Progress report for GW22-231
Project Information
Problem: High-elevation hay meadows are a critical but under-performing component of livestock operations in the Mountain West. Flood irrigation, high elevation, and cool temperatures result in concentration of organic materials near the soil surface, constraining N cycling and forage productivity. Limited forage productivity in meadows is surprising considering meadow soils contain as much as 2400 kg N/ha in the top 10 cm, reflecting a disconnect in the microbial community's ability to mineralize N for plant growth.
Question: How can the resource of stored N in meadow soils be utilized to reduce dependence on N-fertilizer and improve economic and environmental sustainability of western ranches?
Solution: Understanding N mineralization in meadow soils will give ranchers tools to better manage natural N-release and reduce N-fertilizer rates.
Method: We propose an on-farm research trial where soil cores are incubated in-situ and routinely sampled for mineralized N content in order to determine the temporal patterns and magnitude of N release in meadows.
Outreach: Results will be disseminated to stakeholders through producer meetings and publications in extension and peer reviewed articles. We will also focus on training a core group of ranchers to communicate findings within their communities and promote innovation.
Expected outcomes: We expect to find N mineralization in meadows occurs in discrete time periods between flooding events when soil conditions are ideal for N mineralization. This knowledge will give our rancher collaborators tools to innovate novel management strategies to optimize N mineralization and fertility management on their operations.
Research objective 1: Determine the amount of N mineralized in high-elevation hay meadows annually to better predict N availability and reduce dependence on N fertilizer.
Research objective 2: Determine the temporal patterns of N mineralization so meadow management tactics can target critical periods of N mineralization to optimize N cycling in the field.
Research objective 3: Determine relationships between N mineralization and soil health indicators to develop measures for evaluating meadow soils with healthy N cycling.
Education objective 1: Hold producer meetings at three critical stages of the project to relay research findings and updates to local ranchers and stakeholders.
Education objective 2: Develop a core group of 5-10 ranchers who receive regular communication about our research to foster outreach from within local ranching communities.
Education objective 3: Disseminate research findings to producers, industry stakeholders, and academia through written and oral media.
Education objective 4: Hold a producer round-table to develop practical management tactics that implement our research findings.
Cooperators
- - Producer
- - Producer
Research
Research objective 1: Determine the amount of N mineralized in high-elevation hay meadows annually to better predict N availability and reduce dependence on N fertilizer.
Research objective 2: Determine the temporal patterns of N mineralization so meadow management tactics can target critical periods of N mineralization to optimize N cycling in the field.
Research objective 3: Determine relationships between N mineralization and soil health indicators to develop measures for evaluating meadow soils with healthy N cycling.
To achieve our research objectives, we propose an in-field buried soil core mineralization study, which is the most accurate determination of in-situ N mineralization (Sullivan et al., 2020). Our structured experiment, described below, will adhere to the SMART objectives framework, by providing measurable objectives to be met by defined research activities within the scope and timeframe of work to be accomplished by our research team. Please see the additional info section of the project team portion of the narrative for details on project responsibilities among our research team members.
Study Location
The study was initiated in April 2023 at two ranches in southern Wyoming and northern Colorado, producing grass hay on typical flood irrigated meadows. At each ranch we are studying two meadows: one that has been historically fertilized, and one that has been historically unfertilized, both on the same soil series, to observe the effects of long-term fertilizer application. Meadows are being managed, irrigated, and harvested normally by our rancher collaborators for the duration of the study.
Our previous research at these sites has established three randomly located plots for repeated sampling within each meadow/management location. Randomly located within each plot, we established a completely randomized 1 m2 grid for in-situ incubated soil core determination of N mineralization.
In-Situ Nitrogen Mineralization
In-situ N mineralization studies subject soils to natural edaphic conditions for the determination of net N mineralization. In-situ cores differ from general soil samples in that the sampled core is not exposed to inward and outward fluxes of N for the duration of experiment, controlling for leaching and plant uptake of mineralized N. Our experiment will utilize the method by Moberg et al. (2013), which combines ion exchange resin (IER) and soil cores to create an incubation environment permeable to gas and water exchange, but impermeable to inorganic N. Briefly, 10-cm diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubes were inserted into the soil to a depth of 27 cm (representing the active root zone of meadow forage species). In-tact cores encased in their tubing were be removed from the soil and the bottom 3 cm of soil was removed from the core to allow room to insert two IER bags. Encased cores with bags inserted in the bottom were re-installed in the hole from which they were sampled.
Ion exchange resin bags allow water and gas to naturally exchange through the encased soil core, but capture inorganic N by adsorbing it to the ion resin. Because meadows are subject to a high water table, the bottom of the two IER bags at the base of the core eliminates any movement of N into the core with rising water (Moberg et al. 2013), while the upper IER bag captures any N that leaches from the inside of the soil core. A third IER bag was placed at a depth of 5 cm at the transition between the O and A horizons in the soil to distinguish any differences in mineralization rates in the different soil horizons. In this way, an in-situ soil incubation was developed that is exposed to natural edaphic temperature and air/water flow conditions while containing any produced inorganic N. To eliminate the effect of plant uptake of N, sod at the top of the core was killed with non-selective herbicide. Cores were installed immediately following soil thaw, prior to biological soil activity and fertilizer application, in order to capture an entire season of mineralization.
We have currently completed the first 3 pre-defined sampling events. During sampling, cores were removed from the field and taken to the lab for analysis. To avoid any effects of transportation, samples were kept at 4ºC in a cooler and processed in the lab within 24 hours of collection. In the lab, soil was removed from its PVC core and homogenized by thoroughly mixing and passing it through an 8-mm sieve. Two 10-g subsamples were taken for determination of gravimetric water content and extraction of inorganic soil N as ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3-). The 10 g of soil for N extraction was shaken with 50 ml of 2M KCl in a 120-ml specimen cup for 30 minutes, then decanted and filtered after 12 hours of settling. The supernatant was analyzed for NO3--N and NH4+-N colorimetrically by cadmium reduction (Knepel, 2012) and alkaline phenol/hypochlorite method (Harbridge, 2007), respectively, on a Lachat 8500 QuickChem (Hach Industries, Loveland, CO). Nitrogen leached from the soil core and captured in the IER bag between the O and A horizons, and at the bottom of the core was also extracted. Inorganic N in the IER bag was extracted according to Moberg et al. (2013) by extracting N from the IER bag with a series of three extractions. For each extraction, 25 ml of 2M KCl was added to the IER and shaken for 20 minutes. Following shaking, supernatant was collected. The supernatant from all three extraction rounds was analyzed colorimetrically for NO3- and NH4+. Increases in the measurement of inorganic N as it changes through the season will allow for the quantification of N mineralization in meadows and meet objective 1.
Sampling design
Within sampling plots, we established a 1-m2 grid with nine equidistant points. Each point represents a location where a core was constructed and incubated in the field. The nine points in the grid form a completely randomized block where we assigned samples to be incubated for nine different durations in the field. Duration of incubation was designed to capture periods in the field most likely to promote mineralization, thus reducing sample number to ensure our objective is achievable without sacrificing sensitivity to determine periods of N mineralization, as set by our second objective. Sampling times and corresponding biological significance are listed below.
- Spring, post soil thaw: This marks the first sampling event and represents the baseline N status of the soil prior to the beginning of biological activity for the year.
- One week prior to irrigation: Initiation of irrigation water changes the redox potential of meadow soils. This sampling period will capture N mineralized early season.
- Halfway through irrigation period: Meadows are typically irrigated for 6-8 weeks. A sample taken in the middle of this period will capture mineralization corresponding to the introduction of irrigation water.
- Prior to irrigation termination: Sampling before water recession will capture any changes in mineralization during the irrigation period when soils are warming.
- Two weeks following irrigation termination: The transition of meadow soils from saturated to moist is likely the most optimum combination of temperature and moisture for microbial activity in the whole year. Therefore, a sample taken shortly after this period will capture the potentially active period of N mineralization.
- Four weeks following irrigation termination: Many meadows face a period of drought following irrigation termination. This sampling period will capture the transition from moist to dry soils.
- One-month following sample 6: Meadow productivity tails off in late summer. This sample will capture mineralization occurring late season.
- One-month following sample 7: This sample will capture mineralization that occurs in the transition to fall and cooler soil temperatures.
- Prior to soil freeze: This sample will capture total net N mineralization through a whole season.
The sampling grid was replicated three times for a total of n = 3 at each site. However, each meadow system is replicated in two locations for a total of n = 6, which is the minimum replication suggested by Kolberg et al. (1997). The study will be repeated a second year, to allow for a total of 4 site-years for both unfertilized and fertilized meadows (8 site-years in total). Each year, a total of 108 samples will be analyzed. Although more replication through space and time would be ideal to better represent meadows in a variety of conditions, we feel our labor-intensive method must be scaled to a level that can be achieved with a team of 2-3 researchers within the 2-year duration of our study while still allowing us to meet our research objectives for this novel approach in meadows.
Mineralization/Soil Health Relationships
Although mineralization studies offer the best method for determining N release from soils, they are retroactive and time consuming, rendering them unsuitable for predicting future soil health and performance (Sullivan et al., 2020). Therefore, other methods have been proposed to assess soil N cycling. Our team has experience in lab incubations for N mineralization. Anaerobic potentially mineralizable N (PMN) tests have been shown to be the most useful soil health indicator related to field mineralization (Sullivan et al., 2020), and have been successfully used to adjust early-season N applications (Anderson et al., 2010).
Early season samples allow producers an opportunity to evaluate soil N status before making seasonal management decisions (Anderson et al., 2010), therefore, we also took a composited soil sample from the perimeter of the plot at the initiation of the study, following soil thaw, for analysis of PMN (Waring and Bremner, 1964, Anderson et al., 2010). This initial PMN status of the soil will then be correlated to net N mineralization at the end of the season to determine if a relationship exists between lab and field N mineralization and if PMN measured in the lab is a useful soil health indicator to evaluate meadow N cycling (objective 3).
Data Analysis
All data analysis will be performed using R. Cumulative N mineralization will be determined from cores incubated the entire duration of the season as net inorganic N content compared with samples taken at the initiation of the study (Moberg et al., 2010). Temporal patterns in N mineralization will be determined by plotting cumulative N mineralization through time to observe periods of the season where N mineralization occurs most rapidly. Regression analysis will also be performed to define relationships between lab-derived PMN and in-situ net N mineralization. Finally, Analysis of Variance will be performed to detect differences in meadow management and sites, with +/- fertilizer application as the fixed effect and location as the random effect.
References
Anderson, N.P., J.M. Hart, N.W. Christensen, M.E. Mellbye, M.D. Flowers, et al. 2010. Using the Nitrogen Mineralization Soil Test to Predict Spring Fertilizer N Rate. Oregon State Univ. Ext. Serv. EM 9020(November): 1–5.
Harbridge, J. 2007. Determination of ammonia (salicylate) in 2M Kcl soil extracts by flow injection analysis (high throughput). Lachat Instruments QuikChem Method 12-107–06(2): F.
Knepel, K. 2012. Determination of nitrate in 2M KCl extracts by flow injection analysis. Lachat Instruments QuikChem Method 12-107-04-(1-): B.
Kolberg, R.L., B. Rouppet, D.G. Westfall, and G.A. Peterson. 1997. Evaluation of an In Situ Net Soil Nitrogen Mineralization Method in Dryland Agroecosystems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61(2): 504. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100020019x.
Moberg, D.P., R.L. Johnson, and D.M. Sullivan. 2013. Comparison of Disturbed and Undisturbed Soil Core Methods to Estimate Nitrogen-Mineralization Rates in Manured Agricultural Soils. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 44(11): 1722–1732. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2013.783060.
Sullivan, D.M., A.D. Moore, E. Verhoeven, and L.J. Brewer. 2020. Baseline soil nitrogen mineralization : measurement and interpretation. Oregon State Univ. Ext. Publ. (March): 10–11.
Waring, S.A., and J.M. Bremner. 1964. Ammonium Production in Soil under Waterlogged Conditions as an Index of Nitrogen Availability. Nature 201: 951–952.
For research objectives 1 and 2 we successfully initiated the study at the proposed timeline in April 2023. So far, we have collected the first three of nine sampling events and have analyzed the samples for nitrate and ammonium concentration. Although results have not yet been statistically analyzed, we have seen a visual increase in inorganic N concentration in both the incubated soil and in the IER bags, indicating that N is being mineralized and trapped in our incubation cores as proposed. When all samples are collected at the end of the growing season, we will be able to meet objectives 1 and 2 and determine the amount and timing of N mineralization in meadows for an entire growing season.
For research objective 3, we successfully completed a PMN test using soil samples taken at the initiation of the study. Samples have been analyzed for mineralized nitrogen incubated in laboratory conditions. At the end of the growing season, we will correlate these results to those taken in the field to determine if there is a relationship between field and laboratory mineralization rates.
Research Outcomes
So far, we have successfully completed the first 3 of 9 proposed sampling events according to our proposed timeline. Therefore, we do not yet have a complete data set from which to provide recommendations.
Education and Outreach
Participation Summary:
Education objective 1: Hold producer meetings at three critical stages of the project to relay research findings and updates to local ranchers and stakeholders.
Education objective 2: Develop a core group of 5-10 ranchers who receive regular communication about our research to foster outreach from within local ranching communities.
Education objective 3: Disseminate research findings to producers, industry stakeholders, and academia through written and oral media.
Education objective 4: Hold a producer round-table to develop practical management tactics that implement our research findings.
Research has shown that communication of innovation is not a linear process, but is most successful when users are involved in the development of innovation and also active communicators of its results (Leeuwis and Aarts, 2011). Our group has found this to be true, as ranchers respond well to disseminating knowledge within their local communities and are quick to offer practical suggestions that guide our research through all stages of a project. To take advantage of this, we propose educational objectives that promote rancher interaction from the initiation of the project.
We realize formal meetings only achieve so much, and that only a few hours of information do not always correlate to lasting change. To overcome the challenges of formal extension meetings, we have focused our initial education and communication energy on objective 2 by developing a core group of local ranchers who are passionate about our project and capable of disseminating information and educating fellow ranchers in the community. Our team is fortunate to have established connections with ranches in southern Wyoming and northern Colorado through our ongoing meadow research. So far, our core group of ranchers is composed of 8 individual producers. Each of these ranchers receive regular outreach from our team in the form of monthly phone calls with project status updates and to make them aware of research being conducted on collaborating ranches. We also personally meet with the ranchers when on their operations for field research. Already, we have confirmed that our regular personal contact maintains trust and open lines of communication for the ongoing work of this project.
Educational objectives 1, 3, and 4 require a complete data set from the first year of this study, so we have not completed those objectives at this time.
References
Leeuwis, C., and N. Aarts. 2011. Rethinking communication in innovation processes: Creating space for change in complex systems. J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 17(1): 21–36. doi: 10.1080/1389224X.2011.536344.
So far, we have remained on our educational objectives timeline by focusing our initial efforts on educational objective 2. We have successfully developed our core group of ranchers who have learned about our project and receive regular communication about its progress. We currently have a group of eight ranchers who have been educated on our project design and justification. Of these eight ranchers, four were directly present in the field at project initiation. Of the four who were present, two directly participated in creating incubation cores, installing them in the field, and collecting samples.
Communicaiton frequency among the core ranchers varies. Three are highly involved and interested in the study and communicate with us multiple times a month. Two are interested and communicate monthly. The remaining three are harder to reach out to and have received communication and education about our study design and justification at the initiation of the study and one follow-up communication 6-8 weeks later.
One rancher has shared our research and objectives with a local agronomic professional who in turn met with us to discuss our project and how it relates to soil fertility in meadows. This confirmed that our focus on training a core group of ranchers leads to natural dissemination of knowledge in the broader agricultural community.
Educational objectives 1, 3, and 4 were proposed to be completed later in the timeline of this study.