Alternative Use of Seasonal Forage Crops: Triticale, Field Peas, and Brassicas

Final Report for FNE99-249

Project Type: Farmer
Funds awarded in 1999: $750.00
Projected End Date: 12/31/1999
Matching Non-Federal Funds: $1,395.00
Region: Northeast
State: New Hampshire
Project Leader:
Christian D. Gowdy
Brookfield Farm
Expand All

Project Information


Note to readers, attached is the complete final report for FNE99-249

Chris was interested in multi-cropping alternative forage species, with the principle aim of extending his grazing season further into the Fall. He also wanted to find species that would suppress the growth of weeds, so that he could replant the following spring without first having to apply herbicide.
Chris planted Triticale and field peas on six acres in late April and harvested two months later. After harvesting he went over the field with a disc harrow, then sowed turnip seed at the rate of 10 lbs/acre. The turnips came up among the regrowth of Triticale and peas, giving a mixed forage.

The turnip proved, upon analysis, to be 86% water. Protein content on a dry matter basis was quite high, at 26%. Total digestible nutrients (TDN) tested at 76%. By way of comparison, silage made from the Triticale and pea forage was 68% water, with crude protein and TDN content (dry matter basis) 19% and 64% respectively.
Chris reports that the mixed forage of Triticale, peas and turnips succeeded in both suppressing weeds and extending the grazing season. Before he turned cattle loose to graze in the experimental area the mixture was dominated by the turnips, because the Triticale and peas were more severely affected by drought. However, once the area was opened to grazing, maintaining the mixed stand because something of a problem, because the cattle loved the turnips, pulling them up roots and all. For this reason Chris says that, though he likes the idea of using Brassicas to extend the grazing season, next time he intends to try other species, perhaps kale or swede.


Click linked name(s) to expand/collapse or show everyone's info
  • Bruce Clement


Participation Summary
Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE.