Hemp Fiber – Finding Value in the Supply Chain

Final report for ONE22-410

Project Type: Partnership
Funds awarded in 2022: $29,465.00
Projected End Date: 01/31/2024
Grant Recipient: University of Vermont Extension
Region: Northeast
State: Vermont
Project Leader:
Dr. Heather Darby
University of Vermont Extension
Expand All

Project Information

Summary:

As hemp fiber markets start to emerge farmers are beginning to explore markets for this new crop. Providing farmers with regionally specific production and harvesting requirements for fiber hemp will help them better meet emerging market demands.

This project evaluated varieties suitable for hemp fiber in the region to help farmers maximize yield and quality. Varieties ranged from 97 to 160 days until grain maturity. Hemp fiber is commonly harvested between full flower and right before grain formation with the early varieties harvested on 8-August and the late maturing varieties harvested on 25-September. All varieties reached acceptable maturity for fiber harvest. The fiber yield averaged over 8 tons of dry matter per acre. The variety Fiber 1 had the greatest dry matter yield (12.1 tons ac-1) but had larger stems. Yuma had the second highest dry matter yield in the trial. However, Yuma is not bred for textile grade fiber and did not yield a favorable ratio of bast fiber. Yuma is better suited for hurd production than for textile fiber. Varieties with a higher ratio of hurd fiber had a thicker woody core. This is not optimal for textile production but is well suited for other industrial applications. Stem diameter varied greatly with an ideal diameter for textile fiber between 6 and 7mm. More research is needed to develop practices that will help to achieve more uniform germination, optimal plant populations, and stem diameter.

Hemp fiber production also requires a retting process prior to baling and processing in order to separate the fibers. Retting is akin to a controlled rot, and most often takes place in the field. By leaving the plants on the ground after they have been cut, the plant cell tissues that bind the bast fiber to the hurd break down. The speed of the field retting process is influenced by moisture and temperature, which directly impacts microbial activity responsible for breaking down the lignin, pectin, and hemicellulose binding the fibers. Warm and moist conditions, like those typical of the late Vermont summer, will encourage increased microbial activity and thus speed the retting. Applied research was initiated to develop information and tools to help farmers learn about in-field retting and gain skills to know when the process is complete. A hemp fiber harvest date study evaluated three harvest timings: 7-Aug, 14-Aug, and 28-Aug; or 74, 81, and 95 days from planting. Harvest date impacted stem diameter, with the thickest stems, averaging 8.2 mm, coming from HD4 on 28-Aug. The first harvest timing, which occurred 74 days from planting, yielded the highest percentage of bast fiber at 38.6% of the stalk. Neither of the following harvest dates yielded a statistically similar result. This data is aligned with the widespread belief that bast fiber quality and quantity can be expected to diminish with the onset of flowers and seeds. Given that the highest bast fiber percentage was observed in HD1 and the thickest stems were observed in HD4, it is likely that the hemp stalks are getting woodier as the plants transition from the vegetative stage to flowering. Farmers will need to consider modifying harvest timing to meet the quality demands of either the bast or hurd fiber market. A subsequent trial was initiated to evaluate the effect of different field retting durations on the properties of hemp fiber in Vermont’s climate. Hemp field retting durations included 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 days after harvest. The plant concentration of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin reached a maximum after 3 weeks of field retting indicating that much of the easily degradable material had been lost. At this point the fiber concentrations began to decline which is likely a result of the degradation of the hemicellulose and cellulose after week 3. This preliminary indicates that hemp fiber was likely retted to an optimum point for textile production after 3 weeks of retting in the field and likely fiber destined for hurd market could remain in the field longer if needed.

Extensive outreach and education provided interactive events that helped farmers build knowledge on the infrastructure, equipment, and fiber quality specifications required in hemp manufacturing. Videos, photo guides, and a hemp fiber guide were created to help farmers become more familiar with this critical aspect of fiber production. Outreach events including a Green Design Workshop, a conference, and field days were attended by over 140 stakeholders. Thirty-nine farmers gained new information to help improve their farming operation and hemp related businesses. Additional resources were secured to continue hemp fiber research.

Project Objectives:

This project seeks to develop hemp production practices that produces fiber suitable for a variety of markets. The benefits to farmers are improved fiber yield and quality and ultimately higher profitability.

Objective 1. Identify hemp varieties that maximize fiber yield. If successful, growers will be able to select varieties that help them reduce inputs and maximize yields.

Objective 2. To identify best harvest dates for optimizing fiber yield and quality. If successful, growers will adopt appropriate harvest windows to maximize yield and quality.

Objective 3. To evaluate the effect of different field retting durations on the properties of hemp fiber in Vermont’s climate. If successful, growers will become effective in identifying proper retting duration required to produce higher quality fiber.

These research and education objectives will result in the development of best management practices delivered to farmers and end- users through an extensive outreach program. The outreach materials will be delivered via guides, videos, web-based resources, and outreach events.

Introduction:

While the market for hemp flower and cannabidiol (CBD) products has developed rapidly in the Northeast, the market for fiber from the hemp stalks has had a much slower start. This is due in part to CBD oil from flowers commanding a much higher value than fiber from stalks.  In addition, significant investment is required to setup processing infrastructure to take the stems and convert it to fiber components that can be used in manufacturing.  However, a new processing facility was recently purchased and developed by Zion Growers (https://ziongrowers.com) in St. Johnsbury, VT with start-up planned for summer of 2022. These are promising signs for Vermont’s nascent hemp fiber market which is poised to participate in this new marketplace.  According to Hemp Industry Daily’s 2021 projections, “the USA hemp fiber market –a broad category that includes textiles as well as bast fibers and hurd products such as bioplastics, animal bedding and hempcrete – will grow from $209 million in 2020 to $482 million in 2025, a compound annual growth rate of 18%.” 

As hemp fiber markets start to emerge farmers are beginning to explore this new opportunity. In Vermont last year 2021, five farmers registered for growing hemp for fiber or grain, and this year 2022, twelve farms are registered to produce hemp fiber. Moreover, several more farmers are considering growing hemp for fiber since the start-up of Zion Growers. Zion Growers plans to process 500 acres of hemp in 2022 with hopes to expand to a thousand acres in 2023. Fiber product generated by Zion Growers will be sold into a variety of manufacturing channels including bedding and building materials.

The problem this project will address is the lack of region-specific hemp fiber agronomic and harvest information available to help the farmers adopt this new crop and meet the market requirements. At the 2022 UVM Hemp Conference, over half of the 202 attendees participated in the sessions focused on fiber production. When surveyed as to their top needs to successfully grow hemp, one farmer responded “I need to know everything! What varieties to plant, when and how to plant, and how to harvest.”? Of those responding to the post-event survey, 66% wanted more information on specific varieties and pest management options, 48% fertility requirements, and 98% were concerned about harvest equipment, timing, and retting of the crop. Although the needs of the farming community were diverse, it was clear harvesting was perceived as a major obstacle by nearly all the farmers.

Harvesting or cutting the fiber is actually very easy and only requires a sickle bar mower. However once mowed the material must be left in the field to rot also known as retting. One of the major processing steps that determines overall fiber quality is retting. Retting can be done by different techniques that each have their own advantages and disadvantages. The most economical technique is in-field retting. Moisture and microbes in the field degrade connective structures between the hemp fibers allowing them to be easily separated once they reach the processing plant. Retting duration is also of importance because under retting can result in fibers that are hard to extract or fibers that are very thick, making fine textile production very difficult. Over retting is also possible. This will damage the structural integrity and strength of the fiber themselves by degrading the cellulose in the fiber. On top of these factors, hemp cultivars, timing of harvest, and growing conditions greatly influence the fiber yield and quality of the plants as well. Once retting is complete the hemp stalks can be baled with a typical round baler found on many Vermont dairy farms.

Over the past 3 years, Dr. Darby and her team have been investigating hemp varieties suitable for fiber. A range of yields have been observed depending on the variety and the year. In 2021, the average fiber yield was 9,732 lbs of dry matter per acre. However, yields ranged from 7,549 to 13,225 lbs of dry matter per acre. This study did not determine fiber quality but clearly indicates that variety selection is an important factor to maximize yield.

This project proposes to continue evaluating varieties suitable for hemp fiber production in the region to help farmers maximize yield and quality. An additional critical research component is to begin to develop information and tools to help farmers learn about in-field retting and gain skills to know when the process is complete. There is currently no information available on average duration that hemp needs to ret in the Vermont climate. Video, photo guides, and visual ques will be documented as well as fiber chemical qualities to help farmers become more familiar with this critical aspect of fiber production. Lastly, research to determine trade-offs in fiber quality from harvesting at different plant maturities will allow farmers to balance their workload and meet fiber market needs. Extensive outreach and education provided through interactive events will further build farmer knowledge on the infrastructure, equipment, and fiber quality specifications required in hemp manufacturing.

 Our project will contribute to the Northeast SARE’s outcome statement: “Agriculture in the Northeast will be diversified and profitable, providing healthful products to customers. Farmers and the people they work with will steward resources to ensure sustainability and resilience, and foster conditions where farmers can have high quality of life and communities can thrive” by:

  1. Helping farmers build skills and knowledge to successfully add hemp fiber to their farm.
  2. Helping farmers meet the specifications of a value-added market.
  3. Helping farmers grow a crop that is known to have sustainable attributes and produce sustainable fiber product alternatives.
  4. Contributing agricultural product to a growing industry that will also help to build rural communities.

 

 

 

Cooperators

Click linked name(s) to expand/collapse or show everyone's info
  • Alex Escher - Technical Advisor
  • Susan Hodgson (Educator)
  • Steve Kostell (Educator and Researcher)
  • Mark Mordasky - Producer
  • Roger Rainville - Producer
  • Travis Samuels - Technical Advisor (Educator)
  • Stephanie Smith - Technical Advisor (Educator)

Research

Materials and methods:

Hemp Fiber Variety Evaluation Trial

Objective 1. Identify hemp varieties that maximize fiber yield. If successful, growers will be able to select varieties that help them reduce inputs and maximize yields.

Hypothesis: If growers select varieties best adapted to Vermont, then hemp fiber yield and quality will be maximized.

Table 1. Agronomic information for the industrial hemp fiber variety trial 2023, Alburgh, VT.

Location

Borderview Research Farm                         

Alburgh, VT

Soil type

Benson rocky silt loam over shaly limestone, 3-8% slope

Previous crop

Spring wheat

Plot size (ft)

5 x 20

Planting date

25-May

Row spacing

7”

Planting equipment

Great Plains NT60 Cone Seeder

Seeding rate (live seeds m-2)

450

Harvest

See Table 2            

 

In 2023, a trial was conducted at the Borderview Research Farm in Alburgh, Vermont (Table 1) to evaluate the impact of variety on fiber yield and quality. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replications. There were fifteen hemp varieties evaluated (Table 2) in the trials. The typical seeding rate used when growing industrial hemp is usually 55-65 lbs ac-1, and even up to 80 lbs ac-1 for thin spinning fiber. In this experiment, seeding rates were adjusted for germination rate as well as thousand kernel weight, and ranged from 64.7- 148 lbs ac-1 with the intention of producing 450 live seeds m-2 or approximately 1,821,087 plants ac-1. Avipel, a nonlethal, organic chemical bird repellent, was also applied to the seed prior to planting. Seeds were sown in 25-May into 5’x20’ plots.

 

Table 2. Hemp varieties evaluated in the industrial hemp fiber trial 2023, Alburgh, VT.

Variety

Harvest date

Days to seed maturity

Seed  supplier

Bialobrzeski

8-Aug

115

International Hemp

Carmenecta

22-Aug

 140

International Hemp

Fedora 17

8-Aug

129-134

Konopius Seeds

Felina 32

8-Aug

133-138

Hemp Seed Warehouse

Ferimon 12

9-Aug

129-134

Hemp Seed Warehouse

Fiber 1

5-Sep

140-150

Kanda Seeds

Fibror 79

11-Aug

101-106

Konopius Seeds

Futura 83

9-Aug

110-118

Konopius Seeds

Muka 76

9-Aug

102-108

Konopius Seeds

Orion 33

8-Aug

120

Hemp Seed Warehouse

Santhica 70

9-Aug

97-102

Konopius Seeds

USO 31

8-Aug

122-127

Hemp Seed Warehouse

Yuma

25-Sep

160

Kanda Seeds

Yuma- S

28-Aug

140

Kanda Seeds

Yuma- T

28-Aug

140

Kanda Seeds

On 8-May, approximately 2.5 weeks prior to planting, the trial field received 300 lbs ac-1 19-19-19. Fertility amendments were based on soil test results. On 25-May, plots were seeded with a Great Plains NT60 cone seeder, and on 1-Jun, plant emergence populations were recorded by counting the number of plants in a foot-long section of the row, three times per plot. From 8-Aug to 25-Sep, in accordance with full flowering, wet weight harvest yields were calculated by sampling the hemp biomass within a 0.25 m2 quadrat. Harvest moisture was calculated by taking a subsample of hemp biomass and drying it at 105⁰ F until it reached a stable weight. Heights and stem diameter were determined from five randomly selected plants from within each plot. Ten plants were also selected at random from each plot and run through a custom-built decorticator . While the stalks were still fresh, they were decorticated to separate the bast and hurd fibers. As the stalks passed between the two moving gears, hurd fiber broke away and dropped to a bucket placed underneath. Whole stem weights and bast fiber weights were recorded to determine ratios and varietal differences.  

The variety trial data were analyzed using mixed model analysis using the mixed procedure of SAS (SAS Institute, 1999). Replications within trials were treated as random effects, and variety treatments were treated as fixed. Mean comparisons were made using the Least Significant Difference (LSD) procedure when the F-test was considered significant (p<0.10).

Hemp Fiber Harvest Timing Trial

Objective 2. To identify best harvest timing for optimizing fiber yield and quality.

Hypothesis: If growers harvest timely fiber yield and quality will be maximized.

A trial was conducted at the Borderview Research Farm in Alburgh, Vermont (Table 3) to evaluate the impact of harvest timing on fiber yield and quality. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replications. The variety used for testing was Futura 83 (Konopius Seeds). Seeds were sown on 25-May into 5’x 20’ plots. The target population for each plot was 1,821,087 live seeds ac-1. Four harvest dates were originally trialed in this experiment, though data from HD3 on 21-Aug was lost due to a harvest error. Thus, this report reflects results across three harvest timings: 7-Aug, 14-Aug, and 28-Aug; or 74, 81, and 95 days from planting, respectively. On 8-May approximately 2.5 weeks prior to planting, the trial field received 300 lbs ac-1 19-19-19. Fertility amendments were based on soil test results. On 25-May plots were seeded with a Great Plains NT60 cone seeder, and on 1-Jun plant emergence populations were recorded by counting the number of plants in a foot-long section of the row, three times per plot. Upon each harvest date, wet weight harvest yields were calculated by sampling the hemp biomass within a 0.25 m2 quadrat from corresponding plots. Harvest moisture was calculated by taking a subsample of hemp biomass and drying it at 105⁰ F until it reached a stable weight. Heights and stem diameters were recorded from five randomly selected plants within each plot before they were run through a custom-built decorticator. While the stalks were still fresh, they were weighed and decorticated to separate the bast and hurd fibers. As the stalks passed between the two moving gears, hurd fiber broke away and dropped to a bucket placed underneath. The bast and hurd were weighed to determine ratios and differences.  

Table 3. Agronomic information for the industrial hemp fiber variety trial 2023, Alburgh, VT.

Location

Borderview Research Farm                          Alburgh, VT

Soil type

Benson rocky silt loam over shaly limestone, 3-8% slope

Previous crop

Spring wheat

Plot size (ft)

5 x 20

Variety, Source

Futura 83, KonopiUS Seeds

Seed Contact

Robin Destiche ([email protected])

Planting date

25-May 2023

Row spacing

7”

Planting equipment

Great Plains NT60 Cone Seeder

Seeding rate (live seeds m-2)

450

Harvest Dates (HD)

HD 1: 7-Aug 2023

HD 2: 14-Aug 2023

HD 4: 28 Aug 2023

The harvest timing trial data were analyzed using mixed model analysis using the mixed procedure of SAS (SAS Institute, 1999). Replications within trials were treated as random effects, and seed rate treatments were treated as fixed. Mean comparisons were made using the Least Significant Difference (LSD) procedure when the F-test was considered significant (p<0.10).

Hemp Fiber Retting Duration Trial

Objective 3. To evaluate the effect of different field retting durations on the properties of hemp fiber in Vermont’s climate.

Hypothesis: If growers become effective in identifying proper retting duration fiber quality will be optimal for the available markets.

The trial was be conducted in 2023 at Borderview Farm (Alburgh, VT) and Smokey House Farm and the experimental design was a randomized complete block (RCBD) and four replications. Hemp retting duration will include 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 days after harvest will serve as the treatments. The hemp from the harvest date study was used to form piles of hemp for the retting duration trial. Hemp production information for this trial can be found in Table 3.  Piles of hemp were removed from the field weekly. At the time of sampling, plant biomass was collected, weighed, and a sample taken for dry matter determination. For each sample date, chemical analysis of the fiber was conducted by DairyOne laboratory in Ithaca, NY with the methods described by Van Soest et al. (1991). Hemp fiber was sent for wet chemistry analysis for various fiber components that influenced by variety and maturity including lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectins. Retting duration will be considered optimum when the cellulose increase halts and possibly starts to decrease (Liu et la., 2015).

Mixed model analysis will be calculated using the mixed procedure of SAS (SAS Inst., 2008). All treatment factors in this experiment will be considered fixed with the exception of replicates. Mean separation among treatments will be obtained using the Least Significant Difference procedure when significant F-tests (P<0.10) are observed. Data will be interpreted into short farmer friendly research reports and other outreach materials.

 

Research results and discussion:

Seasonal precipitation and temperature were recorded with a Davis Instrument Vantage Pro2 weather station, equipped with a WeatherLink data logger at Borderview Research Farm in Alburgh, VT (Table 4). June exhibited cloudy weather with standard rainfall. July’s rainfall saw a staggering departure from normal with 10.8 inches of precipitation, 6.74 inches more than the 30 year average. Much of Vermont experienced persistent rain in tandem with hazy conditions caused by Canadian wildfire smoke over the course of July and August. Despite the heavy rainfall, the well-saturated research farm did not experience the flooding that wrought havoc on many other farms in the state. Overall, from May to September there were 23.4 inches of rain and 2038 Growing Degree Days (GDDs) accumulated, which was 124 GDDs below normal.

Table 4. Seasonal weather data collected in Alburgh, VT, 2023.

Alburgh, VT

May

June

July

August

Average temperature (°F)

57.1

65.7

72.2

67.0

Departure from normal

-1.28

-1.76

-0.24

-3.73

 

 

 

 

 

Precipitation (inches)

1.98

4.40

10.8

6.27

Departure from normal

-1.78

0.14

6.69

2.73

 

 

 

 

 

Growing Degree Days (Base 50°F)

303

483

712

540

Departure from normal

1

-41

17

-101

Based on weather data from a Davis Instruments Vantage Pro2 with WeatherLink data logger. Alburgh precipitation data from August-October was provided by the NOAA data for Highgate, VT. Historical averages are for 30 years of NOAA data (1991-2020) from Burlington, VT.

 

Hemp Fiber Variety Evaluation Trial

Objective 1. Identify hemp varieties that maximize fiber yield. If successful, growers will be able to select varieties that help them reduce inputs and maximize yields.

Hypothesis: If growers select varieties best adapted to Vermont, then hemp fiber yield and quality will be maximized.

 

Table 5. The impact of variety on plant characteristics and harvest yield of industrial hemp fiber, Alburgh, VT, 2023. 

Variety

Plant height

 Stem diameter

Harvest population

Harvest population

Dry

matter

yield

 Dry

Matter

Yield

Bast fiber

 Hurd fiber

 

cm

Mm

plants ac-1

plants ft-2

lbs ac-1

tons ac-1

%

%

Bialobrzeski

160

4.68

805,324

18.5

13,686

6.84

33.6*

66.4

Carmenecta

233

7.12

465,388

10.7

15,730

7.87

14.1

85.9*

Fedora 17

168

4.73

627,262

14.4

15,520

7.76

27.7

72.3

Felina 32

173

5.46

712,246

16.4

15,626

7.81

27.4

72.6

Ferimon 12

158

4.88

1,023,854

23.5

15,211

7.61

32.2*

67.8

Fiber 1

302

11.6

542,279

12.5

24,278

12.1

11.6

88.4*

Fibror 79

183

7.12

586,794

13.5

16,565

8.28

32.7*

67.3

Futura 83

184

5.92

667,731

15.3

16,283

8.14

35.4*

64.7

Muka 76

167

5.10

789,137

18.1

19,063

9.53

35.4

64.4

Orion 33

207

8.08

400,639

9.20

16,637

8.32

21.3

78.7

Santhica 70

166

5.35

590,841

13.6

14,645

7.32

29.1*

70.9

USO 31

162

5.25

562,513

12.9

12,003

6.00

31.6*

68.4

Yuma

187

6.33

768,902

17.6

19,198

9.60

11.2

88.8

Yuma-S

185

6.79

716,293

16.4

17,333

8.67

14.3

85.7*

Yuma-T

191

5.96

683,918

15.7

14,790

7.39

15.1

84.9*

LSD (p=0.10)‡

21.9

1.54

189,787

4.36

NS§

NS

7.69

7.69

Trial Mean

188

6.29

662,875

15.2

16,438

8.22

24.8

75.2

†Treatments marked with an asterisk (*) did not perform statistically different than the top performing treatment shown in bold (p=0.10).

‡LSD; least significant at the p=0.10 level.

§NS; there was no statistical difference between treatments in a particular column (p=0.10).

Given the versatility of hemp in the market, one must be clear on their goals for end-use from the start. Whether it’s the choice of variety or seeding rate, agronomic practices will have an influence on the resulting crop. In our trial, our initial goal was to produce a dense stand of plants with stem diameters comparable to that of a pencil or chopstick (6-7mm). This is the recommended girth of plants grown for textile-quality bast fiber. Theoretically, stem diameter can be manipulated by the density at which the seed is sown. More seed will result in a greater number of thinner plants that stretch upwards to compete for sunlight in the canopy without much lateral branching. Others might optimize their growing conditions for high biomass yield, using less seed for the production of bigger, more spacious plants. Others still might prioritize hurd production, or dual cropping. Plants with a higher ratio of hurd fiber will have a thicker woody core. This is not optimal for textile production but is well suited for other industrial applications. Yuma hit the average target stem diameter with the second highest dry matter yield in the trial (Table 5). However, Yuma is not bred for textile grade fiber and did not yield a favorable ratio of bast fiber. Yuma is better suited for hurd production than for textile fiber.

 In our trial, Fiber 1 had the largest stem diameters with an average of 11.6mm, and the greatest dry matter yield of 12.1 tons ac-1 (Table 5). Numerically, Fiber 1’s dry matter yields were nearly double those of many of the varieties but no statistical difference was detected between the fifteen varieties. This is likely the result of substantial variability across Fiber 1’s four replications, which causes a loss of confidence in the consistency with which it can produce such high yields. In other words, one replication yielded very low, one yielded very high, and the other two spanned the gap in between.

French varieties including Ferimon 12, Fibror 79, Futura 83, and Muka 76, continued to be consistent and reliable performers in our region (Table 5). These varieties also produced some of the highest bast fiber yields in the trial. Fibror 79 has a unique genetic marker that colors the stem and foliage yellow, as seen on the cover page of this report. This is a characteristic that is unique to some fiber hemp varieties and is linked to a more tender and less hearty stalk than some. For these reasons, Fibror 79 experienced severe lodging due to rain compared to its more robust counterparts.

The tallest of the fifteen varieties in the 2023 fiber variety trial was Fiber 1 by Kanda Hemp with an average height of 302cm (Table 5), or 9.9 ft. No other varieties produced average heights of statistical similarity, with the second tallest variety, Carmenecta, averaging 233cm. Fiber 1 also yielded the largest quantity of biomass, which was measured to be 12.1 tons per acre. Noting that Fiber 1 had a lower stand count than most at only 12.5 plants ft-2, it is evident that this high yield was the result of the towering stature of the plants and not the density of the stand. No matter what the primary end-use is for an industrial hemp fiber crop, bast and hurd fibers are each a profitable byproduct of the other and turning the highest profit hinges on maximizing yields of both. Important factors to account for during the growing season include genetics, soil fertility, germination rate, seeding rate, and harvest timing.

Hemp Fiber Harvest Timing Trial

Table 6. The impact of harvest timing on plant characteristics and harvest yield of fiber hemp, Alburgh, VT 2023.

 

Harvest Date

 

Plant height

 

Stem diameter

 

Dry matter yield

 

Dry matter yield

Harvest population

Harvest population

Bast fiber

 Hurd fiber

 

cm

mm

lbs ac-1

tons ac-1

plants ac-1

plants ft-2

%

%

HD1   7-Aug (Day 74)

198

7.78*†

18,370

9.19

1,011,714

23.2

38.6

61.4

HD2  14-Aug (Day 81)

190

6.23

18,541

9.27

833,652*

19.1*

22.5

77.5

HD4  28-Aug (Day 95)

216

8.20

22,132

11.1

530,138

12.2

25.6

74.4

LSD (p=0.10)

NS§

1.45

NS

NS

211,495

4.86

3.05

3.05

Trial Mean

202

7.40

19,681

9.84

791,834

18.2

28.9

71.1

†Treatments marked with an asterisk (*) did not perform statistically different than the top performing treatment shown in bold (p=0.10).

‡LSD; least significant at the p=0.10 level.

§NS; There was no statistical difference between treatments in a particular column (p=0.10).

 

The trial results by fiber hemp harvest date are summarized in table 6. Our goal with this experiment was to observe the impact of harvest timing on plant characteristics and yield. The trial showed no statistically significant difference in plant heights or yield across the three harvest timings (Table 6). However, harvest date did appear to have an impact on stem diameter, with the thickest stems, averaging 8.2 mm, coming from HD4 on 28-Aug. Perhaps the most noteworthy data collected in this trial is that of bast to hurd ratio. The first harvest timing, which occurred 74 days from planting, yielded the highest percentage of bast fiber at 38.6% of the stalk. Neither of the following harvest dates yielded a statistically similar result. This data is aligned with the widespread belief that bast fiber quality and quantity can be expected to diminish with the onset of flowers and seeds. Given that the highest bast fiber percentage was observed in HD1 and the thickest stems were observed in HD4, it is likely that the hemp stalks are getting woodier as the plants transition from the vegetative stage to flowering. During HD1 we also saw the highest populations of plants at 1,011,714 plants ac-1, with HD2 yielding a statistically similar result of 833,652 plants ac-1. It is possible that the reduced population of plants in HD4 was the result of “self-thinning” or a die-off of smaller plants under the canopy by the time of harvest.

Hemp Fiber Retting Duration Trial

Objective 3. To evaluate the effect of different field retting durations on the properties of hemp fiber in Vermont’s climate.

Hypothesis: If growers become effective in identifying proper retting duration fiber quality will be optimal for the available markets.

Figure 1 shows the impact of retting time on the concentration of neutral detergent (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) over a five week period. The concentrations of both components increases until the 3rd week of retting at which point the concentrations begin to decline. The NDF consists of hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin whereas the ADF consists of cellulose and lignin. At harvest the NDF and ADF concentrations were lowest as the material rets in the field there is a loss of easily degradable plant materials such as various sugars and pectins. The level of soluble carbohydrates was highest at harvest and declined by 76% from harvest until week 2 (Table 7). As the carbohydrates are lost during the "rotting" process the concentrations of less degradable material, the fiber, increase in concentration. The concentration of NDF and ADF reach a maximum at week 3 and this would indicate that much of the easily degradable material has been lost. At this point the NDF and ADF concentrations begin to decline which is likely a result of the degradation of the hemicellulose and cellulose after week 3. This preliminary indicates that hemp fiber was likely retted to an optimum point for textile production after 3 weeks of retting in the field. Additional work needs to be done to characterize the fiber and suitability for a variety of end-use products. 

Table 7. Impact of retting duration on plant fiber, lignin, and carbohydrates.

Retting duration

Acid

detergent fiber

Neutral

detergent fiber

Lignin

Soluble carbohydrates

 

%

%

%

%

0

69.5

78.4

11.1

2.50

1

67.5

77.6

9.98

2.00

2

72.6

81.8

12.4

0.63

3

71.4

85.3

12.0

0.70

4

72.3

83.0

13.1

0.53

5

70.3

81.6

13.9

0.70

Hemp Fiber for Green Design – Finding Perspective and Partnership

The UVM Extension in partnership with Zion Growers, Hemp Hollow Processing, Vermont Green Building Network, Smokey House Farm, and the Northeast Climate Hub held a design brainstorming session to develop ideas for climate smart green building and design products using hemp bast and hurd fibers and other local fiber from crops grown in Vermont.  The session was called “Hemp Fiber for Green Design” held in August of 2023 at Vermont Marble Works in Proctor, Vermont.

Hemp can provide dual crops of grain and fiber, with multiple end uses, which are potentially carbon negative and renewable. Hemp concrete (aka hempcrete) offers a carbon smart alternative because of its low carbon impact, thermal properties and moisture buffering capacity with a low life cycle impact compared to similar products. The overall emissions balance is favorable due to biogenic CO2 uptake during hemp growth and to CO2 uptake by carbonation meaning that hempcrete blocks can have a negative carbon footprint and can act as effective carbon sinks (Arrigoni et al, 2017).

Hemp also improves diversification to Vermont's agricultural economy and provides value-added production opportunities, including new products for the bio-based green building sector which mitigates climate change and provides a healthy living environment.

During the UVM Extension workshop, 24 participants identified a number of barriers and opportunities to developing this emerging marketplace.  Zion Growers led a tour of the facility which showed what needed to be done to retrofit a large mixed-use space formerly used for marble cutting and manufacturing  to other uses including hemp drying, storage, processing, and design.

In addition to industrial hemp, the group also discussed other renewable fibrous materials which can be cultivated and sourced from Vermont and adjacent states. The sources are well-managed woodlands and farms harvesting timber, sheep wool, hemp, flax, and straw. These fibrous materials are noted for superior thermal, hygroscopic properties, and antimicrobial properties, as well as the fact they are renewable and have relatively short rotations.   In the session, participants considered green to be “climate smart,” that is, having a lower carbon footprint and emitting less greenhouse gases over the lifetime of the product than its conventional default choice.

Hemp and other natural fibers have been designed into insulation products, SIPs (structural insulated panels) and floor and wall coverings.   Young companies such as Hemp Hollow and New Frameworks Cooperative have found a growing niche in Vermont design using regionally sourced fibrous materials.  At the workshop, Alex Esher, Hemp Hollow, demonstrated the process of making hempcrete bricks. Esher is working on ASTM building standards for hemp.  There are also international standards for third party certification and systems to document and verify a product’s carbon credentials. However, most of these are geared to large companies.Compared to other part of the world, the USA is playing catch up with a hemp fiber industry in its infancy and in some ways is “bringing a historical crop back into the future, ” Esher says.  New businesses like his only became possible when the 2018 Farm Bill Act removed industrial hemp from inclusion in the Controlled Substances Act.

All in all, workshop participants agreed that more applied research and market development is needed to move this nascent industry forward both on the supply side to help farmers identify and grow the best varieties for fiber and also on the demand side in product development and raising customer awareness.  There’s more work to be done. Read more about hemp projects including research and educational activities on the industrial hemp page of UVM Extension’s Northwest Crops & Soils hemp programs.

 

 Alex Esher demonstrating hempcrete making, Proctor, VT

Alex Escher making hempcrete

 

 Travis Samuels discussing hemp fiber storage in Proctor, VT

Travis Samuels at Zion Hemp

Research conclusions:

According to the National Hemp Report issued by the USDA in early 2023, the average yield for 2022 fiber hemp was estimated at 3,070 lbs ac-1. In our trials, the average dry matter yield across all varieties was 16,438 lbs ac-1 with variety Fiber 1 surpassing that value by almost four tons. This was also more than double our 2022 average dry matter yield of 7,486 lbs ac-1. The yields from this trial indicate that hemp fiber can be grown and harvested in the Northeast with favorable outcomes. However, growing a successful fiber crop requires the hemp to be retted prior to removal from the field. 

Hemp fiber production also requires a retting process prior to baling and processing in order to separate the fibers. Retting is akin to a controlled rot, and most often takes place in the field, but can also occur by submerging the plants in water. By leaving the plants on the ground after they have been cut, the plant cell tissues that bind the bast fiber to the hurd break down. The speed of the field retting process is influenced by moisture and temperature, which directly impacts microbial activity responsible for breaking down the lignin, pectin, and hemicellulose binding the fibers. Warm and moist conditions, like those typical of the late Vermont summer, will encourage increased microbial activity and thus speed the retting process. Farmers need to be able to gauge when the fiber has been retted to an appropriate degree for the end product being produced. In the first year of study, we found that hemp had lost a high portion of soluble carbohydrates and pectins at 3 weeks of retting. We would imagine that there are many factors that influence retting time. Additional data needs to be collected on retting time and quality so that farmers are better able to provide the quality of fiber needed in the marketplace. 

Participation Summary
2 Farmers participating in research

Education & Outreach Activities and Participation Summary

25 Consultations
5 Curricula, factsheets or educational tools
1 On-farm demonstrations
1 Published press articles, newsletters
2 Webinars / talks / presentations
3 Workshop field days
6 Other educational activities: These included the blog posts listed below.

Participation Summary:

98 Farmers participated
43 Number of agricultural educator or service providers reached through education and outreach activities
Education/outreach description:

Dr. Darby’s extension program reaches a diverse group of farmers throughout the region. The team maintains a blog, social media presence, YouTube Channel and website that are all significant resources of information for farmers.

Several blog posted were generated and posted the the UVM outcropn blog to highlight and share relevant hemp topics with our stakeholders.  There are 134 stakeholders that receive these blogposts. 

Wrapping up the Field Fiber Season. 13-Dec 2023.  https://blog.uvm.edu/outcropn/2023/12/13/wrapping-up-the-fiber-field-season/

Hemp Fiber Outreach Recap. 6-Dec 2023.  https://blog.uvm.edu/outcropn/2023/12/06/hemp-fiber-outreach-recap/

Beginning the Hemp Field Season. 4-May 2023.  https://blog.uvm.edu/outcropn/2023/12/04/beginning-the-hemp-field-season/

 July On-Farm Field Day. 7-Jul 2023. https://blog.uvm.edu/outcropn/2023/07/07/july-on-farm-field-day-opportunities/

  Join Us for a Winter Conference or Webinar. 1-Feb 2023.  https://blog.uvm.edu/outcropn/2023/02/01/join-us-for-a-winter-conference-or-webinar/

  Sunsetting of Vermont's Hemp Program. 19-Sep 2022. https://blog.uvm.edu/outcropn/2022/09/19/sunsetting-of-vermonts-hemp-program-and-the-transitioning-to-the-u-s-domestic-hemp-production-program/

A Hemp Fiber Production Guide was developed and includes general information on hemp growth, agronomics, pest management, harvest, retting, and storage considerations. 

https://legacy.drup2.uvm.edu/sites/default/files/Northwest-Crops-and-Soils-Program/Industrial%20Hemp/UVMExtHempFINAL2.pdf

 

A photo-instructive guide on hemp retting in the Northeast was developed to accompany the video and information in the Hemp Fiber Production Guide. Hemp Fiber Retting Photo Guide

There were three research reports generated at the end of the season from each experiment conducted.

Darby, Heather; and Sullivan, Laura, “2023 Industrial Hemp Fiber Variety Trial” (2024). Northwest Crops & Soils Program. https://www.uvm.edu/sites/default/files/Northwest-Crops-and-Soils-Program/2023%20Research%20Rpts/2023_Hemp_Fiber_VT_Report.pdf

Darby, Heather; and Sullivan, Laura, “2023 Industrial Hemp Fiber Harvest Date Trial” (2024). https://legacy.drup2.uvm.edu/sites/default/files/Northwest-Crops-and-Soils-Program/2023%20Research%20Rpts/2023_Hemp_Fiber_Harvest_Date.pdf

Darby, Heather; and Sullivan, Laura, “2023 Industrial Hemp Fiber Seeding Rate Trial” (2024). Northwest Crops & Soils Program. https://legacy.drup2.uvm.edu/sites/default/files/Northwest-Crops-and-Soils-Program/2023%20Research%20Rpts/2023_Hemp_Fiber_Seeding_Rate_Report_FInal.pdf

 

There were 3 short YouTube video on fiber hemp harvest, the water retting process, and the making of paper.

paper making: https://youtu.be/8IYLXK6Q1UA

harvesting and field retting: https://youtu.be/mN7GTIF33yg

water retting: https://youtu.be/we2ILyuY2i0

The Annual Hemp Conference was held on February 23, 2023. There several sessions with various hemp products and markets as the focus. Hemp fiber production information was presented by the team, industry and farmers. This event had 75 attendees.

The Annual Crop and Soil Field Day was held at Borderview Farm on July 27, 2023. The annual field day started with a tour of the farm and many of its research plots. Growers received updates on ongoing and innovative crop and soil research trials, and UVM researches shared highlights from the hemp research at the farm. In the afternoon a hemp processing demonstration was held. This included processing and fiber separation methods and an equipment showcase, both where basic farm equipment can be used and where specialized equipment such as a decorticator is needed.  A demonstration showed hemp fiber types and hemp fiber material properties and how they are used with other materials and equipment to make useable products. There were 181 attendees at the field day with 42 at the fiber demonstration. 

A Hemp Fiber Green Design Program was held at the Vermont Marble Museum in Proctor, VT. UVM Extension, Zion Growers, Hemp Hollow Processing, Vermont Green Building Network, and Smokey House Farm collaboratively provided a guided tour of Zion Growers new soon-to-be hemp processing operations, followed by a design brainstorming session to develop ideas for prototyping green building and design products using hemp bast and hurd fibers as well as other fiber from crops grown in Vermont.  Hemp provides dual crops of grain and fiber, with multiple end uses, which are potentially carbon negative and renewable. Hemp also improves diversification to Vermont's agricultural economy and provides value-added production opportunities, including new products for the bio-based green building sector which mitigates climate change and provides a healthy living environment. In this hands-on session, we will discuss both barriers and opportunities to developing this emerging marketplace and what the next steps can be for helping Vermont farmers grow and process hemp. The tour showed what needed to be done to retrofit the large space formerly used for marble to the new uses for hemp. There were 24 participants. 

 

 

 

Learning Outcomes

39 Farmers reported changes in knowledge, attitudes, skills and/or awareness as a result of their participation
Key areas in which farmers reported changes in knowledge, attitude, skills and/or awareness:

Post event surveys were conducted at the Hemp Conference, Annual Field Day and Green Design Workshop in 2023. 

From the Hemp Conference 53 participants returned surveys and 96% learned or gained new information that will help improve  their farming operation or their hemp related business. Of the farmers responding (36), 74% expected to implement a new practice, idea. or strategy that they had learned from attending the conference. The farmers indicated making changes in following soil fertility management, pest management, variety selection, harvest timing, post harvest handling. 

From the Annual Field Day 48 participants returned surveys and 90% indicated they plan to make a change on their farm or in their work with farmers as a result of what they learned at the event. There were 2 farmers that indicated they would start growing hemp feeling more confident after the information they had learned and the support available. 

In particular one attendee responded "After comparing hemp varieties at UVM research site to those in Lancaster, PA. I can now better advise my clients in then more northern zones.".

Another comment about the field day "Critical important access point for those that need information, services, and advice".

From the Green Design Workshop 13 of the 24 participants returned post event surveys. Of the 13 participants 11 (84%) learned new knowledge about Green Design and 12 (92%) learned new knowledge related to hemp fiber. 

Project Outcomes

4 Farmers changed or adopted a practice
2 Grants applied for that built upon this project
2 Grants received that built upon this project
$485,000.00 Dollar amount of grants received that built upon this project
2 New working collaborations
Project outcomes:

Our farm partner had a lot of success growing her first hemp crop this past growing season. Being a fiber artist, Andrea has many years of experience growing another bast fiber called flax, but had never before attempted to grow hemp. Last year she grew two monoecious varieties; Futura 83 and Bialobrzeskie, with plans to hand process the fiber alongside her flax crop to analyze the quality for end-use. Andrea is slated to work with us again in the 2024 season, and is even set to expand her own hemp fiber research with the support an independent farmer SARE grant, which will look at fiber quality in male and female plants as well as retting. We look forward to continuing our research alongside her as we begin to work on our new USDA CARE grant and SunGrant. 

Assessment of Project Approach and Areas of Further Study:

There are many important research questions that still need to be answered regarding hemp fiber quality. End-users and other buyers may be able to accept a wider range of retted fiber depending on markets. More research is needed to  characterize various hemp fiber through chemical, and visual cues.

Information Products

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE.