The Waste-Feeders’ Manual: Research and Development of a Practical Guide for Feeding Food Loss and Waste to Hogs and Laying Hens in the Northeast

Project Overview

FLW24-013
Project Type: Community Foods Project
Funds awarded in 2024: $846,585.00
Projected End Date: 08/31/2027
Grant Recipient: Stone Barns Center for Food & Agriculture
Region: National
State: New York
Project Leader:
Ryan Martens
Stone Barns Center

Commodities

No commodities identified

Practices

  • Sustainable Communities: other, food sovereignty, food sovereignty, food loss and waste recovery/reduction, food loss and waste recovery/reduction, food loss and waste recovery/reduction, food loss and waste recovery/reduction, food loss and waste recovery/reduction

    Proposal abstract:

    The Environmental Protection
    Agency estimates that the United States wastes the equivalent of
    35% of its food supply each year
    , contributing substantially to the
    greenhouse gas emissions and other environmental impacts of waste
    disposal. Food waste is a significant obstacle to efficient use
    of limited agricultural resources, to improving food security,
    and to increasing the sustainability of our food systems. Despite
    recognition that feeding food waste to monogastric livestock
    presents a promising waste-prevention opportunity, and despite
    successful examples set by Japan and South Korea,

    the U.S. remains without the
    infrastructure, regulations, or guidance to encourage waste
    feeding to meaningfully impact the environmental and economic
    landscape. The use of food waste as animal feed presents a
    systems approach to waste reduction because it simultaneously:
    (1) decreases the environmental impacts of waste disposal and
    livestock feed production; (2) increases food security by
    liberating agricultural land from feed production in favor of
    diverse crops for human consumption; and (3) improves the
    economic efficiency of meat, egg, and dairy production by
    lowering feed costs and improving farm margins.

    Practical guidance is necessary
    to enable farmers to capture the benefits of waste feeding at the
    local level by improving farm economics and local ecosystems.
    This project will: (1) test and optimize the feeding of diverse
    sources of food loss and waste to developing and finishing hogs
    and developing and mature laying hens in a diverse,
    pasture-based, rotationally grazed production system; and (2)
    develop a Waste-Feeder’s Manual, in conjunction with outreach
    efforts to stakeholders, containing practical guidance for
    sourcing and feeding regionally appropriate waste-based
    diets. 

    Research will be conducted at the
    Stone Barns Center for Food & Agriculture, with parallel and
    identical experimental and control hog and laying hen groups on
    one geographically separate partner farm. On each farm, using
    nutritional analysis and in consultation with an animal
    nutritionist, we will optimize experimental diets from locally
    sourced food loss and waste sources. Control groups will be fed a
    commercially-available, organic grain feed. We will also conduct
    sensory analyses, and additional nutritional analyses, of the
    meat and egg products of each animal group on each farm. Finally,
    we will demonstrate the benefits and trade-offs of feeding waste
    diets to each animal group by conducting a life cycle-style
    analysis of the economic, food loss and waste prevention, and GHG
    emission impacts of the optimal waste-fed system versus the
    organic grain-fed system. Using this data, and information
    learned from stakeholder outreach, we will produce an
    evidence-based training and technical assistance guide for
    producers and their communities. Additionally, we will explain
    our findings and encourage livestock farmers, chefs,
    policymakers, food businesses owners and community leaders to
    engage with each other at a Waste Feeding Conference to be held
    at the Stone Barns Center in year 3 of this project.

    Through research and broadcast,
    our goal is to validate and democratize these food loss and waste
    feeding strategies and begin to shift cultural, market, and
    policy perceptions toward a deeper understanding of the value of
    waste-feeding.

    Project objectives from proposal:

    Our objective is to research and
    broadcast best practices for optimizing food loss and waste
    (“FLW”) diets for hogs and laying hens to reduce on-farm,
    manufacturing, and pre-consumer restaurant and retail food waste
    in the Northeast region and beyond. This study will include
    economic and nutritional research to determine the benefits and
    trade-offs of an FLW diet for the economics of small farms, for
    environmental impacts, and for human nutrition. Research will be
    conducted at the Stone Barns Center for Food & Agriculture and
    replicated identically at one geographically separate partner
    farm. Specific project objectives are outlined in more detail
    below.

     

    Objective 1:
    Source and blend diets for hogs and laying hens to establish the
    optimal percentage and mix of FLW from our region that meets the
    dietary needs of each animal group. We will:

    • Source and gather diverse FLW
      from multiple stages in our local food chain, including on-farm
      waste (fruit and vegetable waste), manufacturing waste (spent
      brewer’s grains), and pre-consumer restaurant and retail waste
      (restaurant and grocery store fruit, vegetable, fish, and dairy
      waste);
    • Analyze the composite
      nutritional composition of each FLW source at regular intervals
      over the life of the project;
    • Analyze the nutritional
      composition of commercially-available organic grain feeds fed
      to each control group; and
    • Engage an animal nutritionist to assist in blending complete
      FLW diets meeting all dietary needs of hogs and laying hens.


    Objective 2: Measure the
    effects of feeding the optimized FLW diet on both production and
    animal health and welfare for pastured hogs and pastured laying
    hens. We will:

    • Feed an FLW diet to a
      population of pastured hogs at developing and finishing stages,
      alongside a control population fed a commercially available,
      organic, grain-based feed;
    • Record and analyze health
      scores of both populations of hogs at regular intervals;
    • Record and analyze the average
      daily weight gain of both populations of hogs;
    • Feed an FLW diet to a
      population of pastured laying hens in developing and mature
      stages, with increasing FLW percentages at regular intervals,
      alongside a control population fed a commercially available,
      organic, grain-based feed;
    • Record and analyze health
      scores of both populations of laying hens at regular intervals;
      and
    • Record and analyze the hen-day egg production of both
      populations of laying hens.


    Objective 3: Demonstrate the
    economic and environmental benefits and trade-offs of feeding FLW
    diets to each animal group for the economics of small farms. We
    will:

    • Analyze the amount of FLW
      diverted to animal feed, by source, over the life of the
      study;
    • Determine the cost, labor
      hours, and incidental expenses of sourcing, gathering, and
      blending effective FLW diets;
    • Record the cost of commercially
      available, organic, grain-based feed fed to each control group;
      and
    • Compare potential greenhouse
      gas footprint of FLW diets versus the conventional.


    Objective 4: Demonstrate
    that not only is it possible to meet the dietary needs of hogs
    and laying hens using regionally sourced FLW-based diets, but
    that such a diet produces high quality pork and egg products for
    human consumption. We will:

    • Evaluate the carcass
      characteristics of hogs slaughtered from both
      populations;
    • Conduct blind sensory analysis
      panels of pork harvested from both hog populations, including
      aroma and taste characteristics;
    • Analyze the nutritional
      composition of pork harvested from both hog populations,
      including fatty acid profiles, macronutrient composition,
      micronutrient composition, and phytonutrients;
    • Conduct blind sensory analysis
      panels of eggs harvested from both laying hen populations at
      each FLW interval, including aroma and taste characteristics;
      and
    • Analyze the nutritional
      composition of eggs harvested from both laying hen populations
      at each FLW interval, including fatty acid profiles,
      macronutrient composition, micronutrient composition, and
      phytonutrients.


    Objective 5: Utilize data
    and information learned from the above objectives to develop a
    “Waste-Feeders’ Manual” for complete FLW diet sourcing and
    feeding in the Northeast. While the manual will be particularly
    applicable to the Northeast region, our goal is to establish and
    recommend best practices that can be easily adapted to other
    regions of the country. We will:

    • Conduct a survey of Northeast
      pork and egg producers to determine, among other things,
      industry demographics, availability of FLW sources, and the
      desire and need for specific FLW-feeding strategies and
      guidance to be addressed in the Manual; and
    • Host a Waste-Feeding Conference
      for hog and laying hen farmers, chefs, butchers, policymakers,
      and other stakeholders to present the results of this project
      and glean additional stakeholder priorities for inclusion in
      the Manual.


    Objective 6: Broadcast project progress through
    the Stone Barns Centers’s (“SBC”) regular media channels,
    including regular posting to SBC social media and through SBC’s
    newsletter, and through SBC’s regular in-person programming
    offered to SBC members and the general public.

    Objective 7:
    Complete and submit at least two scientific manuscripts sharing
    the results of these studies. One paper will focus on the results
    of nutrient analyses of the FLW feed streams versus the nutrient
    analysis of the organic grain ration. At least one additional
    paper will focus on the nutritional comparison of the final
    products raised on the optimized FLW diets versus those raised on
    the organic grain rations. It is possible that this paper may be
    split into two, one for each animal group.

    Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE.