High Residue Farming in the Irrigated Far West

Project Overview

EW13-008
Project Type: Professional Development Program
Funds awarded in 2013: $26,400.00
Projected End Date: 12/31/2016
Region: Western
State: California
Principal Investigator:
Andrew McGuire
Washington State University Extension

Annual Reports

Commodities

Not commodity specific

Practices

  • Crop Production: conservation tillage
  • Education and Training: extension, networking
  • Production Systems: general crop production
  • Soil Management: soil quality/health

    Proposal abstract:

    Farmers in the irrigated regions of the far west have not adopted high residue farming (HRF; no-till, strip-till, etc.) to any great extent. Compared to the Midwest, adoption in these areas has been slowed by the challenges of using these systems with surface irrigation, by intensive crop rotations that include vegetables and other non-agronomic crops, and by the relatively less urgent soil conservation issues in arid climates. Recently, however, needs for water conservation, a new interest on building soil quality, increased overhead irrigation, and increased focus on controlling wind erosion has spurred adoption of high residue farming. To assist farmers with this major change, Extension and NRCS field personnel must adapt systems used in other regions to different climates, crops, and soils. We propose to bring together Extension and NRCS representatives from AZ, CA, ID, NM, OR, and WA for a two-day conference to discuss the challenges of doing this, how best we can help each other, and how best to reach farmers. Farmers from these states, who are already using HRF, will also attend to guide and ground our discussions. Finally, we will bring in an expert on adult education to give us the most current research on what motivates adults to make large, significant changes like the one to HRF and what methods could be used to increase adoption rates. After this meeting, we will initiate a HRF network using a central website, a listing of people and active projects, and news sharing resource.

    Project objectives from proposal:

    Objectives:

    1. Increase Extension and NRCS personnel’s awareness and knowledge of HRF practices, challenges, and solutions in other states with similar ag systems

    2. Collaboratively identify HRF problems common to these regions

    3. Identify and implement appropriate adult educational strategies for moving ahead with HRF programs

    4. Establish collaborations between Extension and Research personnel and with NRCS programs

    Timetable for objectives:
    Objectives 1, 2, and 3: Jan.-March, 2014
    Objective 4: Jan. –July, 2014

    Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE.