Cultivating Multi-Trophic Aquaponics: Evaluating Freshwater Shrimp as Biological Detritivores to Reduce Ammonia and Increase Farm Profitability

Project Overview

ONE26-479
Project Type: Partnership
Funds awarded in 2026: $29,850.95
Projected End Date: 02/28/2028
Grant Recipient: AI SUSTAINABLE FOODS INC
Region: Northeast
State: Pennsylvania
Project Leader:
Anastasiya Sharapan
AI Sustainable Foods

Commodities

  • Animals: fish, shellfish

Practices

  • Animal Production: aquaculture
  • Education and Training: farmer to farmer
  • Production Systems: aquaponics

    Proposal abstract:

    Small-scale aquaponic operations across the Northeast face a common and costly challenge: solid fish waste accumulates in recirculating tanks, generating ammonia spikes that damage crops, stress fish, and require intensive water exchange or mechanical filtration to manage. This project tests a biological solution with a dual economic benefit - integrating freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) into the benthic layer of tilapia aquaponic tanks to consume solid waste, reduce ammonia accumulation, and simultaneously produce a premium secondary cash crop.

    Conducted across six 300-gallon aquaponic tanks housed in climate-controlled reefer nodes at AI Sustainable Foods' Saylorsburg, PA facility and a commercial partner farm, this 15-month study compares three Control tanks (tilapia only) against three Variable tanks (tilapia plus benthic shrimp) across two full production cycles. Weekly water chemistry measurements - ammonia, nitrite, nitrate, pH, dissolved oxygen, and total suspended solids - will quantify the shrimp's detritivorous impact. Harvest data will generate a comparative enterprise budget documenting the net profitability of multi-trophic versus single-species production.

    Outreach is central to this design. Two on-farm Field Days will bring regional CEA producers to view the dual-harvest system and engage with the water chemistry data. A freely distributed 'Freshwater Prawn Integration Guide' will provide setup instructions, enterprise economics, and replication protocols. Results will be presented at the PASA Farming Conference and archived in the Northeast SARE project database.

    This project advances SARE's legislative priorities by conserving water, reducing nitrogen loads in effluent discharge, improving agricultural profitability, and expanding employment opportunities in food systems. It addresses a documented operational barrier facing a growing sector of Northeast agriculture with a practical, low-infrastructure, biologically grounded solution.

    Project objectives from proposal:

    1. Water Quality: Determine whether the
      introduction of benthic Macrobrachium rosenbergii at a stocking
      density of [X] juveniles per 300-gallon tank reduces total
      suspended solids (TSS) by at least 20% and ammonia spike frequency
      (events exceeding 0.5 mg/L NH3) by at least 20% compared to
      tilapia-only Control tanks, as measured by weekly sensor logging
      and quarterly confirmatory lab analysis over two 6-month production
      cycles.
    2. Enterprise Economics: Calculate the net
      revenue-per-square-foot differential between Variable
      (multi-trophic) and Control (single-species) tanks across two
      production cycles, targeting a 15% or greater increase in total
      revenue per unit water volume via the secondary shrimp harvest, and
      document all input costs required to achieve that outcome in an
      enterprise budget replicable by other Northeast operators.
    3. Knowledge Transfer: Train a minimum of 40
      regional CEA farmers through two on-farm Field Days; distribute the
      Freshwater Prawn Integration Guide to all attendees and publicly
      via the PASA network and Northeast SARE database; and document
      adoption intent via post-event surveys, with a follow-up survey at
      6 months post-distribution to track actual adoption.
    Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.