Transitioning Sea Farms to Clean Battery Power

Final report for LNE23-478R

Project Type: Research Only
Funds awarded in 2023: $198,750.00
Projected End Date: 02/28/2025
Grant Recipient: The Boat Yard, LLC
Region: Northeast
State: Maine
Project Leader:
Nick Planson
The Boat Yard, LLC
Expand All

Project Information

Summary:

The Boat Yard, LLC (TBY) is expanding on our work with the aquaculture industry to build and deploy battery solutions to power on-water farming and harvesting operations. We are focusing on building, from existing prototypes, a suite of clean power solutions that can be safely operated in wet environments to replace gas and diesel generators currently used by sea farms. We have evaluated what equipment to use and how much battery capacity is needed for operations and will now determine which electric motors and pumps to use, and how the batteries will be recharged to address the current gaps in knowledge in this area.

By researching, building, and deploying battery solutions for sea farms through this project, we will help transition the aquaculture industry away from fossil fuel generators. Our innovation creates much-needed alternatives for sea farmers whose current fossil fuel-dependent systems are noisier, more expensive to fuel and maintain, and pollute. The benefits of battery power make it an attractive solution to sea farmers everywhere.

Led by PI Nick Planson over the duration of the grant, TBY successfully built a suite of clean power solutions for sea farms through the following seven project objectives:

  1. Survey sea farmers about power needs on their farms, identifying greatest needs
  2. Aggregate specifications and catalog available batteries and components to service aquaculture needs
  3. Identify equipment that can be powered using DC power from batteries
  4. Create a suite of battery-powered solutions that can be replicated by individual sea farms or customized, modified, and installed by TBY
  5. Perform a cost-benefit analysis of battery-powered solutions vs. fossil fuel generators
  6. Deploy and test portable battery-powered systems on sea farms
  7. Conduct outreach to sea farmers, Extension professionals, and other stakeholders

To successfully test, evaluate, and develop our suite of power solutions, we have completed the tasks below.

  • Complete Duty Cycle analysis on at-sea farm equipment
  • Identify replacement equipment that can be powered by batteries
  • Identify optimal batteries and wiring to power that equipment
  • Identify various charging solutions for batteries
  • Acquire and test each prototype configuration in workshop and at sea, gather and document performance relative to required duty cycles
  • Address performance issues
  • Deploy configurations on sea farms, test, and document feedback

Farmers have a high interest in reducing their environmental impact through decreased air, water, and noise pollution. Farmers are also highly motivated by the potential to save fuel and maintenance costs. These statements were proven accurate during our site visits to kick off this project. Many aquaculture species clean the water as they grow – processing them with zero-carbon solutions will further enhance their environmental benefits and will lead to a carbon-neutral or carbon-negative supply chain.

Project Objective:

TBY will build a suite of clean power solutions, from existing products, for the marine aquaculture industry. The technology is proven cost-effective and reliable – now it needs to be simplified and standardized to make it easily accessible by all sea farmers. Replacing gas and diesel generators and pumps with battery-powered alternatives will reduce operating costs, the industry’s carbon footprint, noise affecting neighbors and workers, and eliminate the possibility of fuel and oil spills.

Introduction:

Sea farmers currently spend an inordinate amount of time and money operating, fueling, and maintaining gas and diesel generators to power equipment on the water at their farms. Fossil fuel is the main power source in aquaculture, and its combustion generates a large amount of greenhouse gases and other emissions (Korican, 2022). A typical fish farm requires between 200,000 and 450,000 kWh of electricity a year, supplied by diesel-powered generators (Ford, 2021). Data on energy use in aquaculture is sparse and varies greatly – from 17 to 20 MJ/kg of pangasius, to 18 to 27 MJ/kg of tilapia (Eurofish, 2022). Even a small oyster farm could have three or more small generators, each creating noise, air, and water pollution through the inevitably leaked or spilled fuel and oil. Our innovation will create much-needed alternatives for sea farmers whose current risk of polluting the surrounding environment. The many benefits of battery power make it an attractive solution to sea farmers everywhere.

Our novel approach aims to solve the many financial and environmental risks associated with fossil fuel generators. The resulting electric power suite will enhance the sustainability and resilience of sea farms as well as improve the quality of life of sea farmers, in direct connection with NESARE’s mission.

The global aquaculture market was valued at $204B in 2020 and is expected to reach $262B by the end of 2026 with Asia and Europe accounting for more than 70% of the world’s aquaculture production (Trade.gov, 2020). In contrast, the U.S. is behind in aquaculture production, ranking 17th in worldwide aquaculture production (Sadusky, 2022). There is a significant opportunity in the U.S., and in particular, the Northeast, to further expand and support the aquaculture industry. Aquaculture is an important and lucrative industry in Maine that has seen steady growth in the last decade. Industry experts anticipate this industry will continue to grow, estimating it will double by 2029 (McEvoy, 2019). At this time, there are approximately 150 lease sites and nearly 700 limited purpose aquaculture (LPA) license sites in Maine. These aquaculture operations will serve as the initial target market for our electric batteries and can be adopted nationally and internationally. All aquaculture farms worldwide could benefit from these solutions. We are already collaborating with small oyster farmers, kelp farmers, and some of the largest salmon farmers worldwide on this project.

In this project, we expanded our work with the aquaculture industry to build and deploy battery solutions to power on-water farms and harvest operations. The technology now exists to cost-effectively replace these combustion power sources with a suite of battery-powered solutions that can be safely operated in wet environments. These batteries are paired with electric motors and pumps and can either be recharged on land or using renewables on the water.

Research

Hypothesis:

TBY will build a suite of clean power solutions to replace fossil fuel generators currently used by sea farms.

We will test and evaluate the following research questions:

  • What are the various types of common ICE-powered equipment on sea farms
  • How and how much are they used?
  • What are readily available DC-powered alternatives?
  • What are the best battery and charging solutions to power DC motors and DC hydraulic power packs on sea farms?
  • What are simple, safe, and optimal designs for battery-powered sea farm equipment?
  • What is the cost-benefit analysis of battery power vs. fossil fuels generators?
Materials and methods:

The following treatments/objectives and tasks/methods were proposed as part of the original application. Updates for each objective and tasks is outlined in the “Project Outcomes” > “Additional Outcomes Narrative” section of the report.

a. Treatments

  1. Survey sea farmers about their portable power requirements, determine duty cycles, and desired power characteristics to identify the greatest needs
  2. Aggregate specifications and catalog available batteries and components to service aquaculture needs through duty cycle analyses of existing ICE-powered aquaculture equipment (e.g., oyster tumblers and sorters, kelp and mooring winches, hydraulic power packs for cranes or DC cranes, and line haulers)
  3. Identification of alternative equipment that can be powered using DC power from batteries (e.g., DC motors and hydraulic power packs) and identification of batteries and battery-protective equipment to safely deploy batteries at sea
  4. Create a suite of battery-powered solutions that can be replicated by individual sea farms or customized, modified, and installed by TBY and develop logistical approaches for recharging batteries either onshore or on farms (using renewable sources)
  5. Perform a cost-benefit analysis of battery-powered solutions vs. fossil fuel generators
  6. Deploy and test portable battery-powered systems on sea farms
  7. Conduct outreach to sea farmers, Extension professionals, and other stakeholders

b. Methods

Task 1: Survey (March 2023 to August 2023)

TBY will conduct a survey of sea farmers about their portable power consumption needs to identify the greatest needs as well as their interest in adopting the technology. Survey results will be collected by TBY and analyzed. Results will inform other tasks and prototype designs. In this task, we did the following:

  1. Determined survey platform and create relevant survey questions
  2. Identified survey participants and perform outreach for completion of survey
  3. Analyzed survey results and create findings report

Task 2: Equipment duty cycle analysis (June 2023 to September 2023)
Using information aggregated in Task 1, TBY will identify common on-water equipment typically powered by ICE generators on finfish, shellfish, and seaweed farms. We verified that batteries powering direct current (DC) motors and/or DC hydraulic power pack solutions will provide sufficient power (as measured in horsepower or kilowatts) for enough time to meet the defined equipment use profiles. This will also determine charger requirements and options. Methods will include the following:

  1. Analysis of baseline and comparable use data gathering for the existing on-farm equipment including an assessment of:
    1. Work time logs
    2. Fuel consumption
    3. Weather patterns
    4. Worst case scenario definition
    5. Existing troubleshooting or emergency protocols
  2. Detailed fuel log and receipt verification
  3. Generator and power pack maintenance records
  4. Review of manufacturer power curves and available empirical data from operating equipment
  5. Location and specifications of planned charging infrastructure

Data will be gathered by TBY. Hyde Renewables (HRE) will analyze and review the defined power and energy profiles and modeled system performance and availability. HRE will present its assumptions, potential risks identified, and any limitations expected to TBY and project stakeholders.

Task 3: Identification of DC motors and DC hydraulic power packs (October 2023 to December 2023)

HRE and TBY will work with equipment manufacturers to identify DC motors and DC hydraulic power packs that will meet the needs and rugged environments of aquaculture farms. Using DC equipment avoids the losses resulting from converting DC battery power to AC power using an inverter. TBY will vet the equipment identified with sea farmers to confirm its suitability. HRE will leverage the above duty-cycle analysis results to calculate battery requirements for the DC motors and power packs, advise sources of applicable batteries, design the general wiring, safety measures, and controls required for safe and reliable operation, and conduct desktop validation of the performance expectations provided by sea farms. The purpose of this validation is to confirm and compare the battery, motor, and pump manufacturers’ described performance with known variables, use case specific factors, and stakeholder needs and risk tolerance. The methods include a review of:

  1. Manufacturer-provided power curves based on simulated performance
  2. Available empirical manufacturer data on power curve and availability performance
  3. Manufacturer maintenance schedules, as well as corrective maintenance logs if available
  4. Manufacturer spare parts recommendations
  5. Manufacturer warranty documents, including service level obligations for warranty claims and corrective action based on the project region

HRE will present its assumptions, potential risks identified, and limitations expected to TBY.

Task 4: Construction and testing of power solutions (October 2023 to March 2024)
TBY will source required equipment for beta-prototype configurations to battery-power relevant equipment, including tumblers, sorters, winches, and small cranes, based on identified needs and solutions identified in Tasks 1-3. Leveraging HRE’s designs, TBY will construct and configure the systems for testing in real-world applications on sea farms. TBY will collect feedback on the performance of the prototypes to determine the success of the project and address any identified issues.

Task 5: Cost-benefit analysis (April 2024 to June 2024)

This task will critically evaluate estimated purchase prices from suppliers and shipping costs to determine the upfront costs of battery/charger configurations at specific power levels and how these costs compare to ICE generators. Lifecycle financial analysis will include costs of electricity, maintenance and battery transport for the beta-prototype configurations and costs of fuel, maintenance, and fuel transport and storage for the ICE generators. Refinements of these estimates, combined with other cost considerations, will determine the feasibility of replacing ICE generators with beta-prototype configurations of cleaner battery power. This work will be completed by PI Planson with assistance from HRE and Atlantic Corporation.

Task 6: Deploy and test portable battery-powered systems on sea farms (April 2024 to September 2024)

Utilizing TBY’s extensive network of sea farmers, new prototypes will be deployed and tested in real-life situations on sea farms. Data and feedback from sea farms will be gathered by TBY to address any final performance issues.

Task 7: Outreach and presentation of results (October 2024 to February 2025)

The results of this project will be summarized and reported to the committee. The report or synthesized data will be shared widely and made available to stakeholders across the aquaculture industry. Specific outreach efforts are outlined below in Section d. and in the previous Outreach to Farmers section.

c. Data Collection

Data will be collected by the project leader and by sea farmers testing equipment, at various stages of the project. This will be done in a systematic way to capture all crucial data needed to develop strong prototypes and demonstrate the results of the project to all across the aquaculture industry. Data to be collected includes:

  • Sea farmer survey: Initial data will be collected through a survey of sea farmers to identify the greatest power needs of their operations. This information will inform later stages of the design and testing of our prototypes.
  • Testing data of prototypes: TBY will test each prototype prior to deployment to identify the most efficient configuration. Data will be collected to identify and address any performance issues before deploying them to sea farms.
  • Performance data of prototypes: Once deployed, our prototype configurations will be closely monitored and tested by sea farmers. Farmers will communicate feedback and results to TBY to be shared throughout the industry.

d. Data Analysis and Presentation of Results

Final data will be analyzed by the PI and team and published in a findings report. All designs and research results will be published on TBY’s website (www.theboatyard.me) and will be widely available to aquaculture stakeholders. We presented the findings through industry events, conference presentations, and Sea Grant workshops.

Research results and discussion:

Throughout the duration of the grant, TBY completed Tasks 1-7, as described in Section b. Methods above. The results are summarized below.

Task 1: Survey

We performed a combination of phone, online, and in person interviews and data collection sessions, supported by ArcGIS Survey123, iPad photos and notes, notepads, and Fluke meters. We documented what challenges sea farmers face, what ambitions, and wish list items they have, and what equipment they are currently using, when, and for how long. We measured inrush and steady-state loads. We met with sea farmers in Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Georgia, Alaska, Washington, Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, and beyond. Results have been summarized in spreadsheets, photos, PowerPoint presentations, and prototyping budgets. The final survey data is available to the program director in Appendix A of the printed report. Nick Planson led the work on this task, with support from Chad Strater, and Kyle Dorsey over the second half of 2023.

Task 2: Duty Cycle Analysis

Duty cycle analysis data was collected from over 40 in-person farm visits in Task 1, as well as additional remote interviews of sea farm owners and operators. Farms varied drastically in size, complexity, and maturity; thus, a wide swathe of opportunities were identified. Some farm visits and data collection occurred via the Survey123 iPad-based app; however, the vast majority of input was from conversation, notes, and photographs. High-level fuel consumption and maintenance estimates were sufficient to determine the costs and logistics of operating existing farm machinery, thus it quickly became clear that collecting detailed fuel logs, receipts, and maintenance records was unnecessary and an inefficient use of farmers’ time. All necessary data was collected for needs assessment and solution design in the next tasks of the project. Throughout the second half of 2023 TBY staff, aquaculture farmers, and technical resources reviewed the data collected, use profiles, fuel usage, equipment used, seasonality, geographical considerations, and access to charging infrastructure to identify the best opportunities for electrification. Much depends on the size of the sea farm and the farming techniques. Smaller farms primarily rely on gasoline-powered generators and pumps; larger farms rely on gasoline-powered hydraulic power packs. Noise reductions are the primary driver of interest from sea farmers in electrification; emissions reduction, greater reliability, and cost improvements are secondary drivers. A detailed analysis with graphics and charts will be included in the final report.

Data collection and high-level analysis was completed by Nick Planson, Chad Strater, and Kyle Dorsey between August 2023 and November 2023. This was about a 60-day delay on our original target, which is mostly attributed to securing assessment times with farms during their peak season. 

Task 3: Identification of DC motors and DC hydraulic power packs

This task was originally delayed by 60 days from our original deadline due to the timeline change in Task 1. TBY, Philip Rench, and HRE worked with equipment manufacturers, sea farmers, and other marine operators to identify DC motors and pumps that will meet the needs of aquaculture farms. We then vetted the identified equipment with sea farmers to confirm suitability and deployed them on sea farms on a trial basis.

HRE used the duty-cycle analysis results from Task 2 to calculate battery requirements for the DC motors and power packs. We identified the ideal source of applicable batteries, Epoch Batteries, based on their marine credentials, 11-year warranties, and on-board Bluetooth monitoring and heating. HRE has begun designing the general wiring, safety measures, and controls required for safe and reliable operation and have conducted desktop validation of the performance expectation provided by sea farms. The purpose of this validation is to confirm and compare the battery, motor, and pump manufacturers’ described performance with known variables, use case-specific factors, and stakeholder needs and risk tolerance. We have also identified and acquired readily available floating platforms for this equipment and have learned thoroughly from the sea farming industry on what has and hasn’t worked well when using solar/electric on sea farms. This has informed our team’s designs and equipment selections. Preliminary electrical designs have developed alongside the equipment selection. Work is ongoing to identify and size the correct solar panels, racking, and charge controllers for these implementations.

TBY and HRE have completed a working draft of the Single Line Diagram and Equipment Layout in standard Electrical Drawing Software, AutoCAD. The draft ensures that the equipment layout allows for the specified use case of the pontoon as defined by the sea farmers, while meeting the highest electrical safety standards for working conditions.

The latest review of electrical loads (Tumbler Motor, Outboard Propulsion Motor, Line Hauler Motor, and Water Pump) require updates to the battery configuration. The teams have also identified a use case in which Torqeedo Batteries will be utilized alongside Epoch batteries which will require a redesign of the charging configuration.

The final steps of the electrical design will be sizing conductors, protection devices and electrical enclosures for safe operation based on maximum load conditions. This will be accompanied by details for attachment points and a Bill of Materials detailing equipment specs. 

Task 4: Construction and testing of power solutions

In Task 4, we constructed and tested beta-prototype configurations of battery-powered equipment, including tumblers, sorters, and haulers based on the needs and solutions identified in the previous tasks. We focused on sourcing the necessary equipment and collecting feedback to assess the success of the prototypes and address any issues.

The prototypes generally performed well in the demanding conditions of sea farms. Battery-powered tumblers and sorters showed significant reductions in operational noise and emissions, aligning with farmers’ priorities identified in earlier tasks.

Farmers reported high satisfaction with the noise reduction and ease of use of the battery-powered equipment. The reliability of the equipment was positively noted, with minimal downtime and maintenance required during the testing period. Some performance issues arose and are being addressed on an ongoing basis. Figures 1-5 show the completed prototypes. 

Task 5: Cost-benefit Analysis

TBY, with assistance from Atlantic Corporation, conducted a comprehensive cost benefit analysis of fossil fuel powered gas generators vs an electric alternative. We explored the usage of three different models of gas generators which differed in their cost of purchase as well as fuel consumption.

We completed a Lifecycle Financial Analysis and calculated the overall costs associated with three models of gas generators, namely the Ryobi 3400, the Predator 4375 and the Honda EU2200i. We also calculated the overall costs associated with the electric alternative.

We then did a cost benefit analysis and compared the economic benefit of using each of the three models of gas generators vs using the electric alternative.

In addition to the economic benefits, we also looked at the environmental benefits (reduced carbon emissions) associated with using the electric alternative.

We determined that the electric alternative offers substantial economic as well as environmental benefits which will make it an attractive option for sea farmers everywhere. The economic benefits will include increased ROI, and the environmental benefits will include reducing their environmental impact through decreased air, water, and noise pollution.

Task 6: Deploy and test portable battery-powered systems on sea farms

The primary objective of Task 6.1 was to deploy and test portable battery-powered systems on active sea farms in Maine. These deployments were critical to evaluating real-world performance, usability, reliability, and environmental resilience of the clean energy systems developed throughout this project. Deployment and testing were led by Nick Planson and Chad Strater of The Boat Yard, with support from Kyle Dorsey and partner technicians. We deployed portable battery-powered equipment at six diverse sea farms across coastal Maine:

  • Blackstone Point Oysters – Damariscotta, ME
  • Nauti Sisters Sea Farm – Yarmouth, ME
  • Madeleine Point Oyster Farms – Freeport, ME
  • Beso del Mar Oysters – Harpswell, ME
  • Butterfield Shellfish – Brunswick, ME
  • Maine Ocean Farms – Casco Bay, ME
  • Cranberry Oysters – Great Cranberry Island, ME

Each site was selected for its unique environmental conditions, operational scale, and farming methods (oysters, kelp, and multi-species operations). Prototype battery systems were delivered to these farms between April and August 2024 and tested in situ for daily farming activities such as tumbling, washing, line hauling, and sorting.

Sea farmers were provided with training, documentation, and support from TBY personnel to integrate the equipment into their regular operations. Performance data was gathered via onboard battery diagnostics and in-field observations. Qualitative feedback was collected through structured check-ins, field notes, and follow-up interviews.

Deployment occurred between April and September 2024, with monitoring continuing through the end of the project window. The systems performed successfully across all six farms, with the following key findings:

  • Performance: Battery-powered systems consistently met operational needs for the majority of farm tasks. Runtime was sufficient for daily operations, and overnight recharging with standard shore power or solar panels proved viable.
  • Noise and Emissions Reduction: Farmers universally appreciated the reduced noise levels, and the elimination of exhaust fumes compared to ICE generators.
  • Reliability: Minimal maintenance was required overall. However, several farms experienced issues with malfunctioning water pumps and intermittent failures of control buttons. These reliability concerns prompted additional troubleshooting, redesign, and testing of pump hardware and control interfaces.
  • Usability: The lightweight and modular nature of the systems made transport and set up straightforward. Some farmers requested physical design improvements, including handles or wheels to assist with mobility on boats and docks.

Real-world deployments confirmed the technical feasibility and broad appeal of the battery systems. The feedback gathered has informed final adjustments to improve durability and ease-of-use. These findings directly shaped Task 7.1 outreach materials and commercialization strategy. Our next steps related to this task include:

  • Upgrade waterproofing and connector designs to improve performance in rough marine conditions
  • Develop a user guide for safe and optimal operation based on field testing
  • Explore packaging options (handles, waterproof containers, trolleys) to improve transport and mobility on boats and docks

Task 7: Outreach and presentation of results

In Task 7, The Boat Yard worked to disseminate the results of this SARE-funded project to stakeholders across the U.S. aquaculture industry. Outreach efforts were multifaceted and included:

  • Participation in aquaculture conferences and industry events
  • Presentations at co-ops and extension-hosted workshops
  • On-site demonstrations with farmers and service providers
  • Digital and print communications through The Boat Yard’s website and social media
  • Collaboration with Maine Sea Grant, Maine Aquaculture Innovation Center, and Maine Aquaculture Association for wider dissemination

Additionally, the project was presented at several high-visibility venues and industry events, including:

  • Aquaculture America 2025 (poster presentation)
  • Maine Aquaculture Association Annual Meeting
  • Northeast Aquaculture Conference & Exposition (NACE)
  • Maine Fishermen’s Forum (panel + presentation)
  • Massachusetts Aquaculture Association annual meeting
  • Cleantech Open Regional and Global Forums
  • Maine Oyster Festival
  • Maine Outdoor Economy Summit
  • Common Ground Fair
  • Work Boat Conference meetings
  • Canadian Maritimes customer discovery trip

Social media content also reached a broad audience and helped stimulate inquiries from sea farmers and sustainability-focused marine technology companies. The Boat Yard also used direct farmer engagement and community events, like the Common Ground Fair, to answer questions, gather feedback, and support easy adapters of the technology. Our outreach efforts reached farmers, educators, clean energy professionals, aquaculture innovators, and policymakers – building momentum toward wider adoption of zero-emissions sea farm systems.

This Task was completed by Nick Planson, Chad Strater, and Kyle Dorsey with support from participating sea farms, Maine Ocean Farms, Nauti Sisters Sea Farms, and other partner organizations, as listed above. Outreach activities took place from Spring 2023 through February 2025. 

Research conclusions:

Task 1: Survey

The conclusion of the task is a detailed understanding of the equipment used on regenerative sea farms, the duty cycles, and the challenges and frustrations users face. The results directly inform us of what technology we need to develop and what power and energy requirements it needs to support. There were no deviations from the original objectives; however, the method we used was slightly altered from the proposal. We originally proposed a formal, single, survey using an online platform. After working with the farms, we determined an informal focus group-type approach was much more fruitful and provided us with all the necessary data.

Task 2: Duty Cycle Analysis

The overarching conclusion of this task was the prioritized feasibility of the development plan, as follows:

  • DC pump for battery + solar oyster upweller, with remote alert and monitoring, possibly with on-board gantry crane
  • Fully DC-powered oyster farming equipment (tumbler, washdown + pressure washing pump, and line hauler), with portable and/or solar-charged batteries, without hydraulics or inverting to AC power
  • Battery-over-hydraulic knuckle boom cranes for workboats and farm barges, with sufficient batteries to meet duty cycles using overnight shore charging

Other potential technologies we may explore through other funding avenues include:

  • Battery-over-hydraulic knuckle boom cranes with sufficient batteries and on-farm recharging from renewables
  • DC to AC inverted power solutions for existing on-farm AC-powered equipment
  • DC hydraulic power packs to replace the gasoline motors on existing on-farm hydraulic power packs

Now that the team has identified focus areas for Task 4: Construction and testing of power solutions, future work will include a targeted, more detailed, analysis of the duty cycles, seasonality, and reliability of the equipment we’ll be developing in the following categories. As systems are configured, they will be tested on land, then at sea, with farmers. Performance, usability, and safety feedback will be immediately incorporated into improved designs through an iterative process of continuous improvement:

  • DC pump for battery + solar oyster upweller, with remote alert and monitoring, possibly with onboard gantry crane: The next steps are to work hand-in-hand with oyster farmers on their experience with AC-powered grid-connected upwellers and learn from others who’ve built their own solar-powered upwellers (e.g., learn from an upcoming presentation at the NACE conference). We continued working with the best-known upweller pump company to collaboratively develop a DC-powered pump and will integrate a cellular communication component to alert farmers if the pump stops working. A high degree of reliability is required as oyster seed will die within 3-4 hours if sea water stops being circulated by the pump. Once constructed, wen ran the solar upweller for several weeks before putting oyster seed in it, to confirm reliability, redundancy, and alert functionality.
  • Fully DC-powered oyster farming equipment (tumbler, washdown + pressure washing pump, and line hauler), with portable and/or solar-charged batteries, without hydraulics or inverting to AC power: We configured, integrated, and constructed this comprehensive system in a small format that will fit on a collaborating farmer’s boat, she then tested it, and we continuously improved it.
  • Battery-over-hydraulic knuckle boom cranes for workboats and farm barges, with sufficient batteries to meet duty cycles using overnight shore charging: We continued discussions with hydraulic power companies to assess the feasibility of a battery-powered hydraulic power pack meeting the duty-cycle needs of oyster farms. We acquired a hydraulic knuckle boom crane and integrated it with an electric motor, batteries, and controls, similar to those we’ll be using for the above-mentioned DC-powered oyster farming equipment. We and our partner farmers tested the functionality, durability, and power needs of this equipment.

There were no deviations from the original objective. In some cases, the data collection and analysis methods were adjusted to reflect real-world information availability and efficiency.

Task 3: Identification of DC motors and DC hydraulic power packs

The conclusion of Task 3 is that Epoch Batteries are the ideal applicable battery for our use case based on their marine credentials, 11-year warranties, and on-board Bluetooth monitoring and heating.  We have also identified and acquired readily available floating platforms for this equipment and have learned thoroughly from the sea farming industry on what has and hasn’t worked well when using solar/electric on sea farms. This has informed our team’s designs and equipment selections. From these findings, we were able to work with HRE to create a preliminary design of the solar canopy.

Task 4: Construction and testing of power solutions

The successful testing of our prototypes has validated the design choices made and confirmed the viability of battery-powered equipment in sea farming operations. The feedback collected from sea farmers and operators will help us determine further refinement of the equipment, focusing on optimizing size, weight, and cooling systems. We built on the results of this task through three actionable steps:

  • Refinement of Prototypes: TBY will work on optimizing the design of the equipment to address the issues related to weight, size, and battery cooling
  • Expansion of Testing: In future phases, we will expand the testing to additional sea farms with different environmental conditions to ensure the equipment’s adaptability and to improve electrical configurations and end-use equipment
  • Continued Collaboration: We will continue working closely with sea farmers to refine the prototypes and ensure they meet the diverse needs of different farming operations.

The insights gained from this task will guide the continued development and deployment of our sustainable power solutions for the aquaculture industry.

Task 5: Cost-benefit analysis

Through our cost-benefit analysis and lifecycle financial analysis, we determined that the electric alternative offers substantial economic and environmental benefits. The primary economic benefit was an increased ROI, and the main environmental benefit included reducing sea farmers’ environmental impact as a result of decreased air, water, and noise pollution. These benefits will make it an attractive option for sea farmers everywhere.

Task 6: Deploy and test portable battery-powered systems on sea farms

Real-world deployments confirmed the technical feasibility and broad appeal of the battery systems. The feedback gathered has informed final adjustments to improve durability and ease-of-use. These findings directly shaped Task 7.1 outreach materials and commercialization strategy. Our next steps related to this task include:

  • Upgrade waterproofing and connector designs to improve performance in rough marine conditions
  • Develop a user guide for safe and optimal operation based on field testing
  • Explore packaging options (handles, waterproof containers, trolleys) to improve transport and mobility on boats and docks

Task 7: Outreach and presentation of result

The outreach efforts significantly increased awareness of battery-powered alternatives in aquaculture. Farmer interest in adopting clean power systems has grown, and several commercial collaborations are underway to support ongoing deployment and refinement. Next steps will include:

  • Continue to maintain and expand online educational resources
  • Develop formal workshops and certification-style trainings for system use and maintenance
  • Collaborate with Maine Sea Grant and others to create a farmer-friendly version of the project’s technical guide
Participation Summary
21 Farmers participating in research

Education & Outreach Activities and Participation Summary

Educational activities:

7 On-farm demonstrations
1 Online trainings
5 Tours
21 Webinars / talks / presentations
19 Workshop field days
5 Other educational activities

Participation Summary:

20 Farmers participated
10 Number of agricultural educator or service providers reached through education and outreach activities
Outreach description:

Educational activities throughout the project included 21 presentations, webinars, and talks as well as 19 field days and on-site demonstrations across Maine and beyond. While many of these engagements were integrated into our data collection process, they provided invaluable opportunities for farmer education, knowledge exchange, and hands-on exploration of emerging clean power technologies.

Each visit to a participating farm included not only technical evaluation and equipment testing, but also open conversations about the benefits and limitations of battery-powered systems. These interactions helped sea farmers better understand the trade-offs between AC and DC power, the operational considerations of electrified tools, and the broader environmental and economic impacts of shifting away from internal combustion engines.

In many cases, these interactions sparked immediate ideas for improving workflow, reducing reliance on generators, or adapting gear for quieter, cleaner operation. Farmers were encouraged to share their firsthand experiences, which shaped iterative improvements to our prototypes and informed our outreach messaging.

We also presented findings and early designs at major industry events such as Aquaculture 2025, the largest aquaculture conference and tradeshow globally, attracting nearly 4,000 attendees from over 90 countries. These venues gave us a platform to reach hundreds of stakeholders at once—including farmers, researchers, students, engineers, and policy professionals—and receive meaningful feedback in return.

Additionally, we collaborated with Maine Sea Grant and the Maine Aquaculture Innovation Center through their Aquaculture in Shared Waters program, which has helped hundreds of fishermen, farmers, and professionals start or improve shellfish and seaweed businesses in Maine. This partnership allowed us to integrate our clean power solutions into established training curricula, reaching a broader audience of prospective aquaculturists.

As we prepare for the commercial rollout of our suite of clean power tools, we will shift from project-based engagement toward a more formal, curriculum-based educational model. This will include:

  • Training workshops hosted in collaboration with Sea Grant, aquaculture co-ops, and extension programs
  • Online tutorials and videos featuring setup, operation, and maintenance of battery-powered gear
  • User manuals and quick-start guides available through our website and at in-person events
  • Product showcases and test-drive events at working waterfronts across the Northeast

This two-phase outreach strategy—education during R&D followed by structured customer support post-launch—ensures that our tools are both accessible and usable by a broad range of sea farmers. Our goal is to empower farmers not only to adopt cleaner technology, but to become advocates and educators themselves within the aquaculture community.

Learning Outcomes

20 Farmers reported changes in knowledge, attitudes, skills and/or awareness as a result of their participation
10 Service providers reported changes in knowledge, attitudes, skills and/or awareness as a result of project outreach
10 Educators or agricultural service providers reported changes in knowledge, skills, and/or attitudes as a result of their project outreach
Key areas in which farmers reported changes in knowledge, attitude, skills and/or awareness:

Increased awareness of battery and renewable application to marine operations

Awareness of viable replacements for ICE generators and power packs on farms
Awareness alternatives to coolers and ice

Project Outcomes

2 Grants applied for that built upon this project
1 Grant received that built upon this project
$181,500.00 Dollar amount of grant received that built upon this project
25 New working collaborations
Additional Outcomes:

Based on some of the early findings from our field visits, it was apparent that farm operators would also be interested in electric boats and barges to coincide with the development of a suite of clean power tools. Because farmers would be seeking a way to transport and operate the tools on-water, we elected to apply for funding to develop an electric work boat (USDA SBIR Phase I) and electric boat tender (NOAA SBIR Phase I). The USDA Phase I was awarded in topic area 8.7 “Aquaculture” and the NOAA SBIR Phase I is currently in review. Successful completion of the SBIR project will further advance the development of the tools developed as part of the SARE workplan and collectively impact a larger number of farms and value-added producers.

Success stories:

Several farmers are successfully transitioning to renewable electric power solutions on their farms:

  • Blackstone Point Oysters in Damariscotta, ME, and Nauti Sisters Sea Farm in Yarmouth, ME, have both deployed and tested portable battery-powered systems on their farms. These systems have proven to be reliable and efficient for daily farming activities such as tumbling, washing, line hauling, and sorting.

  • Madeleine Point Oyster Farms in Freeport, ME, and Beso del Mar Oysters in Harpswell, ME, are also integrating battery-powered systems into their operations. Farmers at these sites have reported high satisfaction with the noise reduction and ease of use of the equipment.

 

  • Butterfield Shellfish in Brunswick, ME, and Maine Ocean Farms in Casco Bay, ME, have experienced minimal maintenance issues and appreciated the elimination of exhaust fumes compared to internal combustion engine (ICE) generators. They are both increasingly moving to fully-electric equipment.

 

  • Cranberry Oysters on Great Cranberry Island, ME, has successfully tested and deployed the battery-powered systems, confirming their technical feasibility and broad appeal.

  • Deer Isle Oyster Farm is moving to solar refrigeration on their electric work truck.

  • The New Meadows River Oyster Co-Operative will be deploying a solar-powered oyster processing barge.

  • Farmers in other states are pursuing related projects, and we expect many more to follow.

These farmers have been able to reduce their environmental impact through decreased air, water, and noise pollution. The battery-powered systems have consistently met operational needs, with sufficient runtime for daily operations and viable overnight recharging options using standard shore power or solar panels.

Assessment of Project Approach and Areas of Further Study:

One area that proved more challenging than anticipated was the time it took to collect farm data. While we designed the project around close engagement with farmers, we underestimated the demands on their time during peak farming seasons, particularly in the summer and early fall. Many sea farmers were operating on tight schedules and weather-dependent harvest windows, which delayed our ability to collect detailed operational data, perform in-depth duty cycle measurements, and observe equipment in use under controlled conditions. While this extended our task-specific timelines, it did not significantly impact the overall delivery of the project.

We also encountered variability in farm infrastructure and workboat setups, which necessitated more custom adaptation of power systems than originally expected. This highlighted the importance of modular design and flexible configurations, suggesting a need for further R&D into "plug-and-play" electrification systems that can be easily adapted to different vessels, gear types, and workflows.

One important area of ongoing exploration is the trade-off between AC and DC equipment. While DC systems tend to be more energy-efficient and safer in wet environments, particularly when paired directly with battery systems, we found that some farm workflows and legacy equipment are still best served by AC-powered tools. The ability to offer both configurations, or hybrid systems, is essential. Further testing and documentation of AC vs. DC system performance, integration complexity, and cost implications is recommended.

Another consistent technical challenge was the reliability of saltwater-compatible water pumps. Despite careful component selection and multiple rounds of iteration, pump durability and performance in marine environments continue to be an issue. This underscores the need for further research, product development, and potentially industry standards specific to aquaculture pumping systems.

Early failures in pumps and control buttons also revealed that even commercially available “marine-rated” components may not be sufficient without added waterproofing, strain relief, and thermal protection. These issues were resolved through redesign and additional field testing but suggest a broader need for aquaculture-specific performance standards for electric and battery-powered equipment.

We also identified opportunities to improve the reliability and uptime of our remote monitoring and cloud-connectivity systems. While the potential for real-time alerts and performance tracking is significant—particularly for mission-critical equipment like upweller pumps—we encountered challenges related to cellular connectivity, software stability, and hardware integration. We plan to continue improving this functionality, with an emphasis on redundancy, offline fallback capabilities, and robust alerts for farm operators.

Further study is also warranted in the areas of:

  • Solar + battery integration on floating platforms, especially under variable weather conditions.
  • Battery lifecycle and environmental impact, particularly disposal and recycling at end-of-life.
  • Farmer training and support as essential elements of successful adoption—technology alone is not enough.

Finally, the enthusiasm we encountered from farmers during outreach underscores a growing demand for cleaner, quieter, and more efficient power solutions. A future project might focus on more rigorous, longitudinal testing of these systems across multiple seasons, as well as the development of financing mechanisms, cooperative purchasing programs, or subsidy structures to support widespread adoption.

This project laid a strong foundation, and we hope the lessons learned here will guide and support future work in clean energy integration for aquaculture and other working waterfront industries.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.