Improved Cover Crop Options for Corn Belt Farmers

2014 Annual Report for LNC13-352

Project Type: Research and Education
Funds awarded in 2013: $197,608.00
Projected End Date: 12/31/2016
Region: North Central
State: Iowa
Project Coordinator:
Dr. Andy Lenssen
Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University

Improved Cover Crop Options for Corn Belt Farmers

Summary

Seventeen cover crop treatments (nine sole-crops, five binary mixtures, two trinary mixtures, and a no-cover-crop control) were planted in two environments in Iowa in October 2013 and three environments in October 2014 following harvest of soybean. Establishment was excellent in four environments, however, cover crops at one environment did not emerge prior to winter conditions arrival in 2014. Winter rye (“cereal rye”), winter triticale, Camelina sativa, and hairy vetch overwintered in 2013-2014, but Brassica napus, B. rapa, spring oat and barley entries did not. Cover crops differed significantly for stand density, accumulation of aboveground biomass, C and N in fall and the subsequent spring of 2014. The C:N ratio of cover crop aboveground biomass and weed density did not vary among cover crop entries at termination in spring 2014. Winter rye, and mixtures with winter rye, produced greater amounts of biomass and accumulated more N than other cover crops or cover crop mixtures. Corn stand density, grain moisture at harvest, and weed community prior to the first in-crop herbicide application, did not vary for cover crop entry in 2014. However, corn yield following triticale cover crop was less than corn production following Brassica rapa cover crop. Weed community in cover crops was dissimilar to weed community in subsequent corn in the first completed cycle of this study.

Objectives/Performance Targets

1 – Compare establishment, winter survival, biomass production, N accumulation, and weed community in 17 cover crop treatments. Plant 17 cover crop treatments at three locations (envrionments) following soybean harvest annually. Over two years, the cover crops were planted in five environments following soybean harvest (Table 1). We were unable to plant the cover crops at the Sutherland environment in 2013 due to excessive rains, which resulted in delayed planting and harvest of soybean that year. Stand establishment and density were assessed in the fall at each of the five environments, with data collected at four of five. Due to late soybean harvest at Boone in 2014 and cold conditions, cover crops did not emerge following planting on 30 October. It was noted that most cover crop seed had germinated, but none had emerged by 11 November.   Fall biomass, N, and C accumulation were determined for cover crops at one of two planted environments in November 2013 and one of three planted locations in November 2014 due to limited cover crop growth. Biomass, N, and C accumulation in cover crops were assessed from samples harvested from both environments in May 2014 prior to termination of cover crops.         

2 – Compare corn establishment, growth, N status, grain yield, and weed community following 17 cover crop treatments.   

3 – Mr. Seth Appelgate was recruited as the M.S. candidate supported by this project. He completed his B.S. in Agronomy at Iowa State University and began employment in the second week of May 2014.  

Accomplishments/Milestones

Cover crop establishment

1 – Initial plant stand and winter survival data of Camelina sativa appear promising, however, we are not yet close to recommending its use as a cover crop in the upper Midwest Corn Belt.

2 – Both Brassica napus canola varieties and B. rapa turnip established well, and survival was initially good at the Curtiss Farm site (near Ames) due to snow cover when temperatures fell to 7 F. However, these three crucifer entries suffered nearly total stand loss from the 7 F encountered at the Atlantic site in early November. None of these three entries survived the winter of 2013-2014 at either location.

3 – Prior to termination in May 2014, 2013 fall-seeded cover crop entries differed for C and N concentrations (results not presented) and accumulations (Table 2) in aboveground biomass.

Corn following cover crops

Corn was planted in May 2014 following termination of cover crops (Table 1). Cover crop entry did not influence corn stand density (Table 2) or grain moisture at harvest. Data were collected on corn leaf chlorophyll concentrations and corn growth and development (results not presented). Corn grain yield differed following cover crops from the Armstrong Farm environment (Table 2).

Weed community

Weed density did not vary in April 2014 among cover crop entries that were planted in October of 2013 (Table 2). The weed community in association with corn was composed of 24 species (results not presented). However, tall water hemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) accounted for 95.4% of total individuals of the weed community. Marestail (Conyza canadensis) had the second highest density, and accounted for less than 1.1% of the total number of individuals observed. Cover crop entries did not significantly influence total weed density in corn prior to the first in-crop herbicide application, when mean density for total weeds in corn across cover crop treatments was 224 m-2 (Table 3).

 

Table 1. Planting dates and locations for 17 cover crops and subsequent corn, 2013-2014.  

 

Cover crop

 

Corn

Environment

Planting date

Termination date

 

Planting date

Harvest date

Curtiss Farm

10-11 October 2013

5 May 2014

 

19 May 2014

Armstrong Farm

17-18 October 2013

6 May 2014

 

9 May 2014

16 October 2014

Sutherland Farm

14-15 October 2014

 

Armstrong Farm

21 October 2014

 

Boone Farm

30 October 2014

 

†Corn at the Curtiss Farm was abandoned in 2014 after the site suffered severe flooding on the third of four occasions.

Table 2. Cover crop biomass, carbon and nitrogen concentration, and carbon and nitrogen content from two locations, May harvest, 2014

Cover crop

Stand

Fall 2013

Weeds

Spring 2014

Biomass

Spring 2014

Biomass Carbon

Spring 2014

Biomass Nitrogen

Spring 2014

Biomass C:N Spring 2014

 

no. m-2

no. m-2

kg ha-1

kg ha-1

kg ha-1

 

   Winter rye

184 cde

5.8

483 a†

189 a

13.7 a

13.9

   Winter triticale

187 bcde

3.3

184 cde

74 de

6.5 cd

12.0

   Rye-Sitro canola

236 abcd

4.5

301 abc

123 bc

9.4 bc

12.7

   Barley

145 def

3.3

   0‡

   0

0

   Oat

127 ef

6.8

   0

   0

0

   Camelina

183 cde

5.0

201 cde

70 de

7.2 cd

9.5

   Sitro canola

63 fg

5.0

   0

   0

0

   Claremore canola

103 efg

6.3

   0

   0

0

   Turnip

120 efg

5.5

   2 f

   1 f

0.1 e

11.6

   Hairy vetch

22 g

6.5

   9 f

   4 f

0.3 e

11.1

   Rye-camelina

286 ab

2.0

376 ab

145 ab

11.4 ab

12.4

   Rye-vetch

119 efg

2.8

294 bcd

120 bc

8.6 c

12.7

   Triticale-camelina

288 a

3.5

175 de

67 de

5.9 cd

10.9

   Triticale-vetch

129 ef

6.8

115 e

47 ef

3.7 de

11.7

   Rye-camelina-vetch

270 abc

3.8

348 ab

139 bc

10.9 ab

12.8

   Triticale-camelina-vetch

273 abc

2.3

245 bcd

90 cd

8.2 c

11.0

   No cover crop

   –

8.9

   0

   0

0

Location

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Armstrong

116 b

10.0 a

175 b

66 b

6.2 b

10.3 b

   Curtiss

226 a

 

323 a

119 a

8.6 a

13.5 a

Significance

 

P>F

 

 

 

 

   Location (L)

0.001

0.001

0.001

0.001

0.001

0.001

   Cover crop (C)

0.001

0.412

0.001

0.001

0.001

0.001

   L × C

0.001

0.409

0.001

0.001

0.001

0.074

   R2

0.83

0.58

0.92

0.88

0.83

0.78

   CV (%)

9.5

116.9

7.9

31.8

32.6

12.0

† Means within a column followed by different letters differ at P= 0.05 using Tukey’s HSD test following analysis of variance.

‡Means of 0 not included in statistical analysis of biomass, C, or N data.

Table 3. 2014 corn grain yield from Armstrong Farm.

Cover crop before corn

Stand

Yield

(15% moisture)

Grain moisture

   at harvest

Weed density

 

no. m-2

kg ha-1

g kg-1

no. m-2

   Winter rye

7.25

12087 ab†

199

197

   Winter triticale

7.33

8896 b

221

415

   Rye-Sitro canola

7.78

14152 a

197

166

   Barley

7.12

11428 ab

200

332

   Oat

6.42

11179 ab

203

138

   Camelina

7.04

11364 ab

209

275

   Sitro canola

7.20

12181 ab

200

267

   Claremore canola

5.76

11548 ab

199

133

   Turnip

7.12

13769 a

199

155

   Hairy vetch

7.70

11801 ab

196

223

   Rye-camelina

6.50

10605 ab

208

234

   Rye-vetch

7.45

10645 ab

197

315

   Triticale-camelina

7.82

11642 ab

204

136

   Triticale-vetch

5.89

12292 ab

196

224

   Rye-camelina-vetch

7.20

12977 ab

199

241

   Triticale-camelina-vetch

7.08

10023 ab

202

197

   No cover crop

6.57

11553 ab

207

197

Significance

 

 

 

P>F

   Cover crop

0.737

0.022

0.790

0.939

   R2

0.407

0.718

0.389

0.596

   CV (%)

17.6

10.0

5.4

11.5

† Means within a column followed by different letters differ at P= 0.05 using Tukey’s HSD test.

Impacts and Contributions/Outcomes

Impacts and Contributions/Outcomes

The project was started in October 2013. Insufficient time has passed for our project to have had large impacts and outcomes. However, funding of our project and description of cover crop treatments was presented at two cover crop meetings in fall of 2013. Outputs for 2013 include planting cover crops at two sites in October 2013 and three sites in October 2014.

Collaborators:

Sarah Carlson

sarah@practicalfarmers.org
Scientist
Practical Farmers of Iowa
600 Fifth St
Suite 100
Ames, IA 50010
Office Phone: 5152325661
Dr. Mary Wiedenhoeft

mwiedenh@iastate.edu
Professor
Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University
2104 Agronomy Hall
Ames, IA 50011-1010
Office Phone: 5152943274
Website: http://www.agron.iastate.edu/personnel/userspage.aspx?id=730