Final report for SW22-938
Project Information
Cheatgrass invasion increases the risk of wildfire and negatively impacts agricultural production in the western United States. Grazing has been suggested as a tool to combat cheatgrass and increase resilience to wildfire. However, most research on targeted grazing of cheatgrass has been done with cattle. Studies on targeted grazing of sheep on cheatgrass remain sparse, despite interest from stakeholders. This project will answer questions about the use of sheep to reduce cheatgrass and wildfire risk, while also examining the economic costs and benefits of this practice.
We will establish a sheep targeted grazing experiment at a management-relevant scale in central Idaho to examine vegetation responses and belowground processes affected by grazing. Grazing treatments will compare dormant-season grazing in spring and fall, when cheatgrass is growing but most perennial species are not, to “traditional” summer grazing. In addition to assessing treatment effects on the composition of aboveground vegetation and fuel loads, we will examine impacts on soil processes to enhance understanding of the ecological mechanisms underpinning our results. Fire behavior models and economic models will estimate the financial and societal costs and benefits of adopting sheep targeted grazing practices.
Outreach to producers, land managers, researchers, and the general public—locally and regionally—will occur through diverse venues ranging from field days to podcasts. Rangeland monitoring workshops will build knowledge and shared understanding among land managers, sheep producers, and herders, with trainings offered in Spanish to serve the primarily Spanish-speaking sheepherder community. To contribute to youth education about rangeland issues, we will develop lesson plans about the invasive annual grass-fire cycle and targeted grazing with sheep, which will be shared with teachers in Idaho and beyond. These efforts will increase knowledge of the potential for using sheep as a management tool, while broadening public acceptance for active rangeland management.
This work will be of significance throughout the Intermountain West, much of which is invaded by cheatgrass. With over 2 million sheep still being raised in the western states, harnessing their ability to reduce cheatgrass and associated wildfire risk poses an opportunity to improve environmental conditions and enhance sheep producers’ role as stewards of the lands they manage.
Project information will be disseminated in English and Spanish among agricultural stakeholders via podcasts, field days, industry newsletters, video, and fact sheets, with assistance from the Idaho Rangeland Resources Commission and the Idaho Wool Growers Association. An online economic decision tool about sheep grazing as a cheatgrass management practice will be shared through these venues and professional networks.
Expected outcomes:
-
Ecological and economic understanding of sheep as a management tool for cheatgrass and wildfire risk reduction.
-
Improved skills to implement sheep grazing to reduce cheatgrass and fuel loads.
-
Increased collaboration among scientists, land managers, and livestock producers.
-
Wider public acceptance of active rangeland management.
Research objectives:
- Evaluate the effects of sheep grazing treatments on vegetation communities by quantifying changes in cheatgrass and perennial species cover and density.
- Examine mechanisms driving vegetation responses by quantifying the impact of sheep grazing treatments on litter accumulation, soil organic matter content, and nitrogen cycling.
- Predict outcomes for wildfire risk by quantifying grazing treatment effects on fuel loads and modeling associated wildfire behavior.
- Compare economic costs for achieving a change in ecological condition based on targeted grazing with sheep to other cheatgrass management strategies.
Education objectives:
- Increase knowledge of the ecological and economic impacts of invasive annual grass.
- Increase knowledge of the potential for adopting sheep grazing as a management tool to minimize invasive annual grass and reduce wildfire risk.
- Achieve wider public acceptance of active land management in rangelands.
|
July 1, 2022 - June 30, 2025 |
Su 22 |
Fa 22 |
Sp 23 |
Su 23 |
Fa 23 |
Sp 24 |
Su 24 |
Fa 24 |
Sp 25 |
Su 25 |
|
Team meetings |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Conduct research (Research Objectives 1-4 denoted in chart) |
||||||||||
|
Establish plots |
1-3 |
|||||||||
|
Fall grazing treatment |
1-3 |
1-3 |
||||||||
|
Spring grazing treatment |
1-3 |
1-3 |
||||||||
|
Summer (control) grazing trt |
1-3 |
1-3 |
||||||||
|
Veg, soil sampling |
1-3 |
1-3 |
1-3 |
|||||||
|
Veg, soil sample analysis |
1-3 |
1-3 |
1-3 |
1-3 |
1-3 |
1-3 |
||||
|
Experiment data analysis |
1-3 |
1-3 |
1-3 |
1-3 |
1-3 |
1-3 |
||||
|
Fire behavior modeling |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|||||||
|
Economic data collection |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
||
|
Economic modeling |
4 |
4 |
4 |
|||||||
|
Outreach and Products (Education Objectives 1-3 denoted in chart) |
||||||||||
|
July 1, 2022 - June 30, 2025 |
Su 22 |
Fa 22 |
Sp 23 |
Su 23 |
Fa 23 |
Sp 24 |
Su 24 |
Fa 24 |
Sp 25 |
Su 25 |
|
Field days |
1-3 |
1-3 |
||||||||
|
Monitoring workshops |
2 |
2 |
||||||||
|
Curriculum (grade 6-12) |
3 |
3 |
||||||||
|
ID Wool Growers presentations |
2 |
2 |
||||||||
|
Conference presentations |
1 |
1 |
||||||||
|
Podcasts |
1-3 |
1-3 |
||||||||
|
Manuscripts |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|||||||
|
Economic decision tool |
1 |
|||||||||
|
Life on the Range video |
2,3 |
|||||||||
|
Rangeland Partnership presentation |
3 |
|||||||||
|
Fact sheets |
1-2 |
1-2 |
||||||||
|
Newsletters |
2 |
|||||||||
|
Science article for kids |
3 |
|||||||||
|
Science Pub |
3 |
|||||||||
Cooperators
- - Technical Advisor - Producer
- - Producer
- - Producer
- (Educator and Researcher)
- (Educator and Researcher)
- (Educator and Researcher)
- (Educator and Researcher)
- - Technical Advisor (Educator and Researcher)
- (Educator and Researcher)
- (Researcher)
- (Researcher)
- (Educator and Researcher)
Research
Research hypotheses:
- Targeted grazing by sheep will reduce cheatgrass cover, with the strongest effects when grazing occurs in both spring and fall.
- Sheep will alter soil inputs and nitrogen cycling, potentially promoting cheatgrass growth via increased nitrogen availability.
- Reductions in cheatgrass will decrease wildfire risk and severity.
- Economic costs of targeted grazing will vary across operations but will be outweighed by benefits and lower than alternative treatment methods.
This project will assess the ecological and economic feasibility of using dormant season sheep grazing to control cheatgrass and reduce wildfire risk. Specific research objectives include:
1: Evaluate the effects of sheep grazing treatments on vegetation communities by quantifying changes in cheatgrass and perennial species cover and density.
2: Examine mechanisms driving vegetation responses by quantifying the impact of grazing treatments on litter accumulation, soil organic matter content, and nitrogen cycling.
3: Predict outcomes for wildfire risk by quantifying grazing treatment effects on fuel loads and modeling associated wildfire behavior.
4: Compare economic costs for achieving a change in ecological condition based on targeted grazing with sheep to other cheatgrass management strategies.
Project site:
Our study is located on the Sawtooth National Forest in Blaine County, Idaho. It is in the transition zone between areas heavily invaded by cheatgrass and more intact big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata vaseyana) systems at high risk of invasion under climate change (Boyte et al. 2016). Domestic sheep are herded through these ecosystems annually.
Experimental design:
In the summer of 2022, we established a randomized block experiment with four treatments designed to capture the impacts of sheep grazing on cheatgrass at different phenological stages: (1) spring targeted grazing, (2) fall targeted grazing, (3) spring + fall targeted grazing, and (4) “traditional” summer grazing, which is serving as the “control” for this region (Fig. 1). Since relatively light summer grazing (maximum 25-35% utilization) is common in the study region, we take it to be the standard condition. With this experiment we are therefore testing different grazing regimes, rather than including a grazing removal (no grazing) treatment (Vermeire et al. 2023). However, during the first year of grazing treatments, several of the fall and spring targeted grazing plots were not visited by sheep for reasons beyond our control (e.g., lack of water access due to an exceptionally dry fall), which enabled us to compare the control plots that were grazed lightly in summer to the un-grazed plots. This comparison confirmed that cheatgrass cover in the control/summer-grazed plots did not differ significantly from the un-grazed plots after the first year of treatment implementation, thus lending support to our choice to treat summer grazing as the control condition.
Treatments are replicated 4 times across two grazing allotments (4 treatments x 4 replicates x 2 allotments; N = 32). Three 50 m transects are positioned in each 50 x 50 m plot for vegetation and soil measurements (Herrick et al. 2017). Soil temperature was measured continuously in plots with Kestrel environmental dataloggers for the first year of the study, and soil moisture is measured during field sampling with a Campbell HydroSense sensor. Field data collection in the summer of year 1 (July 2022) preceded the targeted grazing treatments and serves as baseline data. All measurements are aggregated to the plot level as the unit of analysis.
To test for treatment effects on ecosystem properties, we are using generalized linear mixed effects models in a fully factorial (spring x fall grazing), before-after control-impact design with plot as a random effect. We are running the models with the lme4 package in R (R Core Team 2023, Bates et al. 2015).
Targeted grazing implementation:
Each allotment has ~1000 ewes participating in the experiment, representing a realistic amount for commercial producers in this region. The researchers and sheep producers work with herders to maintain sheep in the treatment areas until objectives are achieved, or use of other resources triggers the need to move. Spring and fall targeted grazing occur when cheatgrass is green, for approximately 2 weeks in May-June and in October. Interannual variability in environmental conditions requires us to remain flexible. Fall grazing treatments have occurred in October 2022, 2023, and 2024, and spring grazing treatments have occurred in May-June 2023, 2024, and 2025. Post-treatment measurements for the fall 2024 and spring 2025 grazing treatments and beyond will be part of the second phase of this project (2025-2028).

Animal nutrition and health:
Sheep nutrition and health are linked to the ecological outcomes of the proposed research study and the economic viability of the participating grazing operations. Nutritional requirements on rangelands are an interplay between physiologic status (dry, pregnant, lactating) and changes in plant phenology. Fall grazing, after most forage species have matured or senesced, can lead to dietary protein and nutrient deficiencies that affect sheep performance (Otsyina et al. 1982). We have been monitoring conditions throughout the experiment to help ensure that sheep will not incur a physiologic cost during grazing treatments. The sheep industry recognizes checking body condition scores to determine whether ewes are meeting their nutrient requirements (Kenyon et al. 2014, Thompson and Meyer 2011). We provided training materials to sheep producers (in English) and herders (in Spanish) on body condition scoring protocols that can be employed efficiently throughout the study period. Producers and herders performed body condition scoring, combined with continuous visual assessments, before and during the grazing treatments and did not observe declines in body condition.
In July 2022 and 2023, we clipped biomass (described under Objective 1, below) and sent samples of annual grass (i.e., cheatgrass), perennial grasses, and forbs to Dairy One Forage Laboratory for analysis of their nutrient and energy contents. We selected samples from half of the plots (n=16), distributed throughout each treatment and allotment. Results indicated that forage was sufficient to meet ewes’ daily crude protein requirements. The producers and research team therefore opted not to provide protein supplements during the targeted grazing treatments.
Data collection and analysis:
Objective 1:
Aboveground vegetation sampling enables us to assess grazing treatment effects on cheatgrass and perennial vegetation, while also supporting the aims of Objectives 2 and 3. In July 2022, 2023, and 2024, we took line-point intercept measurements of plant species and ground cover every 1 m along sampling transects. Destructive sampling within 15, 0.25 m2 quadrats/plot was conducted along transects to measure aboveground biomass of functional groups and litter. Samples were dried (48 hours, 60°C) to estimate aboveground biomass dry weight. We aggregated the species cover data into five functional groups: cheatgrass, other graminoids, native and non-native forbs, and shrubs. Treatment effects on species diversity, functional group cover, and functional group biomass were conducted with generalized linear mixed effects models, as described above. Distance-based redundancy analysis was used to test for treatment effects on plant community composition.
Objective 2:
To improve mechanistic understanding of the ecological sustainability of the grazing treatments, we quantified how grazing alters litter input, soil organic matter (SOM) content, soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) stocks and soil N cycling, since these feed back directly to plant production and community composition. To assess N cycling, we measured in-situ nitrogen release of plant-available N with ion-exchange resins (Plant Root Simulator probes) that we buried near the start of the growing seasons in 2022 and 2023 and retrieved after one year to capture annual nutrient supply rates (Adair et al. 2008, Concilio and Loink 2008, Martinsen et al. 2012). In addition to measuring nitrate- and ammonium-associated N, the probes also adsorb other cations and anions available in the soil (e.g., phosphate, potassium, calcium, magnesium, etc.), which can be correlated with plant mineral concentrations obtained from the forage analyses.
We complemented the field measurements of available N from the Plant Root Simulator probes with lab analyses of nitrate- and ammonium-associated N concentrations in soil samples. In July 2022, 2023, and 2024, we collected litter and soil samples (5 cm depth, 4.5 cm diameter) every 10 m along each transect for measurements of pH, soil organic matter (SOM), soil C and N, and nitrate- and ammonium-associated N. Upon sampling, soil was air dried and stored in a dark place at 20°C until further analyses. Soil samples were then analyzed in the lab for pH, SOM, and C and N concentrations. Bulk soil organic C and N concentrations were analyzed using a Thermo Electron Flash EA 1112 CN analyzer. SOM content was analyzed using loss-on-ignition (Hoogsteen et al. 2015). Nitrate- and ammonium-associated N were measured colorimetrically after KCl extractions (Doane and Horwath 2003). Treatment effects on soil properties were assessed with generalized linear mixed effects model, as described above.
Objective 3:
To evaluate grazing treatment effects on potential wildfire behavior, field measurements collected during the 2022, 2023, and 2024 field seasons were used to parameterize fuel characteristics for fire behavior modeling. Herbaceous fine fuel loading was estimated from aboveground biomass measured in Objective 1 plots. Herbaceous fuelbed depth was represented using mean herbaceous canopy height measured concurrently with biomass sampling. Down woody debris was rare across study sites and was not included as a modeled fuel component. Horizontal fuel continuity was quantified using line point intercept measurements. Points lacking vegetation cover were used to characterize gap size and distribution within each treatment. Shrub fuel loads were estimated using species specific allometric relationships relating shrub volume to biomass (Harrison et al. submitted; Huff et al. 2017; Hulet et al. unpublished data). These measurements were used to parameterize treatment specific fuelbeds in Fuel and Fire Tools (FFT) to simulate potential fire behavior across grazing treatments. Preliminary simulations have been conducted, and additional fuelbed refinement and sensitivity analyses are ongoing.
Objective 4:
To ensure that this research is relevant and applicable to stakeholders, we began developing a budget model to identify economic tradeoffs associated with adopting targeted grazing as a cheatgrass management strategy. First, we designed an analytic framework to organize potential costs and benefits by multiple criteria. The framework distinguished private from public costs and benefits, as well as costs and benefits during dry and wet years. We refined this framework through discussions with sheep operators, U.S. Forest Service staff, academic researchers, and other natural resource sector experts to better understand the potential outcomes of sheep targeted grazing regimes. We then collected data on economic costs and benefits from a variety of sources and stakeholders to characterize the realities described by the project partners (Hallam et al. 1998). Costs of alternative management strategies (e.g., wildfire risk mitigation) were obtained from U.S. Forest Service collaborators.
In May-June 2022, we established 32 treatment plots for the targeted grazing experiment. Half of the plots are located in the Deer Creek allotment and half in the Limekiln allotment in the Ketchum District of the Sawtooth National Forest. In July 2022, 2023, and 2024, we collected vegetation, soil, and fuels data in each of the plots. The grazing treatments were implemented in October 2022, 2023, and 2024 (fall and fall + spring targeted grazing), May-June 2023, 2024, and 2025 (spring and fall + spring targeted grazing), and June-July 2023 and 2024 (summer grazing). Monitoring of each plot by Forest Service personnel and Boise State researchers found that sheep impacts were low in October 2022, due to low precipitation that season and less available green cheatgrass and other forage for sheep. However, utilization estimates were higher in subsequent targeted grazing seasons. We are assessing treatment effects using a before-after control-impact model, with data collected from the plots in 2022 representing the "before" condition and data collected in subsequent years as the "after." Within this first phase of the study, we can evaluate results from two years of grazing treatments that spanned from fall 2022 to summer 2024. The study is ongoing into a second phase (2025-2028) that will enable us to assess additional years of treatment effects.
Objective 1:
Our field measurements using the line-point intercept method at 150 points along three 50-m transects in each plot revealed that the mean cover of cheatgrass across all plots in 2022 was 63%, with 18% cover of other non-native species and 58% cover of native species. (The total percent cover can sum to over 100%, due to plants overlapping each other in the canopy.) Cumulatively, across all years and plots, we identified over 130 plant species. Of those identified, 88% are native species and 12% non-native. We found 95 forb species, 22 grasses, 14 shrubs, 2 trees, and 2 sedges. On average, summer control plots in 2022, which served as the baseline condition, had a mean of 18.9 species intercepted along the transects. Species richness increased significantly in 2023, which was a wetter year.
Cheatgrass cover in plots that were lightly grazed in summer, which we designated as the "control" treatment for the experiment, did not differ significantly from 5 plots that were inadvertently not grazed in any season during the first year of grazing treatments. These findings lend support to our assumption that light summer grazing has relatively low impacts on the target species and can therefore serve as a useful reference point for the targeted grazing treatments.
We detected few treatment effects on plant functional group biomass, but found that cover and biomass were highly correlated for most functional groups each year. Given the patchier sampling of biomass relative to species cover in each plot, we therefore focus on how the treatments affected plant cover as our main metric of understanding vegetation change.
Cheatgrass cover varied significantly each year in the summer control plots, reflecting interannual variation in production. After accounting for differences in starting conditions and interannual variation, we found that spring targeted grazing significantly reduced cheatgrass cover after both the first and second years of treatments, by an average of 9 and 13%, respectively. Fall targeted grazing did not affect cheatgrass cover after the first year, when there was little fall green-up of cheatgrass. In the second year, however, fall targeted grazing occurred when cheatgrass had emerged and was green, and the fall treatment significantly reduced cheatgrass cover by 19% that year. The interaction of fall x spring targeted grazing led to a 9% reduction in cheatgrass cover after the second year, which was less of a reduction than was observed under either fall or spring targeted grazing alone.
After accounting for differences in starting conditions and interannual variation, fall targeted grazing significantly increased native forb cover (+16%) after the first year of treatments and significantly decreased non-native forb cover (-6%) after the second year. In contrast, spring targeted grazing significantly decreased the cover of all non-target plant functional groups except for shrubs (native forbs -15% and -23% after the first and second year, respectively; non-native forbs -3% after the first year; graminoids -5% and -9% after the first and second years). When combined, the fall x spring targeted grazing treatment interaction dampened or reversed the effects of spring targeted grazing alone, leading to less reduction in the cover of native and non-native forbs and an increase in cover of non-cheatgrass graminoids. Targeted grazing treatments did not significantly affect shrub cover. Consequently, spring targeted grazing significantly reduced species richness and the Shannon effective number of species, but the reduction in richness was dampened in plots with fall x spring targeted grazing. Species evenness was not significantly affected by the first two years of targeted grazing treatments.
Plant community composition varied significantly across years, with “year” accounting for 13% of the variation in species composition explained by the distance-based Redundancy Analysis. Spring targeted grazing had a marginally significant effect on the plant community composition, accounting for 2% of the variation in species composition, and shifting the community away from one dominated by non-native annual species and toward one characterized by annual forbs and native graminoids. Fall targeted grazing also shifted the community away from one dominated by cheatgrass, although this was not statistically significant. The interaction of fall x spring targeted grazing was significant, explaining 3% of the variation in species composition. Plots that received this combination of fall x spring grazing moved the least away from their starting composition each year, compared to plots with either fall or spring targeted grazing alone.
Objective 2:
Sheep targeted grazing had varying effects on soil properties. Fall and spring targeted grazing treatments each initially increased litter cover after one year and then significantly decreased litter cover after the second year of treatments. Similar to the second year of fall and spring treatment effects, the combination of fall x spring targeted grazing reduced litter cover by 19% each year. Soil organic matter concentrations increased significantly under the spring targeted grazing treatments each year, perhaps in part through the incorporation of litter into the soil. We did not, however, detect any significant changes in soil organic carbon or nitrogen concentrations after two years of treatments. This result is expected, as bulk soil C and N stocks tend to change relatively slowly.
In contrast, mineralized forms of N that are available for uptake by plants (nitrate and ammonium) did change across years and grazing treatments, with significantly higher concentrations of both nitrate and ammonium in bulk soils in 2023 – a wetter year – which also saw an additional increase in nitrate in spring-grazed plots and a decrease in ammonium in fall-grazed plots. Overall, soil nitrate concentrations were higher than ammonium concentrations across the experiment.
In contrast to the controlled lab analyses of nitrate and ammonium in bulk soil that measure nitrogen that is potentially available to plants at the time of sample collection, Plant Root Simulator Probes measured nitrate and ammonium that is actually available to plants in each plot for approximately one year, starting near the beginning of the 2022 growing season and repeated the following year. Nitrate availability (µ = 253 µg 10 cm-2 year-1, σ = 90.1 µg 10 cm-2 year-1) was much higher than ammonium availability (µ = 3.56 µg 10 cm-2 year-1, σ = 2.06 µg 10 cm-2 year-1) across all plots across the first year, matching the trend found in the lab analyses. However, we did not find any significant treatment effects on in-situ, plant-available nitrogen supply rates in the soil. While the annual sampling interval may have disguised impacts that occurred at a finer temporal resolution, or plants may have been taking up any increase in mineral nitrogen that became available, thus masking treatment effects, these results suggest that targeted grazing is not promoting a net increase in mineral nitrogen supply rates at an annual timescale.
Objective 3:
Fuelbeds were parameterized from field measurements collected between 2022 and 2024. Treatment-specific fuelbeds representing fall grazing, spring grazing, and fall plus spring grazing were developed in Fuel and Fire Tools (FFT). Slope was held constant to isolate fuel effects, and fire behavior was evaluated under 5, 10, and 20 mph wind scenarios.
Modeled rate of spread (ROS) increased with wind speed across all treatments. At 5 mph winds, ROS averaged approximately 25 m min⁻¹; at 10 mph winds, approximately 45 m min⁻¹; and at 20 mph winds, ROS exceeded 120 m min⁻¹ across fuelbeds, including those with relatively low herbaceous biomass. These results indicate that wind strongly constrained fire behavior at higher speeds, reducing the relative influence of grazing-driven fuel differences on spread rates.
Flame length was more responsive to variation in fuel structure. At 5 mph winds, flame lengths averaged approximately 1 m in fall and fall plus spring grazing treatments. Fuelbeds with greater fine-fuel loads and structural heterogeneity produced higher flame lengths, particularly where herbaceous biomass and litter continuity were elevated. Grazing effects were most evident under low to moderate wind speeds, when differences in fuel structure more clearly influenced modeled fire behavior. Under high wind conditions, treatment differences diminished as wind became the dominant driver of spread.
When fuel characteristics were averaged across all plots within a grazing period, modeled fire behavior differed little among treatments. This reflected substantial within-treatment variability in biomass, shrub distribution, and grazing selectivity. Grazing was not a uniform fuel treatment; heterogeneous fuelbeds continued to carry fire at the stocking densities evaluated. For initial modeling, representative subplots spanning the observed range of vegetation structure were used to explore relative fire behavior responses.
These findings suggest that targeted grazing can influence modeled fire behavior under low to moderate wind conditions, but effects diminish as wind becomes the dominant driver. However, effectiveness is context dependent and varies with vegetation structure, grazing intensity, and weather. FFT outputs represent modeled potential fire behavior under standardized conditions rather than observed wildfire outcomes. Fuelbed refinement and additional sensitivity analyses are ongoing to better evaluate the extent to which seasonal sheep grazing can meaningfully alter fuel structure and modeled fire behavior in rangeland systems.
Objective 4:
Our results suggest that the private and public costs of targeted grazing—as we are practicing it in our study—were modest relative to overall grazing operations and did not appear to create major additional financial burdens for participating producers or agency staff. Time spent on project set-up by Forest Service staff of various pay grades and university scientists was estimated at $2,850 in salary costs during the first year. Additional time (and hence salary) was required of all team members as they continued to coordinate and devote effort to the project each year.
The largest determinant of producers’ costs was access to trained labor (i.e., herders), who would already be herding range sheep bands regardless of whether they were also participating in targeted grazing. An additional herder from another band was occasionally used to help implement the treatments, particularly in spring, when lambs are with the band and make intensive herding more challenging, but no new herders were hired specifically to support the project. Other, smaller costs arose throughout the project. On one allotment, a creek dried up during a dry fall and necessitated the use of a water truck, with associated mileage costs. During the first year of the study, one of the producers deployed a team of three people for three days to repair a public trail that was damaged by sheep during the targeted grazing treatment window. This could be considered a learning cost, as all involved were learning new ways of managing the sheep to meet project goals.
Sheep producers and U.S. Forest Service staff also identified economic benefits that could arise from the adoption of targeted grazing. For producers, these included some savings in feed and transportation costs due to the different timing of grazing under the treatments and free access to forage during the treatment periods, as well as the option value of increased flexibility in how they managed sheep across their Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management grazing permits.They noted that the increased flexibility in permit management outweighed the value of any savings in feed costs. Similarly, new relationships that arose as a result of participation in the study afforded tangible benefits, such as the formation of a partnership between a conservation-oriented private landowner and a sheep producer who was able to streamline his access to the Forest Service allotment by crossing over and grazing on private land on his way to the study area. They also valued the potential avoided costs that would be associated with a wildfire, including relocation to other public grazing lands following a fire or maintaining access to feed on private land, which they estimated as costing between $6,300-$10,850 per band of sheep per year following a fire.
Forest Service staff identified potential savings in cheatgrass control and wildfire prevention activities, as well as an expectation of reduced costs due to improved relationships between the Forest Service, sheep producers, and the general public.These included avoided herbicide application costs, estimated at $135 per acre, in areas where targeted grazing treatments were applied. They also perceived that increased acceptance of sheep grazing on public lands as a result of the targeted grazing project reduced the time that staff spent fielding complaints about the sheep and allowed them to shift their time to other priorities.
Modeled reductions in wildfire flame length under low to moderate wind conditions suggest that targeted grazing may influence suppression feasibility and operational response options. However, the extent to which these modeled changes translate into economic savings depends on fire occurrence probability, weather conditions at the time of ignition, treatment scale and placement, and the frequency with which grazing must be repeated to maintain reduced fuel loads. Because fine fuels regenerate annually and high wind events diminish treatment effects, economic outcomes are likely context dependent. Accordingly, grazing should be viewed as a potential risk-moderation strategy rather than a guaranteed cost-reduction measure.
Our findings indicate that, within the context of this study, short-term private and public costs of implementing targeted grazing were modest relative to perceived ecological and operational benefits. If targeted grazing treatments successfully reduce cheatgrass cover, there is potential for social and economic benefits to exceed short-term implementation costs. Moreover, if land management agencies work with producers to structure grazing permits that accommodate targeted grazing objectives, longer-term producer benefits may increase. However, the magnitude and persistence of these costs and benefits are expected to be influenced by exogenous factors, such as climate variability, fire occurrence probability, treatment scale, and the frequency with which grazing must be repeated.
Research outcomes
After two years of targeted grazing treatment implementation with sheep, we found that both fall and spring treatments can be effective at significantly reducing cheatgrass cover. In spring, sheep also reduced the cover of non-target herbaceous plant functional groups and plant species richness. In contrast, fall targeted grazing increased the cover of native forb species, decreased non-native forbs, and did not affect species diversity. Fall targeted grazing effects were more variable between years, however, likely due to interannual differences in precipitation and cheatgrass green-up preceding the fall treatments. Interactions between fall x spring targeted grazing also had mixed effects across years, sometimes dampening the effects of either fall or spring grazing alone.
The before-after control-impact study design that we implemented has proven to be useful for a study taking place across a variable landscape and with high variability in environmental conditions across years. This design has enabled treatment effects to be parsed out from these other sources of background variation, making our analyses more robust. We therefore recommend that other studies aiming to capture the realism of heterogeneous environmental conditions should include a baseline year of data collection to allow for the use of this analytical approach. However, given the high degree of interannual variability in the plant community, more years of targeted grazing treatments will also be helpful to distinguish enduring trends in how targeted grazing is affecting cheatgrass and non-target plants.
We suggest continuing to focus on plant cover measurements at a finer spatial scale than is feasible for biomass clipping. A focus on cover measurements is not only more efficient for research teams in the field, but also better captures grazing effects that are distributed patchily throughout the plot, thus enabling better detection of treatment effects on aspects of the plant community for which biomass measurements are not strictly critical. More focus on assessing grazing utilization rates at the time of treatments is also recommended, as this is of high interest to land managers.
We found few changes to soil variables within the first years of the experiment. This lack of change is somewhat expected, as many soil properties tend to change slowly. However, these results provide important information that the more intense grazing pressure and spatial concentration of sheep with targeted grazing is not rapidly increasing the concentration of nitrogen in the soil, which could benefit cheatgrass at the expense of native species. Initial results for soil properties that do respond more quickly, such as changes in litter cover and soil organic matter concentrations, suggest that there is potential for shifts in soil carbon and nitrogen over time, and that these concentrations should continue to be tracked. More nuanced assessments of their forms (e.g., mineral N, soil C fractions) would provide further insight into how nutrient cycling is affected by targeted grazing treatments in the longer term.
Results indicate that targeted grazing may alter fine-fuel structure and modeled fire behavior under low to moderate wind conditions. While high wind scenarios diminish treatment effects, future research should evaluate whether strategic deployment of grazing in areas of high ignition probability or near infrastructure could enhance its effectiveness as a risk-moderation tool. Increasing stocking density or grazing duration may further influence fuel continuity and fuelbed structure; however, such adjustments must be evaluated within ecological limits to maintain rangeland health. Future work should integrate spatial fire spread modeling and targeted treatment placement to clarify the conditions under which grazing contributes meaningfully to sustainable agricultural production and fire resilience in the western United States.
Although our economic work remained largely qualitative, we found that we were able to implement sheep targeted grazing treatments and significantly reduce cheatgrass cover at almost no extra cost to producers. The main benefits were avoided costs and perceived advantages in terms of improved relationships and management flexibility. Our wildfire modeling found that under low to moderate wind conditions, targeted grazing treatments could produce lower modeled flame lengths relative to traditional grazed fuelbeds. While wildfire suppression decisions depend on multiple operational factors, our modeled differences under the targeted grazing treatments suggest the potential for changes in tactical feasibility under certain conditions, which could include a shift to less costly wildfire fighting options. However, we caution that our implementation of targeted grazing within the context of the study cannot be directly applied to all real-world situations, as we designed the project to buffer participating producers from incurring costs. We therefore suggest that additional work could go toward quantifying economic costs and benefits from a broader suite of targeted grazing scenarios. It would also be useful to explore the potential for producers to access niche markets as a source of direct profit, wherein consumers who value practices associated with the provision of ecosystem services would be willing to pay premium prices for products from sheep involved in targeted grazing.
Education and Outreach
2.) "Sheepscape Ecology" course offered at Boise State University in spring 2024 (HES 596, 1 credit).
3.) Informational signs at Trailing of the Sheep Festival in fall 2024.
4.) Presentation to 6th grade classroom at Hawthorne Elementary in Boise, ID in spring 2025.
5.) Targeted grazing curriculum taught at the BYU STEM Camp in summer 2024 and 2025 to youth ages 14-17.
6.) Targeted grazing curriculum taught at the BYU Range and Wildlife Camp in summer 2025 to you ages 14-17.
Participation summary:
Education and Outreach Objective 1: Increase knowledge of the ecological and economic impacts of invasive annual grass.
Field days and complementary outreach activities:
A field day was initially scheduled for November 2022 following the first round of targeted grazing treatments. Due to unfavorable late-season weather conditions and limited field accessibility, the event was initially postponed to ensure meaningful on-site engagement. Rather than delay outreach efforts, we expanded alternative education and media-based engagement strategies to reach a similar and broader audience in the first years of the project.
Interviews with project team members resulted in feature articles in Western SARE News, the Western Integrated Pest Management newsletter, and the Idaho Mountain Express newspaper, which serves the Wood River Valley communities near the study area. We also wrote articles for the Sun Valley Property News magazine (which also serves the Wood River Valley and Sun Valley region) and for the Trailing of the Sheep Festival newsletter, describing the problems associated with cheatgrass invasion, the ecological principles behind targeted grazing with livestock, and outlining our research objectives. The Trailing of the Sheep Festival is a regional nonprofit organization that "celebrates the history of sheep ranching in Idaho and the West," drawing both local stakeholders and visitors from across the region.
These efforts provided direct engagement with community members and producers in the same geographic area originally targeted for the field day, while also reaching a substantially broader audience. This approach maintained alignment with the project’s objective of increasing awareness and knowledge regarding invasive annual grasses and the role of targeted grazing in rangeland management.
Conference presentations:
To disseminate research findings from all four of the project’s core research objectives to livestock producers, land managers, and scientists, project team members delivered a total of ten oral and poster presentations at national and international conferences. These included the Society for Range Management conference in 2023, 2024, and 2025, the Ecological Society of America conference in 2024 and 2025, the International Mountain Conference in 2025, and the Society for Ecological Restoration World Conference on Ecological Restoration in 2025. We reached over 400 audience members with these presentations, comprising mostly scientists and land management agency staff.
To engage directly with the sheep industry and producer community, graduate students and faculty also presented project findings at the West Central States Wool Growers Convention held in Boise, ID in November 2023, which attracted hundreds of sheep producers and other industry stakeholders from Idaho, Oregon, Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming.
Undergraduate students involved with the project shared results locally through three poster presentations and a lightning talk at Boise State University's Undergraduate Research Showcase in 2023 and 2024, and at Boise State’s Service Learning/Vertically Integrated Project Fall Expo in 2024, strengthening workforce development and regional engagement.
Workforce development and capacity building:
In addition to formal outreach activities, the project contributed substantially to workforce development across academic, producer, and agency communities. Over the course of the project, training and hands-on research experience were provided to:
- 22 undergraduate students
- 8 Master’s students
- 1 PhD student
- 2 K–12 teachers
- 7 agricultural producers
- 6 federal and state agency personnel
- 2 local private land managers
- 1 professional botanist
Undergraduate students gained field-based monitoring experience addressing real-world rangeland management challenges, including vegetation sampling, fuel characterization, and stakeholder engagement. Graduate students used project data to develop research design, statistical analysis, and science communication skills while interacting directly with producers and agency personnel. In two instances, graduate students from beyond our initial project team leveraged our experiment as part of their thesis and dissertation research on sheep utilization of plant functional groups and on cheatgrass pathogens, respectively.These experiences strengthened applied research capacity and fostered cross-sector collaboration essential for implementing targeted grazing strategies at operational scales.
Scholarly publications and data sharing:
Manuscripts describing the effects of sheep targeted grazing on vegetation dynamics, soil properties, and modeled wildfire behavior are in preparation for submission to peer-reviewed journals. Two graduate student theses focused on Research Objectives 1 and 2 have been accepted by Boise State University’s Graduate College and will be publicly available through ProQuest.
In addition, we have shared data from our project to support national- and global-scale efforts, which will in turn support future research and management decisionmaking. First, we contributed soil temperature data from our experiment plots to the global microclimate database. This initiative is being led by researchers at the University of Antwerp, Belgium, and will be published as an open-access dataset. Second, we shared the vegetation cover data from our plots with the US Geological Survey’s (USGS) Earth Observation and Science (EROS) Center team that produces annual fractional vegetation cover maps (RCMAP) and early detection maps of exotic annual grasses, including cheatgrass, for the western United States. Our vegetation data are now being used alongside other monitoring data in their vegetation cover models, which generate outputs used widely by rangeland scientists and managers. This collaboration arose, in part, through our joint appearance with USGS scientists on an episode of the USGS EROS podcast, Eyes on Earth, in which we discussed cheatgrass ecology and mapping, and the potential of targeted grazing with sheep as a cheatgrass management tool. This episode was streamed by over 4,300 listeners, greatly increasing our project’s reach.
Economic decision tool:
The project initiated development of an economic framework to compare targeted sheep grazing with alternative cheatgrass management strategies. Preliminary data compilation and conceptual model development were completed; however, personnel transitions within the economic team and few generalizable costs associated with our approach to implementing targeted grazing limited progress toward development of the proposed web-based decision tool during the project period. As a result, a fully integrated economic model was not completed.
The ecological and fire behavior analyses conducted through this project provide essential inputs for future economic modeling. Continued development of a comprehensive decision-support framework will require dedicated economic expertise and additional integration of probabilistic fire risk and cost data.
Education and Outreach Objective 2: Increase knowledge of the potential for adopting sheep grazing as a management tool to minimize invasive annual grass and reduce wildfire risk.
Field days and complementary outreach activities:
We planned to host a field day in the spring of 2025 to present project results and lessons learned, but these plans were affected by funding disruptions beyond our control. However, we still managed to accomplish many of the intended objectives of the field day by taking advantage of other outreach opportunities. Ultimately, through these activities, we reached a far wider audience than a single field day could have accomplished.
In June 2024, we participated in the Idaho Section of the Society for Range Management’s (SRM) Summer Field Tour. One of our team members led a session that presented our research design and preliminary findings to an audience of livestock producers, scientists and other rangeland stakeholders. She also facilitated a panel discussion with SRM professionals and livestock producers focused on practical applications, operational constraints, and implementation considerations for targeted grazing in working rangelands.
In October 2024, sheep from one of the producers on our team were used in the National Qualifying Sheep Dog Trials in association with the Trailing of the Sheep Festival held near our study area. Each year, this extremely well-attended event draws local visitors as well as tourists from around the country and beyond. We used this opportunity to post signs informing attendees that “These sheep eat cheatgrass!” The signs included information about cheatgrass and the efficacy of our targeted grazing treatments, a QR code to connect to our education materials online, and a copy of our magazine article in Sun Valley Property News.
Our outreach efforts drew the attention of reporters with the local National Public Radio (NPR) station and a Boise television station who were each interested in how targeted grazing could be used to mitigate wildfire risk in cheatgrass-invaded areas. A reporter from Boise State Public Radio News, which is the NPR station serving central and southern Idaho and northern Nevada, joined our team during the fall targeted grazing treatments to interview scientists, students, a sheep producer, and a sheep herder from our team. Her story ran on the radio and online in December 2024. In January 2025, a television reporter featured our project for the “Inside Ag” segment of the nightly KTVB news. Each of these outlets reaches thousands of listeners and viewers throughout the region, again greatly helping to build awareness of the potential to use sheep targeted grazing as a tool to manage cheatgrass and wildfire fuels.
Workshops and applied training:
Rather than hosting stand-alone field days, outreach efforts were integrated into existing Extension and producer-led programming to enhance participation and logistical feasibility. In collaboration with the University of Idaho Extension and industry partners, sheep utilization monitoring and targeted grazing principles were incorporated into regional workshops and producer meetings. These efforts focused on practical application of monitoring tools, including the Landscape Appearance method, and were designed to serve livestock producers, agency personnel, and land managers.
To strengthen communication with Spanish-speaking herders and improve alignment between research objectives and on-the-ground implementation, the project translated the Landscape Appearance method into Spanish. The Landscape Appearance method provides a rapid visual assessment of forage utilization by comparing grazed plants to reference conditions, allowing managers to estimate grazing intensity in real time. Translating this tool was intended to facilitate clearer communication of target utilization levels and support adaptive management decisions during grazing events. Distribution and field application of the translated materials will occur as ongoing grazing activities continue under related project support.
To support producer education, bilingual (English and Spanish) instructional videos and worksheets were developed to demonstrate ewe body condition scoring and its relevance to targeted grazing management. This material was further disseminated through a presentation at the West Central States Wool Growers Convention (November 2023), by Dr. Sergio Arispe, extending reach to regional sheep producers and industry representatives.
In addition to our proposed outreach and education activities, the project contributed to complementary initiatives that expanded its educational reach and increased awareness of the potential for adopting sheep grazing as a management tool for invasive annual grass management. A graduate-level course titled "Sheepscape Ecology" was offered at Boise State University, structured around discussions of The Art and Science of Shepherding, edited by Michel Meuret and Fred Provenza (2014). The course examined ecological, behavioral, and management dimensions of sheep grazing systems and directly inspired two students to pursue new research avenues related to sheep grazing and management. We also developed a new collaboration with researchers at Marshall University, who are focusing on improving methods to quantify sheep utilization estimates under real-world targeted grazing scenarios. This work is ongoing beyond the timeframe of this project.
Industry and agency presentations:
To directly engage key sheep producers and industry stakeholders, we organized a half-day breakout session titled "Sheep Management and Targeted Grazing on Rangelands" at the 2023 West Central States Wool Growers Convention held in Boise, ID. More than 120 producers from Idaho, Utah, Nevada, and Wyoming participated in our session.
The program brought together a diverse panel of experts, including sheep producers; university faculty, postdoctoral researchers, and graduate and undergraduate students (Boise State University, Brigham Young University, Cal Poly Humboldt); Extension specialists (Oregon State University, Utah State University, University of Idaho); and federal agency representatives (U.S. Forest Service, Agricultural Research Service). Presentations addressed applied management strategies, ecological responses to targeted grazing, monitoring approaches, and implementation challenges.
A post-session evaluation was distributed to assess knowledge gains and interest in adopting targeted grazing practices. Although survey response rates were limited, in-session discussion and subsequent feedback indicated strong engagement and interest among participants. The session fostered cross-sector dialogue and strengthened connections among producers, researchers, and agency personnel regarding the practical application of targeted sheep grazing.
We also presented our research findings to U.S. Forest Service staff interested in learning more about targeted grazing with sheep for cheatgrass management. In 2024, we shared our findings at the "Range All Hands Meeting" for Region 6 (Pacific Northwest Region) of the U.S. Forest Service in Pendleton, OR. This venue provided an opportunity to engage range specialists representing more than a dozen National Forests and Grasslands and facilitated dialogue on the application of sheep grazing for cheatgrass management and wildfire fuel reduction at operational scales. In 2025, we were invited to present our work at the U.S. Forest Service’s “All Hands Interregional Meeting,” which was held virtually. Our presentation was attended by 104 staff, representing one-third of all range staff in the Forest Service at the time.
Podcasts:
A scientist and sheep producer from our team were interviewed about our project’s approach and findings for two podcasts: The Art of Range and Sheep Stuff Ewe Should Know. While the former covers rangeland issues broadly, the latter is more narrowly focused on the sheep industry. These podcasts are each hosted by knowledgeable rangeland professionals who elicited both scientific and practical information about targeted grazing for cheatgrass management. Importantly, they also provided an opportunity to feature the perspective of a producer participating in our project, who highlighted the operational dimensions of targeted grazing and drew upon his decades of experience raising sheep in cheatgrass-invaded ecosystems. Our episode on the Art of Range reached 884 unique listeners in its first year, and the episode on Sheep Stuff Ewe Should Know reached 156 listeners after several months, thus greatly expanding our outreach to those interested in rangelands in general and sheep in particular.
Newsletters and other media:
Our project was featured by 8 local and regional media outlets, including newsletters (Western Integrated Pest Management, Trailing of the Sheep), newspapers (Idaho Mountain Express, Idaho Press, Skagit Valley Herald), a magazine (Sun Valley Property News), radio (Boise State Public Radio), and television (“Inside Ag” segment of KTVB News). Many of these articles were further disseminated by the Idaho Wool Growers Association and the Idaho Rangeland Resources Commission, further expanding their reach among producers, land managers, and the broader public.
Practical materials for targeted grazing implementation:
Our team was invited to contribute to a targeted grazing guidebook (Targeted Grazing 101: Starting & Sustaining a Grazing Service Enterprise) published by the American Sheep Industry Association as a supplement to its 2006 Targeted Grazing Handbook. A chapter describing our study design and collaborative implementation approach was developed following interviews with project partners, including a university faculty member, a sheep producer, and a U.S. Forest Service representative. Other chapters cover practical topics ranging from monitoring, to animal husbandry, logistics, and business basics. Within its first year of publication (2026), it sold 289 copies.
Two fact sheets were proposed to communicate findings to producers and land managers: (1) economic considerations associated with targeted sheep grazing, and (2) implementation and rangeland health implications of sheep grazing for invasive annual grass management. Completion of final data processing is ongoing, and outreach materials are being refined to reflect finalized ecological and fire behavior results. The rangeland health and implementation fact sheet will be completed following peer-reviewed manuscript publications. Economic considerations will be incorporated into outreach materials in a manner consistent with available data and documented assumptions.
Education and Outreach Objective 3: Achieve wider public acceptance of active land management in rangelands.
Curriculum development and pilot implementation:
The project developed three structured curriculum modules designed to increase understanding of sheep-based land management among middle and high school students:
- Unlocking the Power of Targeted Grazing (middle school; includes the interactive “AGRAZING Race” activity)
- Woolly Wonders: Exploring Sheep, Wool, and Micron Counts Across the Globe (middle school; includes the Global Wool Map: Common Sheep Breeds and Their Journeys)
- Fleece to Feast: Sheep Through Time–Cultural Heritage and Modern Innovations (high school; includes the interactive “Barter in the Barnyard” activity)
These modules move beyond traditional lecture-based instruction and incorporate interactive, systems-based learning tools. Across modules, students engage with sheep production as a multifaceted system linking agriculture, ecology, economics, and cultural history.
The “Unlocking the Power of Targeted Grazing” module introduces students to targeted grazing as an applied land management strategy through an interactive board game, “The AGRAZING Race.” In this simulation-based activity, students navigate sheep across a rangeland landscape while encountering real-world ecological challenges, including invasive species, wildfire, drought, predators, soil compaction, and disease. On-the-ground knowledge from sheep producers and herders helped inform which challenges and realistic responses were incorporated into the game. Game mechanics reinforce ecological cause-and-effect relationships: students advance when sheep reduce cheatgrass and invasive forbs, improving biodiversity and decreasing wildfire fuels, and must adapt to stochastic events such as extreme weather or predator encounters. The visually designed game board and custom cards incorporate professional artwork and structured decision points, making abstract concepts such as fuel reduction, integrated weed management, and ecosystem resilience tangible and memorable for middle school learners.
The “Woolly Wonders” module focuses on the biological and physical properties of wool, including micron counts, fiber characteristics, and industrial applications. Students examine how biogeography influences sheep breeds and wool traits, and how these factors shape global wool markets. The module incorporates an interactive ArcGIS-based Global Wool Map (https://arcg.is/11fbTa1) that allows students to explore geographic variation in wool production and connect climate, environment, and agricultural specialization.
The “Fleece to Feast” module situates sheep within historical and modern systems, culminating in the “Barter in the Barnyard” activity. In this activity, students trade sheep-derived commodities to fulfill historically grounded civilization objectives, integrating concepts of resource allocation, trade, technological innovation, and cultural development. The curriculum includes professionally developed custom artwork and structured game mechanics that reinforce applied decision-making.
Materials include structured lesson plans, PowerPoint presentations, student activities, and reference lists to support classroom implementation. The curriculum has been piloted through BYU STEM Camp (2024 and 2025; 90 total youth participants) and the BYU Range and Wildlife Camp (2025; 35 participants), providing direct engagement with students ages 14-17. Feedback from these implementations informed refinement of lesson pacing, activity structure, and clarity of key concepts.
Curriculum materials are housed within the BYU Rangeland Restoration lab website (https://pws.byu.edu/rangeland-restoration-lab/sheep-discovery-zone) and are being prepared for broader dissemination through partnerships with Wool Growers Associations and state-level rangeland education organizations. Current efforts are focused on aligning materials with state science standards, expanding distribution networks, and developing pre- and post-assessment tools to evaluate learning outcomes.
K-12 outreach:
The proposed Science Journal for Kids article was not developed because the journal requires adaptation of a published, peer-reviewed manuscript. As manuscripts describing vegetation, soil, and fire behavior outcomes are currently in preparation, development of a youth-adapted article will follow formal publication. However, given the potential interest in invasive species, wildfire, and sheep-based management among younger audiences, we pursued other opportunities to engage K-12 students. In addition to the curriculum development and piloting described above, we gave a presentation to a sixth-grade class at a Boise elementary school as part of their year-long inquiry project about the impacts of wildfire on Idaho ecosystems. Drawing on curriculum materials described above, we shared how our research is testing if targeted grazing can reduce cheatgrass invasion and thereby mitigate wildfire danger in sagebrush ecosystems. We brought vegetation samples from our experiment to give the students hands-on experience with the differences between very dry and highly flammable cheatgrass in comparison to native plants, which their teacher reported was a highlight.
Life on the Range video:
Working in close collaboration with the Idaho Rangeland Resources Commission, we created a video and accompanying article about our project for their “Life on the Range” educational series that showcases stories about rangeland issues in Idaho. The video included interviews with scientists, students, a sheep producer, a sheep herder, and Forest Service staff working on the project. It described the problems associated with cheatgrass, our collaborative efforts, and the findings from each of the interviewees’ perspectives. The video was viewed 745 times in its first year and led to newspaper articles published by the Idaho Press and Skagit Valley Herald (Washington). The video was also shown at a meeting of the Idaho Rangeland Resources Commission, reaching an audience of livestock producers and natural resource management agency staff from throughout the state.
Outreach through non-traditional venues:
We had proposed to present our findings at a “Science Pub” event in Blaine County, ID near the end of our project, but we discovered that this public event series had gone on hiatus in our final project year. Despite this opportunity no longer being possible, we still managed to participate in alternative means of engagement with the general public.
An undergraduate research assistant who had worked on the project since its inception was awarded a fellowship in Fall 2023 that supported him to conduct an independent study project on sheep forage nutrition, using samples from our experiment, while also writing an original five movement flute composition about his experience conducting field work for the targeted grazing study. His composition received a great deal of attention locally. He gave five public performances across a range of venues and audiences, including Boise's Treefort Music Fest (a music festival that attracted over 47,000 attendees) and Boise State University's SPARC mixer (Showcasing Projects And Research Creativity), where his performance was accompanied by a mixed digital media film using video and images from our experiment. At each of these venues, he had a chance to introduce the music by first explaining the threat of cheatgrass invasion to western rangelands and how we are investigating the use of targeted grazing with sheep to mitigate it. While many people in the western U.S. seem to be well aware of cheatgrass and the challenges it poses, we found that these performances reached segments of the population who told us that they were not previously aware of cheatgrass, much less targeted grazing. The integration of art and science therefore helped us break through to new audiences with our outreach.
Education and Outreach Objective 1: Increase knowledge of the ecological and economic impacts of invasive annual grass
Outreach activities under Objective 1 increased exposure to research findings related to invasive annual grasses and associated wildfire risk among producers, land managers, scientists, and the general public. Media coverage through regional outlets and producer networks broadened dissemination beyond traditional academic audiences. Conference presentations and producer-focused sessions provided opportunities to communicate ecological mechanisms linking invasive species, ecosystem condition, and wildfire behavior. In addition, the project contributed to workforce development and capacity building through hands-on training and research experience for nearly 50 students and education and management professionals. While formal pre- and education and post-knowledge assessments were limited, engagement levels at professional meetings and follow-up conversations with producers and agency staff, as well as interactions with members of the general public, indicate sustained interest in the ecological and economic implications of cheatgrass management.
Education and Outreach Objective 2: Increase knowledge of the potential for adopting sheep grazing as a management tool to minimize invasive annual grass and reduce wildfire risk
The half-day breakout session we organized at the West Central States Wool Growers Convention proved to be an effective venue for reaching a concentrated audience of sheep producers and industry stakeholders. More than 120 attendees participated in the session, and among the 26 participants who completed the evaluations for the Sheep Body Condition Scoring presentation, reported that they increased their understanding of body condition scoring from "Basic" to "Great." Although overall response rates to paper-based evaluations were lower than desired, audience engagement during presentations and discussions was high. These findings suggest that interactive, digitally based feedback mechanisms such as Slido may improve future assessment efforts.
Collectively, our presentations and signage, diverse media attention, producer engagement, and educational materials reached thousands of people to increase awareness of sheep targeted grazing as a management tool for invasive annual grass and wildfire fuels reduction. Nearly 300 copies sold of the American Sheep Industry Association’s Targeted Grazing 101 book, to which we contributed, suggests that producers are already taking concrete steps to learn more about this practice. While the project did not directly measure adoption behavior, feedback from producers and agency personnel also indicates growing interest in the feasibility and constraints of implementing sheep-based targeted grazing at management-relevant scales.
Education and Outreach Objective 3: Achieve wider public acceptance of active land management in rangelands
Curriculum development and youth engagement efforts under Objective 3 contributed to broader public understanding of active land management practices in rangelands. Through implementation at BYU STEM Camp, the BYU Range and Wildlife Camp, and a Boise classroom presentation (140 total youth participants across events), students engaged with interactive simulations, applied decision-making exercises, and systems-based learning activities focused on targeted grazing, wool production, and sustainable land management. These materials introduce concepts of ecological trade-offs, invasive species management, and agricultural sustainability to middle and high school audiences, fostering early awareness of the role livestock can play in addressing environmental challenges. By including historical and international dimensions, they also draw attention to the long-standing importance of sheep to human communities, leading to their role in present-day adaptive practices, like targeted grazing for ecosystem management.
Although long-term shifts in public acceptance were not formally measured, the development and pilot implementation of durable, standards-aligned curriculum materials provides a foundation for continued dissemination and broader public engagement beyond the grant period.
Youth education efforts were complemented by outreach efforts to the general public. These included the production of a “Life on the Range” video about using sheep for cheatgrass management, which was created in collaboration with the Idaho Rangeland Resources Commission. Subsequent newspaper articles drew further attention to this work, which featured the perspectives of project scientists, students, U.S. Forest Service staff, and sheep managers. Outreach through non-traditional venues, such as a brief presentation and 10-minute original flute performance about the project at the Treefort Music Fest helped reach audiences who may have otherwise been less engaged with rangeland management issues.
Collectively, these education and outreach activities translated research findings into formats tailored to producers, land managers, youth, and the broader public. Rather than relying on a single dissemination pathway, the project integrated professional meetings, producer engagement, curriculum development, diverse media outlets, and student training to increase understanding of sheep-based land management as a strategy for addressing invasive annual grasses and wildfire risk. While some assessment components were limited, the combined activities strengthened stakeholder relationships, expanded educational capacity, and created durable materials that can continue supporting informed consideration of targeted grazing practices beyond the grant period.
Education and Outreach Outcomes
- Leverage concentrated producer gatherings for high-impact outreach. Producer conventions and targeted breakout sessions proved more effective for reaching engaged livestock operators than standalone field days. Future efforts should prioritize established industry meetings where attendance is already high and interest is aligned.
- Use interactive and digital feedback tools to improve evaluation response rates. Paper evaluations resulted in low response rates, whereas interactive polling platforms (e.g., digital audience response systems) appeared to generate greater engagement. Future outreach should incorporate real-time digital assessment tools to better measure knowledge gains and interest in adoption.
- Capitalize on outreach opportunities, even when formal assessment is not feasible. Several outreach efforts, including radio and television news programs, reached broad audiences but did not allow for integration of formal evaluation procedures. Feedback from these efforts was primarily informal, including phone calls, emails, and word-of-mouth responses relayed to the project team. Although these formats limited our ability to quantify learning outcomes, they proved valuable for raising public awareness and fostering broader discussion about targeted grazing and active rangeland management at a large scale.
- Prioritize bilingual monitoring and communication tools to support implementation. Translating technical monitoring materials into Spanish strengthened the potential for clearer communication with herders and improved alignment between research objectives and grazing implementation. Future projects should integrate multilingual resources early in project design.
- Sequence outreach products after peer-reviewed publication. Efforts to develop youth-adapted scientific articles and producer fact sheets are most effective once peer-reviewed manuscripts are published. Outreach timelines should account for publication schedules to ensure accurate and accessible science communication.
- Integrate art and science to reach new audiences. Having a student translate our research into an original flute composition garnered attention from segments of the population who may not have otherwise sought out information about rangeland issues. Despite the music being an abstract representation of our work, it was accompanied by an artist’s statement that introduced the core concerns and findings of our project. Future efforts could similarly seek out creative means of engaging with the arts to raise project awareness and share results.
- Sheep Body Condition Scoring
- The importance of collaboration in effective rangeland management
- Sheep herding as a livestock and land management practice
- Rangeland ecology methods
- Principles of targeted grazing for invasive annual grass management
- Forage utilization monitoring, including the Landscape Appearance method
Sheep Body Condition Scoring
The importance of collaboration in effective rangeland management
Awareness of targeted grazing as a management tool for invasive annual grass
Awareness of forage utilization monitoring concepts
Information Products
- Sheep Body Condition Scoring Resources
- Sheep Body Condition Scoring flyer
- Targeted Grazing Curriculum - 1.1 Lesson plan
- Targeted Grazing Curriculum - 2.1. Agrazing Race Instructions
- Targeted Grazing Curriculum - 2.2. Agrazing Race Game Board
- Targeted Grazing Curriculum - 2.3. Agrazing Race Cards
- Targeted Grazing Curriculum - 3.1. Wooly Wonders Lesson Plan
- Targeted Grazing Curriculum - 3.3. Sheep Map
- Targeted Grazing Curriculum - 4.1. Fleece to Feast Lesson Plan
- Targeted Grazing Curriculum - 4.1. Fleece to Feast Barter Cards
- Targeted Grazing Curriculum - 4.1. Fleece to Feast Civilization Cards
- Targeted Grazing Curriculum - 4.5. Fleece to Feast Stockpile Cards
- Targeted Grazing Curriculum - 4.2. Fleece to Feast Game Instructions
- Landscape Appearance - Metodo de apariencia del paisaje - ESP
- Landscape Appearance - Metodo de apariencia del paisaje - pauta - ESP
- Landscape Appearance - Metodo de apariencia del paisaje - hoja de trabajo - ESP