Sweetpotatoes: Testing traits for increased market value and sustainable production for direct market farms in the maritime northwest

Progress report for SW23-951

Project Type: Research and Education
Funds awarded in 2023: $313,125.00
Projected End Date: 04/01/2026
Grant Recipient: WSU Extension Regional Small Farms Program
Region: Western
State: Washington
Principal Investigator:
Laurel Moulton
WSU Extension Regional Small Farms Program
Co-Investigators:
Dr. Carol Miles
WSU Mount Vernon NWREC
Clea Rome
Washington State University
Expand All

Project Information

Summary:

Recent studies have shown that Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) yields in the northern United States can be the same or greater than the national average. Small organic growers in western Washington have started to experiment with growing them in a maritime climate with varying results. In Washington, wireworm damage reduces the marketability of sweetpotato storage roots. However, there are advanced breeding lines with wireworm resistance, and we have tested these in preliminary trials at WSU Mount Vernon NWREC and now have adequate numbers of roots to propagate for field trials.  

The research project will investigate the efficacy of wireworm-resistant sweetpotato advanced breeding lines in western Washington, assess the yield potential of sweetpotato varieties, and develop sweetpotato production guidelines for growers in western Washington State. These research objectives will be accomplished through on-station and on-farm trials. Results will help determine the potential of sweetpotato as a high-value and unique crop for direct market farmers in the maritime climates of the Olympic and Kitsap Peninsulas in Washington State.   

Creating this project partnership between local producers and Extension researchers will benefit farmers by facilitating access to newly released sweetpotato varieties from USDA-ARS that show resistance to wireworm damage and have other traits that may have benefit to the small organic farm beyond those traits found in commercially available varieties. Data from on-station trials and input from participating farmers may contribute to the public release of additional sweetpotato lines that have superior qualities for the maritime northwest and that would not be prioritized for release when only trialed in traditional growing regions. The project will also create a platform for information sharing between producers to speed the process in finding the most sustainable and efficient production methods for our maritime climate. Educational opportunities facilitated by Extension educators will help bring research findings and farmer innovation to the broader western Washington area. Education and outreach will include on-farm workshops and field days, online seminars, publication of fact sheets and presentation of results at regional conferences. We will also share results with our research and Extension peers through journal articles. 

Project Objectives:

Research objectives:

  1. Investigate the efficacy of wireworm-resistant sweetpotato advanced breeding lines in western Washington.  Assess the yield potential of sweetpotato varieties and advanced breeding lines with soil-warming mulch.  
  2. Develop sweetpotato production guidelines for growers in western Washington State.  

Education objectives:

  1. Hold two on-farm field days per project year (6 total) to view trial results, share innovative techniques that individual farmers develop for propagating, producing, curing/storage or marketing sweetpotatoes in a cool maritime climate.  
  2. Hold online (Zoom) farmer to farmer discussion sessions on growing sweetpotatoes.  Public events will occur as a part of the regular WSU Regional Small Farms “Dirt Talk” series. Dirt Talk is hosted by WSU Regional Small Farms in conjunction with a local farmer or agriculture specialist willing to share their expertise in a given topic. Events are held in a supportive yet informal atmosphere, that allows participants to share, exchange perspectives, and learn from each other without pressure. Events are open to all new and current farmers. Dirt Talk events are recorded and posted on the Regional Small Farms website for future viewing. Project team events include an annual end of season meeting to troubleshoot, assess success/failure and inform changes to the project in the following season.
  3. Update Extension fact sheets that were created in preliminary research. Fact sheets include sweetpotato slip production, field production practices, and curing and storage. Updates will be based on trial results and farmer feedback. Fact sheets will be made available on the WSU Extension Publication website and other Extension outlets and translated into Spanish.
  4. Present results to research peers at the American Society of Horticultural Science (ASHS) annual conference and to regional growers at Washington Farming and Agriculture Tilth Conference.

Cooperators

Click linked name(s) to expand/collapse or show everyone's info
  • Leilani Wood - Producer
  • Bryan Custer - Producer
  • Karen Halberg-Weaver - Producer
  • Kia Armstrong - Producer
  • Christine Kearsing - Producer
  • Tammy Rattlif - Producer
  • Laura Schulz (Researcher)
  • Dana Steege - Producer
  • Srijana Shrestha (Researcher)
  • Shay Hohmann - Producer
  • Arleen Jenson - Producer
  • Melanie Miller - Producer
  • Karyn Williams - Producer
  • Diane Fish
  • Josh DeWitt - Producer
  • Laura Gardener - Producer
  • Scott Chichester - Producer
  • Justin Domingus - Producer
  • Annie Chapman - Producer
  • Nils Bakke - Producer
  • Julie Jordan - Producer
  • Paul Miller - Producer
  • Kai Ottensen - Producer
  • Josh Sturdevant - Producer
  • Elizabeth Bragg - Producer
  • Holly O'Neil - Producer

Research

Materials and methods:

On-station trials

On station trials were held at WSU Mount Vernon NWREC (48°26’28”N, 122°23’38”W). The region has a cool Mediterranean climate, and during the summer growing season (June through September) the average (1970 to 2023) air temperature is 15.7°C (average minimum 10.1°C, average maximum 21.5°C) and precipitation is 135.7 mm (AgWeatherNet, 2023).

For all on-station trials, air temperature, relative humidity (RH), solar radiation, and rainfall data during the cropping season were collected from the WSU AgWeatherNet station located approximately 140 m from the experimental field plot. Soil temperature and moisture were recorded at 15-minute intervals with sensors (TEROS 11; Meter Environment, Pullman, WA) installed 10 cm deep in the center of the middle plot in replicate 2. 

1. Wireworm Resistant Cultivars Trial

A replicated variety trial was carried out in a certified organic field in 2023 and 2024. It will be repeated in 2025. The experiment had a randomized complete block design with 5 sweetpotato varieties and 4 breeding lines as the treatments and four replications. Varieties Bayou Belle, Beauregard, Covington, Monaco, and Orleans were from the North Carolina State University sweetpotato breeding program (J. Schultheis, Horticultural Science; G.C. Yencho and K. Pecota, Sweetpotato Breeding Program, Raleigh, NC). Breeding lines PI 666141 (released as cv. Cascade), USDA-04-136, USDA-04-284, and USDA-04-791 were from the USDA ARS sweetpotato breeding program (P.A. Wadl, Research Geneticist, Charleston, SC). ‘Covington,’ which is susceptible to wireworm, was the control treatment. Each plot included 15 plants in a single row with 25.4 cm spacing between plants on a raised bed covered with black polyethylene (PE) mulch (1 mm, Filmtech, Allentown, PA). Plots were separated by 1.5 m in the bed to facilitate data collection, and beds were 1.8 m center-to-center. An organic fertilizer (8-2-4, Stutzman Environmental Products, Inc., Canby, OR) was applied over the center of the row at the rate of 112 kg‧ha-1 of nitrogen and incorporated as the beds were formed. Drip irrigation tape (Rivulis Irrigation T-Tape, Kibbutz Gvat, Jezreel Valley, Israel) with 20 cm emitter spacing was installed at the time PE mulch was laid. Slips were produced from sweetpotato roots grown and stored at WSU NWREC. Planting was May 31 in 2023.

Plant establishment/growth. Plant establishment was measured as the total number of live plants per plot 2 and 4 weeks after transplanting. Plants with any visible amount of green tissue were counted as alive. Length of the longest vine was measured from the soil level to the base of the growing point for the center six plants in each plot 2 weeks after transplanting (June 14, 2023), in mid-season (August 9, 2023), and at harvest (September 27, 2023). Canopy cover was measured at the same time as vine length and included the five northernmost plants of the center six plants. Percent canopy cover was measured using Image-J (Rasband, 2023). Photos were taken from 1 m above the surface of the raised bed.

Storage root yield and wireworm damage. Harvest was October 3 in 2023, before the soil temperature reached below 13℃ (Brandenberger et al., 2014). The center 2 m of each plot was hand harvested for yield and wireworm damage assessment. For yield assessment, sweetpotatoes were sorted into categories using U.S. standards for grades of sweetpotatoes (USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service, 2005): Jumbo (>22.9 cm length and >8.9 cm diameter), U.S. No. 1 (7.6‒22.9 cm length and 4.4-8.9 cm diameter), U.S. No. 2 (≥3.8 cm diameter), and cull (storage roots of any size with off-shapes and/or damages from disease, rodents, bruises, or other means). Sweetpotato roots that were not at least 2.5 cm in diameter and 7.6 cm in length were discarded. The number and weight of harvested sweetpotatoes were recorded for each cultivar. Average number and marketable yield of sweetpotatoes per plant were also calculated for each treatment. Root damage by wireworms was rated using a severity index based on the number of feeding scars (no scars = 0, 1-5 scars = 1, 6-10 scars = 2, >10 scars = 4) (Schalk et al., 1993), and the overall wireworm damage severity per plot was calculated as a weighted average score between 0 and 4. Only wireworm scars greater than 1 mm in diameter were counted.

Data analysis. All data were analyzed using statistical analysis software (R version 4.3.2, R Studio, Vienna, Austria). The assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance were tested using the Shapiro-Wilk Test (α=0.05) and Levene’s Test (α=0.05), respectively. Means were separated using Tukey’s HSD Test (α=0.05).

2. In-Row Plant Spacing Trial

This experiment was added in response to grower interest in spacing efficiency in the field. The experiment had a split-plot design with four main plot treatments and three subplot treatments, and four replications. The main plot treatment was sweetpotato varieties and breeding lines, and subplot treatment was plant spacing. Main plot treatments included the USDA ARS breeding line Cascade (PI 666141) and cvs. Monaco, Beauregard and Covington. The subplot treatment included three plant spacings: 8 in, 10 in, and 12 in. Each subplot included 10 plants in a single row on a raised bed covered with PE mulch. Plots were separated by 1.5 m, and beds were 1.8 m center-to-center. Urea (46-0-0) was applied at the rate of 112 kg‧ha-1 of nitrogen and incorporated as the beds were formed. Drip irrigation tape was installed at the time mulch was laid. Planting was May 31 in 2023.  

Plant establishment/growth. Plant establishment was measured as the total number of live plants per plot 2 and 4 weeks after transplanting. Plants with any amount of green tissue were counted as alive. Length of the longest vine was measured from the soil level to the base of the growing point for the center six plants in each plot 2 weeks after transplanting (June 14, 2023), in mid-season (August 10, 2023), and at harvest (October 2, 2023). Percent canopy cover was measured using Image-J to analyze photos taken from 1 m above the surface of the raised bed. Canopy cover was measured for the same center plants in each plot at the same time as vine length was measured. For plots with 10 inch spacing, five plants were included in canopy cover analysis. For plots with 8 and 12 inch spacing, photos were taken from the same 1 m height so they included the same area of analysis, which corresponded to six and four plants, respectively.  

Storage root yield. Harvest was October 2 in 2023, before the soil temperature reached below 13℃ (Brandenberger et al., 2014). The center 2 m of each plot was hand harvested for yield and wireworm damage assessment. For yield assessment in all trials, sweetpotatoes were sorted into categories using U.S. standards for grades of sweetpotatoes (USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service, 2005): Jumbo (>22.9 cm length and >8.9 cm diameter), U.S. No. 1 (7.6‒22.9 cm length and 4.4-8.9 cm diameter), U.S. No. 2 (≥3.8 cm diameter), and cull (storage roots of any size with off-shapes and/or damages from disease, rodents, bruises, or other means). Sweetpotato roots that were not at least 2.5 cm in diameter and 7.6 cm in length were discarded. The number and weight of harvested sweetpotatoes were recorded for each variety. Average number and marketable yield of sweetpotatoes per plant were also calculated for each treatment. Root damage by wireworm was rated using a severity index based on the number of feeding scars (no scars = 0, 1-5 scars = 1, 6-10 scars = 2, >10 scars = 4) (Schalk et al., 1993), and percentage of wireworm damaged roots (by weight and number) was calculated. Only wireworm scars greater than 1 mm in diameter were counted.   

3. Dual-Cropping for Greens and Roots Trial

This experiment was added in response to grower interest in greens production. The experiment had a split plot design with three main plot treatments and four subplot treatments, and four replications. The main plot treatment was sweetpotato breeding lines, and the subplot treatment was greens harvesting schedule. Main plot treatments included the breeding lines USDA-04-284, USDA-04-791, and USDA-04-136 obtained from USDA ARS (P.A. Wadl, Research Geneticist, Charleston, SC). These breeding lines are being evaluated in a separate study for wireworm resistance in western Washington, so additional information on how the breeding lines respond to greens harvesting will also be useful to the breeder for potential variety release. The subplot treatment included four greens harvesting schedules: no harvesting (control), early harvesting, late harvesting, and continuous harvesting (Table 1). Each subplot included 10 plants in a single row with 10-inch spacing between plants on a raised bed covered with polyethylene (PE) mulch. Plots were separated by 1.5 m, and beds were 1.8 m center-to-center. Based on soil test results, urea (46-0-0) was applied at the rate of 112 kg‧ha-1 of nitrogen in 2023 and incorporated as the beds were formed. Drip irrigation tape was installed under the mulch. Planting was June 8 in 2023.  

 

Table 1. Sweetpotato greens harvesting schedule; greens were harvested for all treatments 16 weeks after transplanting, which was 1-2 days before storage root harvest.  

 

Weeks after Transplanting  

Treatments 

10 

12 

14 

16 

No Harvesting (Control) 

 

 

 

 

 

Early Harvesting 

 

 

Late Harvesting 

 

 

 

Continuous Harvesting 

 

 

Plant establishment/growth. Plant establishment was measured as the total number of live plants per plot 2 and 4 weeks after transplanting. Plants with any amount of green tissue were counted as alive. Length of the longest vine was measured from the soil level to the base of the growing point for the center six plants in each plot 2 weeks after transplanting (June 21, 2023), in mid-season (August 15, 2023), and a few weeks before harvest (September 25, 2023). Percent canopy cover was measured using Image-J to analyze photos taken from 1 m above the surface of the raised bed. Canopy cover was measured at the same time as vine length was measured and included five of the center six plants. 

Greens harvest and yield. At each harvest date, the terminal 15 cm (measured from the base of the growing point) was cut from every vine that was at least 15 cm long on each plant. For subsequent harvests, vines were only re-harvested if there was at least 15 cm of new growth. Vine branches were harvested in addition to harvesting the main vine if the branches were at least 15 cm long from the branching point. All plants in each plot were harvested, but only the vines from the center eight plants were collected, counted, and weighed. On the final greens harvest date, which was 1-2 days before root harvest, the terminal 15 cm of vines were removed and counted. Then all remaining vines were cut and collected. The total vines from each plant (the terminal 15 cm and the remaining vines) were placed in a paper bag, and fresh weight was recorded within 1 hour of harvest. Bags containing the vines were dried in an oven at 60°C for up to 120 hours, until completely dry. In 2023, greens were harvested on August 2-4 (8 WAT), August 16-21 (10 WAT), August 30-31 (12 WAT), September 13-14 (14 WAT), and September 28-October 9 (16 WAT).  

Storage root yield. Harvest was October 13 in 2023, before the soil temperature reached below 13 ℃ (Brandenberger et al., 2014). The center six plants in each subplot were harvested by hand. Yield and wireworm damage were assessed for the center six plants in each subplot. Sweetpotatoes were sorted into categories using U.S. standards for grades of sweetpotatoes (USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service, 2005): Jumbo (>22.9 cm length and >8.9 cm diameter), U.S. No. 1 (7.6‒22.9 cm length and 4.4-8.9 cm diameter), U.S. No. 2 (≥3.8 cm diameter), and cull (storage roots of any size with off-shapes and/or damages from disease, rodents, bruises, or other means). Sweetpotato roots that were not at least 2.5 cm in diameter and 7.6 cm in length were discarded. The number and weight of harvested sweetpotatoes in each category were recorded for each subplot. Average number and marketable yield of sweetpotatoes per plant were also calculated for each treatment. Root damage by wireworms was rated using a severity index based on the number of feeding scars (no scars = 0, 1-5 scars = 1, 6-10 scars = 2, >10 scars = 4) (Schalk et al., 1993), and percentage of wireworm damaged roots (by weight and number) was calculated. Only wireworm scars greater than 1 mm in diameter were counted.  

On-farm trials

Two replicated and 12 observational field experiments were carried out on farms in Clallam, Jefferson, and Kitsap Counties in northwest Washington in 2023. In 2024, trials were expanded to farms in Mason, King, Skagit, Snohomish, Whatcom and Thurston Counties and included 2 replicated and 23 observational experiments. Trials will be repeated in 2025 with additional recruited participants. In 2023, participating farms were provided sweetpotato roots so that they could produce their own slips to plant. In 2024, we enlisted a local nursery to produce slips, because slip production proved to be a barrier to full trial participation in the previous year. Along with roots or slips, participating farms were provided with a draft slip production guide that was created as a part of preliminary trials (Shrestha and Miles, 2023). The on-farm replicated experiments were a randomized complete block design, and treatments included cv. Cascade (formerly PI 666141), a USDA ARS wireworm-resistant variety, and two commercial varieties, Beauregard and Covington (control treatment). The replicated experiments included three replications and 10 plants per plot with 12 inch spacing between plants. Most of the observational experiments included the varieties Cascade, Covington, and Beauregard. However, due to challenges with on-farm slip production in 2023, some observational experiments included Mahon Yam or Monaco in place of one or more of Cascade, Beauregard, and Covington. Mahon Yam slips were not produced on farms but were provided by a local grower who has had a good experience growing the variety locally and purchased the slips online (Johnny’s Selected Seeds, Winslow, Maine). In 2024 farmers were given slips of the three main varieties, Cascade, Beauregard and Covington, and other commercial varieties that were left over from on-station trials including Bayou Belle, Orleans and Monaco (for greens production only). Tables 2a and 2b provide a summary of cultivars planted at each farm and warming techniques used in 2023 and 2024. Observational experiments included a single plot of each cultivar with a minimum of 10 plants per plot and 8 to 12 inch spacing between plants (Table 3 a and b). 

 

Table 2a. 2023 On-farm trial locations, cultivars, mulch.  

Farm no. Replicated/ observational County Varieties planted Mulch type
1 Replicated Clallam Beauregard, Cascade, Covington black silage tarp
2 Replicated Kitsap Beauregard, Cascade, Covington PE*
3 Observational Clallam Beauregard, Mahon Yam weed cloth
4 Observational Clallam Beauregard, Covington black plastic packing tarp
5 Observational Jefferson Beauregard, Cascade, Covington weed cloth
6 Observational Jefferson Beauregard, Cascade, Covington, Mahon Yam PE
7 Observational Kitsap Beauregard, Cascade, Covington, Monaco black silage tarp
8 Observational Kitsap Beauregard, Cascade, Covington black plastic
9 Observational Kitsap Mahon Yam wood chips
10 Observational Kitsap Mahon Yam black plastic

PE = black polyethylene mulch  

 

Table 2b. 2024 On-farm trial locations, cultivars, mulch and other warming methods

Farm no. Replicated/observational County Varieties planted Mulch type Additional warming methods
1 Replicated Clallam Beauregard, Cascade, Covington black silage tarp  
2 Replicated Kitsap Beauregard, Cascade, Covington PE* slitted plastic over low hoops
3 Observational Clallam  Beauregard, Cascade, Covington, Mahon Yam weed cloth next to south side of greenhouse
4 Observational Kitsap Beauregard, Cascade, Covington PE slitted plastic over low hoops
5 Observational Jefferson Beauregard, Cascade, Covington weed cloth  
6 Observational Kitsap Beauregard, Cascade, Covington black silage tarp floating row cover
7 Observational Kitsap Beauregard, Cascade, Covington biodegradable black plastic film  
8 Observational Clallam Beauregard, Cascade, Covington, Bayou Bell, Orleans  black silage tarp  
9 Observational Clallam Beauregard, Cascade, Covington none  
10 Observational Clallam Beauregard, Cascade, Covington, Bayou Bell, Orleans  weed cloth  
11 Observational Kitsap Beauregard, Cascade, Covington none floating row cover
12 Observational Clallam Beauregard, Cascade, Covington  weed cloth sheep wool under landscape fabric
13 Observational Jefferson Beauregard, Cascade, Covington, Bayou Bell black silage tarp  
14 Observational Clallam Beauregard, Cascade, Covington none  
15 Observational Clallam Cascade weed cloth  
16 Observational Mason Beauregard, Cascade, Covington weed cloth half planted in high tunnel
17 Observational Mason Beauregard, Cascade, Covington wood chips and straw floating row cover, some planted in high tunnel
18 Observational Clallam Beauregard, Cascade, Covington black silage tarp high tunnel
19 Observational Kitsap Beauregard, Cascade, Covington biodegradable black plastic film 12" deep raised beds
20 Observational Kitsap Beauregard, Cascade, Covington PE  
21 Observational King Cascade, Bayou Bell, Orleans, Monaco  PE  
22 Observational Skagit Beauregard, Cascade, Covington, Bayou Bell, Orleans  PE half planted in high tunnel
23 Observational Snohomish Beauregard, Cascade, Covington PE plastic low tunnel early season
24 Observational Skagit Beauregard, Cascade, Bayou Bell, Orleans  weed cloth  
25 Observational Whatcom Cascade,  Bayou Bell weed cloth (between rows)  

 

 

Table 3a. 2023 on-farm trial slip production and transplanting methods.  

Farm no. 

Slips started 

Transplant date 

In-row plant spacing (in) 

Slip treatment 

 

June 5 

12 

direct planting 

 

June 5 

12 

direct planting 

 

June 1- July 1 

12 

direct planting 

April 

July 8 

10 

direct planting 

April 23 

June 6 

direct planting 

April 18 

June 8 

12 

rooted in 4" pots

April 15 

May 8, 15, and 29  

12 

direct planting 

 

 

 

rooted in 4" pot (Beauregard, Covington);  

direct planting (Cascade) 

did not produce slips 

 

 

 

10 

did not produce slips 

June 10 

12 

direct planting 

 

 

Table 3b. 2024 on-farm trial slip production and transplanting methods. 

Farm No. Slips started Transplant date In-Row Plant Spacing (in)  Slip treatment
1 na* June 6 10 direct planting 
2 na June 6 10 direct planting 
3 unknown June 1 8 Produced own slips. Planted some directly and some pre-rooted
4 na May 20 18 direct planting 
5 na June 11 8 direct planting 
6 na June 26 8-10 half pre-rooted
7 unknown June 21 12 produced own slips. Planted some directly and some pre-rooted
8 na June 12 10-12 planted some directly and some pre-rooted
9 na June 24 10 pre-rooted
10 na June 11 10 planted some directly and some pre-rooted
11 na June 12 12 direct planting 
12 na June 14 12-18 direct planting 
13 na June 12 12 direct planting 
14 na July 5 8-10 pre-rooted
15 na June 11 10-12 direct planting 
16 unknown May 27 18 produced own slips. Planted directly
17 na June 13 10 direct planting 
18 na June 13 10 direct planting 
19 na June 14 20-22 direct planting 
20 unknown June 25 10 produced own slips. Planted some pre-rooted
21 na June 7 12-14 direct planting
22 na June 6 10 direct planting 
23 na June 7 12-14 direct planting 
24 na June 5 12 direct planting 
25 na June 20 8 direct planting 

na= most slips were produced centrally and distributed to farmers in 2024.

 

We provided growers with draft publication, Growing Sweetpotatoes in Western Washington, that was first developed during preliminary WSU NWREC trials and then updated in 2024 based on this work (Shrestha and Miles, 2022b), and we recorded how each grower planted and maintained the crop (Tables 2-4). Each grower used black polyethylene (PE) mulch or their preferred alternative (i.e. black silage tarp, weed fabric, biodegradable black film, etc.) to grow sweetpotatoes in their farm experiments (Table 2a and b). Some growers implemented additional or alternative warming methods in 2024 such as planting in high tunnels, covering rows with floating row cover, or covering greens with slitted plastic hoops (Table 2b). Due to western Washington’s cooler temperatures, farmers were interested whether planting pre-rooted slips would reduce the loss of 2-3 weeks of active growing time that slips experience when they are planted directly. In both years, some growers chose to experiment with planting pre-rooted slips (3 in 2023 and 10 in 2024). A handful of growers decided to plant and harvest later in the season to avoid the risk of frost damage in June. Data for the on-farm replicated trials was collected by WSU Extension personnel on the Olympic Peninsula. Farmers hosting an observational experiment collected their own data using a short questionnaire that was provided at the time of planting in 2023. Farmers received assistance with data collection from WSU Extension personnel in 2024 in order to obtain better data. During farm visits, the research assistant helped with weed control, recorded data about growing practices, checked-in with growers to assess needs and was present to collect harvest data on the majority of observational farms.  

 

Table 4a. 2023 on-farm trial field practices and harvest dates.  

Farm No. 

Weed Control 2-6 WAT1 

Irrigation (type; schedule) 

Harvest Date 

Other Notes 

adequate 

drip 

 

frost shortly after planting; 
water may have been uneven at the start 

insufficient 

drip 

 

deer damage;  
no irrigation for several weeks before harvest 

excellent 

drip; 2 inches once a week 

October 11 

 

 

drip; in very dry weather only 

October 18 

 

excellent 

drip; once a week 

October 15 

 

none 

drip; 27 gph 7 hrs a week; 6" spacing 

October 19 

 

excellent 

drip; 40 gal/100 ft row 2-3 times a week 

September 29 

rabbit damage; 
heat wave early on contributed to poor slip survival (replaced on later planting dates) 

excellent 

drip 

 

 

excellent 

drip; 2.5 hrs per day 

 

 

10 

excellent 

drip; 10 min per day 

October 

rabbit damage early on; covered with row cover for remainder of growing season to deter rabbits 

WAT = weeks after transplanting 

1The first 2-6 weeks after transplanting is the critical weed free period for sweetpotato (Nedunzhiyan et al., 1998; Seem et al., 2003; Wadl et al., 2023).  

 

Table 4b. 2024 on-farm trial field practices and harvest dates*. 

Farm no. Harvest date Plant vigor at harvest Soil type Irrigation type Wildlife interference wireworms
1 October 10 very vigorous loamy drip moderate vole damage yes
2 October 21 slightly vigorous sandy loam drip severe deer grazing yes
3 October 3 moderately vigorous clay-like drip none yes
4 September 25 very vigorous loamy drip moderate vole damage yes
5 October 3 moderately vigorous clay-like drip none yes
6 October 3 very vigorous loamy compost overhead none no
7 October 15 moderately vigorous clay-like drip severe vole damage yes
8 October 21 moderately vigorous clay-like drip moderate vole damage yes
9 October 1 not vigorous clay-like drip none yes
10 October 14 very vigorous loamy clay drip moderate vole damage yes
11 October 15 not vigorous clay-like drip none yes
12 October 9 slightly vigorous loamy clay overhead none no
13 October 14 moderately vigorous loamy clay overhead none no
14 October 11 not vigorous loamy clay overhead none yes
15 October 10 slightly vigorous clay-like drip none yes
16 October 22 very vigorous clay-like drip severe rodent damage no
17 October 22 slightly vigorous clay-like drip moderate vole damage yes
18 October 30 slightly vigorous clay-like overhead none yes
19 October 2 moderately vigorous loamy compost drip none yes
20 October 14 very vigorous sandy loam drip severe vole damage no
21 October 20 moderately vigorous   overhead none yes
22 September 27 very vigorous   drip none yes
23 November 2 moderately vigorous   overhead none unknown
24 October 3 moderately vigorous   drip none no
25 Oct 13-Nov 1 very vigorous   overhead none no

*Different data is displayed between 2023 and 2024 (Tables 4a and b). This will be consolidated and rectified in the final report. 

 

Weather data. Air temperature, relative humidity (RH), solar radiation, and rainfall data during the cropping season were collected from the WSU AgWeatherNet stations located within 10 miles of each on-farm trial. Soil temperature and moisture were recorded at 15-minute intervals with sensors (TEROS 11; Meter Environment, Pullman, WA) installed 10 cm deep in the center of the middle plot in replicate 2 of each replicated on-farm experiment.   

Plant survival and vigor. Slip survival rate was recorded as a percentage of plants alive 2-4 weeks after transplanting. Plant vigor was rated at harvest using rating system based on photos that showed examples of plants that were not vigorous, slightly vigorous, moderately vigorous, or very vigorous. Plant vigor ratings were coded as 0 (plant was dead), 1 (not vigorous), 2 (slightly vigorous), 3 (moderately vigorous), or 4 (very vigorous) for data analysis. For replicated experiments, plant vigor was recorded for each plant selected for harvest (3 plants per plot). For observational experiments, overall plant vigor was recorded the entire experiment.  

Weed Control. Weed control was rated by WSU Extension personnel during mid-season farm visits as none, insufficient, adequate, or excellent (Table 4). 

Storage root yield and wireworm damage. Harvest dates are shown in Table 4. Farmers were asked to harvest before the soil temperature reached below 13℃ (Brandenberger et al., 2014). In the replicated on-farm trials, 3 central plants from each plot were hand harvested for yield and wireworm damage assessment. If one or more of the original central plants was missing, different plants from the same plot were harvested instead. In the on-farm observational experiments, 1 to 3 representative plant(s) of each cultivar were harvested for yield and wireworm damage assessment. Sweetpotato roots less than 1 inch in diameter and 3 inches in length were discarded. The remaining total root weight was recorded for the 3 representative plants in each plot, and the number of harvested sweetpotatoes in each size category was recorded. The average number and marketable yield of sweetpotatoes per plant were calculated for each treatment. Categories were U.S. standards for grades of sweetpotatoes (USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service, 2005): Jumbo (>22.9 cm length and >8.9 cm diameter), U.S. No. 1 (7.6‒22.9 cm length and 4.4-8.9 cm diameter), U.S. No. 2 (≥3.8 cm diameter), and cull (storage roots of any size with off-shapes and/or damages from disease, rodents, bruises, or other means). Root damage by wireworm was rated using a severity index based on the number of feeding scars (no scars = 0, 1-5 scars = 1, 6-10 scars = 2, >10 scars = 4) (Schalk et al., 1993), and a wireworm severity index from 0 to 4 was calculated as a weighted average for each plot.  

Data analysis. All data were analyzed using statistical analysis software (R version 4.3.2, R Studio, Vienna, Austria). A cumulative link mixed effects model (clmm) was used to determine if weed control, wildlife interference, and growing degree days were significant predictors of plant vigor at harvest. Plant vigor at harvest was used instead of root yield due to missing data and inconsistencies with how root yield was measured and reported by farmers. Growing degree days (GDD) was calculated using air temperature data from the AgWeatherNet station closest to each farm. GDD was calculated both with a base temperature of 10 ⁰C and 15.5 ⁰C (Duque et al., 2022). GDD was used to account for planting date, harvest date, and temperatures throughout the growing season all in one metric. Weed control was rated for the first 2-6 weeks after transplanting as 0 = none, 1 = insufficient, 2 = adequate, 3 = excellent. Wildlife interference was rated to account for significant damage by rabbits or deer as 0 = no major wildlife interference, 1 = major wildlife interference. There were 20 farms in total with complete data sets in 2024.  

Research results and discussion:

On station trials

1. Wireworm Resistant Variety Trial

Plant establishment and growth. In 2023, plant establishment across all entries was 99% after 2, 4, and 6 weeks. In 2024, plant establishment was 99% after 2 weeks, 98% after 4 weeks, 97% after 6 weeks, and 97% after 8 weeks. The cooler and wetter June in 2024 compared to 2023 likely contributed to declining plant survival rate in 2024, though plant establishment was still very high across all entries in both years.  

In 2023, canopy cover across all entries was 4% after 2 weeks, 92% after 9 weeks, and 90% after 16 weeks. In 2024, canopy cover across all entries was 2% after 2 weeks, 88% after 9 weeks, and 87% after 16 weeks. Canopy cover is known to decline at the end of the growing season for sweetpotato as older leaves are shaded out and start to senesce. Across 2023 and 2024, canopy cover at 9 weeks after transplanting ranged from 82% (USDA-04-136) to 94% (Beauregard).  

In 2023, longest vine length across all entries was 10 cm after 2 weeks, 114 in mid-season, and 174 cm at the end of the season. In 2024, longest vine length across all entries was 7 cm after 2 weeks, 116 in mid-season, and 158 cm at the end of the season. Across 2023 and 2024, longest vine length at the end of the season ranged from 73 cm (Monaco) to 258 cm (Bayou Belle). Monaco had an erect growth habit (longest vine length < 75 cm), USDA-04-284 had a semi-erect growth habit (longest vine length 75 to 150 cm), USDA-04-136, Covington, Beauregard, USDA-04-791, Cascade, and Orleans had a spreading growth habit (longest vine length 150 cm to 250 cm), and Bayou Belle had an extremely spreading growth habit (longest vine length > 250 cm).  

Root yield. Yields were much lower in 2024 than in 2023 across all varieties and breeding lines due to cooler temperatures in the first part of the growing season. However, the same trend in yield and wireworm damage across varieties was found in 2024 as in 2023. Across 2023 and 2024, varieties that produced the greatest weight of roots (irrespective of wireworm damage) were Bayou Belle, Orleans, Beauregard, and Covington (Figure 2). Average total root yield (USDA categories Jumbo to US No. 2 and including wireworm damaged roots) across 2023 and 2024 ranged from 9.6 t/ha (USDA-04-136) to 28.3 t/ha (Bayou Belle).  

 

a box graph comparing the total root yield of 9 different sweetpotato varieties growing in Mount Vernon in 2024

Figure 2. Total root yield in USDA categories Jumbo to US No. 2 and including wireworm damaged roots, for sweetpotato varieties and breeding lines grown at WSU Mount Vernon NWREC in 2024.  

Wireworm damage. Varieties Orleans, Covington, and Beauregard had the highest wireworm damage across 2023 and 2024. The most resistant entries were breeding lines USDA-04-136 and USDA-04-791, followed by cv. Cascade (Figure 3). Like 2023, in 2024 we observed that wireworm-resistant entries tended to have lower total yield when wireworm damage was not considered. Average wireworm damage index across 2023 and 2024 ranged from 0.76 (USDA-04-791) to 3.40 (Orleans).  

 

Box graph comparing wireworm damage between sweetpotato varieties grown in Mount Vernon, WA

Figure 3. Wireworm damage index for sweetpotato varieties and breeding lines grown at WSU Mount Vernon NWREC in 2024.  

Bayou Belle stood out as having high yield with only moderate wireworm damage, so it may be especially suitable for western Washington. Cascade was the most resistant released variety, and though it had lower total yield than the wireworm-susceptible varieties when wireworm damage was not considered, it may be the best option for producing marketable roots on farms with high wireworm pressure. Cascade is a dry, white flesh type sweetpotato, which is the preferred flesh type in most regions of the world outside of the United States. However, for growers who prefer a moist, orange type sweetpotato and have high wireworm pressure, Monaco has good wireworm resistance with yields comparable to Cascade. Bayou Belle has less wireworm resistance than Monaco but is higher yielding if there is no wireworm pressure, so is most suitable for farmers who want to grow orange sweetpotatoes and have low wireworm pressure.

2. In-row plant spacing trial

The plant spacing trial indicated that maximum sweetpotato yields per hectare were achieved with 25 cm or 30 cm (8 or 10 inch) spacing (p<0.0001). Decreasing in-row plant spacing decreased root yields per plant (p<0.0001) but increased overall yield per hectare because of a higher plant density. Average root size was highest at 10 inch spacing, which was not significantly different from average root size at 12 inch spacing but was significantly greater than average root size at 8 inch spacing (p<0.0001).  Reducing the plant spacing yields more large and medium sized roots that are preferred for fresh market sales. Jumbo-sized roots are typically reserved for the processing market, and are usually undesirable for fresh market sales (Schultheis et al., 1999). Narrower in-row spacing also results in more canopy cover early in the growing season (Shrestha and Miles, 2022), which may help with weed competition.

3. Dual-cropping for roots and greens trial

Based on requests from producers, we added a trial at NWREC to measure the impact of harvesting sweetpotato greens on root yield. Sweetpotato greens are commonly consumed in West Africa, the American Southeast and other locations where sweetpotatoes are widely grown. Sweetpotato greens are high in many nutrients, including carotene, calcium, and iron (Ishiguro et al., 2004) and can be cooked and consumed like other greens such as spinach and chard. 

The impacts on root yield should be considered before harvesting greens in areas with short growing seasons, such as the Pacific Northwest, when sweetpotatoes are being grown primarily to harvest the storage roots.  A field experiment evaluated time of vine tip (15 cm from the end of every vine) harvest on sweetpotato root yield of breeding lines USDA-04-284 (semi-erect growth habit), USDA-04-136 and USDA-04-791 (both with spreading growth habit). Treatments included no harvest during the season (control treatment, 1 harvest at time of root harvest), early harvest (8–12 weeks after transplanting, 4 harvests), late harvest (12–14 weeks after transplanting, 3 harvests), and continuous harvest (8–14 weeks after transplanting, 5 harvests). Vine tips were harvested at 2-week intervals during the harvest period, with an additional harvest for all treatments (including control) immediately before root harvest. Breeding line USDA-04-284 (semi-erect growth habit) produced 330 g of greens (fresh weight) per plant on average for all harvest treatments, which was significantly higher (p<0.0001) than USDA-04-136 and USDA-04-791 (spreading growth habit), which produced 118 and 139 g, respectively. Total greens production was significantly higher for the early and continuous harvest treatments (ca. 219 g/plant) than for the late and control treatments (ca. 173 g/plant) (p<0.01). Marketable root yield was similar for all the greens harvest treatments and was significantly lower for all harvest treatments compared to the control (p<0.0001). Compared to the control treatment, marketable root yield was lowest for early harvest and continuous harvest (ca. 34%), and highest for late harvest (51%). Across all greens harvest treatments, marketable root yield was lower compared to the control in the spreading breeding lines (33% and 40% for USDA-04-791 and USDA-04-136, respectively) than in the semi-erect breeding line (51% for USDA-04-284). While sweetpotato can be dual cropped for both greens and roots, the production of greens as an additional vegetable crop must offset financial losses of decreased root yield. Harvesting sweetpotato greens later in the season or only immediately before root harvest can reduce root yield losses while still producing a substantial crop of greens. Erect cultivars are best suited for greens production due to the lesser impact of greens harvest on root yield and higher production of greens.    

Growers might consider harvesting vine tips from sweetpotato plants a few days before storage root harvest to produce sweetpotato greens with no impact on storage root yield. At the end of the season when the plants are harvested, the entire vines can be used as feed for livestock. 

On farm trials:

1. Replicated variety trial

Across both replicated farms in 2024, there was no significant difference in yield between varieties. While not statistically different from other varieties, the highest yielding variety was Covington, with an average root weight per plant of 9.4 lbs on Farm no. 1. Beauregard was second highest yielding with an average of 8.7 lbs per plant followed by Cascade, yielding 7.5lbs per plant. Average yield per plant was higher in 2024 than in 2023 for both replicated farms. Farm no. 2 still experienced challenges, primarily with preventing deer grazing of greens first two months after transplanting which severely impacted harvest yields. While not statistically significant on the randomly sampled plants, farm no. 1 had higher yields overall in 2024 than the 2023 season. This improvement in success could have been from changes in crop management such as more consistent watering, better weed control early in the season, and plastic mulch that was more tightly tucked around the beds. Additionally, slips planted in 2024 did not experience frost damage within the first few weeks after planting, as observed in 2023. Farm no. 1 was able to cure and market most of their harvest via a virtual farm stand and at local farmer’s markets and grocery stores.   

Overall both replicated farms exhibited very little wireworm damage. As mentioned, farm no. 2’s harvest was low due to high deer pressure early in the season. Loss of vine mass severely stunted root development. Of the few roots harvested, there was minimal wireworm damage (<1 on the severity scale). The highest wireworm damage was seen in Covington. At farm no. 1, the most severe damage was only 0.75 on a scale from 0 to 4 on the wireworm severity index.  

While wireworm damage was minimal in the replicated trials, there was damage caused by other wildlife activity. Deer grazing activity on greens and vole damage to roots highlights a need to identify additional pest management tools for growers. Later in the summer, farm no. 2 set up slitted plastic low tunnels over the sweetpotato beds to protect from further deer grazing. In addition to protecting sweetpotato greens from deer, the added warmth and protection from wind helped plants start to recover from earlier damage. If the tunnels were placed earlier in the season, we believe a more successful harvest would have been possible.  

1. Observational trials

Twenty-seven farms participated in observational trials and data from 20 of these farms across Clallam, Kitsap, Mason, and Jefferson counties, was used to explore various explanatory variables’ impact on average plant yield (lbs). Multiple linear regression was used to test if soil type, growing degree days, soil mulch, wildlife interference, or wireworm damage were significant predictors of average sweetpotato root yield (lbs). The overall regression was statistically significant (R2 = 0.7, F (8, 45) = 12.83, p < 0.0001). It was found that both plastic mulch (β = 1.89, p < 0.0001) and alternative soil warming mulch (β = 2.24, p < 0.0001) significantly predicted higher root yields. This result mirrored findings from the on-station trial, indicating that use of black PE mulch (or other alternatives) to warm soil increases the likelihood of good yields in the region. This model also suggests that using alternative mulches, such as recycled black silage tarp or weed fabric, are a viable method to improve yields of sweetpotato roots for growers who are averse to single use plastics. 

Variety trials: Out of the five varieties grown on-farms, no single cultivar exhibited a statistically significantly higher yield in average root weight per plant. Generally, the six farms that grew Orleans and Bayou Belle were the highest performing, but not by a significant amount. Many of the farmers reported they felt they had more success with higher yields in 2023 than in the 2024 season. We suspect this is because of the cooler summer temperatures and mid-August and September rain events that were experienced across western Washington in 2024. Due to the higher yields observed in Orleans and Bayou Belle cultivars, all participating growers will be provided with Orleans and Bayou Belle varieties in addition to Covington, Beauregard, and Cascade in the 2025 trials. 

Wireworm damage: Overall, wireworm damage was not severe on many of the farm sites in 2024, and no significant differences between cultivars and wireworm damage severity was found (Figure 4). For farms where wireworm activity was observed, Cascade was the variety with the lowest amount of wireworm damage when compared to Beauregard and Covington. This difference, however, was not statistically significant. The handful of growers that did seem to have higher wireworm presence in their fields did not produce usable harvest data due to other factors. Root yields on these farms were heavily impacted by other challenges such as not using soil warming mulch, deer grazing, or cold summer temperatures. These factors all together made it difficult to get an accurate assessment on the resistance of different sweetpotato cultivars to wireworms. 

graph showing wireworm damage between three sweetpotato varieties grown in on-farm trials

Figure 4.  Severity of wireworm damage for three different sweetpotato varieties in 2024 on-farm trials  

Wildlife interference: A one-way ANOVA was conducted to examine the effects of wildlife interference on plant root yield (lbs). There was a statistically significant difference between the levels of wildlife interference on root yield (F(2, 264) = 17.13, p <0.0001). Tukey’s HSD post hoc tests were carried out. The mean root yield for plants that experienced moderate wildlife interference was significantly higher than the average root yield for plants that experienced severe wildlife interference as well as plants with no interference from wildlife at all (p <0.0001). It is likely that root yield on average was higher for plants with moderate wildlife impacts than no interference, because of the large amount of vole damage observed in the 2024 season. Farms that did experience losses from voles were also using plastic or alternative mulches. The use of soil warming mulch results in larger roots and the mulch itself provides voles protection from predators, therefore creating conditions that may be more attractive to rodents. Many of the farms reporting no wildlife activity were also growers that chose not to use plastic mulch, suggesting their root harvest was lower due to other variables and conditions.  

Voles were the most common wildlife pest damaging sweetpotato roots. Over 45% of growers reported rodent damage. The second most common source of wildlife impact was deer. Several farms experienced deer grazing that started in the early weeks after planting. One farmer decided to drop out of the trial completely due to the inability to manage deer damage. Several growers who had experienced damage from deer or rabbits in 2023, used floating row cover as a wildlife deterrent to protect greens. Floating row cover and slitted plastic low tunnels, appear to be successful in reducing grazing damage from deer and rabbits. In 2025, we plan to gather more information from growers and agricultural literature on methods of deterring vole and other rodent activity below the soil.  

Soil Type: Sweetpotatoes grow best in well drained and fertile loam, sandy-loam or clayey-loam soils (Mukhopadhyay et al. 2011). In our 2024 trails, only two of the participating farms had naturally sandy-loam soil. On the Olympic Peninsula, clay-like soil is common. Heavy clay soil can severely restrict the development of sweetpotato roots and cause shape irregularity that leads to lower yields and difficulties during harvest (Mukhopadhyay et al. 2011). Clay soils can lead to cooler soil temperatures and hold more water later in the season when rain starts, leading to physical deformities such as corky root. While data collected in 2024 was not conducive to statistically significant analysis, we hypothesize that root yields are higher in loamy and sandy-like soils than clay-like soils. In 2025, we will provide more information about the importance of soil type to growers than in previous years. For example, if growers have compacted or heavy clay soils, we may recommend planting in raised beds or fields amended with compost when possible. 

Pre-rooted slips: In 2024, 4 participating farmers experimented with planting rooted vs. unrooted slips. A one-way ANOVA did not find significantly different average root yield between unrooted and rooted slips on the 4 farms (p-value > 0.05). This is likely due to limitations in data collection at the time of harvest. There were some issues with proper labeling of rooted and unrooted slips, making it difficult to identify the plants during harvest. However, several growers reported observing that rooted slips experienced less shock during the first few weeks after planting than unrooted slips. 3 out of 4 of the farmers noticed new vine growth on rooted slips quicker than on unrooted slips. We observed pre-rooted slips were more prone to producing irregularly shaped sweetpotatoes than unrooted slips. We believe this occurred because the rooting process was started too far ahead of planting and the slips became root bound. Participating growers continue to request pre-rooted slips due to benefits reported by other growers in short growing season areas. In 2025, we intend to offer more pre-rooted slips and will assist at least 5 farms in trialing properly labeled rooted vs. unrooted slips. We will start the pre-rooting process only a week or two before recommended planting dates in hopes of reducing the frequency of irregularly formed sweetpotato roots. 

In 2023, farmers participating in the observational and replicated trials encountered problems with processes that are specific to sweetpotatoes: slip production and curing. Both processes require heat and humidity conditions not required for any other crops that are grown locally. Slip production problems were remedied in 2024 by producing slips centrally and distributing them to farms instead of asking farmers to produce their own. Farmers continued to struggle with the curing process after harvest in 2024. Only properly cured sweetpotatoes can be stored successfully. Curing is a wound-healing process where a protective cork layer is formed over the root surface. As this layer forms, a waxy material ‘suberin’ is produced by the root’s outer cells and is deposited on the root surface. The cork layer and suberin combined act as a barrier to microorganisms and excessive moisture loss. Curing enhances flavor as starch gets converted to sugar during this process. Ideal curing conditions require maintaining a temperature of 80 - 90 °F and 80 - 90% relative humidity for 1 week. At lower but adequate temperatures, the curing process will take longer. When sweetpotatoes experience temperatures below 50°F, even sporadically, they experience cold damage that manifests later as a shortened storage life. Some participating farmers have attempted to cure sweetpotatoes in unheated greenhouses  later in the fall when nighttime temperatures may fall below 50°F, and experienced complete or near complete loss of the crop. We plan on focusing heavily on curing and storage in 2025 educational offerings and direct technical assistance.

In order to better prepare producer-partners, a draft of one of our grant deliverables, a "Growing Sweetpotatoes in Western Washington" growing guide, was updated to better describe:

  1. Physiological conditions such as cold damage and corky root and how to avoid them 
  2. Diseases that are common in sweetpotato production and storage

This draft guide can be found here: https://vegetables.wsu.edu/sweetpotato/ and the final version will be submitted in the final project report. The draft growing guide will be distributed to growers in pre-season communications and at the spring 2025 grower planning meeting. Additionally, research/education team members will provide on site consultation, referencing the growing guide, when delivering sweetpotato slips at planting time.

Participation Summary
29 Producers participating in research

Research Outcomes

No research outcomes

Education and Outreach

65 Consultations
6 Curricula, factsheets or educational tools
3 On-farm demonstrations
2 Published press articles, newsletters
11 Webinars / talks / presentations
2 Workshop field days
8 Other educational activities: Poster presented at 2023 Tilth Conference, Port Townsend, WA
Poster/display at 2 county fairs, Jefferson and Clallam County, WA, 2024
Poster presented at WSU Academic Showcase
Poster presented at WSU All Extension Annual Meeting
Poster presented at ASHS conference, 2024
Sweetpotato taste test
Sweetpotato cook off

Participation Summary:

150 Farmers participated
Education and outreach methods and analyses:

Educational outreach in 2023 and 2024 was provided through in person and online presentations, in person presentations, on-farm workshops, field days, and conference posters and presentations. Online presentations were recorded and added to the WSU Regional Small Farms Team online learning library, where they received the most views of any class housed in the library. The fact sheet, Growing Sweetpotatoes in Western Washington, was created and updated in 2023 and 2024 using input from on-farm trials and farmer feedback and preliminary results from the on-station experiments. Events were advertised in western Washington and beyond through the WSU Regional Small Farms Program, the WSU Food Systems Program, the Tilth Alliance, and local conservation districts.  Additionally, we created short YouTube videos of slip production and planting techniques which were published on the WSU Regional Small Farms online learning library for growers.

On-farm tours/workshops (3 per year)

Farmer to farmer on-farm tours/workshops:

  • Propagating and Planting Sweetpotatoes, Wild Edge Farm in Port Angeles, WA in early June 2023 (Attendance: 15).
  • Harvesting and Curing Sweetpotatoes, Around the Table Farm in Poulsbo, WA in late October 2023 (Attendance: 15)
  • Slip production, Sunbaked Greenhouse, Sequim, WA in May 2024 (Attendance: 5)

Field days:

  • Showcasing on-station variety trials, plant spacing trials and sweetpotato greens harvesting trials. Examples of harvest tools, slip propagation methods, and curing chambers were on display. Preliminary trial results were discussed. WSU NWREC in Mount Vernon, WA in September 2023 (Attendance: 22)   
  • Showcasing on-station variety trials, plant spacing trials, plastic mulch and rooted vs. unrooted trials. Examples of harvest tools, slip propagation methods, and curing chambers were on display. Preliminary trial results were discussed. WSU NWREC in Mount Vernon, WA in August 2024 (Attendance: 31)   

Presentations and farmer discussions (2 per year)

  • Propagating and Growing Sweetpotatoes in the Pacific Northwest (plus pre-season planning meeting for farmers participating in on-farm trials), April 2023 (Attendance: 48, Recording views: 149).
  • Sweetpotato Production and Troubleshooting, July 2023 (Attendance: 30, Recording views: 303)
  • Growing Sweetpotatoes in the Pacific Northwest, Oregon State University Hermiston Farm Fair in Hermiston, OR, November 2023 (Estimated attendance: 50)
  • Growing Sweetpotatoes, December 2023 (Attendance: 34, Recording views: 35). 
  • Growing Sweetpotatoes in Western Washington (plus pre-season planning meeting for farmers participating in on-farm trials), April 2024 (Attendance: 17, Recording Views: 298).
  • New Crops and Finding a Sweet Spot with Sweetpotatoes, Annual Tilth Conference, November 2024 (60 attendees) (highlighted in an article by Capital Press on November 18, 2024)
  • End of Season Sweetpotato Grower’s Roundtable, November 2024 (Attendance: 24)
  • Successfully Growing Sweetpotatoes in the Pacific Northwest, Oregon State University Hermiston Farm Fair, December 2024 (40 attendees)
  • Hitting the Sweet Spot with Sweetpotatoes, 2025 Country Living and Modern Homesteading Expo, Monroe WA, January 2025 (50 attendees)
  • Sweetpotato Growing Workshop, invitation by Vashon Island, WA farmers, January 2025 (34 attendees)

Other events

  • Sweetpotato Cookoff, WSU NWREC in Mount Vernon, WA, October 2024 (Attendance: 45)
  • Sweetpotato Taste Evaluation, WSU NWREC in Mount Vernon, WA, February 2025 (Attendance: 60)

Academic conference presentations

  • Evaluation of Wireworm-Resistant Sweetpotato Cultivars in Western Washington, American Society of Horticultural Science Annual Conference in Honolulu, HI, September 2024 (20 attendees)

Posters

  • Evaluation of Wireworm Resistant Sweetpotato Cultivars, Annual Tilth Conference, Port Townsend, WA, October 2023 (Estimated views: 100)
  • Evaluation of Wireworm Resistant Sweetpotato Cultivars, WSU Academic Showcase, March 2024 (Estimated views: 50)
  • Sweetpotatoes: A New Local Food Near You! , Jefferson County Fair (August 2024), Clallam County Fair (August 2024) and the WSU All Extension Conference (October 2024) (Estimated views 300).
  • Dual Cropping Sweetpotato for Greens and Roots, American Society of Horticultural Science Annual Conference in Honolulu, HI, September 2024 (15 views)

Videos

  • How to Produce Sweetpotato Slips Indoors, created spring 2024 (856 views on YouTube)
  • How to Plant Sweetpotato Slips, created spring 2024 (162 views on YouTube)
Education and outreach results:

We initially proposed holding annual sweetpotato field days on the producer-partner farms, but found that holding more comprehensive field days at the WSU NWREC in Mount Vernon, WA was more practical and honored busy farmer's schedules. These field days will be held at the NWREC throughout the project durration. The on-station variety trials include sweetpotato breeding lines that must be grown on a secure facility, and the on station trials also include a broader variety of experiments than the on-farm trials do.  All other on-farm workshops and tours that covered specific production topics (2 per year) will continue to be held on participating farms.

We found that online events that were recorded and posted online (via YouTube links made available on the WSU Regional Small Farms Program learning library web page and 1 posted on the Clallam County Extension Master Gardener website) reached a broader audience of the farmers that we serve than in-person events (785 total views online from recordings of 4 events vs. 495 attending 16 online presentations, farm walks and field days in-person). A YouTube "view" is counted each time somebody watches at least 30 seconds of a video, and does not track users that might access the video multiple times. Due to the geographical remote location of Clallam, Jefferson and Kitsap Counties, farmers are less likely to travel from outside the area to attend on-farm events, however online resources could easily be accessed. The online resources were also convenient for farmers who balance family and off-farm work duties that are common with small farmers. Offering asynchronous options is important for equity and access to educational resources.  

In response to the high number of views that we experienced with recorded classes that were posted online, we piloted 2 short videos that were created in the short informal format of popular YouTube content. These two videos on slip production and planting techniques received over 1,000 views over 6 months. As a result, we applied for and received additional funding to create a more extensive series of these short videos to aid Extension educators and farmers.

In response to producer requests, and professional curiosity, we also added two types of events: A sweetpotato cookoff, and a blind taste test of sweetpotato varieties included in the variety trials.

The cookoff was an internal event at WSU NWREC where we provided sweetpotatoes grown in NWREC trials to employees, students and a couple of invited guests (local chefs, members of local food organizations) and asked them to cook a dish with the sweetpotatoes and bring it to the tasting. About 20 dishes were entered into the competition, including about 13 savory dishes (soups, salads, galettes, tacos, quiche, and more) and 7 sweet dishes (cheesecake, cake, pie, bread, turnovers, and more). Attendees tasted the dishes and voted on their favorite sweet and savory dish. The winners were a Sweetpotato Galette (savory category) and Sweetpotato Turnovers with Maple Glaze (sweet category). We were interviewed about the event and our work on sweetpotatoes by one of the attendees, local chef and radio show host Sally McArthur, on her show Skagit Through the Kitchen Door.

The taste testing event was extended to interested sweetpotato growers to better understand flavor profiles of available cultivars. We baked 21 sweetpotato cultivars and breeding lines grown at WSU NWREC in 2024 and conducted a randomized, blind taste test with employees of WSU NWREC and selected invited guests, including farmers from our on-farm trials, local chefs, local produce buyers, and others who had previously expressed interest in local sweetpotatoes. Participants were asked to rate at least 12 different varieties, but many participants rated all 21. Each entry was scored from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good) for sweetness, texture, firmness, flavor, color, and overall acceptability. Monaco was the most highly ranked overall, so we will distribute Monaco to more farms in 2025, especially farms in warmer microclimates (Monaco tends to have lower yield than other varieties in cooler areas). The taste test event was successful in raising excitement in local sweetpotatoes among restaurants, food co-ops, chefs, and others who might potentially purchase local sweetpotatoes from farmers in the future.  

Farmers listed the following concerns with being able to grow sweetpotatoes in event evaluation forms:

  • Sourcing sweetpotato slips of the best varieties to grow here
  • Sourcing new virus-free stock every few years for on-farm slip production 
  • Choosing varieties or harvest date to target specific root size (fingerling market, or avoiding jumbo sized roots) 
  • Deciding whether rooted or unrooted slips are more efficient in our cool climate
  • Curing seems difficult or energy intensive
  • Plastic mulch disposal

In 2025 we will advertise events more broadly and hold more events closer to population centers that are found to the east of the study area in the Puget Sound area in hopes of reaching more farmers in western Washington that are outside the original study area.

 

 

93 Farmers intend/plan to change their practice(s)

Education and Outreach Outcomes

Key areas taught:

    Information Products

      Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.