Practical Silvopasture Implementation: A study of the ecological, nutrition, and food system impacts of crop-livestock integration

Progress report for FS24-363

Project Type: Farmer/Rancher
Funds awarded in 2024: $19,947.00
Projected End Date: 03/31/2026
Grant Recipient: Bearwallow Valley Farms
Region: Southern
State: North Carolina
Principal Investigator:
Nicole Coston
Bearwallow Valley Farms
Expand All

Project Information

Abstract:

This project explores the integration of silvopastured ducks into apple orchards, leveraging their benefits for soil health, pest management, and nutrient cycling. Our research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of silvopastured ducks in reducing pest pressure, weed prevalence, and improving soil composition. We employed a paired comparison design and t-test statistical analysis, collecting data on soil nutrient content, pest prevalence, and crop yield. Our results will inform best practices for farmers and ranchers seeking to adopt regenerative agriculture methods, enhance soil health, and promote ecosystem services. This project demonstrates the potential for silvopastured ducks to contribute to a more sustainable and resilient food system.

We have chosen to allow our ducks to rotationally graze in our apple orchards to receive the benefits of Silvopasture (for both animal and prevailing fruit crops) while maintaining food safety.  Our farm has worked with the Henderson County Extension Service Small Fruit and Vegetable Agent and Livestock Agents, as well as the Area Specialized Agent for Fresh Produce Food Safety in Western North Carolina.  Together we developed a rotational grazing plan that takes advantage of off-season and post-harvest land.  This plan follows the 90-120-Day Rule for Organic Crop Manure Amendment from USDA that states raw animal manure must be applied 90 days prior to harvest of the tree crop and 120 days to any crop that comes in contact with the ground.8 

Silvopasturing duck in orchards is not only possible but also a valuable market opportunity for farmers to diversify their product line while reducing costs of commercial fertilize, pesticides, and application labor.  According to the USDA, a farmer can economically manage weeds without herbicides using silvopasture.  These pastured animals compete with weed beds for water, nutrients, and sunlight, thereby enhancing tree growth and reducing weed pressure.15 The economic value of many conventional fertilization schedules is in excess of $10,000.  The value of manure is approximately $0.50/pound but could be double this value considering the economic worth of improved soil structure, diversity, and activity of soil organisms that conventional fertilizers do not provide.16 Fertilize costs have increased substantially over the past decade and silvopasture is an effective means to reduce or eliminate these costs.  Silvopastures create biological diversity and improve water and soil quality; resulting in improved crop output and quality. Perennial forage protects the soil from water and wind erosion and adds organic matter to the soil.  Additionally, ducks are able to forage extensively and can decrease feed costs by as much as 30%.

We have selected the Silver Appleyard Duck breed for our farm because they are one of the best egg-layers in their class and are excellent foragers with superb mothering skills.  Appleyards have a lower saturated fat content than other duck  breeds, providing lean meat that is prized by chefs for its gourmet roasting ability.  Silver Appleyards were developed in the 1940s by Reginald Appleyard in England.  He created the Appleyard as a prolific layer that also has size and large breasts for meat, making it the ideal all-purpose duck. Ducks yield 74% of their weight as marketable, making this bird more valuable than other processed poultry. Silver Appleyards came to the United States in the 1960s, but were not available to the public until 1984, by 2000, The American Poultry Association accepted the Silver Appleyard into the Standard of Perfection.  Today, Appleyards are listed on the Conservation Priority List and are in danger of becoming threatened in the United States.  We are proud to raise this heritage livestock breed and improve market demand for heritage livestock products. 5,7

Customers are requesting regenerative practices and are going beyond organic, recognizing the impact farm practices have on our food system.  This model of silvopasture can also serve as a community-connection opportunity and result in increased sales outlets to holistic and local supermarkets.  And as farmland in Western North Carolina and across the United States dwindles, it is important now, more than ever, for farmers to increase per-acre revenue and market viability.

The Silver Appleyard Ducks will serve a dual purpose: as a high-quality, nutritious marketable product, as well as improve our orchard management practices.  Duck manure has a balanced NPK ratio at 2.8:2.3:1.7 while chickens provide only 1.5:0.5:0.8.  Not only do ducks provide a higher percent of primary macronutrients in a more balanced ratio; but they also provide a larger volume that is in a form more readily available for plant uptake than chicken manure.14-15

Project Objectives:

Most study designs related to manure application measure the litter nutrient content rather than its direct impact on the soil quality and prevailing ability to minimize chemical input.  In this study, we aim to show statistically significant improvements in pest prevalence, weed pressure, and/or soil composition.

Our research uses a paired comparison design and t-test statistical analysis. We have treatment blocks and control blocks, approximately 2.3 acres in size.  Each block contains two plots, one plot of each treatment (treatment and control), blocks are replicated four to six times across the field to account for field fertility gradient, and as recommended by Sustainable Agriculture Research & Education.17

The treatment will include a 6-month rotational grazing pattern for Silver Appleyard ducks at a rate of 30-50 ducks/acre in treatment blocks.  Assessments are completed at Baseline, 3 months post-treatment, 6 months post-treatment, and 1 year post-treatment.  Multiple assessment types and repetitions are required for this research as soil nutrition and composition naturally vary within a field and throughout the course of a season.  Our assessments include the Pest Prevalence Assessment, USDA’s In-Field Soil Health Field Assessment, and NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Soil Testing Section’s Comprehensive Soil Health Laboratory Test, Heavy Metal Analysis, and the Diagnostic Problem Sample Laboratory Test as needed.  We additionally collect subjective data including field notes and images.18-19

Research Question

Is silvopastured duck an effective and practical method of pest, weed, and soil nutrient management in fruit and nut orchards?

  1. Can adding silvopastured duck to fruit orchard management
    system:
    1. Reduce pest pressure/prevalence?
    2. Reduce weed pressure
    3. Improve soil microbiome?
      1. Are any of these changes significant enough to reduce or eliminate chemical input?
        1. If so, to what extent?

Hypothesis

The addition of silvopastured duck in fruit tree management will result in a statistically and financially significant improvement in one or more of the following:

  1. Pest prevalence/pressure
  2. Weed pressure
  3. Soil microbiome

Objectives

  1. Introduce Silvopastured duck into fruit orchard on test plots of approximately 2.3 acres for a 6-month rotational grazing pattern.
  2. Collect and analyze data using Pest Prevalence Assessment, In-Field Soil Health Assessment, and Comprehensive Soil Health Laboratory Testing at baseline, 3-months post-treatment, 6-months post-treatment, and 12-months post-treatment.
  3. Analyze and disseminate results widely in the agriculture and healthcare fields.

 

Cooperators

Click linked name(s) to expand/collapse or show everyone's info
  • Karen Blaedow
  • Brent Coston - Producer
  • Rick Jordan
  • Elena Rodgers
  • Abby Whitaker
  • Javier Soto

Research

Materials and methods:

Materials and Methods

 Data collection methods

  1. Pest Prevalence/pressure

Pest trapping and monitoring is a method of quantitative data collection as recommended in Integrated Pest Management Systems (IPM).  This is conducted by our professional Pest Scout, R. Jordan, who uses a variety of adhesive and pheromone-exuding traps.  Our Pest Scout then uses insect counts, action thresholds, and degree-day models to generate a report of pest prevalence and recommended control solutions.  Our Pest Scout will collect and disseminate synopsis to our farm throughout the data collection period and, ideally, at least one calendar year thereafter. These traps will be set during the tight cluster apple-growth stage and hung approximately 6 feet. off the ground.  Traps are positioned at the interior of the orchard and kept at least 20 feet apart from each other.

The specific pest species we target will determine the type of trap and pheromone lures selected.  We use both Delta-style and wing traps to monitor Codling moths, Oriental fruit moths, and Leaf-Roller Species (tufted apple bud moth, red-banded leafroller, oblique-banded leafroller, and the lesser appleworm) in our orchard.

Below are the trap and pheromone lures used, as recommended by NC State University:

  • Codling moths Delta-style traps with replaceable interior sticky liners and Codling Moth L2 pheromone lures
  • Oriental Fruit Moths: Delta-style traps with replaceable interior sticky liners and Oriental Fruit Moth L2 pheromone lure
  • Leaf-Roller Species (tufted apple bud moth, red-banded leafroller, oblique banded leafroller, and the lesser appleworm); Wing traps instead of Delta traps, which is a more cost-effective option for these. These traps consist of a plastic top, a sticky cardboard bottom, and a wire frame holding the two together with  the applicable pheromone lure.20
  1. Soil microbiome

Soil microbiome will be evaluated using both quantitative and qualitative data collected in conjunction with NC State Extension, Small Fruit, and Vegetable Agent and encompass chemical, biological, and physical properties.  We collect subjective data regarding crop performance, perform a quantitative Comprehensive Soil Health Laboratory Test, and use the
USDA Nature Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Crop Land In-Field Soil Health Assessment
 that evaluates:


    • Soil cover
    • Residue breakdown
    • Surface crusting
    • Ponding/infiltration
    • Penetration Resistance
    • Water-Stable Aggregates
    • Soil Structure
    • Soil Color
    • Plant Root Development
    • Biological Diversity
    • Biopores

We follow collection and sampling guidelines as indicated and directed by NRCS and are available for full review 
here
.18

The Comprehensive Soil Health Laboratory Test (form AD-12) is completed in conjunction with the North Carolina NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Soil Testing Section.Samples are collected and analyzed for nutrient composition.  Form AD-2 we use for diagnostic problem samples, as needed. Lastly, we collect subjective data regarding general crop performance, visual nutrient deficiency symptoms, and field images.3

Research results and discussion:

Results and Measurements

We collected baseline data on soil nutrient content, structure, and composition through the North Carolina Extension Service's soil data sheet. This data serves as a foundation for evaluating the impact of our silvopasture system.

Adaptive Grazing Management (AGM)

We implemented AGM, allowing ducks to rotationally graze based on observation rather than prescription. While we initially aimed to move ducks through all treatment blocks, we found that the minimum threshold of ducks per acre was insufficient to achieve this within the given timeframe. To address this, we plan to increase our flock size to the maximum threshold of 50 ducks/acre during the off-season.

Challenges and Adjustments

Our project faced complications, including predator control issues and the impact of Hurricane Helene. These setbacks delayed our implementation timeline by 30 days. We also experienced a 10-week cessation in egg laying among our ducks and chickens following the hurricane. As a result, we will focus on egg laying data collected from April 2025 onward.

Data Collection and Comparison

We collected baseline input and yield data, including:

  • Crop yield
  • Pesticide use
  • Labor
  • Mowing repetitions
  • Egg production
  • Subjective field data

This data will be compared to outcomes after two years of partial-season silvopasture. We also worked with our Pest Scout, R. Jordan, to establish a baseline pest report for the 2024 season. This report will be compared to post-treatment reports in 2025 and 2026. While we anticipate limited pest data due to various factors, including Hurricane Helene, we hope to see a decrease in coddling moth pressure.

Participation Summary
3 Farmers participating in research

Educational & Outreach Activities

2 Tours
1 Webinars / talks / presentations
2 Other educational activities: • In 2025, we reported on our project's progress at the Business of Farming Conference, engaging with over 45 new and beginning farmers.
• We collaborated with our local Agricultural Development Board to share our work and progress with 10 farmers, four local legislators, three higher education representatives, three agricultural professionals, and almost 10 agricultural support groups.

Participation Summary:

55 Farmers participated
12 Ag professionals participated
Education/outreach description:

Outreach Plan and Progress Report

Our farm is committed to disseminating knowledge and resources through various outlets, targeting diverse audiences, including farmers, students, children, and professionals.

Academic and Professional Outreach

  • We plan to submit our research report to the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics in 2026, highlighting the role of Registered Dietitian-Nutritionists in sustainable agriculture and food systems.
  • We host up to three Master's Level Dietetic Interns annually, promoting the reintegration of food and wellness practitioners into agriculture.
  • We present our findings annually at the Appalachian Sustainable Agriculture Project Business of Farming Conference, reaching hundreds of farmers and ranchers in the Southeast.

Progress Report

  • In 2025, we reported on our project's progress at the Business of Farming Conference, engaging with over 45 new and beginning farmers.
  • We collaborated with our local Agricultural Development Board to share our work and progress with 10 farmers, four local legislators, three higher education representatives, three agricultural professionals, and almost 10 agricultural support groups.

Community and Educational Outreach

  • We partner with Henderson County schools to offer farm field trips, farmer classroom visits, and garden and cooking classes free of charge to over 200 families.
  • We hosted nearly 100 elementary-aged children at our farm, introducing them to ducks and exploring egg-related topics, such as nutrition and safe food handling.
  • Through a partnership with FernLeaf Community Charter School, we brought our flock to the school and engaged with high school juniors on careers in agriculture and sustainability.
  • Our research partner, B. Coston, collaborated with the local community college and public school system to present careers in agriculture to over 1,000 students in Henderson County, sparking interest in our regenerative journey.

 

Learning Outcomes

2 Farmers reported changes in knowledge, attitudes, skills and/or awareness as a result of their participation
Key changes:
  • Food Safety and Silvopasture

Project Outcomes

4 Grants received that built upon this project
5 New working collaborations
Project outcomes:
  1. Soil Health Improvement: Understand the impact of silvopastured ducks on soil microbiome, nutrient content, and structure in fruit and nut orchards.
  2. Integrated Pest Management (IPM): Understand the impact of silvopastured ducks on pest pressure and prevalence in orchards.
  3. Weed Management: Discover the effectiveness of silvopastured ducks in reducing weed pressure and promoting beneficial vegetation in orchards.
  4. Economic Benefits: Analyze the economic benefits of silvopastured duck systems.
  5. Soil Health: Recognize the importance of soil health in influencing nutrient density and food quality, and how regenerative agriculture practices can enhance soil health.
  6. Overcoming Silvopasture Challenges: Identify common obstacles to implementing silvopasture practices in edible orchards, and develop strategies to address these challenges, ensuring successful integration of livestock and orchard management systems.
Recommendations:

Recommendation for Future Research

Based on our experience with integrating ducks into a silvopasture system, we recommend a comparative study to evaluate the effectiveness of different poultry species in a silvopasture context.

Proposed Experimental Design

A Randomized Complete Block (RCB) experimental design is suggested to compare the treatment effects of three poultry management systems:

  1. Duck-only system: Evaluate the benefits and challenges of using ducks as the sole poultry species in a silvopasture system.
  2. Chicken-only system: Assess the effectiveness of using chickens as the primary poultry species in a silvopasture system.
  3. Mixed-flock system: Investigate the benefits of combining ducks, chickens, and guinea fowl in a single silvopasture system, leveraging the unique strengths of each species.

Rationale

Our experience suggests that a mixed-flock system may offer the most benefits, as:

  • Ducks can provide a significant amount of nutrient-rich manure.
  • Chickens can effectively scratch and incorporate manure into the soil.
  • Guinea fowl can serve as a primary predator, controlling over-winter pests and larvae.

This comparative study will provide valuable insights into the optimal poultry management strategy for silvopasture systems, informing best practices for farmers and ranchers.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.