Progress report for FNE24-084
Project Information
This project aims to advance our understanding of optimal design and establishment of silvopasture systems within existing open pastures in the Northeast United States. We aim to investigate and compare two distinct planting methodologies: contour-based planting with grassed water terraces and traditional straight-line planting. This comparative study will focus on tree growth, survival, and soil conservation benefits, providing valuable insights into the most effective silvopasture designs for the region.
Our approach includes setting up and closely monitoring experimental plots, using precise data collection techniques to assess tree health and soil quality over several growing seasons. The project will also evaluate the ease of implementation and cost-effectiveness of each method, addressing a significant challenge faced by many small to medium-scale farmers in the Northeast: the lack of accessible irrigation resources for tree establishment. Outreach efforts will play a pivotal role, involving the dissemination of our findings through workshops, online resources, and collaborations with agricultural organizations. By offering practical, evidence-based recommendations, this project seeks to empower farmers with the knowledge and tools necessary to implement efficient and sustainable silvopasture systems, thus promoting ecological resilience and economic sustainability in agricultural practices.
The objectives of this project are:
-
Evaluate Tree Mortality Rates: Compare the effectiveness of contour-based planting with grassed water terraces against traditional planting methods in terms of tree survival rates over multiple growing seasons.
- Evaluate Tree Growth Rates: Compare the effectiveness of contour-based planting with grassed water terraces against traditional planting methods in terms of tree growth rates over multiple growing seasons.
-
Assess Soil Conservation Benefits: Measure and analyze the impact of each planting method on soil health, including erosion control and water retention capabilities.
-
Determine Cost-Effectiveness and
Practicality: Evaluate the feasibility, labor requirements, and financial implications of each planting method to determine the most cost-effective and practical approach for farmers in the Northeast United States.
These objectives are designed to provide clear, measurable outcomes that will contribute useful information for farmers, aiding in the development of more sustainable farming practices through improved silvopasture techniques.
Silvopasture addresses critical global challenges such as environmental degradation by conventional farming and the struggle for farmer profitability. This practice, integrating trees into pasture landscapes, offers multiple benefits: increased farm productivity through diverse production, reduced animal feed costs, improved animal performance, and tree crop yields. Ecologically, silvopasture contributes to soil stabilization, carbon sequestration, and water retention, among other benefits.
However, establishing silvopastures represents a substantial challenge for farmers. Without careful establishment procedures, tree mortality of trees planted into active pastures is very high. While there is work being done to address how to improve mortality rates in silvopasture plantings, most of that work is focused on tree protection from grazing animals and wildlife. Based on my personal experience and experience working with farmers who have tried establishing trees, the problem of insufficient water is one that also needs addressed. In a year with low or sporadic rainfall like 2023 in western PA, high tree mortality has been observed.
Current best practices for water retention is to mulch all trees that you plant when establishing them. While this helps, it is insufficient during extended periods of low/no rainfall. To maintain trees during these periods, more needs to be done to maintain tree health. For many farmers, this currently means hauling water to their trees if conditions demand or else face the prospect of high mortality or stunted growth.
Our proposed solution is a comparative study of two planting techniques: traditional straight-line planting and innovative contour-based planting with grassed water terraces designed to catch runoff during a rain, then allow the water to slowly infiltrate to the trees roots over time. We have trialed this technique on a limited scale with good results. Our desire is to create test plots and compare the performance of these silvopasture contour strips to silvopasture plantings without a corresponding water cachement system built into the design (beyond mulching).
This research is vital as it aims to establish more effective silvopasture designs that are adaptable to local environmental conditions, specifically addressing water scarcity challenges. By optimizing tree planting methods, the project contributes to the conservation of soil and improvement of water quality, vital aspects of sustainable agriculture. Additionally, it aims to enhance farm productivity and reduce costs associated with establishing silvopasture systems.
The expected impact of this project aligns with the core aspects of sustainable agriculture: it reduces environmental risks by promoting biodiversity and soil conservation, potentially improves farm income by optimizing land use, and enhances the quality of life for farmers by providing practical, scalable solutions for silvopasture implementation. Our approach directly responds to the needs and interests expressed by farmers in our community and beyond, who are keen on adopting silvopasture practices but lack detailed guidance on effective implementation strategies.
In conclusion, this project not only addresses a crucial gap in silvopasture research but also provides a practical solution with the potential for widespread adoption, leading to significant improvements in sustainable farming practices in the Northeast United States.
Cooperators
- - Technical Advisor
Research
-
Evaluate Tree Growth and Survival:
- Location and Setup: The study will be conducted on our 27-acre farm. One area will follow current best practices without contour strips or a water catchment channel, while the other will employ contour-based planting with grassed waterways. The contour strips will be marked with a rented laser level. Two different sizes of cachement basins will be created on contour in the on-contour planting zone, one with a basic double bottom plow and a deeper one created with rented machinery. The different depths and machinery usage will provide additional insight into best practices.
- Materials: A variety of tree species appropriate for our region will be used, including at least one fruit (apple), one nut (hickory), one bush (mulberry), one water-loving species (willow), and one that tolerates drier conditions (persimmon). All trees will receive consistent protection measures in line with best practices, including tree tubes, mulch, and polywire for grazing exclusion.
- Data Collection: Monthly monitoring of tree height, trunk diameter, and health indicators, with a focus on survival rates. A caliper will be used to measure diameter.
-
Assess Soil Conservation Benefits:
- Soil Testing: Soil quality tests will be conducted in both zones, analyzing moisture content, organic matter, and erosion indicators. A moisture probe will be used to measure soil moisture.
- Data Collection: Monthly documentation of soil health changes, with a focus on water retention, facilitated by rain gauges to track precipitation.
-
Determine Cost-Effectiveness and Practicality:
- Implementation Recording: Detailed recording of time, labor, and resources required for each planting method.
- Economic Analysis: Calculation of costs for tree planting and maintenance, including the infrastructure for both methods.
- Data Analysis: Comparative analysis of efficiency and sustainability, considering both immediate and long-term economic impacts.
This detailed approach will ensure a comprehensive evaluation of the two planting methodologies, providing valuable insights into sustainable and economically viable silvopasture practices.
During the 2024 calendar year, we were not able to initiate planting or implement any major project activities for our SARE grant (FNE24-084-AWD00001359). Several factors - particularly the grant start combined with the timing of field preparations and securing materials - delayed our ability to establish the first round of trees, and no measurable progress was made toward the grant’s objectives in 2024.
We have shifted our plans to complete fieldwork and planting in late winter through early spring of 2025. Equipment rentals, trees, and preliminary site preparations are lined up, allowing us to move forward as soon as the weather and soil conditions permit. We plan to share updates in our next report once we’ve made tangible progress with these activities.