Developing a process for off-grid yellow perch fingerling production to increase production at two commercial yellow perch fingerling farms

Project Overview

FNC25-1481
Project Type: Farmer/Rancher
Funds awarded in 2025: $29,885.00
Projected End Date: 12/20/2026
Grant Recipient: Mulberry Aquaponics LLC
Region: North Central
State: Wisconsin
Project Coordinator:
Peter Shep
Mulberry Aquaponics LLC

Commodities

  • Animals: fish

Practices

  • Animal Production: aquaculture
  • Production Systems: aquaponics

    Proposal summary:

    Consolidating multiple farming sectors into large commercial farms have left small farmers (many with food producing experience) seeking other areas of employment. Yellow perch fingerling production could provide a new avenue of agriculture production and a commodity that is in extremely high demand (>$30 million/year market gap since the commercial fishing crash of the mid-1990's) (FAO landings data 2024).

     Perch farming has a systemic problem. Yellow perch farmers tend to gravitate towards the ease of running tier-2 (grow-out) farms which purchase fingerlings from tier-1 farms that breed them. The reason is that operating a tier 1 fish farm is challenging. The issue with this is that there are an abundance of farms growing out fingerlings and almost no one breeding or creating them. This problem has led to a farming industry with unbelievably high demand and almost no supply. 

    My farm ran a marketing analysis for fingerlings in 2024 that we bred and we received e-mails from tier 2 farms indicating an astonishingly high market demand for these fish. Even if the tier 1 farms can satiate the market for food fish farms they will never appease the market for pond stocking in the Midwest. Production limits are open ended.

     

    Project objectives from proposal:

    This proposal will focus on the propagation of yellow perch in a low-cost off-grid
    portable aquaponics hoop-house. The goal of this research project is to demonstrate
    that an off-grid hoop-house could produce similar yields of yellow perch fingerlings as
    a specialized indoor RAS and outperform a specialized yellow perch propagation pond.
    This would show that yellow perch could be propagated in a self
    sustaining hoop-house at a low cost.
    The trial will include 3 "treatments" or "facilities":
    1. Off-grid yellow perch propagation hoop-house RAS: Located at Northey
    Farms LLC. This is a solar and wind powered hoop-house with three 300 gallon
    tanks showing results in triplicate for a designed experiment, and 240 watts of
    water and air pumping power to recirculate the water. (6 egg ribbons)
    2. Two on-grid insulated yellow perch propagation RAS: Located at both
    Mulberry Aquaponics LLC and Northey Farms LLC. This is an on-grid yellow perch
    propagation RAS with three 300 gallon tanks each, identical to the off-grid RAS.
    These systems utilize the same 240 watts of water and air pumping power. (12
    egg ribbons: 6 ribbons x 2 farms)
    3. One commercial propagation pond: Located at Northey Farms LLC. This is a
    0.2 acre commercial production pond which has been used to produce yellow
    perch. (6 egg ribbons)
    Preparation for the experiment will commence in mid-March, but the research trial will commence in middle May-June to ensure warmer temperatures in Wisconsin.
    Twenty-four yellow perch egg skeins will be fertilized and incubated for ten days in an
    incubation system at Northey Farms LLC. Typically over 300 egg skeins are fertilized
    each year at Northey Farms LLC, so only the best quality egg ribbons will be chosen for
    this research to ensure consistent egg performance. At ten days each egg ribbon will
    be cut into twelve pieces and each piece weighed to ensure a similar number of
    fertilized eggs will be placed into each tank/pond using a total of 6 egg ribbons per
    treatment. The egg ribbons will be vigorously aerated for 24 hours to ensure a passive
    unbiased hatching into each tank/pond.
    All RAS treatments will use an identical automated feed regimen of Otihime B1 larval
    weaning feed (Marubeni Nisshin feed company Tokyo, Japan) as well as an automated
    dosing of live-feed (90% Hatch Brine Shrimp - Salt Lake City Utah U.S.A) through 40 days post
    hatch (DPH) to demonstrate successful clearing of the mortality spikes of yellow perch
    larvae at 7-12 DPH and 23 - 29 DPH. Loss of yellow perch after 40 DPH is minimal.
    The pond treatment will follow a process used by Northey Farms LLC, which uses urea
    and alfalfa-meal to promote native zooplankton populations within a pond. The fish are
    stocked, and are allowed to feed on natural zooplankton for 40 days and then
    harvested by using a seine net to collect all surviving fish at 40-DPH.
    At 40-DPH all fish will be collected from each treatment and statistical analysis will be
    used to identify differences in survival, weight, and total production. 

    After data collection for presentation, fish will be assessed and sold.

    Established wholesale yellow perch prices in USD are (0.33/2-4" fish, 1.10/4-6" fish, >3.50/6"+ fish)

    Objectives:
    The objectives of this initial round of research is to:
    - Demonstrate the feasibility of using an off-grid hoop-house to propagate yellow
    perch compared to conventional systems.
    - Identify the hidden expenses of propagating yellow perch in an off-grid system.
    - Identifying the hidden problems with propagating yellow perch in an off-grid
    system.
    - Investigate a pathway to creating a low cost, sustainable yellow perch fingerling
    market.
    Secondary future objectives are to initiate a research process to identify other
    sustainable inputs to off-grid yellow perch propagation.

    These being:
    - Creation of a sustainable domesticated yellow perch larval feed
    - Inclusion of an aquaponics with this system to remove excess nutrients
    - Investigation into the use of a hybrid RAS and pond propagation system

    Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.