Progress report for ONE24-460
Project Information
This project has three main objectives:
- Objective 1: Evaluate a cover crop mix established adjacent to high tunnels to determine its suitability as a habitat planting to attract and sustain beneficial insects.
- Objective 2: Compare natural enemy presence in screened vs. unscreened high tunnels adjacent to the cover crop habitat planting.
- Objective 3: Determine the level of pest management on high tunnel crops in screened vs. unscreened high tunnels adjacent to the cover crop planting.
This project seeks to answer the following general research questions:
- What types of beneficial insects (i.e., pollinators, natural enemies, etc.) are attracted to the cover crop habitat plantings established outside the tunnels and in what quantities?
- Are beneficials that provide pest management detected on crops plants in the high tunnels adjacent to the habitat plantings and are they suppressing pests?
- Are fewer natural enemies observed in a tunnel with screening vs. a tunnel without screening adjacent to the cover crop habitat plantings?
- What plants in the cover crop mixture are the most attractive to beneficial insects?
- What plants in the cover crop mixture will persist over winter and continue to provide floral resources the following season?
The Problem: High tunnel vegetable production across northern New England has increased aided in part through the ‘High Tunnel Incentive’ from the USDA-NRCS, Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP). This is because Northeastern farmers recognize extending their growing season enables them to generate greater revenues and adapt their crop production to the changing environmental condition. Over the past decade, growers have turned to high tunnels to mitigate the unpredictable fluctuations in temperature and precipitation and protect crops from extreme, unseasonable weather events to produce a greater diversity of high-value crops(1,2).
Organic food production is on the rise nationwide as consumers demand fresh produce that is ‘sustainably’ grown with fewer synthetic pesticide residues(3). In 2021, $11.2 billion dollars in certified organic commodities were sold in the US, which was up 13% from the $9.9 billion sold in 2019 whereby 54% was for crops ($6.1 billion)(4). The number of certified organic farms has also risen 5% from 2019 to 2021. Vermont is a top state ranking 8th for certified acres and was the only New England state represented in the top 10, nationwide(4). In Vermont, over 90% of the farms are small diversified, family-owned operations and specialty crops are critical for their economic survival(6,7). Vermont reported an increase in certified organic farms of 6% percent to 693 from 2019-2021 where 547 of those produce crops, primarily vegetables. For vegetables grown under protection, tomatoes are a top commodity and were valued at over $1.8 million and for other vegetables, over $1.3 million(4,5)
High tunnels prolong environments that are ideal for crop production but also provide favorable conditions for arthropod pests(8,9). In several surveys of high tunnel growers across the region(10-13) over the past decade, the top pests causing damage to tunnel crops were aphids, thrips, whiteflies, spider mites, hornworms and cucumber beetles. Aphids, thrips and spider mites are particularly problematic due to their small size and ability to hide deep within the crevices and within plant blossoms. These pests can go unnoticed by growers until extensive damage and population build up has occurred. Organic growers have limited options for managing these key pests in high tunnels. Conventional growers have an array of chemical insecticides. Organic producers often do nothing, accepting the loss, increase labor costs by washing off infested produce and picking out saleable crops, rely on biocontrols that require costly repeat applications or use a variety of reduced risk pesticides that are often broad spectrum(14). Not only does this affect the pests but also beneficial insects (natural enemies and vital pollinators) which may be visiting crops(15).
Adoption of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is key to continue the downward trend of pesticide use, especially to protect beneficial insects while ensuring good yields of high-quality crops (15-17). The Northeastern IPM Center recently identified top priorities facing farmers. The top two extremely important activities in the region were pest id and management (67%) followed by pest management in high tunnels (58%)(18). Stakeholder needs have also been identified in several surveys of Northeast high tunnel vegetable growers that were conducted over the past decade by the PI and regional collaborators(10-13). Growers use a wide variety of IPM tactics in high tunnels, like scouting, crop rotation, natural enemies and habitat plants. There was an over 10% increase in habitat plant use to sustain beneficia insects from 2014–2019. When growers were asked what resources or information would help them manage insect pests in high tunnels, they were most interested in identification tools, regional biocontrol guidelines specifically for high tunnels and action thresholds for specific pests. When growers were asked what limits their greater use of biological control, 52% said a lack of knowledge about how or when to use them; 26% said biocontrol was too expensive, and 22% lacked confidence that biologicals work(13).
The solution: Diversified vegetable farming is a profitable and sustainable method of food production. However, it is challenging with management decisions focused on reducing yield risk by enhancing on-farm ecological processes(19). The use of biological control agents to manage pests is a viable management strategy when pest populations are detected in a timely manner and numbers are below a level that will cause economic damage (9,20-23). Because high tunnels are an ‘open yet closed’ environment that is in between a closed greenhouse environment and open field production, growers must implement two biological control strategies: conservation and augmentative. Conservation biological control uses human intervention to enhance the performance of wild/naturally occurring natural enemies for pest management whereas augmentative biological control uses natural enemies that are mass-reared in rearing facilities and released in anticipation of pest outbreaks(24). Use of flowering plants like cover crops to provide habitat for wild natural enemies is one of several strategies used for conservation biological control in agroecosystems(25,26).
The goal of this project is to investigate the use of flowering cover crops between high tunnels to attract beneficials to the crop production area. The top conservation practices implemented by Vermont agricultural producers are reducing or eliminating pesticide applications and providing wildlife and pollinator habitat (27). This project will specifically address the needs of growers of high tunnel vegetables related to the sustainable management of key arthropod pests and align with their priorities to protect beneficials on their farms. There continues to be a need for the development and refinement of existing IPM strategies, like the incorporation of cover crops that function as habitat planting to sustain beneficials, to combat pests in high tunnels. Research on the performance of IPM strategies for conservation of biocontrol in high tunnel settings is limited in northern New England, warranting more in-depth investigations into their implementation to increase grower adoption. Using cover crops adjacent to high tunnels to enhance beneficial insects would increase on-farm sustainability. This aligns with Northeast SARE’s outcome statement and improve the quality of life for farmers, their families and the community. It will lower environmental and health risks by reducing the need for pesticide applications while promoting soil and beneficial insect conservation.
Cooperators
Research
Progress summary: The project is progressing on schedule. The on-farm research was initiated in the summer of 2025. We experienced a delay in the cover crop planting due to the excessively wet spring (May) which hindered site preparation. This location is also at a higher elevation where snow remains later into the spring season compared to farms in the valleys. The planting was seeded on 7/9/2025 after which another challenge was encountered – a very dry summer. Despite these setbacks, the crops established well, but later in the season than anticipated. The plantings were terminated in October by mowing. In 2026, we will assess the regrowth of the crop strip planted in 2025 and compare it to an adjacent strip that will be newly seeded. See preliminary results below and attached photo gallery in the results section of planting process and some insects visiting the cover crops.
Materials and methods:
Research site: The research site (1,000 Stone Farm, Brookfield, VT) has four, 30 x 160 ft (4800 sqft) high tunnels arranged in a row, side by side. Crops are produced year-round, including assorted greens (kale, spinach and lettuces, etc.) during fall-spring; and typical summer crops like tomatoes mixed with eggplant, cucumber, squash or peppers in summer. Two tunnels are screened and two are not screened. The two screened and unscreened tunnels are adjacent to each other and the cover crop planting was established in the middle of all the tunnels between one screened and one unscreened tunnel.
Cover crop habitat planting establishment: A strip of land (~40x160 = 6,400 sqft) was prepared by the farmer partner lengthwise between the middle two high tunnels in the underutilized space in the spring of 2025. The bed was located ~3 ft from the tunnel edge to avoid disturbance of the structure. It was be prepped by rototilling. In the middle of the strip was an existing strip of elderberries. Therefore, there were two planting beds (one on each side of the elderberries) adjacent to each tunnel ~ 20x160 = 3,200sqft (each).
Untreated cover crop seeds were purchased for use obtained from several vendors (Johnny’s Selected Seeds. Winslow, ME, Fedco Seeds, Clinton, ME or High Mowing Seeds, Wolcott, VT). Six different cover crop types were selected to provide variety of floral shapes, sizes, height, and color and have potential to re-establish in the following season if left to go to seed. The mixture was broadcast seeded after danger of frost and the area was able to be prepared.
A mixture of seeds (buckwheat, lacy phacelia, sweet alyssum, white clover, medium red clover and crimson clover) were prepared at the following ratios per section per label seeding rate per area:
|
Cover Crop Mix |
All |
Sweet Alyssum + Clovers |
Phacelia + Clovers |
Buckwheat + Clovers |
|
Cover Crop |
Section 1 |
Section 2 |
Section 3 |
Section 4 |
|
Buckwheat |
5% |
NA |
NA |
45% |
|
Phacelia |
20% |
NA |
45% |
NA |
|
Sweet Alyssum |
20% |
45% |
NA |
NA |
|
White Clover |
25% |
25% |
25% |
25% |
|
Red Clover |
25% |
25% |
25% |
25% |
|
Crimson Clover |
5% |
5% |
5% |
5% |
|
Total |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Originally a mix of cover crops were going to be planted in the entire prepared space. After discussions with the farmer, we refined the planting design and separated the space into four sections (~1600sqft each) and planted different combinations of the cover crops to assess the performance of different mixes (Figure 1 in the photo gallery).
Habitat planting evaluations: The habitat planting was inspected three times from August – September. Within each section, we visually inspected 4, 1-meter plots when the crops were flowering. These were selected at random using a 1-meter PVC square. Each plot was examined for 3 minutes to observe flying insect activity and the plant species visited. After each plot was examined visually, each plant type was shaken 10x over a laminated white paper to dislodge small arthropods hiding within. The number of arthropods present by type and recorded. The flowering state and condition of the plants were assessed as follows (1) healthy; (2) light decline (<25% dieback/browning); (3) moderate decline (~26-50% dieback); (4) heavy decline (~51-75% dieback); (5) severe decline/death (~76-100% of leaves brown). The presence of weeds was also recorded. In year 2, we will assess the percentage of each crop plant that re-established and compare that to a newly seeded strip nearby as described above.
Crop plant inspections: The four tunnels were assigned a treatment number (1) no screen, no habitat planting, (2) no screen, adjacent to habitat planting, (3) screen, adjacent to habitat planting, and (4) screen, no habitat planting. Each bed within the tunnel had a unique identifier based on distance from the habitat planting. This allowed us to determine natural enemy abundance based on proximity of the habitat strip within the tunnels. The plants in the tunnels were inspected the same day as the habitat planting. Plants were randomly selected and inspected at a rate of 3 plants per each habitat planting assortment (12 plants/bed, 48 plants/tunnel). Each plant was visually inspected for 1 minute for flying insects. Then, the undersides of foliage were examined for pests and evidence of natural enemies (i.e., parasitic wasp mummies, syrphid larvae, etc.). The condition of the crop plant with respect to pest damage was assessed in a similar manner as the habitat plant condition described for objective 1.
ONE24-460 Progress Report 2 Photo Gallery
Preliminary Results: Buckwheat and alyssum flowered within 30 days of planting on July 9, phacelia bloomed within 60 and the clovers did not flower. The buckwheat bloomed until early September and alyssum and phacelia bloomed until the strip was mowed in late October. (Figures 2-5 in the photo gallery).
We observed a total of 318 insects on the habitat planting. 45% were beneficials, 39% were crop pests and 16% were uncategorized insects grouped by order. The majority of visiting beneficials were bees (38%), wasps (25%), syrphid flies (15%), adults and nymphs of the predatory bug Orius (8%), lady beetles (6%), and predatory thrips (3%). Others include small (<1mm) parasitic wasps, the predatory mite Anystis, jagged ambush bugs and tachinid flies. Of the crop pests, the majority were tarnished plant bugs (50%), flea beetles (20%) and cucumber beetles (16%). Other pests that were observed were flea hoppers, thrips, aphids, stink bugs and Japanese beetles (Figures 6-8 in photo gallery). The section with the most insects observed was the most diverse section with all plant species planted together (41%). Followed by the sections dominated by buckwheat (25%), alyssum (20%) then phacelia (14%).
Comparisons of insect abundance on crop plants adjacent to the strip in screened and unscreened tunnels cannot be assessed at this time. The timing of the habitat strip planting and its establishment was challenged by weather conditions. As a result, many crops in tunnels were mature and/or cycled out of production. Tunnels were either in a transition state or contained crops that had existing pest pressure (i.e., spider mites on cucumbers). The majority of data collected on crops were on tomatoes in the unscreened tunnel adjacent to the strip. Because the planting is now already established, we will be able to collect more data on crops plants in 2026 earlier and for a full season to assess beneficials and pests on crop plants adjacent to the cover crop habitat planting.
Education & outreach activities and participation summary
Participation summary:
For this project, a factsheet with research findings and guidelines about establishing habitat plantings adjacent to high tunnels to attract beneficials will be produced. This factsheet will be disseminated to high tunnel growers across northern New England though existing regional stakeholder networks. The document will be uploaded to the project PI’s high tunnel website (High Tunnel Production Toolkit) and sent out via various list serves (GreenGrower, Tunnel Vision, Vermont Vegetable & Berry Growers Association (VVBGA), etc.) and promoted through social media outlets. We anticipate reaching >5,000 growers from northern New England through these various modes of communication. During the second year (summer 2026), an on-site workshop to demo the habitat planting will be organized. It will be promoted through the stakeholder networks described above. We anticipate 25 farmers/other stakeholders would attend. Towards the end of the project, a short blurb about the project will also be developed and included in our Tunnel Vision High Tunnel Newsletter. Project results and deliverables will also be uploaded to the high tunnel habitat plantings website.
Outreach activities to date:
This project was introduced to farmers at the 2025 Northeast High Tunnel Conference in several slides that showed images of beneficials observed visiting the plantings.
Sullivan, C., M. Skinner, R. Bamford, S. Ghasemzadeh Dizaji, A. Tallo. Honing In On High Tunnel Habitat & Trap Plants. 2025 Northeast High Tunnel Production Conference. December 10-11, 2025, West Lebanon, NH. (155 attendees)
Learning Outcomes
Too early in the project to assess.