Project Overview
Commodities
Practices
Proposal summary:
Farmers and ranchers who add trees often struggle with poor survival and slow establishment. When a planting has a low take rate, they end up paying for trees and labor twice and losing years of growth. For agroforestry to spread in our region, farmers need to see quick results in the field and feel that tree plantings work and are worth the investment.
As a business that establishes agroforestry systems, it is also
important for the sustainability of our work to plant trees that
survive, establish quickly, and thrive. Container-grown trees can
extend the planting season and improve survival, but nearly all
potting mixes rely on peat and plastic-coated synthetic
fertilizers. These materials are expensive, shipped long distances,
and are out of line with our values and with our clients, who are
trying to build regenerative, low-input systems.
Additionally, new tools like plasma-activated water, sold as Green
Lightning, offer an on-farm nitrogen source that might support
nursery and field growth without relying only on fossil-fuel-based
fertilizers. Our core problem is to determine whether we can grow
strong, fibrous-rooted nut tree seedlings and improve field
establishment using more local waste-based mixes and
plasma-activated water instead of peat and plastic-coated
fertilizers.
Project objectives from proposal:
We will run two connected on-farm trials: a nursery trial focused on potting mix, fertilizer, and Green Lightning; and a field trial on Green Lightning in new and established agroforestry plantings. Together they test whether we can grow strong nut tree seedlings with finite and fossil fuel based materials (e.g., peat and plastic-coated fertilizer) and support trees in the field with an on-farm nitrogen source (Green Lightning).
Nursery trial (Drew's Nursery)
In our nursery, we will test three factors for chestnut and pecan
seedlings in 1-gallon air-pruned containers:
Potting mix
• Standard mix (S): bark/peat-based Berger BM7-type mix.
• Waste-based mix (W): 60% screened composted horse bedding (pine
shavings + manure), 30% coco coir, 10% rice hulls, plus a light
lime adjustment.
Base fertilizer
• Manure (M): local pelletized manure at a consistent rate per
pot.
• Osmocote-type (O): polymer-coated synthetic slow-release
fertilizer at the labeled rate per pot.
Green Lightning
• No GL (N): irrigated with well water only.
• GL (G): irrigated with well water plus regular Green Lightning
fertigations during active growth.
This creates eight treatment "recipes" per species (SMN, SMG, SON, SOG, WMN, WMG, WON, WOG). We will grow 20 trees per treatment per species (160 trees per species and 320 total) arranged in four replicated blocks, with five trees per treatment per block, randomized within benches. Seedlings will be started in common propagation trays, then randomly assigned to treatments at up-potting so the trial focuses on the 1-gallon phase.
Drew will record survival, height, stem diameter, leaf color, and vigor several times during the growing season. At the end of the season, he will wash roots from a subset of trees in each treatment to rate root density and branching, and track materials and labor costs per treatment to compare cost per saleable tree.
Field trial (Josh Payne - Rusted Plowshare Farms)
On Josh's farm we will test Green Lightning on newly planted
and established trees. For newly planted trees, we will set up a
replicated trial with 120 trees total: 60 chestnuts and 60
hazelnuts. For each species we will compare five treatments:
control (no Green Lightning), D-2 (Green Lightning soil drench
twice), D-4 (drench four times), F-2 (foliar twice), and F-4
(foliar four times). Each treatment has 12 trees per species. Trees
will be planted in a silvopasture system grazed by sheep. All trees
will receive the same planting, mulch, tree tube, and sheep
protection (tree tubes plus an overpass system and offset wire);
only the Green Lightning treatment will differ.
For established trees, Josh will select existing chestnut trees
of similar age and vigor and randomly assign them to Green
Lightning or control. The same drench versus foliar and 2 versus 4
application schedule will be followed where feasible. All other
management will be the same.
Josh will record survival, height, stem diameter, leaf color, and
vigor several times during the growing season data analysis.
Objectives
• Compare Standard Mix versus waste-based mix for chestnut and
pecan seedling growth, foliage quality, and root system quality in
1-gallon air-prune pots.
• Compare pelletized manure and coated slow-release fertilizer for
overall performance, cost per saleable tree, and peat/plastic
footprint in the nursery.
• Test whether Green Lightning fertigation in the nursery
measurably improves growth and plant quality on top of existing
slow-release programs.
• Test whether Green Lightning drenches and foliar sprays improve
survival and growth of newly planted trees and growth of
established trees in agroforestry plantings.
• Share what has been learned through field days, conferences, and
on-farm workshops.