Clonal Production of Hybrid Chestnuts via Stool Bed Layering to Improve Overall Orchard Quality

Progress report for FNE22-033

Project Type: Farmer
Funds awarded in 2022: $19,696.00
Projected End Date: 08/30/2024
Grant Recipient: Z's Nutty Ridge LLC
Region: Northeast
State: New York
Project Leader:
Jeffrey Zarnowski
Z's Nutty Ridge LLC
Expand All

Project Information

Project Objectives:

This project seeks to define the concentration of hormone needed to induce rooting on hybrid chestnut suckers using a common stool bed layering method to improve the profitability to the farmer.  The rooted suckers are identical copies of the mother trees and are called clones.  Clones are asexually reproduced copies of a superior tree providing genetically identical trees and are often called a “cultivar”. 

The objective for this proposal are:

  1. Improve orchard profitability via cloning superior trees.
  2. Develop the proper hormone “recipe” and illustrated instructions to enable any grower can clone via stool bed layering their superior trees.
  3. New cultivar generation as superior trees are cloned via stool bed layering they can become named “cultivars” as copies can be made to be shared throughout the Northeast US.
  4. Increased permaculture as cultivars will encourage more trees to be planted as their quality is known reducing risk to the farmer.



This project will result in new knowledge that will allow growers of chestnut trees to readily improve productivity, by cloning their own trees, replanting, and sharing genetics for the benefit of the whole region. Layering is a tool to help increase orchard yield per acre for every crop year using superior trees. A superior tree we define as an annually high producing hardy tree with good disease resistance. Currently chestnut propagation regionally is either through grafting or seedlings and both are far from ideal. Layering to date has been met with limited results and needs improving for our regional genetics to propagate superior trees and improve sustainability for the whole region.

Chestnut grafts have very high graft failure rate8 and are expensive. Graft failure has been reported to be as high as 100% after five years by the late Dr. Fulbright at Michigan State University. Grafting has been the only option regionally to get the genetics of superior trees. As many small and not so small orchards up to 12 acres7 are being planted with seedlings and are often double planted. As the double planted seedling trees crowed each other, half of the least productive trees are removed in years 5 through 10. It is from these more productive seedlings trees the superior trees can be layered. As grafted trees do not have roots from the original mother tress (a.k.a. “ortet”), their suckers are worthless to layer. One way to have the original genetics of grafted trees on their own roots is to tissue culture9 them and it is a highly skilled effort requiring expensive laboratory equipment to do so reliably. The only other method is to root cuttings of juvenile branches and this is a somewhat complex method with high failure rate10 if not done with very controlled atmosphere and is outside most grower’s skill set and will be a propagation method to be studied in the future.  It is the newly planted seedling orchards that we will find superior trees to clone by the average grower without a high skill set or expensive equipment via layering. Layered clones have the maturity of the mother tree and will start producing nuts by the second or third year.


Most young chestnut trees will send up many suckers that could be cloned. As the tree matures and is finally identified as a tree worth being cloned it produces only a few to no suckers. More mature trees can be encouraged to grow suckers with a good pruning and if necessary, by coppicing (a.k.a. cutting down) the tree to be cloned. Once cloned the young trees are then a very good source of suckers for layering.  Should the mother tree be coppiced one of the suckers can be allowed to grow and we have witnessed them growing six to eight feet per year for the first couple of years as the roots have a lot of energy to send upwards.


Layering requires that the mother tree sends up suckers at the base of the tree that then can be encouraged to grow their own roots with the application of the correct amount of an auxin hormone and the one that is often used is Indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) diluted in water, powder or oil that best works for the tree’s genetics. Often secondary ingredients are included such as 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), vitamins and other adjuncts by companies that make rooting compounds.  It is primary to first understand what hormone concentration and what is used to dilute it, (water, alcohol or oil) to promote rooting before the secondary ingredients are tried to further rooting percentages.  We seek to find the basic ingredients needed to promote rooting for as many trees as possible in this study.  We are not trying to find the ideal treatment for a given tree. The idealized treatments can be found at a much later time once we have a few clones to work with.


In year one we intend to find the basic ingredients needed to root suckers for a good percentage of trees.  Once a narrow range of IBA hormone is found then secondary treatment can be researched to see if further improvements in rooting can be made. The second year will include NAA hormone and vitamins known to help other woody species root. The result of this effort will allow growers of chestnut trees to clone their own trees to replant and share their genetics for the benefit of the whole region.

Description of farm operation:

Dawn and Jeff Zarnowski, owners of Z’s Nutty Ridge - NY’s first commercial hazelnut orchard and nut tree nursery, have been growing nut trees since 1992. After moving to a hilltop in Cortland NY, where the hill sides were being reforested post agricultural abandonment, they began to search for trees that would benefit both nature and humans. In their search they identified hazelnuts and chestnuts , both native to the landscape, as ideal and have since propagated the orchard with hazelnut cultivars using layering and are now ramping tissue culture. (Z’s Nutty Ridge nursery LLC was incorporated in 2011).

Both Jeff and Dawn are members of The American Chestnut Foundation (NYTACF) and the Northern Nut Growers Association (NYNGA). In addition, Dawn is a board member of the NYNGA, and Jeff is a director of the recently formed NYTCA Cooperative. Jeff also works part-time for SUNY Environmental Science and Forestry as their Chestnut Green House and Field Manager. Together, they published a book titled, “How to Grow Hazelnuts and Chestnuts”.

Z’s Nutty Ridge currently has two part-time employees, and a third employee will join the farm in 2023. The farm is 115 acres with two orchards that have deer exclusion fence on 15 acres with 12 acres planted with nut trees and room to expand. It is a fully equipped tree nursery, and they sell trees online and through word-of-mouth. There are currently two greenhouses with a third planned for 2022.

Z’s Nutty Ridge is in a unique position to study layering chestnuts. Their skills, knowledge, and experience, including their networked resources, Technical Advisor, and Key Cooperators should allow for maximum return.


Click linked name(s) to expand/collapse or show everyone's info
  • Marvin Russell, Mr.
  • Brian Caldwell, Mr.
  • Dana Havas, Ms. (Educator)
  • Dr. Patricia Fernandes , Ms. - Technical Advisor (Researcher)
  • Dakota Matthews, Mr. - Technical Advisor (Researcher)
  • SUNY ESF Experimental Station


Materials and methods:

 As we do have a varied gene pool due to the seedling genetics, there will variability of rooting for a given treatment. Ideally, we would have clones to work with to find the best hormone treatment for that cultivar, that will produce the highest percentage of rooting and the greatest number of roots.  As explained previously we need to find the best basic hormone treatment needed to establish clones first.  Our goal is to find the treatment that will provide some clones for a good portion of the trees layered. Therefore, we need a minimum of two years for the project and time to disseminate the resulting information.  The first year we test a wide range of hormone treatments and collect the resulting data. The following year we re-layer the same trees with a narrow range of hormone concentrations based on the previous findings with adjuncts that may further increase rooting percentage. 


Stool bed layering involves:

  1. Eliminate previous years suckers from the base of the trees by end of March. Selecting only trees that have more than six suckers removed.
  2. Mound chestnut with compatible mulch around the base of the mother tree a minimum of six inches. The mulch allows for etiolation of the sucker shoots where the hormone will be applied.
  3. Early June through to September apply hormone dissolved in water, alcohol or oil to etiolated suckers and tie off below the hormone. The etiolated stems are scarified prior to applying hormone.
  4. The following late fall/early spring pull away mulch and cut sucker from the mother tree and gather data that includes number of suckers that have roots, the number of primary and secondary roots and length of each root.

Study Year One

Our research will involve one variable for the first year and that will be the concentration of IBA using Vaseline using the above method of stool bed layering and another secondary variable of when to layer.

The number of suckers that sprout from the base of the mother tree can range from zero to over twenty. Only those trees with at least six suckers at the time of layering will be used.  As we want as much data as possible to encompass as much genetic variability as possible so we will want to layer as many trees as is practicable.  We know a portion of the trees we mulch will not generate the minimum number of suckers desired. Since we know from the number of suckers cut off in March how likely we are to get six or more suckers and will select mother trees accordingly. Therefore, we will initially put compost on no less than 50 trees. This will most likely generate more than 40 trees with more than 6 suckers and definitely more than 20 trees with six or more suckers. This is based on past experience of removing suckers from our chestnut trees.  Six suckers will allow for the negative control, and the following concentrations of IBA: 1000, 2000, 4000, 6000, and 8000 parts per million(ppm).  If there are additional suckers per tree we can then add in more concentrations of IBA or repetition of the above concentrations.  Final decisions on the extra sucker treatment, will be based on the number of extra suckers available and what is found from relevant paper and network research on layering chestnuts.

We will ask that the grower provide any genetic background information on the mother tree and what the health, disease history, age and productivity of the trees are.  We will also soil sample and do a leaf analysis of the mother trees as the nuts are half filled in the summer, to see if there is any correlation between tree health, age and the amount of suckers at the base.

Ideally the trees layered will have many suckers to allow for a control and multiple hormone treatments. The control will be a layered sucker that is treated the same as all other suckers but will not have any hormone applied just Vaseline.  Each sucker will have a different hormone concentration.  The number of suckers on a given tree will determine the number of treatments given.  What concentrations are applied to trees with fewer suckers will be determined as we finalize the experimental design based on any previous work we can gather during the first three months of the research. 

All data will be analyzed using ANOVA by Patricia Fernandes/Jeff Zarnowski. It is often at the end of the first round of measurements that another relevant data point is discovered and any findings to this end that are found will be reviewed for year two.

A report with all data collected will included in our project update.

Study Year Two

After reviewing the data from 2022’, we will bracket the previously determined best IBA hormone concentration to further improve rooting overall. The control will be the same as in year one and we will bracket the on either side of the best rooting IBA concentration. In addition, we will be able to add an additional hormone NAA and vitamin additions to further increase rooting percentages with the extra suckers. Except for the planned changes, all the exact same steps done in year one will be repeated on the same trees to minimize any unforeseen variables. This plan also allows for less suckers per tree on the following year as the number of suckers usually declines with the age of the mother tree.  Any suckers above four will allow for the additional treatments of NAA and vitamin additions.  Those additional suckers will have the hormone concentrations repeated with NAA or vitamin additions.  The additions will be decided based on research in year one and included in the report for year 1.

 At the end of year two the rooting percentages per treatment, the number of primary and secondary roots and root length will be remeasured as was done in year one.  All data will be analyzed using ANOVA by Patricia Fernandes/Jeff Zarnowski.

A report with all data collected will included in our project update.

Research results and discussion:

Trees were layered on June 25th, July 20th, July 27th and September 3rd 2022, at Hemlock Grove, SUNY ESF, Z’s Nutty Ridge and Finger Lakes Nut Farm respectively. In total, for all four farms, 24 trees were layered consisting of 232 suckers.  Only one tree generated rooted suckers in 2022. We believe the lack of rooting is due to dry weather.  On the tree that did root, it didn’t receive any of the IBA treatments as it was at Hemlock Grove, an organic farm. The organic treatments were cinnamon paste and seaweed paste being substituted for Indole 3-Butyric Acid (IBA) dissolved in Vaseline.  This tree rooted 10 suckers out of a total of 45 suckers layered. Of the 20 suckers that were treated with cinnamon paste, seven had produced roots for a 35% rooting. Although totally unexpected, 35% rooting we would consider a decent first year success if that were the average for all trees.

IBA concentrations studied were 1000ppm, 2000ppm, 4000ppm, and 8000ppm and one hormone addition that was 4000ppm + 4000ppm 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA).  NAA is often used in conjunction with rooting hormones on hardwood propagation and was suggested in references[i],[ii].  The NAA addition was a result of having more suckers to layer than what we had originally estimated. Our method and hormone concentration brackets were backed by technical papers and current practices on European (Castanea sativa) X Japanese (Castanea crenata) trees in Europe and was selected to be a good range to find what hormone concentration to use on our cold hardy regional genetics. Majority of our regional genetics are mainly Chinese hybrids that are crossed with European, Japanese and American chestnuts for nut quality and disease resistance.

Of course, we are at the mercy of nature and this summer was the driest since 2016’.  At Z’s Nutty Ridge we have two trees that are six years old planted near the layered trees drop their leaves due to drought. We also had whole branches on hazelnut trees turn brown not 100 feet away from the layered trees.  We noticed many of the smaller caliber suckers were dead when dug and wondered if the drought had been an influence.  One would believe that a very dry summer would have the least impact on suckers from a coppiced tree, where the water needs would have been reduced for the root systems, depending on the number of suckers and their growth. In technical reference material the shorter suckers often root with a higher percentage[iii] lending to our belief the severe dry spell we had this summer hindered our ability to generate any rooted suckers except for one tree.

The lack of rooted suckers doesn’t allow us to compare statistics of rooting percentages and quality between treatments for the year.

Since we didn’t have any suckers root with IBA treatments our timing of when to layer didn’t provide any information.  A review from one technical paper detailed below[iv] illuminated when to layer. Going forward we now know to monitor sucker growth, to know when layer and to water the suckers during dry periods.

Background of Previous data collected:

This study was initiated by chestnuts and hazelnuts being planted throughout the Northeast.  Hazelnuts for the most part will root their suckers if given hormones to enhance root development and is routine, well known procedure. Hazelnut suckers can be layered as early as late June and as late as the first week in September. Applying similar techniques to chestnuts in 2021’ gave very little results and the search was on to gather previous and current practical knowledge on the subject and is the purpose of this study.

Starting in the spring of 2021’ chestnut trees were mulched at Zs Nutty Ridge and at State University of New York at Environmental Science and Forestry (SUNY ESF) to produce etiolated shoots for layering.  The experiment involved layering three trees at Z’s Nutty Ridge using the same layering method as hazelnuts using the same hormone made from 2000ppm of IBA dissolved in ethyl alcohol and diluted to proper concentration with water on July 7.  There were five trees at SUNY ESF layered using 4000ppm, 5000ppm or 8000ppm IBA dissolved in ethyl alcohol and diluted to proper concentration with Vaseline (Petroleum jelly) on August 5th.  Of the 29 suckers layered at Z’s Nutty Ridge all had died and were snapping at the nylon zip tie placement.  It appeared that the suckers had quickly outgrown the zip ties and choked.  Of the 31 suckers layered at SUNY ESF, four suckers did have some roots and three survived being potted.  The suckers that produced roots were three trees from the 5000ppm and one tree from the 4000ppm concentration. 

Conclusions from the 2021 efforts at this point were few.  Water diluted hormones generated zero roots when layered during the first week of July.  It appeared we layered too soon at Z’s Nutty Ridge, as some suckers can grow over four feet from an uncoppiced tree and a coppiced tree can have suckers grow 7 feet or more.  We don’t believe or suspect that the hormone concentration was too high as this is considered on the weaker side for woody perennial layering. The SUNY ESF trees had 13% rooting using double or more concentration of IBA than what was done at Z’s Nutty Ridge and none of the medium or larger suckers were dead.   This information will be used in conjunction 2022’ help understand our efforts to layer chestnut trees.  Also, the differences in the above treatments and timing could be due to the genetic variances between Chinese hybrids (Castanea mollissima x hybrid) versus pure American chestnut (Castanea dentata) and are part of the current efforts to understand.

Efforts layering trees in 2022’

The goal is to find a hormone concentration that will work for most regionally adapted, healthy productive chestnut hybrids.  

The main effort of this study is to layer chestnut trees involved with one main variable and that was the concentration of IBA.  A secondary one was bracketing the timing of the layering as was learned from 2021 effort during the spring of 2022. The common method for layering chestnuts in Europe was found to be documented as a result of this grant, from the technical paper searches and direct contact with European practitioners. 

Generating suckers is fairly simple, duplicating what is done for hazelnuts, coppice the desired tree (if mature) early spring and mulch the stump to encourage etiolated stems.  As discussed during the proposal, adjustments will be made as items are discovered. Timing of layering was staged from lessons learned from the initial layering attempt the previous year (2021).  All suckers were layered except a few stems that would continue to feed the root system for next years follow on layering experiments.  

The steps of layering suckers are as follows: 1. Tie off the base with a wire or similar constrictive device like nylon zip ties or “hog rings”, 2. Wound the stem above the “Tie” and apply rooting hormone, 3. Back fill the etiolated stems to encourage roots to form, 4. Cut suckers after plants have senesced for the season and before sprouting the following spring. Although we have found that suckers dug in the spring have heavier caliper roots for hazelnuts, this isn’t part of the study.  However, we will have comparable data for hazelnuts once they are dug in the spring of 2023’.

Items gleaned from search for technical papers and practitioners of chestnut agriculture in Europe by Dakota Matthews with input from Patrícia Fernandes PhD, yielded useful information to use in consideration for layering, even if it wasn’t well quantified, that includes:

  1. Layering process,
  2. How to mix IBA with Vaseline,
  3. Eliminate tall suckers from layering,
  4. Other hormone additions,
  5. When to layer.

We will discuss each item individually with a new perspective having seen the results from this year’s efforts.

  1. Layering process was the most feared item going into the study and having references reinforce using the same technique for hazelnuts as described above was a welcomed relief.

  2. Mixing dissolved IBA with Vaseline(petroleum jelly) confirmation was another item needed to add confidence to the original presentation that was used to initiate chestnut layering efforts.
  3. Eliminate tall suckers from layering as they have a lower rooting percentage or won’t root, was discussed in Brian Caldwell’s master thesis and in relevant Japanese paper written by, Dr. Takao Li, Of Hyogo Agricultural University, Accepted July 5, 1959 , “Propagation of chestnut by layer.” Caldwell’s thesis had zero shoots root over 30cm in one year and had the same layered trees have 50% of the shoots root that were over 41cm the second year. Dr. Takao Li had less then 2% of the shoots produce roots above 41cm.  As Brian Caldwell did have 50% of the suckers root over 41cm in one year out of two while, Dr. Li had zero suckers root on one cultivar this wasn’t enough of a study to stop layering taller suckers.  Brian Caldwell thought that the suckers in year two had the wounding and hormone application higher from the native soil line by 3 to4 cm may have assisted rooting. When layering we generally put the “Tie” 2 to 4 cm above the native soil line to facilitate cutting the sucker from the mother tree.  Also, this study wasn’t to maximize percentage of rooting as we are trying to find the best hormone concentration to have viable rooted suckers on the most trees with a diverse background, so all suckers were rooted.
  4. Hormone and other adjuncts are secondary to the selected IBA hormone concentration that include:
    1. 2, 4, 5-trichlorophenoxy-proplonic acid,(2,4,5-Tp)
    2. 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA)
    3. 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)
    4. Honey,
    5. Cinnamon

The hormone and adjuncts were found in technical papers, and External Technical References with one exception.  Brian Caldwell suggested using cinnamon powder to enhance root growth, so we tried it along with seaweed.  Seaweed paste did have two layers root out of 20 layers but the two suckers were among tightly spaced suckers that had cinnamon on them.  Listed in the Appendix: External Technical Reference section one hormone recipe contains, IBA, NAA, 2,4-D and honey for European hybrid layering.  Also, a honey with cinnamon combination may be of use for organic growers, yet to be proven for chestnuts. Quick search on the internet shows honey, cinnamon and in combination being used to root plants of all types.

  1. When to Layer suckers is a common concern. As we have now learned, a calendar date proves not to be near as important as how the shoots growth is progressing. As good example learned from layering on July 7, 2021 was too soon as suckers choked at Z’s Nutty Ridge but layering two weeks earlier on June 25, 2022 at Hemlock grove farm generated roots.  According to Dr. Li the best time to layer is when the shoots slow down their growth but have two months’ time to root.   Li’s study found that there was a 61% increase for trees that were easy to root and a 47% increase in rooting for difficult to root trees when allowing 2 months over 1 month time.  One may conclude longer is better but we also know too early the shoots will choke and die. Here in upstate New York that would be layering suckers between beginning of June and before the last week of July for there to be two months before the possibility of frost for a normal year.  Going forward at Z’s Nutty Ridge we will monitor sucker growth weekly on a sample number of trees and when the suckers slow down growth between June and July we will then layer the suckers. This form of monitoring suckers maybe be applicable for all types of trees that are layered.

Having layered 32 trees over a two-year period we see that sucker growth can vary wildly.  Growth depends on how healthy and the age of the coppiced tree was, along with how many suckers are on the root crown.  The tree at Hemlock Grove farm had 45 suckers on it and we were able to layer very early in the season, while the average tree layered in 2022’ had 13.8 suckers. Leason learned is to monitor sucker growth and watch for a slowing and hopefully with two months of the growing season left to maximize rooting.

Layered Chestnut Information

A spread sheet detailing the tree location, heritage, timing and IBA concentration used for the first year study is shown in Table #1.  We believed that we should be able to layer at least 20 trees that had six or more suckers in the grant proposal and a total of 24 trees were layered with a total of 232 suckers.


# Orchard Location Date Layered Tree ID Tree Location   1000 ppm # rooted 2000ppm # rooted 4000ppm # rooted 6000ppm # rooted 8000ppm # rooted 4000ppp + 4000ppm # rooted Control 1 - nothing # rooted Control 2 scrapped # rooted Cinamon paste # rooted Sea weed paste # rooted Scrapped + Zip tied + nothing # rooted Yr Tree planted Comment  
1 Hemlock Grove Farm 6/25/2022 Universal Graft Tree  Back Yard Chinese Hyb.             0   0   0   3   0   20 7 20 2 5 1 2002 20+ year old tree coppiced  
2 McCabe Hollow 7/20/2022 Pond 2 R41 TB American 4   0   4   0   5   0   1   1               2006 Trees are stump resprouts planted in 2006'  
3 McCabe Hollow 7/20/2022 Pond 2 R41 TE American 0   6   4   6   0   0   1   1               2006 Trees are stump resprouts planted in 2006'  
4 McCabe Hollow 7/20/2022 Pond 2 R40 TD American 0   3   6   0   4   0   1   1               2006 Trees are stump resprouts planted in 2006'  
5 McCabe Hollow 7/20/2022 McCabe Hollow R39 TE American 0   0   3   0   2   2   1   1               2006 Trees are stump resprouts planted in 2006'  
6 McCabe Hollow 7/20/2022 Pond 2 R38 TD American 4   0   4   0   0   6   1   1               2006 Trees are stump resprouts planted in 2006'  
7 McCabe Hollow 7/20/2022 Pond 2 R38 TB American 4   4   0   0   0   0   1   1               2006 Trees are stump resprouts planted in 2006'  
8 Z's Nutty Ridge 7/27/2022 1 Field 6 - coppiced row Chinese Hyb.  5   4   0   0   0   0   1   1               2017 Coppiced trees planted in 2017  
9 Z's Nutty Ridge 7/27/2022 2 Field 6 - coppiced row Chinese Hyb.  0   4   0   4   0   0   1   1               2017 Coppiced trees planted in 2017  
10 Z's Nutty Ridge 7/27/2022 3 Field 6 - coppiced row Chinese Hyb.  0   0   3   0   0   3   1   1               2017 Coppiced trees planted in 2017  
11 Z's Nutty Ridge 7/27/2022 4 Field 6 - coppiced row Chinese Hyb.  0   6   4   0   0   0   1   1               2017 Coppiced trees planted in 2017  
12 Z's Nutty Ridge 7/27/2022 5 Field 6 - coppiced row Chinese Hyb.  1   0   0   0   4   0   1   1               2017 Coppiced trees planted in 2017  
13 Z's Nutty Ridge 7/27/2022 6 Field 6 - coppiced row Chinese Hyb.  3   4       0   0   0   1   1               2017 Coppiced trees planted in 2017  
14 Z's Nutty Ridge 7/27/2022 7 Field 6 - coppiced row Chinese Hyb.  6   6   4   0   0   0   1   1               2017 Coppiced trees planted in 2017  
15 Z's Nutty Ridge 7/27/2022 8 Field 6 - coppiced row Chinese Hyb.  3   3   3   3   0   0   1   1               2017 Coppiced trees planted in 2017  
16 Z's Nutty Ridge 7/27/2022 9 Field 6 - coppiced row Chinese Hyb.  0   6   3   0   0   3   1   1               2017 Coppiced trees planted in 2017  
17 Z's Nutty Ridge 7/27/2022 10 Field 6 - coppiced row Chinese Hyb.  4   4   0   0   5   0   1   1               2017 Coppiced trees planted in 2017  
18 Z's Nutty Ridge 7/27/2022 11 Field 6 - coppiced row Chinese Hyb.  0   3   0   4   0   0   1   1               2017 Coppiced trees planted in 2017  
19 Z's Nutty Ridge 7/27/2022 12 Field 6 - coppiced row Chinese Hyb.  5   5   0   4   0   0   1   1               2017 Coppiced trees planted in 2017  
20 Z's Nutty Ridge 7/27/2022 13 Field 6 - coppiced row Chinese Hyb.  0   6   5   0   0   0   1   1               2017 Coppiced trees planted in 2017  
21 Finger Lakes Nut Farm 9/3/2022 1 R10 P10 Chinerse Hyb. 3   0   3   0   0   0   1   1               2017 Trees Planted 2017  
22 Finger Lakes Nut Farm 9/3/2022 3 Row 16 P15 Chinerse Hyb. 3   0   4   0   0   0   1   1               2017 Trees Planted 2017  
23 Finger Lakes Nut Farm 9/3/2022 4 R17 P12 Chinerse Hyb. 5   0   3   0   0   0   1   1               2017 Trees Planted 2017  
24 Finger Lakes Nut Farm 9/3/2022 5 Row 11 P 24 Chinerse Hyb. 5   0   7   0   0   4   1   1               2017 Trees Planted 2017  
        Total Layered   55   64   60   21   20   18   26   23   20   20   5     Tot. Layered 332
        Total rooted     0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   7   2   1   Tot. Rooted 10
                                                          Percent rooted all 3.0%
  Table #1 Summary Data on Chestnut Layering 2022                           Percent rooted by Cinnamon Paste 35.0%






Soil Analysis

Table #2 shows the soil data from the four farm locations and locations within the farm close to layered trees. As there weren’t any rooted layers this year, it is difficult to see if soil has an impact on layering percentage.  Chestnuts need a pH of 6.5 or less for good health and growth.  Oddly, the only tree that layered in this year’s study was at Hemlock Grove and it had a pH of 6.73.

Sample Number Dairy One Analysis Farm/Field Name Organic Matter % Buffer pH pH Mod. Morgan Al.  ppm Mod. Morgan Ca.  ppm Mod. Morgan Fe.  ppm Mod. Morgan K (Potassium)  ppm Mod. Morgan Mg. (Magnesium)  ppm Mod. Morgan Mn. (Manganese)  ppm Mod. Morgan P.(phos)  ppm Mod Morgan P.(Phos.) lbs/acre Morgan Equiv. P Mod. Morgan Zn.  ppm HWS Boron Note:     
74558370 9/12/2022 Finger Lakes RUSTY 1 R10T10 5.77 6.14 6.47 28.9 1551.6 1.9 194.6 215.5 17.2 4.1 8 0 0.9 0.4      
74558380 9/12/2022 Finger Lakes RUSTY 3 R16T15 5.73 6.3 6.6 16.9 1688.6 0.7 351.7 187.3 15 5.5 11 0 0.6 0.7      
74558390 9/12/2022 Finger Lakes RUSTY 4 R17T12 6.31 6.06 5.99 46.3 1416.2 3.4 343.4 161.4 21.8 2.4 5 0 1.6 0.6      
74558400 9/12/2022 Finger Lakes RUSTY 5 R11T25 5.25 6.08 6.07 43.5 1259.6 2.9 261.3 181.4 11.9 1 2 0 0.5 0.4      
74558410 9/12/2022 SUNY ESF POND MCGABE 1.76 6.4 6.53 11.4 708.5 0.9 86.6 90.5 5.6 23.6 47 0 5.6 0.2      
74558420 9/12/2022 B CALDWELL Hemlock Grove 5.28 6.41 6.73 7.7 1988.9 0.8 169.5 222.2 21.3 37.1 74 0 1.1 0.5 Note: highest pH and Ca, Phos., and lowest Aluminum    
74558430 9/12/2022 Z NUTTY 1 LOWER 1 7.65 5.9 5.75 108 1341.2 9.8 158.7 204.9 16.3 2.7 5 0 0.8 0.3      
74558440 9/12/2022 Z NUTTY 2 UPPER 1 6.4 5.89 5.45 104.4 881.7 6 135.6 130.9 15.5 1 2 0 0.9 0.4      
74558450 9/12/2022 Z NUTTY 3 MID 1 6.4 5.62 5.32 299.3 326.5 19.8 52.3 38.7 7.5 1 2 0 1.2 0.1      



Leaf Analysis

Table #3 shows the leaf analysis for the four farm locations where the layers were located. Chestnuts need above 50 ppm of Boron for good nut size.  Hemlock Grove soil and leaf analysis with be taken this coming year.

Sample Location Farm Nitrogen % Potassium(K) % Phosphorus(P) % Calcium % Magnesium % Manganese ppm Iron ppm Copper ppm Boron ppm Zinc ppm
RUSTY 1 R10T10 Finger Lakes Nut Farm 1.91 0.82 0.2 3.1 0.517 1040 160 6.22 56.8 38
RUSTY 3 R16T15 Finger Lakes Nut Farm 2.15 0.82 0.197 1.56 0.36 506 91.9 4.42 50.1 30.3
RUSTY 4 R17T12 Finger Lakes Nut Farm 2 0.77 0.182 1.31 0.191 493 70.9 4.61 59.8 33.4
RUSTY 5 R11T25 Finger Lakes Nut Farm 1.59 0.67 0.193 1.19 0.186 828 73 3.75 42.4 19.4
SUNESF1 POND MCCABE SUNY ESF 2.3 0.86 0.308 1.07 0.242 323 65.1 3.61 15.8 23.2
ZNUTTY 1 LOWER 1 Z's Nutty Ridge  2.1 0.84 0.202 0.64 0.198 1230 54.4 7.57 14.7 33.4
ZNUTTY 2 UPPER 1 Z's Nutty Ridge  2.12 0.56 0.23 1.5 0.267 644 59.8 4.52 27.7 21.5
ZNUTTY 3 MID 1 Z's Nutty Ridge  2.33 0.67 0.212 1.03 0.259 1000 64.7 5.38 28.5 33.2
Leaf sample not taken. Hemlock Grove                    
        Italic = Low              

Table # 2 Tissue analysis using leaves from layered suckers.

The bottom third of the leaves are stripped from the suckers and is normally taken when nuts are filling on the tree to understand if there is any nutrient deficiencies hindering production.  As the tree layered at Hemlock Grove was early In the season the samples weren’t taken, arrangements will be made for 2023’.

Field pictures of layering effort.

Picture of Layering etiolated stems using nylon zip ties at SUNY ESF 2021
Picture #1, Layering etiolated stems using nylon zip ties at SUNY ESF 2021


The McCabe Hollow plot is at State University of New York Environmental Science and Forestry (SUNY ESF) and notice how in Table #1 that five of the six trees are identical clones, named Pond2 generated from tissue culture. The trees are part of The Chestnut Restoration Project headed by Dr. Powell and Dr. Newhouse.  Having 5 clones to work from will allow for high repetition of treatments and allow for various treatments to be studied at the same time.  We were able to layer 62 suckers from five cloned trees.

A fall picture of layered trees.  The American chestnut trees are stump resprouts having succumbed to chestnut blight at SUNY ESFs McCabe Hollow plot, year 2022
Picture # 2, SUNY ESF McCabe Hollow plot fall picture of layered trees. The American chestnut trees are stump resprouts having succumbed to chestnut blight.
Picture of items used in Field kit to layer a tree at Hemlock Grove Farm, west
Picture # 3, Field kit to layer a tree at Hemlock Grove.

 Individual layered stems had colored ribbon tied to stem to keep track of treatment used. Controls were also color coded.

Picture of a row of coppiced mulched chestnut trees at Z’s Nutty Ridge LLC, during the summer 
 of year 2022
Picture #4, A row of coppiced mulched trees at Z’s Nutty Ridge LLC
Picture of Chestnut layer harvest example of brown leaved suckers at Z’s Nutty Ridge LLC
Picture #5, Chestnut layer harvest example at Z’s Nutty Ridge LLC

The number 12 in Picture # 5 represents the tree number in Table #1 for Z’s Nutty Ridge. Notice the different color ribbons for the different treatments used on the suckers.

A picture of  chestnut layers with seven suckers rooted from Hemlock Grove farm, year 2022
Picture # 6, Hemlock Grove chestnut layers with seven suckers rooted.

Rooted suckers were potted and put into cold storage for the winter they will be monitored in the spring for survival and growth.

Technical paper search turned up a very relevant paper written by, Takao Li, Of Hyogo Agricultural University, Japan, July 5, 1959 , “Propagation of chestnut by layer.”  We appreciate this paper as it is a practical guide on timing, concentration of hormones and Chinese chestnuts trees were part of the study.

A good portion of the translated salient points were given in the summary.

In continuation of the preceding research, layering experiment has been conducted on Japanese and Chinese chestnut trees making use of growth promoting substances in lanolin paste.

  1. Varieties which were especially hard to root with IBA alone, rooted better with a mixture of IBA and 2, 4, 5-Tp, and with 2, 4, 5-Tp alone. Also by foliar application of 2, 4, 5-Tp to seedlings in layering bed, vigorous rooting was obtained.
  2. Rooting ability of cultural variety was greater after shoots have stopped growing than during their elongating period.
  3. The longer the length of shoot of cultural variety, the lower the percentages of rooting.
  4. Layers which were grafted on vigorous stock required a longer duration in rooting than those grafted on less vigorous stock.
  5. Concerning the rooting percentages and rooting time, considerable differences were observed among juvenile seedlings and two types of varieties of which one was easy and the other hard to root. Higher rooting percentages were accompanied with longer rooting time.

[i]  Josefa Fernández López , 2014 “CHESTNUT FARMING GUIDE FOR CHESTNUT PRODUCTION”, Board of Wales, Ministry of Rural and Marine Affairs, Santiago de Compostel.

[ii] Vielba, J.M.; Vidal, N.; José, M.C.S.; Rico, S.; Sánchez, C. Recent Advances in Adventitious Root Formation in Chestnut. Plants 20209, 1543.

[iii] Brian Caldwell, 1986, MS Thesis: “Improved Propagation Methods for Chestnut” Cornell University.

[iv] Takao Li, Hyogo Agricultural University, July 5, 1959 , “Propagation of chestnut by layer.” 

Research conclusions:

With one year of the two-year SARE study behind us we have come a long way in understanding when to layer.   Having gone through a total of two seasons of layering chestnut trees it is evident that timing of when to layer has proven to be very important.  A weekly sample of sucker growth to verify growth has slowed prior to layering.  Also, conscious effort to have more than one month and hopefully two months of growing season is available after layering trees. The root crown cannot be stressed due to lack of rain.   The moisture of soil and mulch will be monitored and corrected if needed.  Rain data will be recorded as we now have a weather station at Z’s Nutty Ridge.

Although we weren't planning to add secondary hormone treatment in year one, we had so many suckers we did include one secondary hormone NAA.  Also, being forced to change rooting treatments for organic farming it did allow for more of what year two of the study was for.

Also, since we have so many suckers to layer we will redo year one efforts and at the same time be able to include year two efforts.  Year two efforts are finding what additional hormones and adjuncts may improve rooting.  

Participation Summary
4 Farmers participating in research
Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE.