Vertical Bifacial Solar Panels: A Winning Solution for Agrivoltaics and Farmers

Progress report for LNE22-454R

Project Type: Research Only
Funds awarded in 2022: $199,998.00
Projected End Date: 11/30/2025
Grant Recipient: University of Vermont
Region: Northeast
State: Vermont
Project Leader:
Dr. Bruce L. Parker
University of Vermont
Expand All

Project Information

Summary:

      Our hypothesis is that vertically-positioned bifacial solar arrays are a promising new technology for use in agrivoltaics, where agriculture is combined with renewable energy production via photovoltaic solar panels. The incorporation of vertical bifacial solar arrays into farming can conserve valuable agricultural land for food production, produce abundant energy, and save farmers money on electrical costs. Each row of solar modules in a vertical photovoltaic array occupies just 4 inches of land, and the ample space between rows facilitates the planting and harvesting of crops with heavy equipment if needed. The bifacial solar modules collect sunlight on both sides. This type of system, currently used in Europe, has only recently been installed on a small scale in the United States, where it has never been tested with vegetable crops. Effective applications of vertical solar arrays on farmland allow for crop production within their boundaries while supporting farmers’ financial stability and reducing the demand for fossil fuel consumption and the negative impacts of climate change. Additional research on the agronomic and economic impacts of vertical agrivoltaics for different crops, climates, and economies will support successful widespread adoption of this novel technology. Our focus is on beet and carrot vegetable crops in the Northeast US.

      Our original research plan comprised a detailed evaluation of a 50 kW vertical bifacial solar array slated for installation at the University of Vermont (UVM) Horticulture Research and Education Center by iSun Energy, Inc., a Northeast US solar contractor. Due to many factors including state permitting, contract negotiations between iSun and UVM, supply chain issues in part related to the novelty of the system in the US, and financial challenges of our partner iSun, this vertical solar array has been continually delayed each year since its expected installation in 2022. This has given us additional insights into the process of installing a vertical bifacial photovoltaic array on farmland, and we will share these insights with farmers. We still believe in the benefits of this planned UVM vertical bifacial solar array for research and demonstration purposes, and we are pursuing our options to achieve this goal. However, we no longer expect installation of the solar array to be completed before the 2025 end date of this grant.

      In face of the extended delays to our original research plan, we developed a new approach to address the need for field-based data on vegetable crop growth in vertical agrivoltaic systems without having access to an actual vertical agrivoltaic array. Our solution was to create “shade fences” that simulate the microclimatic conditions crops would experience within our planned vertical solar array. Evaluating crops under these expected conditions will provide insights into their suitability for growth between the fence-like rows of vertical solar arrays in our Northeast US climate. We focused on beet and carrot crops, both commonly grown in Vermont with relatively high yields and market prices by weight. In 2022, we collected full-sun reference data, then conducted a shade fence experiment in one field in 2023 and repeated the shade fence experiment in two fields in 2024. The shade fence experiments tested three levels of shade expected within a vertical solar array, randomized with full-sun areas as controls. When we complete our data analysis, we will share our results with farmers, researchers, solar developers, and regulatory authorities. If our hypothesis of robust crop yields is correct, then limits to solar power development on agricultural lands will shrink drastically, providing opportunities for farmers to adopt agrivoltaics to improve their financial security, produce renewable energy, and maintain high levels of agricultural production.

Shade fences next to carrot and beet crops with microenvironmental monitoring equipment.
Shade fences in 2023
Project Objective:

A vertical bifacial solar array (50kW capacity), compatible with mechanized agriculture and never tested in the US, will be evaluated at the UVM Horticulture Research Center. A variety of high-value specialty crops (vegetables, herbs, etc.) will be grown in and outside the array to determine the suitability of this system for Northeastern farms. Data on energy generation, crop yield and quality, light conditions, environmental impacts on the crops, and economic aspects will be compiled to demonstrate the agricultural opportunities and drawbacks of this vertical system for farmers compared with conventional arrays, which occupy 10 times the space.

Introduction:

      Vertically-positioned bifacial solar panels for agrivoltaics represent a new technology and a system never before tested for vegetable cultivation in the United States. We hypothesize that this system will conserve agricultural land, produce energy greater than that produced by traditional fixed angle arrays, be suitable for crop production, and supply farmers with additional income while saving on fossil fuel costs and thwarting climate change. When installed vertically in rows running north-to-south with bifacial solar modules facing east and west, vertical bifacial solar arrays capture the sun’s energy as it rises in the east and sets in the west, shifting some electricity production to late afternoons, a critical time of day for energy usage. The vertical position of the modules prevents snow buildup from blocking sunlight, and because the system captures sunlight on both sides of the panels, a maximum amount of electricity can be produced. Of equal importance is the fact that vertical systems occupy only a very small fraction of agricultural land. While, by design, conventional solar panels (fixed tilt arrays) limit the usable land between rows, vertical panels occupy an absolute minimum of land. Thus, agricultural fields are conserved for further crop production. It is absolutely necessary to determine if crops grown around the panels will generate high yields of marketable produce during the growing season in our area. This is one of our main research objectives. If agricultural yields are maintained in vertical agrivoltaic systems, farmers' income will benefit from combining electricity and crop production.

      The parties for this research effort include farmers, the University of Vermont (UVM), the UVM Horticultural Research Farm, undergraduate and graduate students, and iSun Energy, Inc. Our original plan was to grow a variety of high-value vegetable crops in and outside our planned research and demonstration array at UVM to determine the suitability of this system for Northeastern farms. Data on energy generation, crop yield and quality, light conditions, environmental impacts on the crops, and economic aspects would be compiled to demonstrate the agricultural opportunities and drawbacks of this vertical system for farmers compared with conventional arrays, which occupy 10 times the space. Because of unanticipated delays relevant to the installation of our planned vertical system, vegetable crop production in 2022 occurred in a reference area under full sun to help us interpret future crop outcomes in shaded scenarios. In 2023, we conducted a shade fence experiment to assess vegetable production and microclimatic variables in three shading environments simulating those between vertical solar panels, and in full-sun control sections. We repeated the shade fence experiment in two fields in 2024. Because farming in the Northeast is gradually becoming a thing of the past, farmers have shown an increased interest in the potential to supplement their dwindling incomes with monies derived from solar coupled with crop production. With the onset of vertical bifacial solar systems, this goal may become more achievable. The research described herein represents an investigation of a viable solution to the dilemmas of low farm incomes and loss of farmland.

 

Statement on Divergence from Original Research Plans:

      As indicated previously, many factors beyond our control resulted in delays to the installation of a vertical bifacial solar array for research and demonstration at the UVM Horticulture Research Farm. This novel vertical solar array was the foundational element of our research plans, and its projected installation is currently stalled with no expected start or end date. We continue to work toward the goal of having this array installed, but do not expect its installation to occur before this grant funding has ended, even with a no-cost extension. The vertical solar array installation was originally projected to be completed by July 2022 according to our partner company and solar installer iSun. This would allow crop research to begin in the array that month. However, the project encountered many roadblocks, which repeatedly extended the installation date. Each year, we were assured by iSun that installation would occur by July to permit field research during the growing season, and each year another roadblock was encountered. Therefore, we modified our research plans on short notice every summer of this project, eventually fully pivoting our focus to using shade fences in lieu of a vertical solar array to address our original research objectives as well as possible. Below is a summary of key dates where progress toward installation of the array was made or delayed.

  • 2021: October: iSun commits to installing the bifacial vertical solar array at UVM and projects that the installation will be completed by July 2022.
  • 2022: March: Grant funding begins. June: State of Vermont approves installation plans. July: Legal agreements between UVM and iSun are not yet finalized. Installation is delayed. SARE research begins with full-sun reference trial at UVM Horticulture Farm.
  • 2023: January: Legal agreements between UVM and iSun are finalized. May: iSun requests state extension due to supply chain issues. June: State grants extension to February 2024. Installation is delayed. SARE research with shade fences begins at UVM Horticulture Farm.
  • 2024: February: iSun requests another state extension. March: State requests further details regarding extension request. April: Deadline passes for iSun response to the state. June: iSun files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Installation is delayed. SARE shade fence research expands to two fields at UVM Horticulture Farm. August: iSun is purchased by Siltstone Capital and renamed Legacy Power. November: State denies extension request after no response from Legacy Power. Legacy Power indicates to UVM that installation plans are stalled.

Cooperators

Click linked name(s) to expand/collapse or show everyone's info

Research

Materials and methods:

      In 2022, we developed our experimental design and research methods for the full intended agrivoltaic experiment, which was originally planned to begin that year and to be repeated in 2023 and 2024. We would grow specialty crops in one field between two rows of the vertical agrivoltaic array and in the neighboring field in full sun using the same randomized layout. After it became clear that the installation of the vertical array would be delayed beyond the 2022 growing season, we adjusted our plans and instead grew crops only in the full-sun reference field, in a reduced version of the complete experimental layout. The reference data collected from these crops would support our understanding of their typical growth outside of an agrivoltaic system.

      We used three full-sun crop beds in 2022 to grow root vegetables (beets and carrots), climbing vegetables (pole beans and snap peas), mini head lettuce, and saffron. As planned for future years, each crop category was grown in three repeated blocks. Root and climbing vegetable blocks were randomized separately to determine which crop type (beets or carrots, beans or peas) would be on the north or south end of each of the block. We direct-seeded ‘Boro’ beets (Beta vulgaris ‘Boro’) and ‘Negovia’ carrots (Daucus carota ‘Negovia’) (High Mowing Organic Seeds, Wolcott, VT) in all three crop beds on July 8 and harvested a random sample of beets on September 2 and carrots on October 7. We direct-seeded beans and peas at the southmost end of the outer two crop beds on July 26, installed trellises for them to climb, and harvested all mature beans on October 2 and peas on October 2, October 21, and October 31. We planted lettuce seeds in plug trays on July 7, transplanted seedlings to the field in the southmost end of the center crop bed on August 3, and harvested mature lettuce heads on September 30. We planted saffron corms just south of the beets and carrots on August 24 and harvested flowers as they emerged between October 28 and December 8. All crop beds were drip-irrigated on an as-needed basis by UVM farmer trainees.

      After harvests in 2022, we collected yield data as planned for future years, using a random subsample of individual plants of each crop type from each crop bed in each block. For beets, we recorded the total number of beet roots per randomly sampled area and we collected data for individual unwashed beet roots with leaves removed. This included mass, maximum diameter, and a subjective damage rating. For carrots, we recorded the total number of carrots per randomly sampled area and we collected data for individual washed carrots with leaves removed. This included mass, maximum diameter, length, and subjective damage and quality ratings. We counted bean and pea pods and collected data for each pod including mass, maximum width, length, number of beans or peas per pod, and subjective damage and quality ratings. We counted lettuce heads and collected data for each washed head including mass, maximum circumference, length, and a subjective damage rating. For saffron, we observed mass as the total combined dry weight of all stigmas collected from each crop bed in each block over the entire harvest period. These data represent typical full-sun crop growth.

      In 2023, after learning that the installation of the vertical array would again be delayed beyond the growing season, we designed shade fence structures to mimic the conditions expected in three different locations within the planned agrivoltaic system. The UVM vertical solar array plan involved three rows of solar modules running north-to-south with inter-row spacing of 9.14 m (30 ft.) east-to-west. Each row would be ~2.74 m to ~3.05 m (~9 ft to ~10 ft) tall, including ~0.61 m to ~0.91 m (~2 ft to ~3 ft) of above-ground empty space underneath two stacked solar modules. We selected our shade fence parameters based on output from the Dual-Use Shading Analysis Tool from the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources, which predicts shade on crops in customized agrivoltaic installations. We designed the shade fences so that the shade cast on the two crop rows of interest would match a range of shade levels (by duration and time of day) predicted for different crop beds in the 9.14 m (30 ft.) space between two rows of our planned vertical agrivoltaic system. We developed a 2x4 factorial completely randomized block design with two levels of crop type (beet and carrot, our main crops of interest), four levels of shade (no shade, brief morning shade, brief afternoon shade, and moderate duration afternoon shade), and three blocked replications (south, center, and north). Each block contained each combination of crop type and shade level. We collected data on microenvironments and crop yield in each shade level.

      We installed the shade fences in 2023 in two crop beds ~1.22 m (~4 ft) wide. The beds were spaced ~4.88 m (~16 ft) apart to limit shading of crops in one bed by fences in the other bed. Due to the short height of the shade fences, which was required for structural stability, we designed their sizes and installation locations so that the intended shade treatments would affect two of the three rows of crops in each crop bed. Each “morning shade” fence was offset to the east of its two main crop rows, with the third row to its east. Each “afternoon shade” fence was offset to the west of its two main crop rows, with the third row to its west. We made the shade fence panels using 90% UV light-blocking woven black plastic (HDPE) shade cloth (Coolaroo USA, GALE Pacific USA, Inc., Charlotte, NC). Each panel was ~3.20 m (~10.5 ft) long with a 1.22 m (4 ft) fiberglass stake in a long sleeve at each end for structural support. Fence panels were centered between two 2.13 m (7 ft) steel t-posts buried ~0.91 m (~3 ft) deep and spaced ~3.66 m (~12 ft) apart. They were attached to the end posts with polyester paracord using adjustable knots, and were also tied to a 1.83 m (6 ft) t-post at the center of each panel, buried ~0.61 m (~2 ft) deep. For “brief shade” treatments (fewer hours of the day in shade), fence panels were 0.61 m (2 ft) tall, installed with ~0.61 m (~2 ft) of empty space below the panels. For “moderate” duration shade treatments, panels were 0.91 m (3 ft) tall, installed with ~0.15 m (~0.5 ft) of empty space below the panels. To reduce wind damage to the shade fences, we cut semicircular wind vent flaps in the shade fabric, which were 42.55 cm (16.75 in) in diameter. “Brief shade” panels had four wind vent flaps in one row across the panel, while “moderate” duration panels had two rows of four flaps across the panel. We added larger secondary flaps on the panels to limit sunlight leakage in low-wind conditions. These were only installed on panels next to carrots due to time constraints.

      For the 2023 shade fence experiment, we direct-seeded ‘Boro’ beets and ‘Negovia’ carrots on June 15. We installed shade fences from June 22 to July 3. We redistributed some beets to fill empty areas and thin dense areas on July 20. Starting on August 11, we conducted microenvironmental monitoring using sensors that automatically logged data every five minutes. We measured sunlight as PAR (photosynthetically active radiation), soil moisture, soil temperature, ambient temperature, and relative humidity for each replication of each shade treatment for carrots. On August 14 and 15, we thinned carrots and beets in the field. We harvested beets on August 23, August 29, and September 6 (south, center, and north blocks, respectively) and carrots on September 12, September 21, and October 10 (south, center, and north blocks, respectively). From the two rows with intended shade treatments applied (or all three rows for full-sun controls), we harvested all beets and carrots in the northmost portion of each 3.66 m (12 ft) experimental section, not counting a 0.30 m (1 ft) buffer on the north end. For beets, the length of this sampling section was 1.83 m (6 ft) south of the buffer, and for carrots it was 1.22 m (4 ft). For each shade level in each replication, we measured the total (unwashed) fresh weight of leaves removed from beets and carrots. We then collected yield data from all harvested beets and carrots after washing, except for the full-sun control carrots, from which we measured a randomly selected two-thirds of the roots. We used yield measures similar to those used in 2022 for the full-sun reference crops.

      In 2024, we repeated the shade fence experiment in two fields using the experimental design from 2023, with crop and shade locations randomized separately for each field. All shade panels had secondary flaps covering the wind vents. For the first field experiment, we installed complete shade fences by June 26. We direct-seeded ‘Boro’ beets and ‘Negovia’ carrots on June 28. Starting on July 7, we conducted microenvironmental monitoring for all carrot sections. On July 16 and 17, we reseeded bare spots in the field. From July 29 to August 1, we thinned beets and carrots in the field. We harvested beets on September 23, September 27, and October 9 (south, center, and north blocks, respectively) and carrots on October 16, October 28, and November 7 (south, center, and north blocks, respectively). For the second field experiment, we installed shade fences without secondary flaps covering all wind vents by July 19 and direct-seeded ‘Boro’ beets and ‘Negovia’ carrots on that date. We finished adding secondary flaps over wind vents on July 26. We did not conduct regular microenvironmental monitoring in this field. On August 2 for carrots and August 6 for beets, we reseeded bare spots in the field. On August 16, 23, and 27, we thinned beets and carrots in the field. We harvested beets on November 20 (south block) and December 11 (center and north blocks) and carrots on December 3, 4, and 5 (south, center, and north blocks, respectively). For both fields, we harvested from all three rows of beets and carrots in each shade section and collected data separately for each row. As in 2023, we harvested only the northmost 1.83 m (6 ft) just south of a 0.30m (1 ft) buffer for each experimental section of beets. We did the same for carrots in 2024. Again, we measured the total (unwashed) fresh weight of leaves removed from beets and carrots for each experimental section and collected post-washing yield data similar to 2023.

Research results and discussion:

Full-sun reference data were collected in 2022 and shade fence data were collected in 2023 and 2024. We will compile and analyze results in 2025.

Research conclusions:

Once we have collected and analyzed all research data in 2025, we will share conclusions in the form of a scientific journal article, and in appropriate formats to reach additional audiences.

Participation Summary

Education & Outreach Activities and Participation Summary

Educational activities:

5 Consultations
2 Curricula, factsheets or educational tools
4 On-farm demonstrations
7 Webinars / talks / presentations
1 Workshop field days
2 Other educational activities: Interviews with undergraduate students and a news reporter.

Participation Summary:

28 Farmers participated
226 Number of agricultural educator or service providers reached through education and outreach activities
Outreach description:

      Our main outreach activity to date has been an online workshop on the topic of agrivoltaics in the Northeast US for farmers, solar energy providers, researchers, and other interested parties. The workshop was held on 11/28/23 and was titled “Agriculture & Solar Energy for the Northeast: A Winning Partnership? A Virtual Workshop Exploring Solar Power Opportunities for Farmers”. Here is a link to the recorded set of presentations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4V8WSLHrw1E.

      In 2023, we demonstrated our shade fence research with an on-site farm tour to a group that included Vermont state government officials and individuals from UVM administration and iSun who were involved with the vertical solar array installation project. We have also shared research details on-site to a touring group of individuals who were focused mainly on integrated pest management at the UVM horticulture farm, to undergraduate farm interns, and to a local farmland owner. We have given oral presentations on our research project locally and internationally, and presented a poster at the 2024 Solar Farm Summit in Illinois, where our project plan was a finalist for Dual-Use Plan of The Year for the 2024 North American Agrivoltaics Awards. We have also consulted with other vertical agrivoltaics researchers regarding their related projects, and have been interviewed by one news reporter and by undergraduate students inside and outside of UVM.

      Finally, we plan to publish our research results and a review paper in scientific journals and to present summaries of our results and conclusions to public media outlets and interested groups including farmers, solar energy providers, researchers, and local government officials. We started a website, https://site.uvm.edu/agrivoltaics/, which we will use to showcase those outreach efforts and this vertical agrivoltaics research project.

Project Outcomes

6 Grants applied for that built upon this project
6 Grants received that built upon this project
$40,317.00 Dollar amount of grants received that built upon this project
Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.