Financial Indicators of Sustainability on Michigan Farms

Project Overview

LNC99-159
Project Type: Research and Education
Funds awarded in 1999: $27,900.00
Projected End Date: 12/31/2001
Matching Federal Funds: $3,100.00
Matching Non-Federal Funds: $22,600.00
Region: North Central
State: Michigan
Project Coordinator:
John Durling
Michigan Agricultural Stewardship Assn, Crop Soil Sciences Dept

Annual Reports

Commodities

  • Animal Products: dairy

Practices

  • Animal Production: grazing - rotational
  • Education and Training: demonstration, extension, farmer to farmer
  • Farm Business Management: whole farm planning, budgets/cost and returns, agricultural finance
  • Production Systems: agroecosystems, holistic management
  • Sustainable Communities: infrastructure analysis, analysis of personal/family life, employment opportunities, sustainability measures

    Abstract:

    Financial Indicators of Sustainability on Michigan Farms brought farmers and Extension agents together to evaluate the usefulness of ratios developed to assess sustainability and progress toward sustainability of Michigan farms. (See Levins, Dick. 1996. Monitoring Sustainable Agriculture with Conventional Farm Data. Land Stewardship Project, White Bear Lake, MN.)

    Methods/Approach

    Farmer members of the Michigan Agricultural Stewardship Association (MASA), Michigan State University Extension agents, and others were introduced to the indicators through two workshops. Participants calculated their own ratios and compared them with historic and contemporary data. A case study involved a conventional-turned-grazing dairy which provided 20 years of ratios and hosted a tour for workshop participants. Workshops were facilitated by University of Minnesota Professor and Extension Agricultural Economist Dick Levins, developer of the ratios.

    Results

    The exercise of wrestling with the ratios, especially in the context of a conventional-turned-grazing dairy, was very instructive. While there was broad consensus on the desirability of some set of readily calculable ratios for distributing farm payments, and possibly for assessing individual farm progress toward sustainability, consensus was not reached on the formulation of the specific ratios. Team efforts to develop this formulation include ongoing discussions with sustainability ratio experimenters in several states.

    Impacts and Potential Contributions

    This project’s impact was primarily in the discussion it generated and the questions it raised about assessing farm sustainability and the collateral issue of using ratios as a basis for farm payment distribution. The conventional-turned-grazing case farm and its 20-year ratio history also evoked important discussion. Discussions from this project were important because of the topic — assessing sustainability — and because of whom were involved in the discussion — key farmer-leaders and Extension agricultural and farm management agents from throughout Michigan. Project experience with the indicators has been the subject of several stories in Michigan’s Farm and Country Journal and is available on the web at http://www.sustainable-ag.org

    Project objectives:

    A. Evaluate usefulness of financial indicators of sustainability and assess their suitability for incorporation into existing farm business analysis programming.

    B. Assess farm system sustainability and quantify progress toward farm system sustainability over time through calculation of financial indicators.

    C. Educate farmers and Extension agents on calculation, utilization, and interpretation of financial indicators of sustainability.

    D. Demonstrate to a broader audience of Michigan agriculturalists, including other farmers and farm service providers, appropriate use of financial indicators of sustainability.

    E. Disseminate project results to a wider audience of Michigan farmers and Extension agents.

    Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE.