Sweetpotatoes: Testing traits for increased market value and sustainable production for direct market farms in the maritime northwest

Progress report for SW23-951

Project Type: Research and Education
Funds awarded in 2023: $313,125.00
Projected End Date: 04/01/2026
Host Institution Award ID: G293-23-W9981
Grant Recipient: WSU Extension Regional Small Farms Program
Region: Western
State: Washington
Principal Investigator:
Laurel Moulton
WSU Extension Regional Small Farms Program
Co-Investigators:
Dr. Carol Miles
WSU Mount Vernon NWREC
Clea Rome
Washington State University
Expand All

Project Information

Summary:

Recent studies have shown that Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) yields in the northern United States can be the same or greater than the national average. Small organic growers in western Washington have started to experiment with growing them in a maritime climate with varying results. In Washington, wireworm damage reduces the marketability of sweetpotato storage roots. However, there are advanced breeding lines with wireworm resistance, and we have tested these in preliminary trials at WSU Mount Vernon NWREC and now have adequate numbers of roots to propagate for field trials.  

The research project will investigate the efficacy of wireworm-resistant sweetpotato advanced breeding lines in western Washington, assess the yield potential of sweetpotato cultivars, and develop sweetpotato production guidelines for growers in western Washington State. These research objectives will be accomplished through on-station and on-farm trials. Results will help determine the potential of sweetpotato as a high-value and unique crop for direct market farmers in the maritime climates of the Olympic and Kitsap Peninsulas in Washington State.   

Creating this project partnership between local producers and Extension researchers will benefit farmers by facilitating access to newly released sweetpotato varieties from USDA-ARS that show resistance to wireworm damage and have other traits that may have benefit to the small organic farm beyond those traits found in commercially available varieties. Data from on-station trials and input from participating farmers may contribute to the public release of additional sweetpotato lines that have superior qualities for the maritime northwest and that would not be prioritized for release when only trialed in traditional growing regions. The project will also create a platform for information sharing between producers to speed the process in finding the most sustainable and efficient production methods for our maritime climate. Educational opportunities facilitated by Extension educators will help bring research findings and farmer innovation to the broader western Washington area. Education and outreach will include on-farm workshops and field days, online seminars, publication of fact sheets and presentation of results at regional conferences. We will also share results with our research and Extension peers through journal articles. 

Project Objectives:

Research objectives:

  1. Investigate the efficacy of wireworm-resistant sweetpotato advanced breeding lines in western Washington. Assess the yield potential of sweetpotato cultivars and advanced breeding lines with soil-warming mulch. 
  2. Develop sweetpotato production guidelines for growers in western Washington State. 

Education objectives:

  1. Hold two on-farm field days per project year (6 total) to view trial results, share innovative techniques that individual farmers develop for propagating, producing, curing/storage or marketing sweetpotatoes in a cool maritime climate.  
  2. Hold online (Zoom) farmer to farmer discussion sessions on growing sweetpotatoes.  Public events will occur as a part of the regular WSU Regional Small Farms “Dirt Talk” series. Dirt Talk is hosted by WSU Regional Small Farms in conjunction with a local farmer or agriculture specialist willing to share their expertise in a given topic. Events are held in a supportive yet informal atmosphere, that allows participants to share, exchange perspectives, and learn from each other without pressure. Events are open to all new and current farmers. Dirt Talk events are recorded and posted on the Regional Small Farms website for future viewing. Project team events include an annual end of season meeting to troubleshoot, assess success/failure and inform changes to the project in the following season.
  3. Update Extension fact sheets that were created in preliminary research. Fact sheets include sweetpotato slip production, field production practices, and curing and storage. Updates will be based on trial results and farmer feedback. Fact sheets will be made available on the WSU Extension Publication website and other Extension outlets and translated into Spanish.
  4. Present results to research peers at the American Society of Horticultural Science (ASHS) annual conference and to regional growers at Washington Farming and Agriculture Tilth Conference.

Cooperators

Click linked name(s) to expand/collapse or show everyone's info
  • Leilani Wood - Producer
  • Bryan Custer - Producer
  • Karen Halberg-Weaver - Producer
  • Kia Armstrong - Producer
  • Christine Kearsing - Producer
  • Tammy Rattlif - Producer
  • Laura Schulz (Researcher)
  • Dana Steege - Producer
  • Srijana Shrestha (Researcher)
  • Shay Hohmann - Producer
  • Arleen Jenson - Producer
  • Melanie Miller - Producer
  • Karyn Williams - Producer
  • Diane Fish
  • Josh DeWitt - Producer
  • Laura Gardener - Producer

Research

Materials and methods:

On-station trials

On station trials were held at WSU Mount Vernon NWREC (48°26’28”N, 122°23’38”W) in 2023 and will be repeated in 2024. The region has a cool Mediterranean climate, and during the summer growing season (June through September) the average (1970 to 2023) air temperature is 15.7°C (average minimum 10.1°C, average maximum 21.5°C) and precipitation is 135.7 mm (AgWeatherNet, 2023).

For all on-station trials, air temperature, relative humidity (RH), solar radiation, and rainfall data during the cropping season were collected from the WSU AgWeatherNet station located approximately 140 m from the experimental field plot. Soil temperature and moisture were recorded at 15-minute intervals with sensors (TEROS 11; Meter Environment, Pullman, WA) installed 10 cm deep in the center of the middle plot in replicate 2. 

1. Wireworm Resistant Cultivars Trial

A replicated study was carried out in a certified organic field. The experiment had a randomized complete block design with 5 sweetpotato cultivars and 4 breeding lines as the treatments and four replications. Cultivars Bayou Belle, Beauregard, Covington, Monaco, and Orleans were from the North Carolina State University sweetpotato breeding program (J. Schultheis, Horticultural Science; G.C. Yencho and K. Pecota, Sweetpotato Breeding Program, Raleigh, NC). Breeding lines PI 666141 (released as cv. Cascade), USDA-04-136, USDA-04-284, and USDA-04-791 were from the USDA ARS sweetpotato breeding program (P.A. Wadl, Research Geneticist, Charleston, SC). ‘Covington,’ which is susceptible to wireworm, was the control treatment. Each plot included 15 plants in a single row with 25.4 cm spacing between plants on a raised bed covered with black polyethylene (PE) mulch (1 mm, Filmtech, Allentown, PA). Plots were separated by 1.5 m in the bed to facilitate data collection, and beds were 1.8 m center-to-center. An organic fertilizer (8-2-4, Stutzman Environmental Products, Inc., Canby, OR) was applied over the center of the row at the rate of 112 kg‧ha-1 of nitrogen and incorporated as the beds were formed. Drip irrigation tape (Rivulis Irrigation T-Tape, Kibbutz Gvat, Jezreel Valley, Israel) with 20 cm emitter spacing was installed at the time PE mulch was laid. Slips were produced from sweetpotato roots grown and stored at WSU NWREC. Planting was May 31 in 2023.

Plant establishment/growth. Plant establishment was measured as the total number of live plants per plot 2 and 4 weeks after transplanting. Plants with any visible amount of green tissue were counted as alive. Length of the longest vine was measured from the soil level to the base of the growing point for the center six plants in each plot 2 weeks after transplanting (June 14, 2023), in mid-season (August 9, 2023), and at harvest (September 27, 2023). Canopy cover was measured at the same time as vine length and included the five northernmost plants of the center six plants. Percent canopy cover was measured using Image-J (Rasband, 2023). Photos were taken from 1 m above the surface of the raised bed.

Storage root yield and wireworm damage. Harvest was October 3 in 2023, before the soil temperature reached below 13℃ (Brandenberger et al., 2014). The center 2 m of each plot was hand harvested for yield and wireworm damage assessment. For yield assessment, sweetpotatoes were sorted into categories using U.S. standards for grades of sweetpotatoes (USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service, 2005): Jumbo (>22.9 cm length and >8.9 cm diameter), U.S. No. 1 (7.6‒22.9 cm length and 4.4-8.9 cm diameter), U.S. No. 2 (≥3.8 cm diameter), and cull (storage roots of any size with off-shapes and/or damages from disease, rodents, bruises, or other means). Sweetpotato roots that were not at least 2.5 cm in diameter and 7.6 cm in length were discarded. The number and weight of harvested sweetpotatoes were recorded for each cultivar. Average number and marketable yield of sweetpotatoes per plant were also calculated for each treatment. Root damage by wireworms was rated using a severity index based on the number of feeding scars (no scars = 0, 1-5 scars = 1, 6-10 scars = 2, >10 scars = 4) (Schalk et al., 1993), and the overall wireworm damage severity per plot was calculated as a weighted average score between 0 and 4. Only wireworm scars greater than 1 mm in diameter were counted.

Data analysis. All data were analyzed using statistical analysis software (R version 4.3.2, R Studio, Vienna, Austria). The assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance were tested using the Shapiro-Wilk Test (α=0.05) and Levene’s Test (α=0.05), respectively. Means were separated using Tukey’s HSD Test (α=0.05).

2. In-Row Plant Spacing Trial

This experiment was added in response to grower interest in spacing efficiency in the field. The experiment had a split-plot design with four main plot treatments and three subplot treatments, and four replications. The main plot treatment was sweetpotato cultivars and breeding lines, and subplot treatment was plant spacing. Main plot treatments included the USDA ARS breeding line Cascade (PI 666141) and cvs. Monaco, Beauregard and Covington. The subplot treatment included three plant spacings: 8 in, 10 in, and 12 in. Each subplot included 10 plants in a single row on a raised bed covered with PE mulch. Plots were separated by 1.5 m, and beds were 1.8 m center-to-center. Urea (46-0-0) was applied at the rate of 112 kg‧ha-1 of nitrogen and incorporated as the beds were formed. Drip irrigation tape was installed at the time mulch was laid. Planting was May 31 in 2023.  

Plant establishment/growth. Plant establishment was measured as the total number of live plants per plot 2 and 4 weeks after transplanting. Plants with any amount of green tissue were counted as alive. Length of the longest vine was measured from the soil level to the base of the growing point for the center six plants in each plot 2 weeks after transplanting (June 14, 2023), in mid-season (August 10, 2023), and at harvest (October 2, 2023). Percent canopy cover was measured using Image-J to analyze photos taken from 1 m above the surface of the raised bed. Canopy cover was measured for the same center plants in each plot at the same time as vine length was measured. For plots with 10 inch spacing, five plants were included in canopy cover analysis. For plots with 8 and 12 inch spacing, photos were taken from the same 1 m height so they included the same area of analysis, which corresponded to six and four plants, respectively.  

Storage root yield. Harvest was October 2 in 2023, before the soil temperature reached below 13℃ (Brandenberger et al., 2014). The center 2 m of each plot was hand harvested for yield and wireworm damage assessment. For yield assessment in all trials, sweetpotatoes were sorted into categories using U.S. standards for grades of sweetpotatoes (USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service, 2005): Jumbo (>22.9 cm length and >8.9 cm diameter), U.S. No. 1 (7.6‒22.9 cm length and 4.4-8.9 cm diameter), U.S. No. 2 (≥3.8 cm diameter), and cull (storage roots of any size with off-shapes and/or damages from disease, rodents, bruises, or other means). Sweetpotato roots that were not at least 2.5 cm in diameter and 7.6 cm in length were discarded. The number and weight of harvested sweetpotatoes were recorded for each variety. Average number and marketable yield of sweetpotatoes per plant were also calculated for each treatment. Root damage by wireworm was rated using a severity index based on the number of feeding scars (no scars = 0, 1-5 scars = 1, 6-10 scars = 2, >10 scars = 4) (Schalk et al., 1993), and percentage of wireworm damaged roots (by weight and number) was calculated. Only wireworm scars greater than 1 mm in diameter were counted.   

3. Dual-Cropping for Greens and Roots Trial

This experiment was added in response to grower interest in greens production. The experiment had a split plot design with three main plot treatments and four subplot treatments, and four replications. The main plot treatment was sweetpotato breeding lines, and the subplot treatment was greens harvesting schedule. Main plot treatments included the breeding lines USDA-04-284, USDA-04-791, and USDA-04-136 obtained from USDA ARS (P.A. Wadl, Research Geneticist, Charleston, SC). These breeding lines are being evaluated in a separate study for wireworm resistance in western Washington, so additional information on how the breeding lines respond to greens harvesting will also be useful to the breeder for potential variety release. The subplot treatment included four greens harvesting schedules: no harvesting (control), early harvesting, late harvesting, and continuous harvesting (Table 1). Each subplot included 10 plants in a single row with 10-inch spacing between plants on a raised bed covered with polyethylene (PE) mulch. Plots were separated by 1.5 m, and beds were 1.8 m center-to-center. Based on soil test results, urea (46-0-0) was applied at the rate of 112 kg‧ha-1 of nitrogen in 2023 and incorporated as the beds were formed. Drip irrigation tape was installed under the mulch. Planting was June 8 in 2023.  

Table 1. Sweetpotato greens harvesting schedule; greens were harvested for all treatments 16 weeks after transplanting, which was 1-2 days before storage root harvest.  

 

Weeks after Transplanting  

Treatments 

10 

12 

14 

16 

No Harvesting (Control) 

 

 

 

 

 

Early Harvesting 

 

 

Late Harvesting 

 

 

 

Continuous Harvesting 

 

Plant establishment/growth. Plant establishment was measured as the total number of live plants per plot 2 and 4 weeks after transplanting. Plants with any amount of green tissue were counted as alive. Length of the longest vine was measured from the soil level to the base of the growing point for the center six plants in each plot 2 weeks after transplanting (June 21, 2023), in mid-season (August 15, 2023), and a few weeks before harvest (September 25, 2023). Percent canopy cover was measured using Image-J to analyze photos taken from 1 m above the surface of the raised bed. Canopy cover was measured at the same time as vine length was measured and included five of the center six plants. 

Greens harvest and yield. At each harvest date, the terminal 15 cm (measured from the base of the growing point) was cut from every vine that was at least 15 cm long on each plant. For subsequent harvests, vines were only re-harvested if there was at least 15 cm of new growth. Vine branches were harvested in addition to harvesting the main vine if the branches were at least 15 cm long from the branching point. All plants in each plot were harvested, but only the vines from the center eight plants were collected, counted, and weighed. On the final greens harvest date, which was 1-2 days before root harvest, the terminal 15 cm of vines were removed and counted. Then all remaining vines were cut and collected. The total vines from each plant (the terminal 15 cm and the remaining vines) were placed in a paper bag, and fresh weight was recorded within 1 hour of harvest. Bags containing the vines were dried in an oven at 60°C for up to 120 hours, until completely dry. In 2023, greens were harvested on August 2-4 (8 WAT), August 16-21 (10 WAT), August 30-31 (12 WAT), September 13-14 (14 WAT), and September 28-October 9 (16 WAT).  

Storage root yield. Harvest was October 13 in 2023, before the soil temperature reached below 13 ℃ (Brandenberger et al., 2014). The center six plants in each subplot were harvested by hand. Yield and wireworm damage were assessed for the center six plants in each subplot. Sweetpotatoes were sorted into categories using U.S. standards for grades of sweetpotatoes (USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service, 2005): Jumbo (>22.9 cm length and >8.9 cm diameter), U.S. No. 1 (7.6‒22.9 cm length and 4.4-8.9 cm diameter), U.S. No. 2 (≥3.8 cm diameter), and cull (storage roots of any size with off-shapes and/or damages from disease, rodents, bruises, or other means). Sweetpotato roots that were not at least 2.5 cm in diameter and 7.6 cm in length were discarded. The number and weight of harvested sweetpotatoes in each category were recorded for each subplot. Average number and marketable yield of sweetpotatoes per plant were also calculated for each treatment. Root damage by wireworms was rated using a severity index based on the number of feeding scars (no scars = 0, 1-5 scars = 1, 6-10 scars = 2, >10 scars = 4) (Schalk et al., 1993), and percentage of wireworm damaged roots (by weight and number) was calculated. Only wireworm scars greater than 1 mm in diameter were counted.  

On-farm trials

Two replicated and 12 observational field experiments were carried out on farms in Clallam, Jefferson, and Kitsap Counties in northwest Washington in 2023. They will be repeated in 2024 and 2025. Sweetpotato roots were provided to each grower along with a slip production guide developed during preliminary WSU NWREC trials (Shrestha and Miles, 2023). The on-farm replicated experiments were a randomized complete block design, and treatments included cv. Cascade (formerly PI 666141), a USDA ARS wireworm-resistant cultivar, and two commercial cultivars, Beauregard and Covington (control treatment). The replicated experiments included three replications and 10 plants per plot with 12 inch spacing between plants. Most of the observational experiments included the cultivars Cascade, Covington, and Beauregard. However, due to challenges with on-farm slip production, some observational experiments included the cultivars Mahon Yam or Monaco in place of one or more of Cascade, Beauregard, and Covington. Mahon Yam slips were not produced on farms but were provided by a local grower who has had a good experience growing the variety locally and purchased the slips online (Johnny’s Selected Seeds, Winslow, Maine). Table 2 provides a summary of cultivars planted at each farm. Observational experiments included a single plot of each cultivar with approximately 10 plants per plot and 8 to 12 inch spacing between plants (Table 3). 

Table 2. On-farm trial locations, cultivars, mulch, and fertilizer use.  

Farm No. 

Replicated or Observational 

County 

Cultivar(s) 

Mulch 

Fertilizer (type; rate) 

Replicated   

Clallam 

Beauregard, Cascade, Covington 

silage tarp 

 

Replicated   

Kitsap 

Beauregard, Cascade, Covington 

PE 

 

Observational 

Clallam 

Beauregard, Mahon Yam 

landscape fabric 

5-2-4 organic; 1/4 cup per row ft 

Observational 

Clallam 

Beauregard, Covington 

black plastic packing tarp 

compost; 1 inch 

Observational 

Jefferson 

Beauregard, Cascade, Covington 

landscape fabric 

All purpose "Chimicum Blend" plus bone meal; followed WSU recommended rates 

Observational 

Jefferson 

Beauregard, Cascade, Covington, Mahon Yam 

PE 

60-30-75; 825 lb/ac; custom mix based on soil test: Bone meal, feather meal, SOP, boron 

Observational 

Kitsap 

Beauregard, Cascade, Covington, Monaco 

silage tarp 

custom mix complete organic (seed meals, lime, calphos, etc.) 4 gallons per 100ft bed. Supplemented with fish and kelp fertigation 

Observational 

Kitsap 

Beauregard, Cascade, Covington 

black plastic   

 

Observational 

Kitsap 

Mahon Yam 

wood chips 

 

10 

Observational 

Kitsap 

Mahon Yam 

black plastic  

 

PE = black polyethylene mulch  

Table 3. On-farm trial slip production and transplanting methods.  

Farm No. 

Slips Started 

Transplant Date 

In-Row Plant Spacing (in) 

Slip Treatment 

 

June 5 

12 

direct planting 

 

June 5 

12 

direct planting 

 

June 1- July 1 

12 

direct planting 

April 

July 8 

10 

direct planting 

April 23 

June 6 

direct planting 

April 18 

June 8 

12 

rooted in 4" pot 

April 15 

May 8, 15, and 29  

12 

direct planting 

 

 

 

rooted in 4" pot (Beauregard, Covington);  

direct planting (Cascade) 

did not produce slips 

 

 

 

10 

did not produce slips 

June 10 

12 

direct planting 

We provided growers with a guide for production practices (Shrestha and Miles, 2022b), and we recorded how each grower planted and maintained the crop (Tables 2-4). Each grower used black polyethylene (PE) mulch or their preferred alternative (i.e. silage tarp or landscape fabric) to grow sweetpotatoes in their farm experiments (Table 2). Data for the on-farm replicated trials was collected by WSU Extension personnel on the Olympic Peninsula. Farmers hosting an observational experiment collected their own data using a short questionnaire that was provided at the time of planting.

Table 4. On-farm trial field practices and harvest dates.  

Farm No. 

Weed Control 2-6 WAT1 

Irrigation (type; schedule) 

Harvest Date 

Other Notes 

adequate 

drip 

 

frost shortly after planting; 
water may have been uneven at the start 

insufficient 

drip 

 

deer damage;  
no irrigation for several weeks before harvest 

excellent 

drip; 2 inches once a week 

October 11 

 

 

drip; in very dry weather only 

October 18 

 

excellent 

drip; once a week 

October 15 

 

none 

drip; 27 gph 7 hrs a week; 6" spacing 

October 19 

 

excellent 

drip; 40 gal/100 ft row 2-3 times a week 

September 29 

rabbit damage; 
heat wave early on contributed to poor slip survival (replaced on later planting dates) 

excellent 

drip 

 

 

excellent 

drip; 2.5 hrs per day 

 

 

10 

excellent 

drip; 10 min per day 

October 

rabbit damage early on; covered with row cover for remainder of growing season to deter rabbits 

WAT = weeks after transplanting 

1The first 2-6 weeks after transplanting is the critical weed free period for sweetpotato (Nedunzhiyan et al., 1998; Seem et al., 2003; Wadl et al., 2023).  

Weather data. Air temperature, relative humidity (RH), solar radiation, and rainfall data during the cropping season were collected from the WSU AgWeatherNet stations located within 10 miles of each on-farm trial. Soil temperature and moisture were recorded at 15-minute intervals with sensors (TEROS 11; Meter Environment, Pullman, WA) installed 10 cm deep in the center of the middle plot in replicate 2 of each replicated on-farm experiment.   

Plant survival and vigor. Slip survival rate was recorded as a percentage of plants alive 2-4 weeks after transplanting. Plant vigor was rated at harvest using rating system based on photos that showed examples of plants that were not vigorous, slightly vigorous, moderately vigorous, or very vigorous. Plant vigor ratings were coded as 0 (plant was dead), 1 (not vigorous), 2 (slightly vigorous), 3 (moderately vigorous), or 4 (very vigorous) for data analysis. For replicated experiments, plant vigor was recorded for each plant selected for harvest (3 plants per plot). For observational experiments, overall plant vigor was recorded the entire experiment.  

Weed Control. Weed control was rated by WSU Extension personnel during mid-season farm visits as none, insufficient, adequate, or excellent (Table 4). 

Storage root yield and wireworm damage. Harvest dates are shown in Table 4. Farmers were asked to harvest before the soil temperature reached below 13℃ (Brandenberger et al., 2014). In the replicated on-farm trials, 3 central plants from each plot were hand harvested for yield and wireworm damage assessment. If one or more of the original central plants was missing, different plants from the same plot were harvested instead. In the on-farm observational experiments, 1 to 3 representative plant(s) of each cultivar were harvested for yield and wireworm damage assessment. Sweetpotato roots less than 1 inch in diameter and 3 inches in length were discarded. The remaining total root weight was recorded for the 3 representative plants in each plot, and the number of harvested sweetpotatoes in each size category was recorded. The average number and marketable yield of sweetpotatoes per plant were calculated for each treatment. Categories were U.S. standards for grades of sweetpotatoes (USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service, 2005): Jumbo (>22.9 cm length and >8.9 cm diameter), U.S. No. 1 (7.6‒22.9 cm length and 4.4-8.9 cm diameter), U.S. No. 2 (≥3.8 cm diameter), and cull (storage roots of any size with off-shapes and/or damages from disease, rodents, bruises, or other means). Root damage by wireworm was rated using a severity index based on the number of feeding scars (no scars = 0, 1-5 scars = 1, 6-10 scars = 2, >10 scars = 4) (Schalk et al., 1993), and a wireworm severity index from 0 to 4 was calculated as a weighted average for each plot.  

Data analysis. All data were analyzed using statistical analysis software (R version 4.3.2, R Studio, Vienna, Austria). A cumulative link mixed effects model (clmm) was used to determine if weed control, wildlife interference, and growing degree days were significant predictors of plant vigor at harvest. Plant vigor at harvest was used instead of root yield due to missing data and inconsistencies with how root yield was measured and reported by farmers. Growing degree days (GDD) was calculated using air temperature data from the AgWeatherNet station closest to each farm. GDD was calculated both with a base temperature of 10 ⁰C and 15.5 ⁰C (Duque et al., 2022). GDD was used to account for planting date, harvest date, and temperatures throughout the growing season all in one metric. Weed control was rated for the first 2-6 weeks after transplanting as 0 = none, 1 = insufficient, 2 = adequate, 3 = excellent. Wildlife interference was rated to account for significant damage by rabbits or deer as 0 = no major wildlife interference, 1 = major wildlife interference.

Research results and discussion:

On station trials

1. Wireworm Resistant Cultivar Trial

Marketable yield ranged from 22 t/ha (USDA-04-136) to 57 t/ha (Bayou Belle) (p<0.001).  The wireworm damage severity index (WDS) ranged from 0.89 (USDA-04-791) to 3.45 (Beauregard) (p<0.001). Beauregard, Covington, and Orleans were the most susceptible cultivars (average WDS index 3.33), while Cascade and the breeding lines USDA-04-136 and USDA-04-791 were the most resistant (average WDS index 1.15). Wireworm susceptible cultivars generally had greater number and weight of sweetpotato roots than resistant entries, but some cultivars stood out: ‘Bayou Belle’ had the highest yield and only moderate wireworm damage, and ‘Cascade’ had moderate yield and very low wireworm damage. Wireworm-resistant sweetpotato cultivars show great promise and have the potential to provide an effective integrated pest management tool in western Washington as higher-yielding cultivars are developed, allowing sweetpotatoes to be effectively integrated into direct-market organic farms in the region. 

2. In-row plant spacing trial

The plant spacing trial indicated that maximum sweetpotato yields per hectare were achieved with 25 cm or 30 cm (8 or 10 inch) spacing (p<0.0001). Decreasing in-row plant spacing decreased root yields per plant (p<0.0001) but increased overall yield per hectare because of a higher plant density. Average root size was highest at 10 inch spacing, which was not significantly different from average root size at 12 inch spacing but was significantly greater than average root size at 8 inch spacing (p<0.0001) Reducing the plant spacing yields more large and medium sized roots that are preferred for fresh market sales. Jumbo-sized roots are typically reserved for the processing market, and are usually undesirable for fresh market sales (Schultheis et al., 1999). Narrower in-row spacing also results in more canopy cover early in the growing season (Shrestha and Miles, 2022), which may help with weed competition.

3. Dual-cropping for roots and greens trial

Based on requests from producers, we added a trial at NWREC to measure the impact of harvesting sweetpotato greens on root yield. Sweetpotato greens are commonly consumed in West Africa, the American Southeast and other locations where sweetpotatoes are widely grown. Sweetpotato greens are high in many nutrients, including carotene, calcium, and iron (Ishiguro et al., 2004) and can be cooked and consumed like other greens such as spinach and chard. 

The impacts on root yield should be considered before harvesting greens in areas with short growing seasons, such as the Pacific Northwest, when sweetpotatoes are being grown primarily to harvest the storage roots.  A field experiment evaluated time of vine tip (15 cm from the end of every vine) harvest on sweetpotato root yield of breeding lines USDA-04-284 (semi-erect growth habit), USDA-04-136 and USDA-04-791 (both with spreading growth habit). Treatments included no harvest during the season (control treatment, 1 harvest at time of root harvest), early harvest (8–12 weeks after transplanting, 4 harvests), late harvest (12–14 weeks after transplanting, 3 harvests), and continuous harvest (8–14 weeks after transplanting, 5 harvests). Vine tips were harvested at 2-week intervals during the harvest period, with an additional harvest for all treatments (including control) immediately before root harvest. Breeding line USDA-04-284 (semi-erect growth habit) produced 330 g of greens (fresh weight) per plant on average for all harvest treatments, which was significantly higher (p<0.0001) than USDA-04-136 and USDA-04-791 (spreading growth habit), which produced 118 and 139 g, respectively. Total greens production was significantly higher for the early and continuous harvest treatments (ca. 219 g/plant) than for the late and control treatments (ca. 173 g/plant) (p<0.01). Marketable root yield was similar for all the greens harvest treatments and was significantly lower for all harvest treatments compared to the control (p<0.0001). Compared to the control treatment, marketable root yield was lowest for early harvest and continuous harvest (ca. 34%), and highest for late harvest (51%). Across all greens harvest treatments, marketable root yield was lower compared to the control in the spreading breeding lines (33% and 40% for USDA-04-791 and USDA-04-136, respectively) than in the semi-erect breeding line (51% for USDA-04-284). While sweetpotato can be dual cropped for both greens and roots, the production of greens as an additional vegetable crop must offset financial losses of decreased root yield. Harvesting sweetpotato greens later in the season or only immediately before root harvest can reduce root yield losses while still producing a substantial crop of greens. Erect cultivars are best suited for greens production due to the lesser impact of greens harvest on root yield and higher production of greens.    

Growers might consider harvesting vine tips from sweetpotato plants a few days before storage root harvest to produce sweetpotato greens with no impact on storage root yield. At the end of the season when the plants are harvested, the entire vines can be used as feed for livestock. 

On farm trials:

2023 was a learning year for the on-farm trials and more experiential data (ie. professional development for conducting on-farm trials for the PI) was collected than statistically significant quantitative data.

Farmers participating in the observational and replicated trials encountered problems with processes that are specific to sweetpotatoes: slip production and curing. Both processes require heat and humidity conditions not required for any other crops that are grown locally. 

Under optimal conditions, sweetpotato slips can be produced in 6 - 8 weeks. However, if the recommended temperatures of 80 - 85 °F and high humidity are not provided, the process may take much longer. Some participating growers had trouble maintaining temperatures that are optimal for slip production in their greenhouses, and encountered problems with the slip producing roots rotting or not producing adequate slips in time for the recommended planting date. The farms hosting the replicated trials were provided "back up" slips if they were unable to produce enough of their own, and some observational participants were given extras. In the 2024 season, all participating farms will be provided with slips to ensure that they can plant at an optimal time (mid May- mid June, depending on micro-climate). Slips will be produced at the research station or by a partner producer (Sunbaked Greenhouse) who has decades of experience with propagation and nursery production.

Only properly cured sweetpotatoes can be stored successfully. Curing is a wound-healing process where a protective cork layer is formed over the root surface. As this layer forms, a waxy material ‘suberin’ is produced by the root’s outer cells and is deposited on the root surface. The cork layer and suberin combined act as a barrier to microorganisms and excessive moisture loss. Curing enhances flavor as starch gets converted to sugar during this process. Ideal curing conditions require maintaining a temperature of 80 - 90 °F and 80 - 90% relative humidity for 1 week. At lower temperatures, the curing process will take longer. The curing chamber must be heated evenly so that sweetpotatoes closest to the heating device aren't damaged by excessive heat and steps must be taken to prevent water condensation on the roots. Some farmers were unable to cure sweetpotatoes adequately, so they did not store well.

Farmers, including those hosting replicated trials and observational trials, encountered problems in the production process including consistent irrigation (impacting initial plant establishment, root vs. foliage production, root cracking) and pest pressure including weeds, deer, rabbits and voles. In order to better prepare producer-partners, a draft of one of our grant deliverables, a "Growing Sweetpotatoes in Western Washington" growing guide, was updated to better describe (in part):

  1. Irrigation requirements and the effects of too much or too little on crop production,  
  2. Critical weed free period,
  3. Techniques that farmers have reported having success with for deer, rabbit and vole deterrence.

This draft guide can be found here: https://vegetables.wsu.edu/sweetpotato/ and the final version will be submitted in the final project report. The draft growing guide will be distributed to growers in pre-season communications and at the spring 2024 grower planning meeting. Additionally, research/education team members will provide on site consultation, referencing the growing guide, when delivering sweetpotato slips at planting time.

Statistical data analysis was performed on both replicated and observational trial data from 2023. Only six farms provided compete data on plant vigor, planting and harvest dates, weed control, and wildlife interference. The remaining farms were not included in the cumulative link mixed effects model. The cumulative link mixed effects model showed no significant effects of weed control (p=0.429), wildlife interference (p=0.947), or growing degree days (p=0.212) on plant vigor. This is likely due to small sample size. In order to collect better data in the 2024 growing season the following changes have been implemented:

  1. Additional farmers were recruited to participate in the trial (and farmers that didn't follow through, at least partially, were eliminated). A bigger pool of farmers should yield a higher number of returned questionnaires.
  2. The questionnaire that was used to collect data for observational participants has been updated to include more yes/no and multiple choice questions and to collect information that we didn't think of when creating the 2023 survey (harvest method, curing method and success, marketing).
  3. One of the research/education team members will visit all of the observational trial farms at specific time points to assist with critical data collection (harvest and initial plant survival).
  4. Farmers will be paid a stipend for returning completed questionnaires at the end of the year.
  5. Farms from additional counties in western Washington (Whatcom, Skagit, Island, King and Thurston counties) will participate in observational trials to expand the impact of the project in the region.

Data from the two on-farm replicated trials also suffered because we were not able to hire a field technician for the 2023 season. A technician for the 2024 season has been hired.

Five farmers reported that they sold their marketable harvest, and the others either didn't harvest marketable sweetpotatoes, or harvested so few sweetpotatoes that they consumed them all at home or shared with the farm crew (due to the small number of trial plants that they grew, wildlife damage or other problems with production). Farm 6 attempted to sell uncured sweetpotatoes and reported that they did not sell well. Farm 1 had smaller harvest than expected due to irregularities in irrigation during the plant establishment phase but still harvested marketable roots. They were able to include sweetpotatoes in their CSA program but the curing process wasn't successful and the roots didn't store well. Farm 3 reported that they were able to cure sweetpotatoes successfully, and offered 50 lbs for sale through a partner farm's farm stand. The sweetpotatoes sold out in less than a day, and the farmer who hosted the farm stand has asked to participate in the trial in the 2024 season in hopes of adding sweetpotatoes to his regular offering. Farm 2 and an additional farm (who has not been included in the data tables because they didn't return their questionnaire) came into the study having some existing background in growing sweetpotatoes locally. They had successful harvest and curing experiences, and offered sweetpotatoes throughout the winter at their farm stands. It should be noted that farm 2 hosted a replicated trial plot, but placed it separately from additional rows of sweetpotatoes that they grew. The deer damage and irrigation issues reported (Table 4) only impacted the trial plot and the sweetpotatoes they harvested and sold were from these other rows.

We observed a 2-3 week delay between planting unrooted slips and plants putting on new growth. In general, planting sweetpotato slips directly into the field without pre-rooting is recommended for commercial growers. A study in New York concluded that regular slips were preferable to pre-rooted slips due to difficulty obtaining slips from commercial suppliers early enough to pre-root them, increased labor requirements, and lower marketable yields for the pre-rooted slips (Bornt, 2012). However, pre-rooting slips is sometimes used in areas with very short growing seasons to try to increase sweetpotato yields (Wees et al. , 2016). A study in Croatia found that slips that were pre-rooted in potting mix for 30 days before transplanting had significantly higher yields (both weight and number of roots) than unrooted slips (Novak et al., 2007). In the short growing season of western Washington, any advantage may lead to a better harvest in the cooler micro-climates. We will be adding pre-rooted slips to the on-farm trials in 2024 to see if pre-rooting can lessen the duration of the establishment phase at the beginning of the season.

Although soil warming mulch is a key tool for successful sweetpotato production in short season growing regions, most participating farmers expressed a desire to avoid single use plastics. Most farmers employed recycled silage or packaging tarps, weed cloth or didn't use soil warming mulch in 2023. One of the 2 farms that didn't use mulch harvested a marketable crop. These two farms were located in areas that recorded some of the highest growing degree days among trial participants. Floating row cover and high tunnels are broadly accepted even on farms that prefer to use as little plastic as possible, so 2024 trials will include at least one producer using floating row cover instead of soil warming mulch, and another planting sweetpotatoes in a high tunnel. 

 

Participation Summary
14 Producers participating in research

Research Outcomes

No research outcomes

Education and Outreach

15 Consultations
1 Curricula, factsheets or educational tools
2 On-farm demonstrations
4 Webinars / talks / presentations
1 Workshop field days
1 Other educational activities: Poster presented at 2023 Tilth Conference, Port Townsend, WA

Participation Summary:

75 Farmers participated
Education and outreach methods and analyses:

Educational outreach in 2023 was provided through in person and online presentations, on-farm workshops, a field day, and a conference poster. Online presentations were recorded and added to the WSU Regional Small Farms Team online learning library, where they received the most views of any class housed in the library. Additionally, a first draft of a fact sheet, Growing Sweetpotatoes in Western Washington, was created using input from on-farm trials and farmer feedback and preliminary results from the on-station experiments. Events were advertised western Washington and beyond through the WSU Regional Small Farms Program, the WSU Food Systems Program, the Tilth Alliance, and local conservation districts.  

On-farm tours/workshops (3 per year)

Two farmer to farmer on-farm tours/workshops were held. The first, Propagating and Planting Sweetpotatoes, was hosted by Wild Edge Farm in Port Angeles, WA in early June (Attendance: 15). The second tour, Harvesting and Curing Sweetpotatoes, was hosted by Around the Table Farm in Poulsbo, WA in late October (Attendance: 15)

A field day was held in early September at the WSU NWREC in Mount Vernon, WA to showcase on-station variety trials, plant spacing trials and sweetpotato greens harvesting trials. Examples of harvest tools, slip propagation methods, and curing chambers were on display. Preliminary trial results were discussed. (Attendance: 22)   

Presentations and farmer discussions (2 per year)

Three online presentations were held. Propagating and Growing Sweetpotatoes in the Pacific Northwest was offered in April (Attendance: 48, Recording views: 149). Sweetpotato Production and Troubleshooting was offered in July (Attendance: 30, Recording views: 303), and Growing Sweetpotatoes was offered in December (Attendance: 34, Recording views: 35). Farmers participating in on-farm trials were encouraged to attend the April presentation, which included a pre-season grower planning meeting afterward. The first two classes were recorded and added to the WSU Regional Small Farms online learning library. The third presentation was recorded and made available on the Clallam County WSU Extension website. 

Additional outreach activities included presenting a poster titled, Evaluation of Wireworm Resistant Sweetpotato Cultivars, at the annual Tilth Conference in Port Townsend, WA (Estimated views: 100), and a presentation, Growing Sweetpotatoes in the Pacific Northwest, at the Hermiston Farm Fair in Hermiston, OR, in November (Estimated attendance: 50)

Education and outreach results:

We initially proposed holding annual sweetpotato field days on the producer-partner farms, but we held the 2023 field day at the WSU NWREC in Mount Vernon. The on-station variety trials include sweetpotato breeding lines that must be grown on a secure facility, and the on station trials also include a broader variety of experiments than the on-farm trials do. Holding the annual field day at the NWREC was more practical for a comprehensive field day, so annual field days will continue to be held there. All other on-farm workshops and tours that covered specific production topics (2 per year) will continue to be held on participating farms.

We found that online events that were recorded and posted online (via YouTube links made available on the WSU Regional Small Farms Program learning library web page and 1 posted on the Clallam County Extension Master Gardener website) reached a broader audience of the farmers that we serve than in-person events (599 total views online from recordings of 3 events vs. 212 attending 7 online presentations, farm walks and field days in-person). A YouTube "view" is counted each time somebody watches at least 30 seconds of a video, and does not track users that might access the video multiple times. Due to the geographical remote location of Clallam, Jefferson and Kitsap Counties, farmers are less likely to travel from outside the area to attend on-farm events, however online resources could easily be accessed. The online resources were also convenient for farmers who balance family and off-farm work duties that are common with small farmers. Offering asynchronous options is important for equity and access to educational resources.  

Farmers listed the following concerns with being able to grow sweetpotatoes in event evaluation forms:

  • Sourcing sweetpotato slips of the best varieties to grow here
  • Curing seems difficult or energy intensive
  • Plastic mulch disposal

In 2024 we will advertise events more broadly and hold more events closer to population centers that are found to the east of the study area in the Puget Sound area in hopes of reaching more farmers in western Washington that are outside the original study area.

 

 

43 Farmers intend/plan to change their practice(s)

Education and Outreach Outcomes

Key areas taught:

    Information Products

      Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE.