminants_of_the_mushroom_culture.html
LaJeunesse, Sara (2017, December 6). Researchers Receive $950,000 to Develop Pest Controls for Organic Mushrooms. Retrieved from
https://news.psu.edu/story/497109/2017/12/06/research/researchers-receive-950000-develop-pest-controls-organic-mushrooms
Electrolyzed Water. Retrieved from https://www.omri.org/electrolyzed-water
Electrolyzed Water as a Novel Sanitizer in the Food Industry: Current Trends and Future Perspectives. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1541-4337.12200
Evaluation of acidic electrolyzed water for phytotoxic symptoms on foliage and flowers of bedding plants
Page Crop Protection Volume 22, Issue 1 , February 2003, Pages 73-77 J. W. Buck, M. W. van Iersel, R. D. Oetting and Y.C. Hung
Sharma, R. R., and A. Demirci. 2003. Treatment of E. coli O157:H7 inoculated alfalfa seeds and sprouts with electrolyzed oxidizing water. Intl. J. Food Microbiol. 86:231-237
Ding, Tian & Rahman, S.M.E. & Oh, Deog-Hwan. (2011). Inhibitory effects of low concentration electrolyzed water and other sanitizers against foodborne pathogens on oyster mushroom. Food Control. 22. 318-322. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.07.030.
Chikthimmah, N., McMillen, J., Demirci, A., LaBorde, L. F., and Beelman, R. B. 2003. Electrolyzed oxidized water irrigation to reduce bacterial populations on fresh mushrooms. Abstracts of IFT Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL. Abstract No. 18922. http://ift.confex.com/ift/2003/techprogram/paper_18922.htm
Elizabeth Almeida is the farmer and owner of Fat Moon Mushrooms. Fat Moon began as a diversified vegetable farm in 2011. In 2015, a transition was made from vegetables being distributed through a CSA to gourmet, organic mushrooms grown for local restaurants. In 2018, the business transitioned from being home-based to growing in a re-purposed mill building to increase capacity. This is Elizabeth’s full-time occupation, producing 200 – 500# per week, depending on the
season. There is increased demand in the spring/summer/fall because numerous local farms offer the mushrooms in their CSA and at their farmstands. The goal is to increase production to 700# per week, year-round.
Cooperators
- - Technical Advisor (Researcher)
Research
20 Shiitake Grow Blocks and 20 Blue Oyster Grow Blocks were fruited in the following months in 2019:
- March
- April
- May
- June
- July
- October
- November
- December
In this experiment, the control group, 10 of each of shiitake and oyster, was sprayed daily with tap water. The test group, 10 of each of shiitake and oyster, was sprayed with electrolyzed water. The mushrooms were harvested and weighed when they reached maturity. Contamination rates were documented daily.
Contamination was tracked visually and recorded as:
- 0%
- 0% - 10%
- 10% - 30%
- Over 30%
Three systems were tested for making electrolyzed water:
Force of Nature - This system produces 12oz at a time and requires use of capsules that cost $1 each. This system is readily available on Amazon for $50.
EcoOne - This system produces 1 liter at a time and uses salt and vinegar. This system is readily available on Amazon for $149.
GenEon - This portable system can generate up to 5 gallons at a time using electrolytes that must be purchased from GenEon. This system must be purchased from a dealer and costs $2500.
Each system produced electrolyzed water of 200 ppm chlorine, tested with chlorine test strips
Each system was used immediately upon receiving it.
Two systems were tested for application:
Force of Nature and Victory Innovations Electrostatic Sprayer - Only after purchase did we realize the two companies selling these sprayers are selling the same item.
Fuji Electrostatic Sprayer
Sprayers were tested immediately upon receiving them and evaluated for ease of use in the grow room.
Contamination
Shiitake
Mar-19 | 31-Mar | 1-Apr | 2-Apr | 3-Apr | 4-Apr | 5-Apr | 6-Apr | 7-Apr | 8-Apr | 9-Apr | 10-Apr | 11-Apr | Contamination | Points | Total | |
Rm T | 65 | 65 | 65 | 66 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 65 | 65 | 65 | ||||
Rm Rh | 85 | 80 | 85 | 85 | 60 | 60 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 60 | 83 | 85 | ||||
C02 level | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | |||||
Control - H20 | ||||||||||||||||
No Contamination |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 0 | 10 | |||||
<10% Cont | 2 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | ||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 90 | |||||||||||||
Test - EO | ||||||||||||||||
No Contamination | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 10 | |||||
<10% Cont | 7 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | ||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | ||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 89 | |||||||||||||
Apr-19 | 13-Apr | 14-Apr | 15-Apr | 16-Apr | 17-Apr | 18-Apr | 19-Apr | 20-Apr | 21-Apr | 22-Apr | 23-Apr | 24-Apr | ||||
Rm T | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | |||||
Rm Rh | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | |||||
C02 level | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | 1000 | |||||
Control - H20 | ||||||||||||||||
No Contamination |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 10 | ||||||||
<10% Cont | 1 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | ||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 90 | |||||||||||||
Test - EO | ||||||||||||||||
No Contamination | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | |||||
<10% Cont | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | ||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 90 | |||||||||||||
May-19 | 10-May | 11-May | 12-May | 13-May | 14-May | 15-May | 16-May | 17-May | 18-May | 19-May | 20-May | 21-May | ||||
Rm T | 68 | 68 | 68 | 68 | 68 | 68 | ||||||||||
Rm Rh | 72 | 79 | 72 | 72 | 72 | 72 | ||||||||||
C02 level | 950 | 1060 | 950 | 800 | 850 | 850 | ||||||||||
Control - H20 | ||||||||||||||||
No Contamination |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||||||||
<10% Cont | 0 | 9 | ||||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 100 | |||||||||||||
Test - EO | ||||||||||||||||
No Contamination | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||||||||
<10% Cont | 0 | 9 | ||||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 100 | |||||||||||||
Jun-19 | 15-Jun | 16-Jun | 17-Jun | 18-Jun | 19-Jun | 20-Jun | 21-Jun | 22-Jun | 23-Jun | 24-Jun | 25-Jun | 26-Jun | ||||
Rm T | 74 | 74 | 74 | 75 | 74 | 74 | ||||||||||
Rm Rh | 85 | 84 | 87 | 85 | 85 | 84 | ||||||||||
C02 level | 860 | 860 | 980 | 1020 | 1150 | 1270 | ||||||||||
Control - H20 | ||||||||||||||||
No Contamination |
10 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | ||||||||
<10% Cont | 3 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 9 | ||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 90 | |||||||||||||
Test - EO | ||||||||||||||||
No Contamination | 10 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 10 | ||||||||
<10% Cont | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 9 | ||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 8 | ||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 90 | |||||||||||||
Jul-19 | 18-Jul | 19-Jul | 20-Jul | 21-Jul | 22-Jul | 23-Jul | 24-Jul | 25-Jul | 26-Jul | 27-Jul | 28-Jul | 29-Jul | ||||
Rm T | 76 | 73 | 79 | 82 | 82 | 76 | 72 | 72 | 75 | 78 | 77 | 79 | ||||
Rm Rh | 85 | 89 | 93 | 76 | 87 | 87 | 87 | 89 | 83 | 88 | 89 | 90 | ||||
C02 level | 966 | 1006 | 1380 | 1080 | 914 | 905 | 916 | 1090 | 956 | 1020 | 916 | 890 | ||||
Control - H20 | ||||||||||||||||
No Contamination |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | |||||||
<10% Cont | 3 | 8 | 1 | 9 | 9 | |||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 91 | |||||||||||||
Test - EO | ||||||||||||||||
No Contamination | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 10 | ||||||
<10% Cont | 2 | 3 | 3 | 9 | ||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 97 | |||||||||||||
Oct-19 | 19-Oct | 20-Oct | 21-Oct | 22-Oct | 23-Oct | 24-Oct | 25-Oct | 26-Oct | 27-Oct | 28-Oct | 29-Oct | 30-Oct | ||||
Rm T | 61 | 62 | 61 | 63 | 63 | 63 | 63 | 64 | 64 | 63 | 64 | 64 | ||||
Rm Rh | 85 | 85 | 85 | 85 | 85 | 87 | 86 | 89 | 89 | 89 | 88 | 88 | ||||
C02 level | 860 | 822 | 823 | 855 | 806 | 831 | 895 | 952 | 922 | 912 | 1030 | 980 | ||||
Control - H20 | ||||||||||||||||
No Contamination |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 10 | ||
<10% Cont | 2 | 2 | 9 | |||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 98 | |||||||||||||
Test - EO | ||||||||||||||||
No Contamination | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 10 | ||
<10% Cont | 2 | 2 | 9 | |||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 98 | |||||||||||||
Nov-19 | 9-Nov | 10-Nov | 11-Nov | 12-Nov | 13-Nov | 14-Nov | 15-Nov | 16-Nov | 17-Nov | 18-Nov | 19-Nov | 20-Nov | ||||
Rm T | 63 | 63 | 63 | 63 | 62 | 60 | 63 | 66 | 65 | 65 | 64 | 64 | ||||
Rm Rh | 90 | 90 | 88 | 88 | 87 | 86 | 86 | 92 | 89 | 91 | 88 | 89 | ||||
C02 level | 1010 | 1020 | 980 | 970 | 1010 | 899 | 895 | 902 | 918 | 920 | 1030 | 980 | ||||
Control - H20 | ||||||||||||||||
No Contamination |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 10 | ||
<10% Cont | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | ||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | |||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 97 | |||||||||||||
Test - EO | ||||||||||||||||
No Contamination | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 3 | 9 | 10 | |||
<10% Cont | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | ||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | ||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 98 | |||||||||||||
Dec-19 | 14-Dec | 15-Dec | 16-Dec | 17-Dec | 18-Dec | 19-Dec | 20-Dec | 21-Dec | 22-Dec | 23-Dec | 24-Dec | 25-Dec | ||||
Rm T | 63 | 64 | 60 | 64 | 64 | 65 | ||||||||||
Rm Rh | 95 | 94 | 91 | 93 | 92 | 97 | ||||||||||
C02 level | 1100 | 950 | 1000 | 1090 | 1070 | 978 | ||||||||||
Control - H20 | ||||||||||||||||
No Contamination |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||||||||
<10% Cont | 0 | 9 | ||||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 100 | |||||||||||||
Test - EO | ||||||||||||||||
No Contamination | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |||||||||
<10% Cont | 0 | 9 | ||||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 100 |
Oyster
Mar-19 | 31-Mar | 1-Apr | 2-Apr | 3-Apr | 4-Apr | 5-Apr | 6-Apr | 7-Apr | 8-Apr | 9-Apr | 10-Apr | 11-Apr | 12-Apr | Contamination |
Points |
Total Points | |
Rm T | 65 | 65 | 65 | 66 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 65 | 65 | 65 | |||||
Rm Rh | 85 | 80 | 85 | 85 | 60 | 60 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 60 | 83 | 85 | |||||
C02 level | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | ||||||
Control - H20 | |||||||||||||||||
No Contamination |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||||||
<10% Cont | 0 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 100 | ||||||||||||||
Test - EO | |||||||||||||||||
No Contamination | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 10 | ||||||
<10% Cont | 1 | 1 | 9 | ||||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 99 | ||||||||||||||
Apr-19 | 15-Apr | 16-Apr | 17-Apr | 18-Apr | 19-Apr | 20-Apr | 21-Apr | 22-Apr | 23-Apr | 24-Apr | 25-Apr | 26-Apr | 27-Apr | ||||
Rm T | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | ||||||
Rm Rh | 75 | 75 | 68 | 66 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||
C02 level | 1100 | 850 | 800 | 950 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | 850 | ||||||
Control - H20 | |||||||||||||||||
No Contamination |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |||||
<10% Cont | 0 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 100 | ||||||||||||||
Test - EO | |||||||||||||||||
No Contamination | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 10 | |||||
<10% Cont | 2 | 2 | 9 | ||||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 98 | ||||||||||||||
May-19 | 9-May | 10-May | 11-May | 12-May | 13-May | 14-May | 15-May | 16-May | 17-May | 18-May | 19-May | 20-May | 21-May | ||||
Rm T | 62 | 68 | 68 | 68 | 68 | 68 | 68 | ||||||||||
Rm Rh | 80 | 72 | 79 | 72 | 72 | 72 | 72 | ||||||||||
C02 level | 837 | 950 | 1060 | 950 | 800 | 850 | 850 | ||||||||||
Control - H20 | |||||||||||||||||
No Contamination |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||||||||
<10% Cont | 0 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 100 | ||||||||||||||
Test - EO | |||||||||||||||||
No Contamination | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||||||||
<10% Cont | 0 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 100 | ||||||||||||||
Jun-19 | 15-Jun | 16-Jun | 17-Jun | 18-Jun | 19-Jun | 20-Jun | 21-Jun | 22-Jun | 23-Jun | 24-Jun | 25-Jun | 26-Jun | 27-Jun | ||||
Rm T | 74 | 74 | 74 | 75 | 74 | 74 | |||||||||||
Rm Rh | 85 | 84 | 87 | 85 | 85 | 84 | |||||||||||
C02 level | 860 | 860 | 980 | 1020 | 1150 | 1270 | |||||||||||
Control - H20 | |||||||||||||||||
No Contamination |
10 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 10 | |||||||||
<10% Cont | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | ||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 1 | 4 | 4 | 8 | |||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 91 | ||||||||||||||
Test - EO | |||||||||||||||||
No Contamination | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 10 | ||||||||
<10% Cont | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9 | |||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 3 | 3 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 91 | ||||||||||||||
Jul-19 | 19-Jul | 20-Jul | 21-Jul | 22-Jul | 23-Jul | 24-Jul | 25-Jul | 26-Jul | 27-Jul | 28-Jul | 29-Jul | 30-Jul | 31-Jul | ||||
Rm T | 73 | 79 | 82 | 82 | 76 | 72 | 72 | 75 | 78 | ||||||||
Rm Rh | 89 | 93 | 76 | 87 | 87 | 87 | 89 | 83 | 88 | ||||||||
C02 level | 1006 | 1380 | 1080 | 914 | 905 | 916 | 1090 | 956 | 1020 | ||||||||
Control - H20 | |||||||||||||||||
No Contamination |
10 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 10 | |||||||||
<10% Cont | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | |||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | |||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 98 | ||||||||||||||
Test - EO | |||||||||||||||||
No Contamination | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |||||||||
<10% Cont | 0 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 100 | ||||||||||||||
Oct-19 | 19-Oct | 20-Oct | 21-Oct | 22-Oct | 23-Oct | 24-Oct | 25-Oct | 26-Oct | 27-Oct | 28-Oct | 29-Oct | 30-Oct | 31-Oct | ||||
Rm T | 61 | 62 | 61 | 63 | 63 | 63 | 63 | 64 | 64 | 63 | 64 | 64 | 64 | ||||
Rm Rh | 85 | 85 | 85 | 85 | 85 | 87 | 86 | 89 | 89 | 89 | 88 | 88 | 88 | ||||
C02 level | 860 | 822 | 823 | 855 | 806 | 831 | 895 | 952 | 922 | 912 | 1030 | 980 | 980 | ||||
Control - H20 | |||||||||||||||||
No Contamination |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 10 | ||
<10% Cont | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 9 | ||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 95 | ||||||||||||||
Test - EO | |||||||||||||||||
No Contamination | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 10 | ||
<10% Cont | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 9 | ||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 95 | ||||||||||||||
Nov-19 | 29-Nov | 30-Nov | 1-Dec | 2-Dec | 3-Dec | 4-Dec | 5-Dec | 6-Dec | 7-Dec | 8-Dec | 9-Dec | 10-Dec | 11-Dec | ||||
Rm T | 65 | 65 | 64 | 61 | 63 | 63 | 63 | 64 | 63 | 63 | |||||||
Rm Rh | 85 | 86 | 89 | 89 | 91 | 91 | 91 | 92 | 91 | 90 | |||||||
C02 level | 780 | 900 | 839 | 949 | 1090 | 1030 | 1120 | 1030 | 970 | 979 | |||||||
Control - H20 | |||||||||||||||||
No Contamination |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 10 | |||||
<10% Cont | 1 | 1 | 9 | ||||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 99 | ||||||||||||||
Test - EO | |||||||||||||||||
No Contamination | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |||||
<10% Cont | 0 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 100 | ||||||||||||||
Dec-19 | 14-Dec | 15-Dec | 16-Dec | 17-Dec | 18-Dec | 19-Dec | 20-Dec | 21-Dec | 22-Dec | 23-Dec | 24-Dec | 25-Dec | 26-Dec | ||||
Rm T | 63 | 64 | 60 | 64 | 64 | 65 | |||||||||||
Rm Rh | 95 | 94 | 91 | 93 | 92 | 97 | |||||||||||
C02 level | 1100 | 950 | 1000 | 1090 | 1070 | 978 | |||||||||||
Control - H20 | |||||||||||||||||
No Contamination |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |||||||||
<10% Cont | 0 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 100 | ||||||||||||||
Test - EO | |||||||||||||||||
No Contamination | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |||||||||
<10% Cont | 0 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
10 - 30% Cont | 0 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
>30% Cont | 0 | 7 | 100 |
Summary of Contamination Results
Dr. Boce Zhang provided a template to analyze the results. In each trial, the following points were applied:
10 Points Uncontaminated Blocks
9 Points <10% Contamination
8 Point 10 - 30% Contamination
7 Points >30% Contamination
Applying this methodology, the difference in contamination levels was insignificant.
Shiitake | March | April | May | June | July | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
Control | 90 | 90 | 100 | 90 | 91 | 98 | 97 | 100 | |
EO | 89 | 90 | 100 | 90 | 97 | 98 | 98 | 100 | |
Difference | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -6 | 0 | -1 | 0 | -0.75 |
Oyster | March | April | May | June | July | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
Control | 100 | 100 | 100 | 91 | 98 | 95 | 99 | 100 | |
EO | 99 | 98 | 100 | 91 | 100 | 95 | 100 | 100 | |
Difference | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
Yields
Shiitake
Month | Control | Electrolyzed Water | Difference |
March | 7.25 | 13.75 | -6.5 |
April | 5 | 8 | -3 |
May | 4 | 4.25 | -0.25 |
June | 19 | 21.25 | -2.25 |
July | 15.25 | 18.75 | -3.5 |
October | 21.85 | 22.75 | -0.9 |
November | 17.2 | 15.3 | 1.9 |
December | 21 | 22.3 | -1.3 |
Total | 110.55 | 126.35 | -15.8 |
Oyster
Month | Control | Electrolyzed Water | Difference |
March | 23.5 | 20.25 | 3.25 |
April | 17.75 | 23.25 | -5.5 |
May | 28.75 | 14.5 | 14.25 |
June | 13.5 | 15.25 | -1.75 |
July | 4.65 | 4.65 | 0 |
October | 28.5 | 29.75 | -1.25 |
November | 13.9 | 24.4 | -10.5 |
December | 25.25 | 25.5 | -0.25 |
Total | 155.8 | 157.55 | -1.75 |
Managing environmental factors - humidity and CO2 levels - was challenging and may have impacted results.
Systems for Making Electrolyzed Water
The systems for making electrolyzed water were evaluated on the following criteria:
- Ease of use
- Appropriate quantity
- Reliability
- Cost of unit
- Cost of inputs
- Availability of inputs
Force of Nature:
- Ease of use - Simple to use, adding one capsule to each batch
- Appropriate quantity - Makes insufficient quantity for each batch, resulting in the need to make multiple batches to fill the sprayer
- Reliability – System was reliable
- Cost of unit –$50/unit, purchased 3 units to be able to make 1 quart/liter at a time
- Cost of inputs - $1 capsule/12oz of electrolyzed water
- Availability of inputs – must be purchased from Force of Nature
EcoOne
- Ease of use - Simple to use, must weigh/measure salt and vinegar
- Appropriate quantity - Makes 1 liter, sufficient to fill the reservoir in the handheld sprayer
- Reliability – System was reliable
- Cost of unit –$149/unit
- Cost of inputs – Common salt and vinegar pennies per batch
- Availability of inputs – can be purchased at any grocery store
GenEon
- Ease of use – More complicated. Each batch must be repeatedly tested and wand re-started in 10 minute increments to increase concentration of chlorine until it reaches 200ppm
- Appropriate quantity - Makes up to 5 gallons at a time. Depending on the scale of the mushroom farm, this might be an appropriate quantity
- Reliability – System was reliable
- Cost of unit – $2500
- Cost of inputs – $3/batch
- Availability of inputs – Must be purchased from GenEon
Considering the above factors, EcoOne was the most desirable for our scale.
Sprayers
Our proposal included the purchase of handheld electrostatic sprayers from Force of Nature and Victory Innovations. Upon purchase, we realized these units were made by the same manufacturer and there was no difference. Overall, the units were ideal, being handheld and battery operated. The capacity of 1 quart was sufficient for application to 20 blocks. Unfortunately, mid-way through the experiment one of the units stopped working. The mushroom environment is high humidity and even our work space and storage spaces have elevated levels of humidity. This caused some rust on the units and may have contributed to the failure. We would recommend this unit, but also recommend purchasing any warranty and appropriate storage to extend the life of the unit.
These units cost $650.
We also tested a stationary unit from Fuji. This was less useful because it had a long hose which made it more difficult to maneuver in the grow room.
This unit cost $720.
The goal of this experiment was to determine if spraying mushroom grow blocks with electrolyzed water would reduce contamination and increase yields. After measuring results for 6 months, we determined the electrolyzed water did not make a statistically significant difference in yields or contamination rates.
Producers interested in moving away from the use of bleach for cleaning may wish to consider one of the systems studied in this experiment for the production of electrolyzed water as an alternative to bleach.
Education & Outreach Activities and Participation Summary
Participation Summary:
The results were not statistically significant, so no outreach event was held.
Learning Outcomes
We expected to find that the application of electrolyzed water would reduce contamination and increase yields; however, neither of the expected outcomes was observed.
Project Outcomes
Looking back, this experiment would benefit from improved climate control. The climate in our grow rooms is variable depending on outside weather. The goal of this experiment was to determine if application of electrolyzed water would help in small-scale productions like Fat Moon. The results do not support using it in our setup, but it might be useful in operations with more sophisticated climate control.