Evaluating Sorrel (Hibiscus sabdariffa) Varieties for Production in Florida

Final report for OS21-146

Project Type: On-Farm Research
Funds awarded in 2021: $19,708.00
Projected End Date: 09/30/2024
Grant Recipient: University of Florida
Region: Southern
State: Florida
Principal Investigator:
Dr. Norma Samuel
UF/IFAS Extension
Expand All

Project Information

Abstract:

Situation:Sorrel/Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa) is a crop of economic importance in many tropical and sub-tropical regions of the world. It belongs to the Malvaceae family and is known to be a very versatile crop with many uses. Sorrel has been gaining popularity with small farmers, but formal research has not yet been undertaken towards optimizing production and marketing systems in Florida. The goal of this study was to evaluate four varieties of sorrel to determine agronomic practices for successful production in Florida and economic viability as an alternative crop by 1) Evaluating the production of sorrel in Florida, 2) determining cost of production and economic viability, 3) developing and distributing educational materials on sorrel production practices as part of an extension and outreach effort, and 4) increasing seed availability of best-performing varieties.

Methods: Two women farmers with organic operations and one male-owned conventional farmer were selected over the course of three years to host this on-farm demonstration trial. Four varieties were evaluated: ‘Local,’ which was previously grown by the farmers, and ‘Festival’, ‘Black’ and ‘Day Neutral’, imported varieties from the United States Virgin Islands. Measurements were taken of plant height. Crop yield data was taken with the bolls and calyces intact and with the bolls and calyces separated. The height measurements data was analyzed using ANOVA, and yield data using SAS GLIMMIX's linear modeling tool. Data comes from an organic farm in Year 1 and the conventional farm in Year 3. For height, the growth rate was similar for each of the varieties in Year 1 but favored 'Festival' in Year 3. The varietal response throughout the time intervals (week of year) was similar in terms of plant height. In Year 1, for the harvested calyces with the bolls intact, the sorrel varieties 'Local' and 'Day Neutral' had comparable mean yield responses, but the calyces without bolls assessment revealed that 'Day Neutral' had a significantly higher mean yield (weight) than 'Local.' In Year 3, the yield of ‘Day Neutral’ and ‘Local’ varieties did not differ significantly with or without bolls. Festival’ produced no marketable calyces until November and ‘Black’ produced none. 

Conclusion:  Sorrel has potential as an alternative crop in Central Florida, with ‘Local’ and ‘Day Neutral’ varieties showing the greatest potential. However, growers need to take precautions to not grow the crop in low-lying areas as it will succumb to disease problems.

 

Project Objectives:

The goal of this study is to evaluate four varieties of sorrel to determine agronomic practices for successful production in Florida and economic viability as an alternative crop. Specific objectives:

  • Objective 1: To evaluate the production of sorrel in Florida.

  • Objective 2: To determine cost of production and economic viability.

  • Objective 3: To conduct educational outreach on sorrel production practices.
  • Objective 4: To increase seed availability of best performing varieties.

A completely randomized block design was used for this project. Plants were spaced 3 feet between plants within row (33 feet row length), 6 feet between rows (18 feet per block) to allow for cultivation and harvest of the fruiting branches (Matthew, et al, 2011). There were four rows per block, one for each variety being evaluated with 12 plants per row for a total of 192 plants. A distance of eight feet between each block and a 3 feet buffer around the plot. Total area is 3,978 square feet (38’ x 102’).

Seeds were started in a greenhouse using protocols for growing vegetables. Seed germination time can be reduced from over a week to three days by scarifying the seed coat. This ensures uniform germination (Matthew & Zimmerman, 2010). From seed germination to a transplantable seedling takes four to five weeks. Seedlings will be manually transplanted. 

Objective 1: To evaluate the production of sorrel in Florida.

On-farm trials were conducted on two organic farms and a conventional farm in Central Florida. The conventional farm was added to the study after one of the organic farmers was unable to commit during year 2. Four varieties were evaluated. Data was collected on the following for each variety:

  • Plant development – measurements were taken on plant height, time to first bloom
  • Yield – weight with and without seed boll

Data was analyzed using ANOVA.

Objective 2: To determine cost of production and economic viability.

  • Cost of materials needed for production
  • Labor costs – planting, crop maintenance, harvesting
  • Profit and loss calculations

Objective 3: To conduct educational outreach on sorrel production practices.

A field day was organized in Year 1 and timed to occur during the harvesting season. The field day introduced farmers and Extension personnel to the botany of the crop, demonstrated production practices utilized, and preliminary yield data. The findings were shared through webinars, in-person educational opportunities, and industry, international media organizations, and social media. Findings were also be presented at the Extension Professionals Association of Florida (EPAF), and the National Association of County Agriculture Agents (NACAA).

Objective 4: To increase seed availability of best performing varieties.

In order to develop a source of available seeds for farmers within the state, seeds were saved from each of the varieties. Sample packets from those determined to be the best performers were made available to farmers attending field day and Extension professionals who were interested in planting sorrel.

Cooperators

Click linked name(s) to expand/collapse or show everyone's info
  • Aubrey Cash - Producer
  • Stafford Crossman (Researcher)
  • Jessica Gentry - Producer
  • Brandon White (Researcher)
  • Matt Smith (Researcher)
  • Dr. Thomas Zimmerman (Researcher)
  • Darryl Siemer
  • Dr. Oscar Liburd - Technical Advisor

Research

Materials and methods:

Objective 1: To evaluate the production of sorrel in Florida.

Three farms in total participated in this on-farm demonstration trial. On-farm trials were conducted in Year 1 on two organic farms in Central Florida starting mid-June. Both farms amended their soil with compost to 1 inch depth  prior to planting. Four varieties: Local – the variety previously grown by farmers in the area; and three varieties from University of the Virgin Islands – Festival, Black, and Day Neutral (unaffected by day lengths) were evaluated. Data was collected from Plants #2; #4; and #6 on the following for each variety in each block:

  • Plant development – plant height measurements were taken at one month after planting and then every two weeks; and time to first bloom.
  • Yield – weight of calyces with and without seed boll. A specially designed tool was used to separate the calyces from the boll, so this allowed for consistency in amount of the calyces being removed/remaining on each boll.
  • Insect, disease, weed, and or nematode problems based on weekly scouting.
Trial plot plan layout showing 4 foot in-row spacing used from Year 2 onward. Credit: Dr. Norma Samuel, UF/IFAS, and Dr. Thomas Zimmerman, UVI.
Trial plot plan layout showing 4 foot in-row spacing used from Year 2 onward. Credit: Dr. Norma Samuel, UF/IFAS, and Dr. Thomas Zimmerman, UVI.

A completely randomized block design was used for this project. Plants were spaced 3 feet between plants within row (18 feet row length), 6 feet between rows (18 feet per block) to allow for cultivation and harvest of the fruiting branches (Matthew, et al, 2011). There were four rows per block, one for each variety being evaluated with 7 plants per row for a total of 112 plants. A distance of 6 feet between each block and a 3 feet buffer around the plot. Total area is 2,304 square feet (24’ x 96’). This spacing was based on the typical growth height and width of the plants in the USVI. Seeds were started in a greenhouse by Bountiful Farms using protocols for growing vegetables. Timing from sowing of the seeds to transplantable seedlings was four weeks. Seedlings were manually transplanted three days between each farm.

In Year 2, one of the farmers had to withdraw from the project due to illness. The research team scrambled to find a replacement farmer. The replacement farmer was a male, conventional farmer who operated a winery and restaurant onsite. The organic farm amended the soil with compost to 1 inch depth prior to planting. In this year, the within row spacing was increased to 4 feet as 3 foot spacing lead to intense crowding amongst the plants. Row spacing remained the same due to space limitations. In Central Florida trials planted in full sun and well-draining soil, plants spaced 4 feet in-row with 6 foot row spacing grew to a maximum height of 8 feet leading to significant overlap between plants. 6 foot in-row spacing allowed for manageable working space during harvest. Growers planting under partial shade may consider higher density planting – 3 to 4 foot in-row – as sorrel is very sensitive to shade and will stunt. 

We had to move the seedlings from Bountiful Farms to another location while we waited to get the land prepared at Whispering Oaks Farm (WOF). WOF was planted three weeks after Bountiful Farms. As the plants at WOF developed, we realized the phenotypical characteristics of the ‘Black’ variety were different from what we were familiar with, so we decided to terminate the trial for 2022 at WOF. A no cost extension was granted to allow us to time to repeat the trial on WOF for the 2023 growing season utilizing the same parameters as in 2022.

Each year, the crop concluded at the end of November when the plants began to senesce. Plant height measurements were analyzed using ANOVA and yield data using SAS GLIMMIX's linear modeling tool.

 

Soil Testing and Nematode Assay

Since sorrel is not on the list of commodities for soil testing, okra was selected on the soil test form as the crop for nutrient recommendations, as sorrel is a relative.

Bountiful Farms – In Year 1, the soil pH prior to planting was 7.4 with high levels of P and low levels of K and Mg. Plants were planted in prepared ground with soil leveled. In Year 2, The soil pH prior to planting was 7.5 with high levels of P and low levels of K and Mg. Plants were planted in prepared ground with soil leveled and covered with landscape fabric for weed control. This plot was located adjacent to the plot used in Year 1. The Nematode Assay prior to planting revealed that the crop would have a high risk of damage by Meloidogyne sp. (root knot nematodes). The recommendation from the nematode assay lab was to apply an organic product called Majestene that shows the most efficacy in research trials or to delay the sorrel planting and rotate with sun hemp or another crop that is a non-host for root knot nematode (RKN). Neither of these options were utilized.

Dirty Dog Organics – In Year 1, the soil pH prior to planting was 7.5 and nutrient levels for P, K and Mg were similar to what was observed at Bountiful Farms. Plants were grown on raised beds approximately 12 inches high and covered with fabric mulch which were buried in the rows with soil. Wood chips were added in the furrows in early September to keep weed growth to a minimum.

Whispering Oaks – The soil pH prior to planting was 6.8. Nutrient levels for P and Mg were high and K was medium. Plants were set in prepared ground with soil leveled and covered with landscape fabric for weed control. The Nematode Assay prior to planting showed root knot nematodes (Meloidogyne sp.) posed minimal threat of damage to the crop.

 

Objective 2: To determine cost of production and economic viability.

  • Cost of materials needed for production
  • Labor costs – planting, crop maintenance, harvesting
  • Profit and loss calculations

Farmers were asked to keep a detailed log of activities related to the crop and to share at the end of the project in 2023 to determine labor costs and profit and loss calculations. 

 

Note: A data analyst wasn’t hired for 2022. One was hired in 2023 to analyze 2022 – 2023 data.

Research results and discussion:

Cooperators

Year 1:
University of Florida Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences (UF/IFAS) Extension

Bountiful Farms

Dirty Dog Organics

University of the Virgin Islands Agricultural Experiment Station (UVI AES)

Year 2:
Dirty Dog Organics replaced with Whispering Oaks Farm. Other partners remained the same.

 

Objective 1: To evaluate the production of sorrel in Florida.

Trial History

Bountiful Farms: In mid-July of Year 1 we noticed symptoms of green wilt in the ‘Black’ variety followed by some chlorosis, leaf drop and eventual death of the plant, if not removed when symptoms become visible. A sample was submitted to the UF/IFAS Plant Clinic in Apopka for diagnosis. The results determined that the cause of the wilt was Phytophthora. As the number of plants with these symptoms and white cottony mycelium at the base continued to progress throughout the field, we submitted another sample to the UF/IFAS Disease Diagnostic Lab in Gainesville. The results showed they were affected by a combination of Southern Blight (Sclerotium rolfsii) and Fusarium Crown and Stem Rot (Fusarium sp./spp.). By the end of August, of the plants from which we were collecting data, we had 0.08% of the ‘Black’; 50% of the ‘Local’ and ‘Day Neutral’; and 42% of the ‘Festival’ varieties remaining. By end of September only 20 plants remained in the entire field, so we decided to officially close out the season at Bountiful Farms on October 7th as there were too many missing data points on the plant height measurements.

During the period the crop was in the ground, June to November, grasshoppers were the only insect pests observed in the field. However, they were not of sufficient levels to cause concern. We had significant rains in Central Florida during that time. Based on rainfall data collected from the two closest weather stations through the Florida Automated Weather Network (FAWN) Okahumpka received 24.72 inches and Ocklawaha received 36.88 inches of rainfall. This severely affected the crop at Bountiful Farms with the field reportedly remaining under water for 1-2 days at a time.

In Year 2, during the May-August growing period, no insect pests of significance were observed in the field. There were regular afternoon showers, so minimal supplemental irrigation was needed once the plants were established. Based on rainfall data collected from the two closest weather stations through the Florida Automated Weather Network (FAWN) closest to Bountiful Farms, Okahumpka Station received a total of 14.19 inches and Ocklawaha Station received 18.41 inches of rainfall. Since the elevation of the research plot was relatively the same as Year 1, this severely affected the crop with the field reportedly remaining under water for up to 24 hours depending on the amount of rain in a single event.

Similar to Year 1, a number of plants began to have a green wilt with a white cottony mycelium at the base. Samples that were rogued were wet at the base with mushy roots. Whole plant samples including roots were taken to the UF Plant Disease Clinic where they were diagnosed with Fusarium wilt (Fusarium oxysporum) and Pythium root rot (Pythium sp.). The disease pathogens collected in Year 1 were Fusarium oxysporum, Phytophthora, and Sclerotium rolfsii.

At the mid-July data collection for plant height measurements, a total crop loss of 27% was calculated. The highest occurrence of diseased plants were in ‘Local’ and ‘Black’ varieties. One hundred percent (100%) of the ‘Local’ plants in Block 2 and 86% (6 of 7 plants) in Block 3 had succumbed to disease. At 12 weeks after planting there was a 65% crop loss with only 39 plants remaining. Quantities of plants remaining for each variety were: ‘Black’ 10.7%; ‘Local’ 17.9%; ‘Day Neutral’ 53.6%; and ‘Festival’ 57.1%. The team decided to bring the trial at this location to an end because a significant number of data-collection plants were lost.

Although we lost the crop at Bountiful Farms in both years, we were able to conclude that sorrel is a crop that cannot tolerate wet conditions. These conditions resulted in plants that looked unhealthy and a combination of disease problems that could possibly render the crop a loss, especially in an organic enterprise where products for disease control may be limited. Farmers in Florida interested in planting sorrel should locate their field in the higher area of their property that has good drainage.

Dirty Dog Organics (DDO): In Year 1 at DDO we lost 2 ‘Black’ and 1 ‘Festival’ plants from the selected plants for data collection. Squirrels were the main pest of concern on this farm once the calyces were developed. They would collect the bolls and chew them in the large oak tree near the field so you could see the remnants below the canopy each day.

Whispering Oaks Farm (WOF): In Year 2 at Whispering Oaks, we had to move seedlings from Bountiful Farms to another location while we waited to get the land prepared. WOF was planted three weeks after Bountiful Farms. As the plants at WOF developed, we realized the phenotypical characteristics of the ‘Black’ variety were different from what we were familiar with, so we decided to terminate the trial for 2022 at WOF. A no cost extension was granted to allow us to time to repeat the trial on WOF for the 2023 growing season utilizing the same parameters as in 2022. Year 3 at WOF, an outbreak of fusarium and Coniella javanica in the required that data be analyzed on a mean-value-per-plant basis as opposed to the mean or total value per variety analysis used on DDO data from 2021.

 

Results

Data is taken from Dirty Dog Organics in 2021 and Whispering Oaks Farm in 2023. 

Plant Growth

Plant Height Year 1
Plant heights in inches taken on the 29th, 31st, and 33rd week of the 2021. Credit: Dr. Gideon Alake, UF/IFAS

Plant height measurements were taken of sample plants in two-week intervals beginning on July 21, 2021, 30 days after planting (above). The data was analyzed using ANOVA. Varieties grew at statistically even rates showing no discernible difference in vegetative vigor. However, in 2023 at Whispering Oaks Farm (below), sorrel plant height differed significantly among the varieties evaluated. Festival was significantly (P<0.05) the tallest sorrel variety with a mean height of 29.46 ± 1.08 inches. Day Neutral and Local did not show a statistically significant height difference (24.32 ± 1.08 and 23.28 ± 1.09 inches, respectively). By contrast, the ‘Black’ sorrel variety, with the shortest with a mean height of 19.84 ± 1.08 inches, was significantly lower than all other varieties.

Comparative Plant Height Year 3
Comparative mean plant height per variety in the 2023 trial. Credit: Dr. Gideon Alake, UF/IFAS

Calyx Yield

SAS GLIMMIX's linear modeling tool was used to evaluate the data. An outbreak of fusarium and Coniella javanica in the 2023 trial required that data be analyzed on a mean-value-per-plant basis as opposed to the mean or total value per variety analysis in 2021.

Yield data was collected for calyces by weight with and without the seed boll. In Year 1 at Dirty Dog Organics, 'Local' produced a total 56.99 pounds and 30.74 pounds with and without bolls, respectively. 'Day Neutral' produced a total 46.17 pounds and 23.81 pounds with and without bolls, respectively. With bolls, the sorrel varieties ‘Local' and 'Day Neutral' had comparable mean yield responses.  The no-boll calyces assessment revealed that ‘Local’ had a significantly higher mean yield than ‘Day Neutral.’ The largest yields were achieved 9/26/21 – 10/9/21 (97 – 110 DAP), with yields then gradually declining for both varieties. ‘Festival’ produced no marketable calyces until November and ‘Black’ produced none. ‘Local’ showed a significantly larger mean weight w/o boll than ‘Day Neutral,’ conferring more yield per calyx picked. 

2021 Mean Weight of Calyces w-wo bolls
Year 1 Trial mean weight of calyces per variety with and without bolls. Credit: Dr. Gideon Alake, UF/IFAS

Due to disease eliminating several trial plants in 2023, data was derived from two harvests conducted on 10/11/23 and 10/27/23 . Only ‘Day Neutral’ and ‘Local’ produced calyces during this time. ‘Festival’ and ‘Black’ began to produce calyces between 11/21/23 and 12/6/23 but were unmarketable due to Coniella infection. The yield of ‘Day Neutral’ and ‘Local’ varieties did not differ significantly (P<0.05) with or without bolls. The mean weights of 'Day Neutral' and 'Local' with bolls were 1.60 ± 0.40 lbs. and 1.43 ± 0.40 lbs., respectively. Similarly, 'Day Neutral' and 'Local', with mean weights of 0.93 ± 0.22 lbs. and 0.81 ± 0.22 lbs., respectively, showed no difference in mean weight without bolls. 

Year 3 Mean Sorrel Yield Weight
2023 mean weight of calyces per variety with and without bolls. Credit: Dr. Gideon Alake, UF/IFAS

The ‘Local’ and ‘Day Neutral’ varieties are suitable for production in Central Florida with multiple harvests received before the crop senesces. Since the ‘Day Neutral’ variety is technically supposed to be able to give a crop year-round, Central Florida farmers could start the seedlings early in the greenhouse and plant after the danger of frost has passed in mid to late March, then plant a second crop of ‘Day Neutral’ and/or ‘Local’ in June or July to extend the cropping season. The significantly higher mean yield (weight) of the ‘Day Neutral’ without bolls makes this an ideal variety to sell in this form to as it would take fewer calyces to make a pound compared to the ‘Local’. ‘Festival’ produced no marketable calyces until November and ‘Black’ produced none.

Because the sorrel leaves are edible, Dirty Dog Organics capitalized on the opportunity to harvest leaves from the crops to sell as greens to provide an added source of income. Due to sorrel’s rapid growth rate, judicial leaf harvesting does not significantly affect further plant development.

The sorrel plants get top heavy as they start to produce and fall over which makes it difficult to maneuver between the rows during harvest. Thus, we recommend that the spacing between rows be increased. The crop could also be planted in a single row as a perimeter crop.

 

Objective 2: To determine cost of production and economic viability.

Assuming the grower has preexisting access to land and land preparation inputs such as a tractor and rototiller, for the 3,978 square feet (38’ x 102’) trial site, pre-production input costs (ground cover, irrigation, harvest tools) totaled $625. Labor costs were calculated using a rate of $15.69 per hour, the average Florida farm worker pay in 2023 per the USDA NASS survey (https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/). Planting required 4 hours at a cost of $62.76. Pre-harvest tasks required 42.5 hours at a cost of $668.83. Harvest season tasks required 32 hours $502.08. Total labor costs were $1,231.67 for 78.5 hours of labor over the season. Therefore, total reported production costs were $1,856.75.

Prices for fresh sorrel calyces with seed boll intact range from a low of $5 per pound to a high of $9.98 per pound, with an average price of $8.99 per pound. The best performing varieties in 2021 – ‘Local’ and ‘Day Neutral’, had statistically equivalent yields, with ‘Local’ yielding nearly 57 pounds of fresh calyces. This would yield an estimated revenue of $512.43 and an overall loss of $1,244.32. However, the 57 pounds only represent a combined 12 data plants in a 112-plant trial. Mean yield per ‘Local’ plant was 4.75 pounds in 2021, so a yield of 532 pounds over the trial site ($4,783 in revenue) is a possibility, leading to an potential $2,926.43 in profit. However, the study did not investigate whether the market would be able to handle this volume of sorrel within a single harvest season.

Sorrel leaves may sell for $3.49 per bunch. Yield and income from the greens were not part of this study.

Participation Summary
3 Farmers participating in research

Educational & Outreach Activities

3 On-farm demonstrations
9 Webinars / talks / presentations
1 Workshop field days
1 Other educational activities: Podcast - Food Systems in Season

Participation Summary:

70 Farmers participated
59 Ag professionals participated
Education/outreach description:

Multiple approaches were used to educate farmers, extension faculty, and other stakeholders on the outcomes of the project. These included:

  • Farmer Field Day – The research team worked with two interns from the Active Learning Program at UF to develop a flyer to promote the event and a survey to obtain feedback from the attendees on the day of the event. Each team member distributed the flyer to their respective mailing lists and personally targeted invites to the Florida Black Farmers and Agriculturalists Association and the Florida Fruit and Vegetable Growers Association. The event was held on November 9, 2021 at Dirty Dog Organics. Twenty-two persons were in attendance and included 13 farmers as well as entomologists, food scientists, andvisitors from College of Agriculture, Science and Education (CASE) in Jamaica, one of whom also has a farm in LaBelle Florida. UF/IFAS Communications supported the event through media releases, blog posts, and real-time posts on social media during the event.  https://blogs.ifas.ufl.edu/news/2021/11/10/sorrel-as-a-new-crop-for-florida/.

    A QR Code was provided on site for the attendees to complete an end of event survey. Some completed it on site. An email reminder was sent to complete the survey which resulted in a combined total of 15 respondents, all of whom showed an interest in growing sorrel in the future. This suggests that the farmers are considering growing sorrel as an alternative crop. Ninety-three percent of those surveyed also indicated they planned to share what they learned about sorrel with those in their network.

    The attached agenda will provide insight on topics covered and the experiential learning approach used at the field day. Dr. Zimmerman commented that he has organized and attended many field days and he was very impressed with the methodologies the team used to engage the participants and plans to model future field days he conducts the same way.

  • Sumter County Farm City Week – This is an annual event for residents showcasing agriculture in Sumter County. The 2021 outdoor event was held on November 12. Norma Samuel made a presentation with props to 53 attendees on Florida Cranberry (Sorrel/Roselle): An interesting and easy to grow edible for Florida gardeners.

  • Social Media Posts – Throughout the season posts were made on Facebook on the UF/IFAS Extension Sumter County; Sustainable Agriculture & Food Systems – Sumter, Pasco, Hernando County; and UF IFAS Extension Sumter County Urban Horticulture & FFL Program Facebook pages.

  • Sumter County New Master Gardener Class Training 2021 – Extra seedlings of each variety were planted in the demonstration gardens at the UF/IFAS Extension Office in a high visibility area. Dr. Samuel integrated sorrel production into her presentation on vegetable gardening by taking the 8 class participants to the garden to introduce them to the crop.

  • Virtual Webinar through Zoom - the team targeted farmers, extension professionals, industry representatives utilizing their respective email lists and social media pages. Three Zoom Webinars were conducted: December 2023, June 2024, and September 2024. A sample flyer is attached.
    • December 2023 - A citrus farmer who participated indicated he had 10 acres that he is looking to change over to an alternative crop and he is considering planting sorrel. We advised to start small to gain familiarity with the crop and also to have a crop rotation plan as a means of managing any disease problems that may occur. He was referred to his agriculture Extension agent since he is not in one of the counties served by the researchers on the project. 
    • June 2024 - This webinar attracted a few international participants. One suggested we partner with the Caribbean Agricultural Extension Providers' Network (CAEPNet) to make the information more widely available to extension professionals and farmers in the Caribbean.
    • September 2024 - The research team partnered with Dr. Zimmerman from the University of the Virgin Islands and the  CAEPNet to offer a workshop on the production of sorrel via Zoom. The attendees were mainly extension professionals from the US mainland, the USVI, countries across the Caribbean, and a few producers. The recording can be found here. https://go.ufl.edu/lev88jz
  • Facebook Posts – Agents shared posts about sorrel on their respective county’s Facebook personal pages to promote the crop and events related to the research project.
  • Presentation at Conferences – Applicants submitted abstracts for presentation of findings at the following conferences:
    • National Association of County Agriculture Agents Annual Conference, West Palm Beach, Florida, 2022 – The research team had an abstract titled: On-Farm Evaluation of Sorrel (Hibiscus sabdariffa) Varieties for Central Florida Commercial Production accepted for an oral presentation at the conference. Matt Smith presented on behalf of the team. The conference proceedings can be found on page 258 of this link. https://www.nacaa.com/uploads/userfiles/files/Proceedings%202022.pdf
    • Extension Professionals Associations of Florida (EPAF), Daytona Beach, Florida, 2024. The team had an informational booth the entire conference. Extension Agents and specialists visiting the booth were able to get a one pager information sheet on sorrel and a recipe sheet, see live container-grown sorrel plant, dried seed bolls, packaged seeds, harvesting tools, dried sorrel calyces, sorrel powder - a value-added product created by UVI, and a stand-up banner on display.
  • Publications – At the time of submission of this final report a series of fact sheets have been created on sorrel production, botany, culture, insects and diseases of sorrel and will be submitted for publication on https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu

Learning Outcomes

21 Farmers reported changes in knowledge, attitudes, skills and/or awareness as a result of their participation
Key changes:
  • At the end of the day, participants were asked to reflect on what they had experienced and how they intended to apply what they’d learned. Of 22 attendees, 21 participated in the reflection portion. 52% were current or aspiring farmers. Based on the information presented at the field day, 87% were interested in growing sorrel in the future. When asked what sorrel-based products they believed people in their network and potential customers would be willing to try, sorrel drink was the most popular with wilted greens following close behind. Participants overwhelming enjoyed the experiential structure of the field day, with 93% reporting that the information was presented very effectively (40%) to extremely effectively (53%). 87% said they would definitely share what they learned at the field day with friends, family, and other farmers.

Project Outcomes

5 New working collaborations
Project outcomes:

The project outcomes are outlined according to objectives:

  • Objective 1: To evaluate the production of sorrel in Florida.
    • The ‘Day Neutral’ and ‘Local’ varieties are more suited for production in Central and possibly North Florida, since they come into production a lot sooner than the ‘Black’ and ‘Festival’ varieties and allowed for multiple harvests before frost. We hypothesize that the ‘Black’ and ‘Festival’ varieties would be more suited for South Florida, since they bloom later in the season; this would allow for an extended production/harvesting season. However, sorrel does not perform well under wet conditions and careful consideration of the planting site is recommended along with an annual site rotation plan to reduce the risk of soil-born disease outbreaks. 
  • Objective 2: To determine cost of production and economic viability.
    • The reported cost of production, labor included, of growing sorrel commercially in Florida on a site the size of our trial was $1,856.75 for a single trial in Year 1. At an average price of $8.99 per pound (with seed boll intact), potential revenue could reach $4,753 leading to leading to a potential profit of $2,926.43. However, the study did not investigate whether the market would be able to handle this volume of sorrel from a single producer within a single harvest season. Additional study is recommended.
  • Objective 3: To develop and distribute educational materials on sorrel production practices as part of an Extension and outreach effort.
    • See "Educational & Outreach Activities" section.
  • Objective 4: To increase seed availability of best performing varieties.
    • Each attendee at the Sorrel Farmer Field Day received a packet of about 20 seeds of either the ‘Local’ or ‘Day Neutral’ Varieties as these were the early performers in the area.
    • We hypothesize that the ‘Festival’ and ‘Black’ varieties will perform better in South Florida. Thus, seed packets of the ‘Festival’, ‘Black’, and ‘Day Neutral’ varieties were shared with the horticulture agent at UF/IFAS Extension Office in St. Lucie County to evaluate in their demonstration gardens for the 2022 growing season.
    • In 2022 – 2023 seeds were distributed to farmers who indicated an interest in growing sorrel in Florida. Due to limited availability of seeds some farmers and other persons with interest in growing sorrel were referred to Dr. Thomas Zimmerman at UVI to purchase seeds.
    • At the 2024 Extension Professionals of Florida (EPAF) Conference, Extension faculty were recruited to be the point of contact for each of the four UF/IFAS Extension Districts and FAMU Extension to grow the varieties suitable to their location in the state. They agreed to help with distribution of seeds saved at the end of their crop in 2025 to other Extension faculty and farmers in their District interested in growing sorrel. This will help tremendously with increasing distribution across the state.
  •  
Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE.