Testing New Dwarfing Apple Rootstocks for the Northern Grower

2010 Annual Report for FNE09-668

Project Type: Farmer
Funds awarded in 2009: $5,363.00
Projected End Date: 12/31/2010
Region: Northeast
State: Maine
Project Leader:
John O'Meara
O'Meara Family Farm

Testing New Dwarfing Apple Rootstocks for the Northern Grower


This project aimed to test new dwarfing and semi-dwarfing rootstocks in a zone 3 climate. Rootstocks G. 41 (dwarfing) and G. 935 (semi-dwarfing), developed at the USDA/ Cornell University Apple Rootstock Breeding Program in Geneva, New York, could offer the hardiness required of a zone 3 climate combined with the benefits of a dwarfing tree. Dwarfing trees could allow the northern grower the advantages of fruit-bearing precocity, ease of harvest, and high orchard density. In addition, G. 41 and G.935 have been bred to be resistant to serious apple diseases, which may make them particularly valuable to growers in various climates.
To test the hardiness of G. 41 and G. 935, this project compared the survivability and growth of the two new rootstocks to Bud. 9, a commonly used hardy, dwarfing rootstock, and Malus antonovka, a hardy standard-sized rootstock.

Objectives/Performance Targets

In the spring of 2009, we grafted 200 trees for this project. Liberty scionwood was used for all 200 grafts. 50 grafts were done on G.41 rootstock, fifty on G.935, fifty on Bud. 9, and fifty on Antonovka. The G. 41 and G. 935 rootstocks were provided by Dr. Fazio. The Antonovka and Bud. 9 rootstocks were acquired from Lawyer Nursery in Montana, the usual source of our rootstock.
Success rate of grafting was recorded in the beginning of the first growing season.
During 2009,2010, and 2011, we monitored the temperature in the nursery daily. This data has been recorded in a notebook.
In the fall of each year, the trees were protected from rodent damage, in preparation for winter.
During three growing seasons (2009, 2010, and 2011), the trees were weeded. They were also monitored for vigor, survivability, growth, and the presence of disease.


Grafting success: The trees were grafted in April, 2009 and planted on May 4th, 2009. As of June 4th, 2009, the following numbers of grafts were successfully growing, by variety.

G.935 16/50
G.41 30/50

Bud 9 13/50
Antonovka 35/50

The G. 41 and Antonovka had significantly better grafting success than the other two varieties. Although every effort was made to acquire rootstock of comparable size and quality, the G. 935 was of larger diameter than the other rootstocks, requiring that the grafting was done a little differently. In addition, the Bud 9 rootstock lacked vigor from the start and did not grow well in general. Although these initial problems may have affected grafting success, we proceeded with the project with the belief that the project would still provide important data about the survivability and overall growth of the rootstocks in question, over the long term.

Fatalities: Some rootstock died during the course of this project. As stated above, the Bud 9 rootstock arrived from our supplier nursery in poor condition. An unusual percentage of those rootstocks were dead on arrival or perished the first season. Deaths among the roostocks:

2009– recorded September

G.935 5/50
G. 41 2/50
Bud 9 12/50
Antonovka 0/50

2010—recorded August

G.935 42/50
G.41 13/50
Bud 9 25/50
Antonovka 2/50

2011– recorded August

G.935 2/50
G.41 20/50
Bud 9 11/50
Antonovka 0/50

Total fatalities– 2009-2010

G. 935 49/50 (98%)
G.41 35/50 (70%)
Bud 9 48/50 (96%)
Antonovka 2/50 (4%)

Impacts and Contributions/Outcomes

Clearly, the dwarfing rootstocks have displayed some problems during the course of this project. Although the Antonovka performed as it has for several years on this farm, the dwarfing rootstocks suffered severe problems of survivability. One cause of this may have been a weed problem that developed in the nursery during 2009. Quack grass became more prevalent in the nursery and possibly inhibited the vigor of the rootstocks in general. The more vigorous Antonovka was more able to compete with the weeds. On the other hand, the rootstocks that did survive performed well, indicating that weed pressure may not have been the major problem. Our advisor, Renae Moran, has expressed the opinion that weed pressure is probably not the primary cause of the fatalities among the dwarf rootstocks.
Severe winter weather is a problem for fruit nurseries in our climate. This project was intended primarily as a test of the winter hardiness of these dwarfing rootstocks. Because the winter of 2009/2010 was one of the warmest winters in our location on record, cold winter temperatures would not seem to be the cause of the high mortality of the dwarfing rootstocks. The winters of 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 have also been moderate in New Sweden.
The problem may be tardiness in hardening off among the dwarfing rootstocks. Although the winters have not been very cold, G.935 and G. 41 may be slower to harden off in fall; the fall temperatures of Aroostook County may be causing a higher mortality among rootstocks not adapted to a zone 3 climate. Further data collection will aid in determining the validity of this theory.

2009 was an unusual year in northern Maine, weather-wise. April and May were unusually warm and almost incessantly windy. June and July were exceptionally rainy. Low and high daily temperatures were recorded daily

2010 also had some unusual fluctuations in weather. There were long dry spells during the summer but no exceptionally cold weather during winter months.

2011 was the wettest summer on record in Caribou, Maine. Although the exceptionally wet weather may have caused even more problems among the dwarfing rootstocks, the Antonovka were unaffected.

This project will conclude in the fall of 2012. The goal of the upcoming growing season will be to determine as best as possible the cause of the fatalities among the dwarfing rootstocks.


Renae Moran

[email protected]
University of Maine
5722 Deering Hall
Orono, ME 04469
Office Phone: 2075811865