Leveraging Genomics-enabled Breeding to Improve Resistance to Powdery Mildew in Summer Squash for Southeastern U.S.

Project Overview

GS24-303
Project Type: Graduate Student
Funds awarded in 2024: $21,997.00
Projected End Date: 08/31/2026
Grant Recipient: University of Florida
Region: Southern
State: Florida
Graduate Student:
Major Professor:
Dr. Geoffrey Meru
University of Florida

Commodities

No commodities identified

Practices

No practices identified

Proposal abstract:

Powdery mildew is a major fungal disease that causes significant
yield and quality losses in squash (Cucurbita spp.)
production. Conventional growers rely on routine fungicide
application to manage the disease, costing an average of $350/
acre per season. Organic growers have limited control options
leading to heavy yield losses when the disease pressure is high.
The availability of squash cultivars resistant to powdery mildew
would reduce yield losses for growers and promote environmental
stewardship through reduced pesticide application. However,
resistance to powdery mildew in most commercial squash cultivars
is lacking or, at best, weak, necessitating complementary and
substantial fungicide applications to ensure profitability.
Recently, we conducted a single greenhouse screen of the USDA
core squash collection (n= 207) in Florida and identified several
novel sources of genetic resistance to powdery mildew. Using the
screening data, we performed a preliminary genome-wide
association study (GWAS) analysis, revealing potential markers
that could be useful for marker-assisted selection. Building upon
this preliminary work, we propose to i) conduct a second
greenhouse screening of the entire core collection and validate
the new resistance sources,  ii) perform a comprehensive
GWAS analysis using multi-screening phenotype data and validate
molecular markers linked to resistance, iii) transfer powdery
mildew resistance into elite squash cultivars using
marker-assisted selection, and iv) characterize the inheritance
mechanism of resistance in novel resistant sources. The novel
powdery-mildew-resistant germplasm will be evaluated for yield
and horticultural performance under field conditions, and the
findings will be communicated to growers through extension
outreach.

Project objectives from proposal:

  1. Conduct a second greenhouse screening of the USDA
    squash core collection and validate new resistance
    sources:
    It builds on preliminary findings to confirm
    resistance traits under controlled conditions, ensuring that
    identified resistance is robust and reproducible.
  2. Conduct a comprehensive GWAS analysis using
    multi-screening phenotype data and validate molecular markers
    linked to resistance:
    The rationale here is to utilize
    advanced genomic tools to decipher the genetic basis of
    resistance to powdery mildew in squash. Unlike traditional
    breeding, which relies on multiple growing seasons to confirm
    traits, thus utilizing many resources (soil, fertilizers,
    manual labor), GWAS enables quicker and more accurate
    identification of resistant genotypes.
  3. Transfer powdery mildew resistance into elite squash
    cultivars using marker-assisted selection:
    This
    objective seeks to apply the findings from genomic analyses to
    practical breeding. The justification lies in its direct impact
    on developing commercially viable, disease-resistant squash
    varieties, reducing reliance on fungicides, and lowering
    production costs.
  4. Characterize the mode of inheritance in the novel
    resistant sources:
    Understanding how resistance traits
    are inherited is fundamental for effective breeding. This
    objective aims to inform breeding strategies by elucidating the
    genetic mechanisms through which resistance is passed from one
    generation to the next, which is critical for predicting the
    behavior of these traits in breeding programs and ensuring the
    stability of resistance in future cultivars.
Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE.