Final Report for FW01-056
The project funds created a Palouse and Nezperce Prairies Soil Quality Card Guide, an educational tool for the region. The prairies cover more than 8,900 square miles, an area with a large farmer population base that can be reached through development of the tool.
Grower workshops, conducted by a technical support team, guided farmers through the development and distribution process of the soil quality guide. Workshop topics included: selection of soil quality elements (such as soil compaction, infiltration, the presence of living organisms, the presence of organic matter, etc.) to include in a regional soil quality guide. From information gathered at the workshops, a draft guide was developed and distributed to the Nez Perce Tribe, USDA offices, conservation district offices, the Pacific Northwest Direct Seed Association and growers in Oregon, Washington and Idaho for field testing. Field evaluation comments were then incorporated and a final guide prepared.
Improving soil quality is an important part of sustaining the economic viability of farming operations and improving the quality of life for farmers. There is a significant need for education on the subject of soil quality in the geographic area that is part of this Western SARE grant, and the development of a soil quality guide is deemed a significant step in the process.
The Paoluse and Nez Perce Prairies, part of the Northwestern Wheat and Range Region, cover more than 8,900 square miles, an area with a substantial population that can be reached through the development of a soil quality card guide. More importantly, the product development itself could empower a significant number of participating farmers.
This proposal is to develop a Soil Quality Indicator Guide for the Palouse and Nez Perce Prairies to meet educational and management needs. Project objectives are:
1. Increase producer knowledge about soil quality and health.
2. Increase communications and rapport between farmers, extension professionals and agricultural researchers through the distribution and use of the cards.
3. Incraese farmer buy-in to the concepts of soil quality and soil health, resulting in field management decisions leading to greater agricultural sustainabilty and greater farm financial stability.
4. Assist farmers in detecting both short- and long-term soil quality changes.
5. Improve farm management record keeping systems and improve analytical and observational skills in the field.
6. Provide a tool for growers to self-evaluate their direct seeding operations. The ability to evaluate soil quality change over time will assist in grower adoption of direct seeding systems.
The Palouse and Nezperce Prairie Soil Quality Card Guide (CARD) design followed the procedures and strategies outlined in the UDSA Soil quality Card Design Guide (GUIDE). This GUIDE was folowed to develop the farmer meetings, create the guide prototype, field test it and created the produce the final card. The GUIDE includes overheads, sample letters and tips on obtaining group participation.
Farmer workshops were held in Culdesac, Genesee and Moscow, ID and Pendleton, OR. More than 150 people participated in some phase of the card development. Participation and interest were seen as being high. A PowerPoint presentation on basic soil quality concepts was developed and shown to growers, along with soils samples to increase the educational value.
After the first round of grower workshops, a prototype card was developed and field tested by USDA Service Centers, local conservation districts and 100 farmers. Most of the comments were related to the timing of the measurements, which were adjusted before the final draft card was produced. A technical team, which worked over several months to write the guide portion, included representatives from the University of Idaho, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Latah Soil and Water Conservation District, Nez Perce Tribe and the Nez Perce Soil and Water Conservation District.
The final draft was reviewed by by the Pacific Northwest Direct Seed Association technical committee, which consts of growers in Idaho, Oregon and Washington Their comments were incorporated and the guide was completed in both written and electronic forms.
A survey was conducted to determine producer reaction and adoption. Most survey respondents indicated that they would use the guide and field card on their fields. Respondents also indicated that the card scoring system was easy to use, the guide was easy to follow and understand and the product was easy to use and practical.
Actual impacts of this project are difficult to measure. However, a paper completed in 2002 estimates that up to a 30% reduction in surface water runoff can be achieved through the change in soil quality in an agricultural field. In addition, estimates in the Palouse indicate a reduction of up to 25% in soil erosion by the adoption of a direct seed system.
Education and Outreach
The card development process was advertised in the Forever Soil and Water newsletter and the Direct Seed Association newsletter. Three grower workshop were held, including more than 150 participants, and two public demonstrations workshops were held with more than 900 participants.
The Soil Quality Card itself was communicated to others -- estimated at nearly 1,200 individuals --through newsletter articles, workshops demonstrating card use and public presentations.
Education and Outreach Outcomes
As field management changes and soil quality improves over time, the following results are expected:
Improved agricultural productivity
Increased financial stability
Improved water quality
Overall enhancement of natural resource conditions
When completing a soil quality indicator guide, soil quality parameters applicable to the project area are needed. Split recommendations were received from growers on the size and format of the card. Those wanting to establish long-term trends requested the 8.5 x 11 inch version. Others felt that a pocket version would work better for them as a reference tool. A recommendation for other groups considering such guides is to produce the guide and two versions of the field sheets for reproduction.
The team developing the guide, which took several months, underestimated the time it would take to write it. Future projects should plan on at least 12 months to write the guide.