Progress report for ONE24-442
Project Information
On previously surface-mined land, this project seeks to evaluate effects of bale grazing on:
- Soil health and fertility
- Pasture productivity
This practice can potentially lead to changes in winter feeding practices that result in improved soil health and pasture productivity without any additional external inputs.
There are more than 2 million acres of strip-mined land in the eastern United States, much of it in Pennsylvania with highest acreage in Indiana County (https://mapmaker.millersville.edu/pamaps/AbandonedMines/). Many, but not all, of these acres have been reclaimed. While reclamation may restore the grade and improve the aesthetics of previously mined land, the soil is degraded and less productive than it was before mining. The soil is often compacted, contains high quantities of rock fragments, has reduced water infiltration, has higher pH and electrical conductivity, lower soil organic matter content, and lower total nitrogen pool (Shrestha and Lal, 2007). Seeding the reclaimed land with grass has been shown to increase organic matter and nitrogen contents faster than planting forest while it protects the soil from erosion (Buta et al., 2019; Thomas et al., 2023). Management intensive grazing may speed up soil improvement leading to an ecological shift to taller and more robust grass species, increased soil organic carbon and nitrogen content, improved cation exchange capacity, increased fungal/bacterial ratio, improved soil structure, and lowered compaction and soil erosion (Teague et al., 2011). Bale grazing in pastures is a practice that can be used in a rotational grazing system to further improve soil and pasture productivity. In the winter farmers need to supplement hay, which is often done in ‘sacrifice’ or hard surface lots, but hay bales can also be fed out in the fields. Plant nutrients are imported with hay, and manure and urine plus residual hay provide fertility and organic matter to soil, potentially improving soil health and forage productivity. Grazing is an interesting form of land use because it can be practiced by beginning and small farmers with low infrastructure and labor needs. Because 50-60% of Pennsylvania farms are small, with sales less than $10,000 (https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2022/index.php), this project is relevant to many farmers in our state and it responds immediately to NESARE’s Outcome Statement by ensuring greater sustainability, resilience, and economic viability contributing to improved quality of life, especially of small, part-time farmers, some of whom are from minority background. The project will generate knowledge that can help farmers change hay feeding practices to improve soil and forage productivity. It will provide information important to grass-fed producers such as the members of the new Cooperative Allegheny Grass Fed. If bale grazing proves beneficial, it would reduce need for nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer on pastures, improve productivity and net farm income; conserve and improve soil; and boost employment in the grazing industry, improving life for small, part- and full-time graziers in the Appalachian Region.
Cooperators
- - Producer
- - Producer
Research
Sjoerd Duiker visited the farms of Ron Kriess and Mark Smith on Sept 20, 2024. He discussed with them a layout of the bale grazing study, with three replications, and three treatments (no bales, intact bales, unrolled bales) in a randomized complete block design, with bales spaced in such a way to represent 2 T/A DM. Field selected were stripmined in the past. Sjoerd took hay samples from the bales using a 18" core sampler, taking a random number of samples from different roundbales, coring from the curved edge of the bales to the center. Samples were sent to Dairy One for analysis. The farmers had not yet started grazing by Jan 1, 2025.
Farmers Kriess and Smith performed bale grazing on the plots as planned. The PI unscussessfully tried to recruit a Penn State undergraduate intern to help with research on this project in the summer. In the fall, the PI recruited an intern from Zamorano University in Honduras to work on this project (she was paid from another budget so doesn't show up in the invoices). The PI and student intern traveled to the collaborator's farms in the week of Oct 22nd to take soil and forage samples. The summer was very dry and grass growth had been very poor, leading to very little regrowth of forage after the first grazing. Bulk samples were processed and sent to Penn State's Ag Analytical Lab for soil fertility analysis. Other bulk samples analyzed for wet aggregate stability in the lab, and core samples were used to determine bulk density. We also took an automated GPS recording penetrometer and measured penetration resistance on Ron Kriess' farm only (because time ran out on the Smith farm). Forage samples were dried and weighed to determine effects of bale grazing on forage regrowth. Soil and forage samples were taken at 8, 20 and 32 feet from the center of intact or perpendicular from the swath of unrolled bales.
The only results are from the hay analysis. Fall 2024 bale forage analysis Dairy One
On the Smith farm, the layout of our study Bale grazing Smith Layout had to be adjusted to accomodate farmer ability to graze our plots. The layout of the study on this farm was therefore not properly randomized, and replications were mere subsamples. On the Kriess farm, the layout Bale grazing Kriess Layout was done in a Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. On the Smith Farm, treatment and field history cannot be untwined, while on the Kriess Farm, treatment effects are not linked with field history.
Statistical analysis is still pending. However, preliminary Soil chemical analysis results show that, if looking at the Control Plots, the Smith Farm had better soil fertility, with higher organic matter (5.6%) , pH (6.8), CEC (15.3 meq/100g) available P (9.7 ppm), K (177 ppm), Ca (2463 ppm) and Cu (2.7 ppm), compared with the Kriess Farm (OM=5.1%, pH of 5.4, CEC=12.0 meq/100g, available P=6.7ppm, K=141ppm, Ca=815ppm, and Cu=1.7ppm). Available Mg, and S were a bit lower on the Smith Farm (136.7 ppm and 10.3 ppm resp.) compared with the Kriess farm (148.7 ppm and 25.8ppm resp.), while available Zn was similar (3.5 and 3.4 ppm). Note that the % values behind bale grazed treatment values in the tables represent the % increase over control values. On the Smith Farm, plots with bale grazing ended up showing better OM, P, K, Mg, and S contents than the control, with the intact bale plots showing better values than the unrolled bales. The distance from the bale centers did not seem to make a big difference on the Smith Farm, suggesting that this effect may have been due to past bale grazing more than due to our treatment effects. Nonetheless, they do show the potential of bale grazing to improve soil health on this former strip-mined soil. On the Kriess Farm we did not achieve the same results, with average soil organic matter and fertility values staying on par with that in the control. However, we did observe increased soil organic matter (4.6% cf 4.1%), available P (8.0 cf 6.7ppm), K (211 cf 142ppm), Mg (174 cf 149ppm), Ca (928 cf 815ppm) and Cu (2.2 vs 1.7) at 8 ft distance from the center of intact bales compared with the control on the Kriess Farm. This effect was not observed in the unrolled bale treatment. These results suggest the effect of bale grazing may not be observable in one year, but are most likely to show close to where the bales were located.
These results are still subject to statistical analyis and revision. Soil aggregate stability, penetration resistance, bulk density and forage results, although analyzed in the lab, are still subject to summarization and statistical analysis and are not presented here.
The preliminary results show that bale grazing can, tentatively, improve soil organic matter and soil fertility. Further processing of results and second year data need to be available for confirmation of this preliminary finding.
Education & outreach activities and participation summary
Participation summary:
In our outreach program, we plan to support one break-out at the Western Pennsylvania Grazing Conference held in Clarion, Pennsylvania every winter (expected audience of 30), and organize 1 field walk per year (30 participants based on previous experience) on bale grazing with Penn State Extension, Soil and Water Conservation Districts, USDA-NRCS specialists, Allegheny Grass Fed Cooperative and others. We will organize monthly book discussions for an expected audience of 10 farmers via Zoom through Allegheny Grass Fed Cooperative with support from Penn State Extension. We plan to write one article on bale grazing for the northeastern U.S. for publication in Penn State’s Field Crop News, with a readership of 11,000, and one Penn State factsheet.
Sjoerd Duiker distributed 5 books "Grassfed to finish" by Allan Nation to each to the farmer collaborators to distribute to other farmers for use in the book club. The 2 collaborators will recruit other graziers to participate in the book club that will take place in Feb-Mar 2025. Book club discussions took place on Zoom on July 22, Sept 16, Oct 29 and Nov 12, 2025. A breakout is planned by Sjoerd Duiker and Ron Kriess on bale grazing as part of the Western PA Grazing Conference, to be held on Mar 13, 2025 in Clarion, PA.
Bale Grazing/Improved Grazing practices presentations were given on Jan 21, 2025 at the Pennsylvania No-Till Alliance Annual Meeting in Western PA in Franklin PA (64 attendees), on Mar 13, 2025 at the Western PA Grazing Conference in Clarion (170 attendees), on Mar 14 to new Penn State Extension Educators (2 attended), at on August 12-14, 2025 at Ag Progress Days (30 attendees), and on Oct 3, 2025 at the 45th anniversary of Southwest Project Grass in Dunnbar, PA (30 attendees), for a total of 296 persons reached.