Comparison of Non-herbicide Methods for Control of Invasive Bush Honeysuckle as Preparation for a Prescribed Burn

Project Overview

FNC24-1421
Project Type: Farmer/Rancher
Funds awarded in 2024: $15,000.00
Projected End Date: 02/15/2026
Grant Recipient: Johnson Farm
Region: North Central
State: Illinois
Project Coordinator:

Commodities

  • Animals: goats

Practices

  • Animal Production: grazing management
  • Natural Resources/Environment: habitat enhancement, Invasive Species Control; Prescribed Burn Preparation

    Proposal summary:

    Prescribed burning is an important forest management tool, but a
    heavy infestation of invasive bush honeysuckle (Lonicera
    spp.) removes that tool from the toolbox. Bush honeysuckle kills
    herbaceous groundcover, which is required fuel for a prescribed
    fire.

    Bush honeysuckle blocks sunlight to the forest floor by leafing
    out first in the spring and keeping its leaves longest in the
    fall. Additionally, it creates a dense understory that shades the
    forest floor during the growing season. Honeysuckle also takes
    moisture and nutrients away from native plants. A severe
    honeysuckle infestation results in little, if any, herbaceous
    groundcover underneath. A prescribed burn, necessary to improve
    forest health, is simply not possible because there is no fuel
    for a fire.

    The problem to be solved is how to control bush honeysuckle in an
    environmentally sound, sustainable way, that is, without the use
    of herbicides. To be successful, the control method must reduce
    honeysuckle sufficiently to allow establishment of enough
    herbaceous groundcover for a good quality prescribed burn in the
    future.

    Project objectives from proposal:

    Objectives:

    1. Compare non-herbicide methods for control of invasive bush
      honeysuckle on 20.6 acres divided into five test plots.
      Treatments include targeted goat grazing, manual mechanical
      cutting, and machine shredding.
    2. Evaluate the effectiveness of lightly seeding native grasses
      during goat grazing to determine if seeding enhances herbaceous
      groundcover
    3. Assess which methods promote sufficient herbaceous
      groundcover to enable a future prescribed burn
    4. Determine which method, if any, should be expanded to larger
      acreage on my farm
    5. Share findings with the community to encourage
      environmentally sound approaches for brush control

     

    [caption id="attachment_1041464" align="alignnone" width="640"]? Image of Woods[/caption]

     

    Solution:

    Two areas, A1 and A2, have been identified within 110 wooded
    acres, and divided into five test plots (see attached image).
    Adjacent area A5 will be used as an untreated control for the
    study. Areas A1 and A2 both have steep ravines (up to 60% slope)
    with incised creeks running through the bottoms. All areas have a
    thick understory of bush honeysuckle, a severe infestation. The
    table below summarizes the study design.

     

    Method number

    Test plot

    Acreage

    Pretreatment

    (winter 2023)

    Treatment 1

    (spring 2024)

    Treatment 2

    (fall 2024)

    Treatment 3

    (spring 2025)

    1

    A1a

    5

    None

    Goats

    Goats

    Goats&Cut

    2

    A2a

    4.8

    None

    Goats

    Cut

    TBD

    3

    A1b

    5

    None

    Goats

    Goats&Cut

    TBD

    4

    A2b

    4.8

    None

    Goats&Cut

    Goats

    TBD

    5

    A1/2e

    1

    Mulch

    Goats

    Goats

    TBD

     

    In the table, “Mulch” means shredding with a mulching head on a
    skid steer (a flat, narrow area at the edge of A1 and A2 is
    machine accessible). “Goats&Cut” means after goats have
    grazed for a week or so, then manually cut honeysuckle taller
    than goat-graze height to near ground level. “Cut” means manually
    cut all honeysuckle with chain saws and hand tools to near ground
    level. “TBD” means to be determined based on treatment
    effectiveness in 2024.

    Goats can graze to a height of six feet, whereas honeysuckle
    grows up to 15 feet. Therefore, mechanical cutting is included in
    each method to drop tall honeysuckle to near ground level.

    Targeted goat grazing will be managed by Grazing Goats Wisconsin,
    a firm that owns the goats and takes responsibility for all
    aspects of goat grazing. Goats will be allowed to graze in mobile
    paddocks with portable electric fencing and a solar-charged power
    source. When the goats have sufficiently grazed an area, the
    fencing will be moved to the next grazing area.

    Test plots A1b and A2b will be grazed concurrently along with the
    adjacent portion of A1/2e using two herds of 250 goats each (500
    goats total) at a stocking rate of 50 goats per acre. The fencing
    will then be moved to concurrently graze A1a and A2a along with
    adjoining A1/2e. Goat grazing 20.6 acres is expected to take up
    to 30 days for the first treatment, and less time for subsequent
    treatments.

    Spring grazing will defoliate brush while fall grazing will
    defoliate but also allow the goats to eat honeysuckle berries.
    After passing through the goats’ digestive tracks, honeysuckle
    seeds may no longer be viable.

    To test the value of seeding, native grass seed (~1 lb/acre) will
    be hand broadcast on half of each test plot during grazing in
    spring 2024. Goat hooves should help push seeds into the soil.

    This study should answer the question of which method, with or
    without seeding, provides the best preparation for a future
    prescribed burn.

     

    Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE.