Youth Entrepreneurs in Agriculture

Project Overview

FW06-311
Project Type: Professional + Producer
Funds awarded in 2006: $7,739.00
Projected End Date: 12/31/2007
Region: Western
State: Washington
Principal Investigator:
Joan Vance
Washington State University

Annual Reports

Commodities

  • Agronomic: general hay and forage crops
  • Animals: bovine

Practices

  • Animal Production: free-range
  • Education and Training: decision support system, demonstration, extension, farmer to farmer, on-farm/ranch research, participatory research

    Abstract:

    The Youth Entrepreneurs in Agriculture provided a series of six farm tours, surveying a variety of agricultural operations suitable for small-scale acreage. Half of the farms were organic, or used strictly sustainable methods of production. The other half used traditional methods, with less emphasis on sustainable practices. Discussion was held both on the farm and in the classroom to compare the methods.

    The primary objective of the farm tour program was to introduce youth to the value of sustainable methods, particularly as they relate to small-acreage farms.

    The second objective was to introduce the youth to the “business” of farming; that is, to begin to explore the financial aspects of production and marketing. The corollary to this topic is the increased value of the organic or natural product in the marketplace.

    Long-term goals of the project were to help influence future farmers to increase the number of acres locally that are in sustainable production, enhancing environmental quality; assist future farmers to increase the economic viability of the farm operations; and to make efficient use of nonrenewable and on-farm resources and integrate natural biological cycles and controls.

    Results/Performance targets
    A total of 22 youth and adults attended the farm tours, with 12 attending all 6 tours. One factor we did not anticipate was that it all of the participants came with the whole family; no teens ended up participating without parents. This also meant that there were several younger children attending the tours as well. As a result, our curriculum was less rigidly focused on the teen age group than we had anticipated. Each farmer took pains to have something for the youngest children to see and do; each one also addressed many questions asked by older youth and parents.

    The farmers that used sustainable methods (two were certified organic, the third markets their products as “naturally raised”) were extremely enthusiastic and very articulate about why they chose sustainable methods. Additionally, each one emphasized the financial benefits of products in this market. One farmer demonstrated multi-species production, utilizing very small units of acreage. Pastured poultry contributed to fertilizing the pastures; sheep and hogs rotated on the same area as well. Each was harvested at a different time, and together they maintained an income stream that was balanced over the year. The dairy farmer emphasized the benefits of the organic coop to which he belongs, and which contracts with him for a year in advance, adding to the stability of his operation and enabling him to successfully plan for the future. The CSA demonstrated the extremely wide variety of produce that can be successfully cultivated both in the field and in the greenhouse in our area. Additionally, they discussed the model of pre-paid membership sales, which is a unique way to market vegetable produce.

    Due to busy schedules, county fairs and other time constraints, we were not able to tour the two flower farms (dahlias and peonies) that we had hoped to see; fall weather prohibited our tour of the cranberry bogs. We anticipate that many of the members of the 2007 tour will try to get together in the coming year to see places we were unable to visit this year.

    Introduction

    Grays Harbor County, located on the central coast of Washington State, has a long history of agricultural production. Most of the population lives outside of the two small cities; a large percentage are rural and/or farm families.

    Recent changes in agricultural economics have meant reductions in family farm income for many. Some traditional methods of farming are less economically profitable; additionally, many families have small acreage tracts that must be carefully utilized in order to be productive farms.

    Economic trends have made it difficult for many young people who are interested in staying in the county to find employment. At the same time, the rise in niche markets, especially organic and naturally-grown products, offers an opportunity for people with small acreage to optimize their land resources. This project was piloted in order to provide a wide and diverse vision to those youth who are interested in entering new positions in our agricultural marketplace.

    Project objectives:

    Youth and families were recruited from 4-H clubs, through fairs and other youth-oriented events. Letters and invitations to join the tours were also extended to all FFA educators and youth.

    The farm tour schedule was designed by the participants themselves. Pre-tour planning identified local operations that would appropriately showcase either a product or concept for the group. The producer (this was a professional/producer project) was responsible for recruiting farm tour sites, and for helping farmers prepare for the tour and to address particular topics.

    The group met at a central point prior to each tour. A packet of information was prepared from Extension resources of basic information about the product of the farm to be visited. A farm tour sheet and/or activity guide was part of the handout. All youth were given a notebook to compile a resource and record of the tours.

    Transportation funds were provided by the grant. Parents of participating families were reimbursed for mileage. Snacks were also provided.

    The group was responsible for choosing which farms were of most interest. Therefore, the schedule was set from month to month, and not pre-determined by the leaders.

    A series of personal interviews and paper survey were the means of evaluation used.

    Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE.