Co-Cultivation of Grapevines and Transgenic American Chestnuts: Improving Water Relations through Niche Facilitation

Progress report for GNE24-315

Project Type: Graduate Student
Funds awarded in 2024: $14,917.00
Projected End Date: 03/31/2026
Grant Recipient: SUNY ESF
Region: Northeast
State: New York
Graduate Student:
Faculty Advisor:
Expand All

Project Information

Summary:

This project investigates the potential of co-cultivating grapevines and a new variety of blight-tolerant transgenic American chestnuts in Northeastern United States agroforestry settings to provide a novel product and diversify the agricultural practices of this region’s vineyards and orchards. Given the ecological and economic significance of chestnuts and grapes, this research explores the viability of their joint cultivation within the Northeast by building upon traditional agroforestry practices observed in other geographic regions. The pairing of these two crops with distinct water use strategies is premised on the hypothesized niche facilitation of grape for chestnut: Grapes have large xylem vessels that uptake vast quantities of water, which may enhance the physiological performance of moderately drought-tolerant American chestnut under conditions of excess soil moisture. American chestnut physiology remains under-examined, given this species’s extirpation prior to the emergence of physiological ecology as a discipline. To address this hypothesis and knowledge gap, I propose research which aims to examine how conditions of competition versus facilitation, induced by co-cultivation under varying grape densities versus standard monoculture plantings, influence light saturated photosynthetic rates, leaf water potential, and stomatal conductance of each crop, as well as chestnut basal diameter and height and grape harvest yield. This research and a coinciding outreach strategy to local orchardists, vignerons, nut growers, and other farmers and agricultural collaborators, will occur over the 2024 and 2025 growing seasons, providing insight into the feasibility and benefits of co-cultivating chestnuts with grapes in the Northeast.

Project Objectives:
  1. Growth and Harvest Yield: To understand how grape planting density in this co-cultivation framework influences chestnut and grape growth performance compared to traditional monoculture systems, I conducted a growth assessment of grapevines and chestnut trees. I measured and assessed:
    1. Chestnut basal diameter 
    2. Chestnut height
    3. Grapevine cluster counts per vine
    4. Grapevine cluster weights per vine
    5. Grapevine shoot lengths per vine
    6. Growth differences among treatments
  2. Photosynthesis and Water Relations: To determine the role of water usage as a driver of competition versus facilitation, I evaluated the photosynthetic capacity and water relations of grapes and transgenic American chestnuts. I measured and assessed:
    1. Leaf gas exchange, specifically light saturated photosynthetic (Anet) rates and stomatal conductance (gs)
    2. Leaf water potential 
    3. Photosynthetic and water use differences among treatments
  3. Agricultural Outreach: To promote the adoption of this regionally novel co-cultivation method within Northeastern vineyards–e.g. the wine region of the Finger Lakes–I will visit local vineyards and farmers and present my work to stakeholders and organizations within ESF’s existing network of outreach and communications. Thus far, I have led and participated in:
    1. Networking and professional engagement opportunities
      1. I led a series of tours of the grape and chestnut research plot for the Northern Nut Growers Association and Chestnut Growers of America 2024 Annual Joint Conference
      2. I led tours of and shared my research on the LRES grape and chestnut plot at the NE-2333 Conference at SUNY-ESF
    2. ESF site visits
      1. I led a tour of and shared my research on the LRES grape and chestnut co-cultivation plot during a site visit with the NY Chapter of the Master Teachers

          In 2025, I will:

                 1.  Conduct external site visits with local vineyards and orchards

Introduction:

The purpose of this project is to investigate how co-cultivating grapevines and transgenic American chestnuts in an agroforestry setting can promote sustainable agricultural practices that enhance ecological resilience and economic viability in the Northeast region. Transgenic ‘Darling’ trees have been engineered with an oxalate oxidase (OxO) gene from wheat, thereby expressing an enzyme that confers a degree of tolerance to the fungal pathogen Cryphonectria parasitica (Newhouse et al., 2021). American chestnuts and grapes were selected as the focus organisms of this research, given the major ecological, social, and economic role chestnuts served prior to their decline from chestnut blight; the present-day high commodity value of grapes; and the fact that species of the genus Vitis are often lianas that naturally grow on trees (Keller, 2020). Moreover, there is an established agroforestry tradition of using hardwood trees as tutors for grapevines in Mediterranean and tropical climates (Altieri and Nicholls, 2002; Dupraz and Liagre 2019; Paris et al. 2019; Oliva Oller et al., 2022), though the viability of this system within a mesic environment, characteristic of our Central New York study site, has not been fully examined. The potential of mixed-species agroforestry to enhance growth and physiological performance of co-cultivated organisms and drive economic diversification in agricultural landscapes underscores the motivation for this research.

 

Co-cultivation of grapevines and American chestnuts may address several key issues in sustainable agriculture. First, growing grapevines on chestnut trees may yield savings on infrastructure. Chestnut trees require modest inputs, such that their maintenance may offset the costs of building and maintaining traditional grape trellis systems. Secondly, this project promotes the diversification of land use and income sources, potentially improving farm resilience to climate change driven market fluctuations. For instance, vignerons–i.e. farmers who cultivate a vineyard for winemaking–could receive supplementary income from the co-cultivated transgenic chestnut trees, which reliably mast if they can adequately tolerate chestnut blight. Further, this form of multilayer farming optimizes and increases the productivity of a plot, as the vertical scaffolding of the trees allows more crop to be grown on a given piece of land. Lastly, this agricultural framework can contribute to the restoration and conservation of the American chestnut, a species of substantial historical, ecological, and economic importance in the Northeast. 

 

I propose to utilize a pre-existing unique experimental platform to test the relative benefits of co-cultivation relative to traditional monoculture in field conditions. Species interactions in co-cultivated settings can result in benefits to one or both species via facilitation or reductions in performance via competition. The degree of facilitation versus competition is likely to be density-dependent. The SUNY ESF Grape and Chestnut Co-Cultivation study, established in 2020, allows for testing of these interactions through a traditional agroforestry vineyard schema in which three plots, each containing nine trees trellised with varying densities of grapes, border a square crop field. Transgenic American chestnuts are planted alongside grapevines at densities of one, three, and five vines per tree, with nearby, non-paired chestnuts and grapes serving as monoculture controls (Figure 1 in Media). The physiological assessment of the chestnut trees will include LI-COR LI-6800 system measurements of light saturated photosynthetic rates, stomatal conductance, and leaf water potential across each grape planting density. A complementary growth assessment within this experiment will measure grape harvest yield and tree basal diameter and height to determine how the measured physiological processes may be influencing biomass acquisition and allocation, and whether co-cultivated crops may be facilitating or impeding the productivity of the other compared to monoculture plantings. We will not measure chestnut harvest yield, as the four-year-old chestnuts are unlikely to reach reproductive maturity by the conclusion of this study.

 

This project aligns with Northeast SARE's outcome statement by contributing to the goal of promoting sustainable agriculture practices that enhance environmental stewardship, farm profitability, and rural community vitality. This research honors the holistic connections among land, water, air, and all living beings through its consideration of plant-soil feedbacks, interspecies water relations, chestnut's pronounced carbon sequestration potential, and the ample socio-economic benefits that pairing chestnut trees with grapes may have for farmers and rural community members. By demonstrating the potential of mixed-species agroforestry to address complex agricultural challenges while also fostering ecological resilience and economic viability, our research will support the overall objectives of sustainable agriculture initiatives in the Northeast region. Moreover, by providing evidence of the benefits and challenges associated with this framework, our research will inform land managers and other agricultural stakeholders, and serve as a proof of concept toward promoting the adoption of these sustainable agroforestry practices.

Research

Materials and methods:

A machine on a workbench used to gather leaf water potential measurements. Measured and hole-punched grape and chestnut leaves sit beside the machine. A LICOR 6800 head clamped onto a transgenic American chestnut leaf, out in the field. The machine's tripod is in frame, as well as the console from which the machine's settings can be controlled and data can be read. The console sits on a cooler, in which gathered leaves are stored. A close up of the LICOR 6800 head clamped onto a transgenic American chestnut leaf, out in the field.

    1. Growth and Harvest Yield: This field site is located in Syracuse,
      NY at the SUNY ESF Lafayette Road Experiment Station’s
      Grape and Chestnut Co-Cultivar study, which was established
      in 2020. The field work proposed here will take place
      during the 2024 and 2025 growing seasons. This study’s
      experimental design features three plots, each containing
      nine four-year-old transgenic trees planted with densities
      of 1, 3, or 5 grapevines around a square garden plot,
      alongside grapevines and chestnuts grown individually
      (Figure 1). Given this experimental design, I will analyze
      data from this work with a split-plot analysis of variance
      (ANOVA) with a main plot factor containing two levels: each
      crop grown together or alone; and a sub-plot factor of
      density of grapevines per chestnut (1, 3, and 5 vines). Our
      response variables are remnant grape cluster count, remnant grape cluster weight, grapevine shoot length, and chestnut
      basal diameter and height growth (Significant die back of the fruits on our vines, likely due to a mildew infection, necessitated an amended harvest yield methodology, which had formerly incorporated grape harvest yield as the weight of fruits and clusters per vine). This growth assessment
      will allow us to determine how physiological processes may
      be influencing biomass acquisition and allocation under
      conditions of competition versus facilitation.
        1. Chestnut basal
          diameter
          : At the end of the growing
          season (October 2024), I measured the basal
          diameter of each American chestnut tree (N = 40)
          using a digital dial caliper down to the nearest
          tenth of a millimeter. Each tree’s basal diameter
          was measured twice at perpendicular angles,
          then averaged to produce one basal diameter value
          per tree. I will use last year’s diameter data to
          calculate the relative growth rate in basal
          diameter. Given that my field work will continue
          during the 2025 growing season, I will repeat this
          method next year and similarly calculate growth
          rate across successive growing seasons. 
        2. Chestnut height:
          In October 2024, I measured chestnut stem
          length for each American chestnut tree (N = 40)
          with a tape measure as the distance from the stem
          base to the tip of the apical bud after
          straightening each tree by hand. I will use last
          year’s height data to calculate the relative growth
          rate in length. Given that my field work will
          continue during the 2025 growing season, I will
          repeat this height methodology next year and
          similarly calculate height growth rate across
          successive growing seasons.
        3. Grape cluster count: In September 2024, I
          counted the remnant grape clusters per vine for all grapevine planting densities. I trimmed off all clusters from the vines to reduce spread of fungal inoculum. 
        4. Grape cluster weights: In September 2024, I weighed all fruitless, remnant clusters per vine, following trimming, using a portable scale.
        5. Grapevine shoot lengths: In September 2024, I measured all shoot lengths per vine using a flexible measuring tape. Shoot lengths were measured as this season's vegetative growth, from the base to the apical tip of each shoot.
        6. Grape Harvest Yield: Next summer, I will use the Harvest Cluster
          Weight methodology outlined in Sabbatini et
          al.
          (2012). I will apply this
          method to all fruit-producing grapevines and
          average values for sub-replicates (i.e. when 3 or 5
          grapevines per chestnut), N ≥ 40.
        7. Growth and harvest yield differences among
          treatments
          : Split-plot ANOVA with type
          III sums of squares using lmer package of R with a
          main-plot factor of cultivation method (mono vs.
          co) and a sub-plot factor of grape planting density
          (1, 3, or 5 grapevines per tree). 
  1.  
  2. Photosynthesis and Water Relations: The physiological assessment of the
    grapevines and chestnut trees included LI-COR LI-6800
    system measurements of light saturated photosynthetic rates
    (Asat) and stomatal conductance
    (gs), and Scholander-type pressure chamber
    measurements of leaf water potential across each grape planting
    density level and monoculture planting. These measurements
    took place across three periods of the growing season (early,
    mid, and late summer) thereby affording comparisons of
    physiological responses to conditions of excess soil moisture
    and drainage. While predawn leaf water potential was initially proposed, we omitted it as the project progressed.
    While it is common in plant water relations research to measure both predawn and midday leaf water potential, the exceptionally wet summer that we had and the limited amount of leaves on these relatively small plants led us to determine that sampling additional leaves for predawn leaf water potential was unlikely to provide more useful information, while imposing a cost of increasing the disturbance to the plants. Our midday leaf water potential measurements tell us that these trees were all well-hydrated with no significant water limitations, so there was no need to invoke predawn measurements to infer whether there was soil moisture limitation of our leaf water potential measurements. 
      1. Leaf gas exchange
        measurements
        : I used a standard open-flow
        gas exchange system (LI-COR LI-6800 with 6
        cm2 leaf chamber) and set
        chamber conditions to 500 μmol s−1 flow rate, 1200 and 300 μmol
        m−2 s−1 Photosynthetically Active Radiation
        (PAR), 420 μmol mol−1 CO2, Relative Humidity (RH)
        40–60%, and block temperature 20 °C. The two distinct PAR values mirror varying conditions of light and shade within each vine-tree co-cultivation system. I measured two
        grape and two chestnut leaves within each grape planting
        density level (1, 3, 5), one leaf per each shade condition (PAR value), for each of the three
        experimental plots and two grapevine leaves and two
        chestnut leaves from six vines and six trees within the monoculture plots (N = 15
        grapevine and 15 chestnut trees; Table 1 in Media) three times
        per growing season over the course of 2024 and 2025
        (May, July, and September). I selected mature, fully
        expanded attached leaves for measurements. I
        performed leaf gas exchange measurements during the
        mid-morning to early afternoon (9am -2 pm) to ensure
        measurement parameters match environmental and
        physiological conditions. A subsample of leaves will
        be sent to a lab to be measured for N content to assess
        potential impacts of soil conditions on photosynthetic
        capacity. Samples have been dried and will be ground and analyzed
        via combustion elemental analysis. 
      2. Leaf water potential: I used a Scholander-type pressure chamber to measure
        midday leaf water potential. I detached all leaves assessed for gas exchange, directly following the gas exchange measurements, and placed each individually in a Ziploc bag containing a moist paper towel, which was then placed in a dark cooler until leaf water potential measurements could be carried out approximately one to three hours later. I measured each detached leaf for the midday water potential measurements. 
      3. Photosynthetic and
        water use differences among
        treatments
        :
        I will follow the same split-plot ANOVA approach as
        described above (Objective 1d)
  3. Agricultural Outreach: I
    will help to advance a broader adoption of this unique
    co-cultivation method and reduce a local agricultural reliance
    on monoculture systems in vineyards, orchards, and other
    farming systems by communicating my findings with stakeholders
    and organizations within ESF’s existing network of outreach and
    communications. 
      1. External site
        visits
        :
        During the 2025 growing season, I will travel to local
        vineyards, orchards, and farms to learn about their
        existing operations and how this experimental framework
        might translate to new sites. In particular, I would
        like to strengthen pre-existing collaborations within
        ESF’s network. Elizabeth Mae Kehas-Dewaghe, for whom a
        Letter of Commitment is attached, has shared
        her contacts from pre-established research
        relationships, given that these contacts demonstrated
        an eagerness to maintain ongoing collaborative
        partnerships. During these site visits, I intend to
        learn about and discuss current operations with
        agricultural collaborators to gauge the feasibility of
        implementing our co-cultivation schema within new
        sites. While these site visits were initially proposed for 2024, they were postponed to 2025 due to ongoing scheduling challenges with potential collaborators.
      2. Networking and
        professional engagement
        : I shared my work at the
        Northern Nut Grower’s Association and Chestnut Growers of America's Annual Joint Conference
        in July 2024, which was hosted at ESF’s campus.
        Additionally, I presented my work at the September 2024
        NE-2333 Chestnut Conference "Biological Improvement of
        Chestnut through Technologies that Address Management
        of the Species and its Pathogens and Pests," which
        also took place at SUNY ESF. I will travel to
        present my work at the NY-TACF chapter’s annual meeting
        in 2025, which will take place in Laurens, NY. ESF’s
        ACRRP maintains a close working relationship with the
        NY-TACF.
      3. ESF site visits: During the 2024 field season, I
        participated in field tours scheduled by ACRRP’s
        Outreach Coordinator and Distribution Manager, Adriana
        Del Grosso. Specifically, I led a tour in October 2024 for local teachers participating in the Master
        Teacher Program. ESF’s ACRRP also invited members
        of the Northern Nut Growers Association for a tour in
        late July 2024, which I assisted in leading.
        During the 2025 field season, I will invite new
        collaborators to the Lafayette Road Experiment
        Station’s Grape and Chestnut Co-Cultivar study to offer
        educational tours and demonstrations.
Participation Summary

Education & Outreach Activities and Participation Summary

3 Tours

Participation Summary:

40 Farmers participated
10 Number of agricultural educator or service providers reached through education and outreach activities
Education/outreach description:

This proposal’s outreach plan is outlined within the “Agricultural Outreach” Objective and Methods sections. In summary, this outreach strategy centers on conducting site visits to orchards, vineyards, and other relevant agricultural sites; presenting at annual conferences; and hosting site visits at the co-cultivar study to offer educational demonstration tours. My 2024 outreach strategy focused primarily on leading ESF site tours with organizations within ACRRP’s existing network of outreach and presenting at conferences. For instance, I led tours and shared my work in late July at the Northern Nut Growers Association and American Chestnut Growers Annual Joint Conference, in September 2024 at the NE-2333 Chestnut Conference "Biological Improvement of Chestnut through Technologies that Address Management of the Species and its Pathogens and Pests," and in October 2024 for local teachers participating in the Master Teacher Program. My 2025 strategy will focus on traveling to collaborators to learn about their existing operations and how this experimental framework might translate to new sites, but will also involve hosting site demonstration tours and presenting my research findings at more conferences and annual meetings. For instance, I will travel to present at the NY-TACF chapter’s annual meeting in Laurens, NY in 2025. 

The goals of this outreach strategy are to strengthen pre-existing partnerships, learn more about local agricultural operations, and share the findings and lessons learned from my research. Ultimately, I would like to promote the broader adoption of this unique co-cultivation method within the Northeast, given that grape and chestnut co-cultivation has immense potential to address pressing challenges related to climate change and sustainable agriculture.

Project Outcomes

Project outcomes:

The positive effects of this project are yet to be fully determined, pending the analysis of my data and the completion of our ongoing outreach and engagement objectives. Still, this work's motivation lies in advancing a sustainable co-cultivation framework which may help crops to be more resilient in the face of increasingly harsh environment conditions. Our hope is that co-cultivating grapevines and hardwood trees (such as chestnuts) may minimize irrigation needs; enhance photosynthetic capabilities--thereby potentially enhancing harvest yield--of each crop; and offer a novel agricultural product through the re-introduction of the presently functionally extinct American chestnut tree.  

Knowledge Gained:

My awareness of sustainable agriculture has certainly expanded due to this project. I have learned a lot about the benefits of mixed crop co-cultivation and how compatible crops can improve each other's resilience during unfavorable weather conditions. I've honed my skills in measuring and assessing plant health and performance, and I'm eager to continue making sense of the data I collected. I've also had informative conversations with farmers and tree growers about potential challenges associated with scaling up the co-cultivation framework I have been studying, despite its potential benefits for crop health and productivity. Alongside these successes and meaningful conversations, I've also learned a lot about the every day challenges associated with growing crops, such as the threat of fungal infections, damaging effects of excess precipitation, and physical toll of long days spent out in the field collecting data. Still, this research opportunity has offered me connections in the industry I may not otherwise have had access to, and has made me increasingly excited about the prospect of working within a viticulture and/or orchard context, following graduation. 

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.