Control of Powdery Scab of Potato With Disease Suppressive Soils

Progress report for GW22-236

Project Type: Graduate Student
Funds awarded in 2022: $29,823.00
Projected End Date: 09/30/2024
Host Institution Award ID: G131-23-W9212
Grant Recipient: Oregon State University
Region: Western
State: Oregon
Graduate Student:
Principal Investigator:
Ken Frost
Oregon State University, Hermiston Agricultural Research and Ext
Expand All

Project Information

Summary:

Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) are the fourth most important food crop in the world and, in 2020 the total value of all potatoes sold Idaho, Oregon, and Washington was $1.82 billion. This proposal addresses powdery scab a potato blemish disease that results in losses to all market sectors of potato in all major production regions of the U.S. Powdery scab reduces potato aesthetics for directly marketed potatoes and through the transmission of potato mop-top virus (PMTV), a virus that causes tuber necrosis leading to rejection of potatoes used for processing. Complete host resistance to powdery scab is not available in commercially accepted varieties and no management tactics alone or in combination have successfully controlled all phases of the disease. In this project, we plan to use culture-free methods to characterize microbial communities in bulk and rhizosphere soils that are associated with reduced disease and may be responsible for powdery scab suppressive activity. Our research objectives are to 1) characterize the temporal dynamics of the potato rhizosphere microbiome through the growing season and in relation to powdery scab development and 2) assay soils for their ability to suppress powdery scab. Our goal is to identify biotic factors that are associated with disease suppressive activity of soil and identify and management practices that promote disease suppressive activity. Our educational objective is to engage growers in the project and communicate our findings to the stakeholder community, at grower education events, through the dissemination of extension publications, and the research community via peer-reviewed publications.

Project Objectives:

Objective 1: 

Characterize the temporal dynamics of the potato rhizosphere microbiome through the growing season and in relation to powdery scab status.

Objective 2: 

Assay soils for their ability to suppress powdery scab by identifying abiotic and biotic factors associated with disease suppression and by identifying systems and/or management practices associated with reduced disease

Objective 3 is to engage growers in project activities and outcomes and communicate research findings about powdery scab to the stakeholder and research community.

Cooperators

Click linked name(s) to expand/collapse or show everyone's info
  • Nick Benavides - Producer

Research

Materials and methods:

Research Plan

The research objectives of this study are to:

  1. Characterize the temporal dynamics of the potato rhizosphere microbiome through the growing season and in relation to powdery scab status
  2. Assay soils for their ability to suppress powdery scab
    1. Identify abiotic and biotic factors associated with disease suppression
    2. Identify cropping systems and/or management practices associated with reduced disease  

Objective 1: 

Characterize the temporal dynamics of the potato rhizosphere microbiome through the growing season and in relation to powdery scab status.

Materials and Methods

Field selection and location. An observational field study was conducted in four commercial potato fields selected based on their powdery scab disease history. Within each field, four 0.1-acre grid areas were established for environmental sensor placement and soil and plant sampling. The sensor unit was installed in each plot after potato planting and hilling. Flags were used to mark the sensor location and plot corners. GPS coordinates and elevation for each location were recorded. Hourly soil water and temperature were collected by the sensor unit. The sensors were installed in April and bulk and rhizosphere soils were sampled in April, May, June, July, and August. Previous management history (i.e., previous crops, fumigation events and fungicide applications, soil amendments, etc.) and in-season management practices were documented for each field.

Bulk soil and rhizosphere sampling. We will sample the potato rhizospheres and bulk soils when plots are established and monthly thereafter until plant senescence. To sample bulk soils, 20 standard (1.87 cm diameter) soil cores to a depth of approximately 20 cm were collected within each field plot, 10 m of the sensor. Soil cores were pooled into a collection bag and mixed well by shaking and turning the bag upside-down 10 times. Ten grams of each soil were placed into a 15 ml centrifuge tube. Centrifuge tubes were placed on ice for transport to the laboratory and stored at -20°C until DNA extraction. Based on our experimental design, this will result in 80 bulk soil samples per year (4 months x 4 fields x 4 locations within field = 64 bulk soil samples per year). At the first sample date, the bag of bulk soil from each plot was used for soil chemical and soil health analyses.

To sample potato rhizospheres, three plants from each location were carefully removed from the soil so that plant roots are left mostly intact. The plants were shaken to remove loose soil from the root system. A 1.0 g sample of root was collected for each plant, and placed in a 15 ml centrifuge tube with 10 ml of phosphate-buffered saline Tween 20 (PBST). Roots were subjected to 3 minutes of vigorous shaking in the field and the cleaned root were removed from the tube. The rhizosphere soil suspended in PBST was stored on ice for transport to the laboratory. In the laboratory, rhizosphere soils were thawed and centrifuged to pellet the soil. The resulting rhizosphere soil pellet was used for DNA extraction. Based on our experimental design, this will result in 240 rhizosphere samples per year (5 months x 4 fields x 4 locations within field x 3 plants = 240 samples per year).

Objective 2: 

Assay soils for their ability to suppress powdery scab by identifying abiotic and biotic factors associated with disease suppression and by identifying systems and/or management practices associated with reduced disease.

Materials and Methods

Collection of soils, 2022. A preliminary greenhouse experiment was set up to compare disease suppression from different soils collected in Oregon. Soils with diverse management histories were collected from ten locations. Soils were collected from potato and non-potato agricultural systems in Oregon (e.g., forage crops, long-term pasture, etc.) (Figure 1). Approximately, 12 gallons of each field soil were obtained from each location. For each soil, the chemical and physical properties (i.e., fertility, soil particle sizes, etc.), microbial biomass, and basal respiration were determined.

Figure 1. Soil Textural Triangle, diversity of soil textures sampled in 2022. Soils were sampled from several locations in Oregon. Five fields have previous potato cropping and five did not.
Figure 1. Soil Textural Triangle, diversity of soil textures sampled in 2022. Soils were sampled from several locations in Oregon. Five fields have previous potato cropping and five did not.

Collection of soils, 2023. A greenhouse experiment was set up to compare disease suppression from different soils collected in Oregon. Soils with diverse management histories were collected from six locations that were informed by the preliminary work from 2022. Soils were collected from potato and non-potato agricultural systems in Oregon (e.g., forage crops, long-term pasture, etc.). Approximately, 20 gallons of each field soil were obtained from each location. For each soil, the chemical and physical properties (i.e., fertility, soil particle sizes, etc.), microbial biomass, and basal respiration were determined.

Greenhouse experiment, 2022. A greenhouse pot experiment was set up to examine disease suppressive activity of the collected field soils. Three different potting mixtures of soil were used in this experiment: potting mixture 1 (PM1) 95% field soil with 5% S. subterranea-infested potting soil, potting mixture 2 (PM2) 10% field soil, 85% potting soil, and 5% S. subterranea-infested potting soil and potting mixture 3 (PM3) 10% autoclaved field soil, 85% potting soil, and 5% S. subterranea-infested potting soil (Figure 2). The three potting mixtures are being used to determine the relative importance of soil edaphic and soil biological factors leading to powdery scab suppressive activity. One treatment consisting of potting soil alone (95% potting soil and 5% S. subterranea-infested potting soil) was included as a control. This experimental design results in a total of 31 treatments. Ten replicate pots, approximately 15 cm diameter, was prepared with each of the potting soil mixtures and one seed tuber of the susceptible cultivar ‘Shepody’ was planted in each of the pots. The experiment was conducted in the plant pathology greenhouse at the HAREC temperatures ranged from 15°C to 44°C, and pots were watered daily to promote S. subterranea tuber infection.

Greenhouse experiment, 2023. A greenhouse pot experiment was set up to examine disease suppressive activity of the collected field soils. Inoculum was applied to all pots at a rate of 5 spores per gram of soil. Three different potting mixtures of soil were used in this experiment: potting mixture 1 (PM1) 100% field soil, potting mixture 2 (PM2) 15% field soil and 85% potting soil, and potting mixture 3 (PM3) 15% autoclaved field soil and 85% potting soil. The three potting mixtures are being used to determine the relative importance of soil edaphic and soil biological factors leading to powdery scab suppressive activity. One treatment consisting of potting soil alone and one treatment consisting of autoclaved potting soil was included as a control. This experimental design results in a total of 20 treatments. Six replicate pots, approximately 35 cm diameter, were prepared with each of the potting soil mixtures and one seed tuber of the susceptible cultivar ‘Kennebec’ was planted in each of the pots. The experiment was conducted in the plant pathology greenhouse at the HAREC, temperatures ranged from 15°C to 32°C, and pots were watered daily to promote S. subterranea tuber infection.

Figure 2. Treatment 1 (PM1) retains the native soil microbial community and the soil traits (pH, texture, chemistry, etc), Treatment 2 (PM2) retains the native soil microbial community and dilutes the soil traits, Treatment 3 disrupts the native soil microbial community and dilutes the soil traits. Control 1 uses a commercial potting mix and Control 2 uses the same commercial potting mix, but it is autoclaved to disrupt the microbial community present in the mix. Control 2 was used in 2023.
Figure 2. Treatment 1 (PM1) retains the native soil microbial community and the soil traits (pH, texture, chemistry, etc), Treatment 2 (PM2) retains the native soil microbial community and dilutes the soil traits, Treatment 3 disrupts the native soil microbial community and dilutes the soil traits. Control 1 uses a commercial potting mix and Control 2 uses the same commercial potting mix, but it is autoclaved to disrupt the microbial community present in the mix. Control 2 was used in 2023.

Soil and rhizosphere sampling, 2022. At the start of the experiment, a sample of each potting mixture was collected and stored at -80°C. Bulk and rhizosphere soils were sampled three times throughout the course of the experiment by destructively sampling. Root galling (disease) was assessed on roots during destructive sampling. Bulk soils were sampled directly from each pot. To sample rhizosphere soils, the plant was removed from its pot, then shaken to remove all loose soil from the plant root system. A 0.8 to 1.0 g sample of root was collected for each plant, placed in a 15 ml centrifuge tube with 10 ml of phosphate buffered saline Tween 20 (PBST), and subjected to 3 minutes of vigorous shaking. The cleaned root was removed from the tube and the rhizosphere soil suspended in PBST was centrifuged to pellet the soil. The resulting rhizosphere soil pellet was used for DNA extraction.

Soil and rhizosphere sampling, 2023. At the start of the experiment, a sample of each potting mixture was collected and stored at -80°C. Bulk and rhizosphere soils were sampled once 95 days after planting by destructively sampling. Root galling (disease) was assessed on roots during destructive sampling. Bulk soils were sampled directly from each pot. To sample rhizosphere soils, the plant was removed from its pot, then shaken to remove all loose soil from the plant root system. A 0.8 to 1.0 g sample of root was collected for each plant, placed in a 15 ml centrifuge tube with 10 ml of phosphate buffered saline Tween 20 (PBST), and subjected to 3 minutes of vigorous shaking. The cleaned root was removed from the tube and the rhizosphere soil suspended in PBST was centrifuged to pellet the soil. The resulting rhizosphere soil pellet was used for DNA extraction.

Disease assessment. Powdery scab was assessed for tubers generated in at the end of the experiment. For each pot, the number of tubers was counted, and powdery scab presence was recorded. Powdery scab severity was also estimated for each tuber based on percent of the tuber surface that is covered by lesions. Powdery scab incidence and severity will be estimated for each pot and averaged for each soil treatment. Roots were surface sterilized and assessed for infection by S. subterranea with PCR.

Objectives 1 & 2

DNA extraction, soil microbiome assay, and bioinformatics pipeline. DNA was extracted from all the soil samples (potting mix, bulk soil, and rhizosphere). We have initiated the process of library preparation for DNA samples collected in 2022, with the goal of sequencing and assigning taxonomic information. DNA collected in July 2023 will be processed in the months to come.

Data Analysis.

Objective 1) We will examine how the bulk and rhizosphere soil microbiomes vary as a function of time, plant maturity, and disease status. An analysis of differential abundance will be performed to determine if specific taxa are associated with disease status. We will also characterize how the soil and rhizosphere microbiome vary as a function of soil moisture and temperature. In combination with Objective 2, we will determine if the potato plant recruits specific microbes from bulk soil that are suppressive to powdery scab.

Objective 2) The suppressive activity of the ten field soils will be compared among the three potting mixtures. Association analysis will be used to examine relationships between soil suppression and soil chemical, physical and biological properties. An analysis of differential abundance will be performed to identify if specific taxa are associated with disease suppression, or disease incidence and severity. The microbiome of bulk and rhizosphere soils will be compared in time to determine if the potato plant recruits specific microbes from bulk soil that are suppressive to powdery scab.

Figure 3. Greenhouse study photos, 2022 (A) Soil sampling in a field (B) Mixing treatments (C) Greenhouse setup, pots were subsequently arbitrarily distributed (D) Disease assessment Greenhouse study photos, 2023 (E) Greenhouse setup two months after planting (F) Root galls (G) Disease assessment of roots and tubers
Figure 3. Greenhouse study photos, 2022 (A) Soil sampling in a field (B) Mixing treatments (C) Greenhouse setup, pots were subsequently arbitrarily distributed (D) Disease assessment Greenhouse study photos, 2023 (E) Greenhouse set up two months after planting (F) Root galls (G) Disease assessment of roots and tubers

 

Research results and discussion:

Objective 1

Analysis of temporal field study is still on-going.

Objective 2

Greenhouse Study, Summer 2022

We found that there was low disease incidence and severity of galls and tuber lesions. We speculate that the temperatures in the greenhouse were too high for symptoms to occur. In future experiments, we will plant earlier in the season to take advantage of the cooler temperatures as well as modify the greenhouse environment to be more conducive for symptoms. We will also increase the size of the pots to help retain soil moisture levels which will also be more conducive to disease symptoms.   

We calculated the average root infection for each treatment and differentially compared the treatments (Figure 3). The data suggests that most 100% field soils we examined are more suppressive than the control, that there is variability of suppressiveness among field soils, and that there are three possible fields we examined that have biological suppressive qualities.

Figure 3. (A) Treatment 1 (PM1, 95% field soil with 5% S. subterranea-infested potting soil) was differentially compared to the control for infection of root tissue (B) Treatment 2 (PM2, 10% field soil, 85% potting soil, and 5% S. subterranea-infested potting soil) was differentially compared to the control for infection of root tissue (C) and Treatment 2 was differentially compared to Treatment 3 (PM3, 10% autoclaved field soil, 85% potting soil, and 5% S. subterranea-infested potting soil).
Figure 3. (A) Treatment 1 (PM1, 95% field soil with 5% S. subterranea-infested potting soil) was differentially compared to the control for infection of root tissue (B) Treatment 2 (PM2, 10% field soil, 85% potting soil, and 5% S. subterranea-infested potting soil) was differentially compared to the control for infection of root tissue (C) and Treatment 2 was differentially compared to Treatment 3 (PM3, 10% autoclaved field soil, 85% potting soil, and 5% S. subterranea-infested potting soil).

Greenhouse Study, Summer 2023

The experiment was taken down at the end of July 2023 and has not been analyzed as of this report. Preliminary observations show that there was more incidence of galling.

Participation Summary
1 Producers participating in research

Research Outcomes

Recommendations for sustainable agricultural production and future research:

Currently, our research results do not change powdery scab management recommendations.

Education and Outreach

2 Consultations
1 Curricula, factsheets or educational tools
3 Webinars / talks / presentations
1 Workshop field days

Participation Summary:

50 Farmers participated
50 Ag professionals participated
Education and outreach methods and analyses:

Objective 3

Information about this project was presented to stakeholders in the region at field days at OSU-HAREC, the annual Hermiston Farm Fair, Southern Rocky Mountain Ag Conference - Monta Vista, CO, and WERA-89. 

Education and outreach results:

We have presented information about this study to stakeholders but have not yet shared our research results.

Information Products

    Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE.