Final report for ENE20-162
Project Information
As fewer Americans grow up on farms or ranches, experiential farmer training programs build skills for aspiring, beginning, or first-generation farmers and create an entryway to the industry. Mentor matching programs increase the number of skilled farmers by pairing experienced farm mentors with novice farmers. Ag Service Providers who coordinate farm mentor networks value the role that quality mentorship relationships play in training farm successors. Professional development for farm mentors can result in more effective training for aspiring and beginning farmers, increase knowledge transfer of agricultural skills, increase employee retention, and improve farm work culture. Networking with other farm mentors builds professional relationships with other producers who share similar educational missions and community engagement values.
Over the course of this three-year project (2019-2023), the project team and advisors developed and facilitated mentor peer support groups and created educational opportunities for hundreds of farm mentors and agriculture service providers through activities that included: 1) three regional multi-day or multi-session professional development workshops targeting agricultural service providers and farmers interested in mentoring or training beginning farmers; these were held in Maryland (online, 2020), Maine (online 2022), and New York (in-person, 2022); 2) webinar versions of workshop topics were posted on New Entry’s website and YouTube channels; 3) regional and national conference presentations were held at NOFA Mass and at four national FIELD Schools; 4) mentor discussion / peer groups and individualized training sessions were held regionally by partners; 5) a Mentor Story Map was created to share reflections from trainees on the Value of Quality Mentorship; 6) a monthly "Anti-Racism in Farmer Training (ARFT)" group formed to address Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion support for farmer training programs; 7) Agricultural High School Guidance Counselor's and 4-H leaders in Maryland were trained on mentor competencies to improve their promotion of agricultural careers; and 8) all project materials were posted on New Entry’s Mentor Training webpage. A Mentor Training Toolkit and Resource Guide for ag service providers developed through a prior program was utilized to develop this project's training agendas, fact sheets, participatory activities, resources, and facilitation guides for supporting peer-to-peer mentor groups.
For each of the three regional trainings held, pre- and post-training surveys were administered with participants and assessed over 25 characteristics of mentorship before and after the trainings. A follow up evaluation with attendees of the three regional trainings at the end of the project (fall 2023) was conducted to assess learning outcomes and verify adoption of new relational practices and any changes in mentor farm educational approaches with trainees (N=49 respondents). The learning outcomes measured confidence in mentoring, quality of communications and listening skills, ability to set expectations, and an assessment of their emotional intelligence (defined as intrapersonal [emotional self-awareness] and interpersonal [empathy, relational, social] skills) before and after the training. A large majority of participants significantly increased their ratings after the training sessions in each of the skill areas, reporting knowledge gains.
Service providers and farmers also reported that a majority (89.3%) of participants made changes to their communications and employment practices, added processes for setting expectations with trainees, created new collaborations, improved their own emotional awareness, and updated their educational resources. One farmer reported implementing, "weekly in-person meetings with current workers during the season and checking in with them about their comprehension of the work, how they are feeling mentally and physically, what the future workload looks like, and expectations as well as feedback on processes they have learned.” Another mentor reported that since the training they "created a formal employee handbook, instituted regular feedback sessions (both individual and group), encouraged employees with differing skills to mentor one another, provided off farm learning opportunities and online classes to employees, and encouraged more of a team approach to farm management.”
An additional outcome of the project for service providers administering mentor training programs were the communication, coordination, and resource sharing at the monthly regional meetings held over the project period. One project director reported, "...through centering farm workers in farm manager education, the funding supported a shift in our perspectives of labor rights and how we train the next generation of farmer educators. The peer to peer space for farm managers hosting apprentices similarly allowed spaces for farmers to digest their experience with apprentices and share learning with one another." Programs reported great value in meeting regularly to share program trends, changes in policies and updated educational resources, discuss challenges, connect with new resources, and strategize how to improve program delivery throughout the COVID-19 pandemic (increased need for mental health services for trainees) and the national racial reckoning that called into question issues of equity, accessibility, and diversity of participants who engage in these types of on-farm experiential training programs. Due to the connection of this project to the national FIELD Network, these conversations are ongoing and will continue after the project concludes through organized monthly national FIELD Networking sessions that feature professional development topics for incubator farm and apprenticeship training programs and through the ongoing monthly Anti-Racism in Farmer Training (ARFT) group.
20 Northeast agricultural service providers train 75 farm mentors to adopt relational practices and increase competence to communicate, set expectations, facilitate self-directed learning, and effectively mentor at least 250 aspiring and beginning farmers in crop production, marketing, business planning, resource linkages, and grow emotional intelligence.
Problem and Justification: As fewer Americans grow up on farms or ranches, experiential farmer training programs build skills for aspiring, beginning, or first-generation farmers and create an entryway to the industry. Mentor matching programs increase the number of skilled farmers by pairing experienced farm mentors with novice farmers. Agricultural Service Providers who coordinate farm mentor networks value the role that quality mentorship relationships play in training farm successors. Yet, balancing the demands of work and facilitating farm-based education and learning can create strains on productivity and profitability. Mentors must consistently set reasonable expectations, effectively communicate, provide feedback, and nurture their mentees. There are few agriculture-specific mentor training resources and agricultural service providers seek tools, curricula, and training strategies to build mentor support networks and offer quality professional training and support to farm mentors to build their capacity as educators.
Solution and Approach: For agricultural service providers and beginning farmer trainers, professional development for farm mentors can result in more effective training for aspiring and beginning farmers, increase knowledge transfer of agricultural skills, increase employee retention, and improve farm work culture. Networking with other farm mentors builds professional relationships with other producers who share similar educational missions and community engagement values. This project developed and delivered robust mentor trainings and facilitated mentor peer support groups. Content delivery included: 1) three regional multi-day or multi-session professional development workshops targeting agricultural service providers and farmers interested in mentoring or training beginning farmers; these were held in Maryland (online, 2020), Maine (online 2022), and New York (in-person, 2022); 2) webinar versions of workshop topics were posted on New Entry’s website and YouTube channels; 3) regional and national conference presentations were held at NOFA Mass and at four national FIELD Schools; 4) mentor discussion / peer groups and individualized training sessions were held regionally by partners; 5) a Mentor Story Map was created to share reflections from trainees on the Value of Quality Mentorship; 6) a monthly "Anti-Racism in Farmer Training (ARFT)" group formed to address Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion support for farmer training programs; 7) Agricultural High School Guidance Counselor's and 4-H leaders in Maryland were trained on mentor competencies to improve their promotion of agricultural careers; and 8) all project materials were posted on New Entry’s Mentor Training webpage. A Mentor Training Toolkit and Resource Guide for ag service providers developed through a prior program and utilized to develop this project's training agendas, fact sheets, participatory activities, resources, and facilitation guides for supporting peer-to-peer mentor groups.
Milestones: Project outreach informed 1,616 producers and 912 ag service providers (total participants; not a "unique count"/there may be duplicates) about mentor training resources and solicited input for future mentor training topics. Three online and in-person mentor trainings reached 462 participants and were held throughout the Northeast Region (MD, ME, NY) with follow up webinar presentations and monthly networking sessions sharing content and resources more broadly. At least 20 Agricultural Service Providers established and continued peer-to-peer mentor support groups to facilitate ongoing professional development and continued mentor training.
Cooperators
- (Educator)
- (Educator)
- (Educator)
- (Educator)
- (Educator)
- (Educator)
- (Educator)
Educational Approach
Education Plan
Participant Recruitment: New Entry accessed 15+ Northeast agricultural networks and listservs that reach over 10,000 agricultural professionals and farmers. Our Ag Apprenticeship Learning Network (AgALN) engaged 160+ organizations collaborating to improve apprenticeship training. A regional advisory group was consulted to connect with additional ag service providers and farm mentors. Mentor listening sessions and a survey in Maryland (2020) helped develop priorities for trainings. Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association (MOFGA) conducted focus groups in 2021 with farm mentors to develop educational priorities for the 2022 mentor trainings. Virtual trainings enabled broad national outreach for online programming and 350 participants registered for the series. Glynwood Center convened regular mentor learning groups as part of its Diversified Apprenticeship Training Program and prepared an agenda for a 3-day in-person mentor training in Coldspring, NY held in fall of 2022 attended by 24 participants. Project partners assessed and developed educational resources. National FIELD Networking sessions engaged additional apprenticeship and mentor programs across the country and shared resources developed through this project.
Curriculum Topics: Monthly project team planning conversations prioritized both novice and experienced mentor topics on: leadership development; effective communications and relational health (active listening; nonviolent communication; conflict resolution); setting goals and expectations; experiential curriculum development; understanding adult learning styles; fostering values around quality education and learning; developing self-directed learners using the Ladder of Inference and protocols for skillful inquiry; balancing work and education; delegating responsibilities; working across intergenerational difference; fostering Diversity, Equity and Inclusion and safe learning spaces on the farm; creating positive workplace culture; addressing gender and harassment; and centering worker experience and facilitating “community” with farm workers, owners, managers, interns working together, and more. Other topics (farm labor/employment law, disaster preparedness/planning) were identified through listening sessions.
Methods to Facilitate Learning: This project had two phases: planning/content development and content delivery. The project team researched existing resources, assessed delivery approaches (moved to online/virtual for MD and ME trainings due to COVID-19 and resumed in-person trainings in 2022 in NY), and in 2020 conducted Maryland mentor listening sessions to gather feedback and input on mentor challenges, opportunities, best practices, and peer learning goals. The UMD team created training agendas, selected qualified trainers, and engaged service providers and mentors through outreach. Content delivery for January 2021 (the first scheduled mentor training) included: 1) three, half-day (2-5 pm) virtual professional development workshops targeting ag service providers and farmers interested in mentoring or training beginning farmers (Year 1: Maryland host; planned for Year 2: Maine, Year 3: New York); 2) webinar versions and recordings of trainings were posted on New Entry and UMD’s websites. To create an interactive, multi-media learning module, a story map video project was created to capture the experiences of learners on farm and the value of agricultural mentorship. The Advisory Council and collaborators recruited apprentices and farm mentors to share their stories and ideals for quality mentorship. A mentor training session was also presented at the NOFA Summer Conference virtual session on July 31, 2021 to present best practices in agricultural mentorship and review the Mentor Training Toolkit resources.
The MOFGA team then hosted focus groups and farm mentor input sessions in fall 2021 to support design and development of the January/February 2022 virtual farm labor management series. In January and February, 2022, MOFGA planned a 5-session series (one session was cancelled due to a presenter's farm emergency) and hosted a virtual, 4-part farm mentor training and labor management series designed for farmers and farm mentors that employ workers or host apprentices. This series centered on farm workers' stories and guided farm managers and mentors through crucial aspects of managing and mentoring including communication, building inclusive workplace cultures, and empowering staff. Registration for the sessions was circulated widely and capped at 350 participants due to Zoom and administrative limitations to facilitate more than a reasonable number of breakout sessions and interactive spaces in the online trainings. With capping the overall series registration at 350, we had a range of 50-125 attendees at each session. Some components of each of the sessions were recorded and posted online on New Entry's YouTube Channel under our Apprenticeship resources. It was determined that the main content/initial presentations would be recorded and posted for those who were unable to attend, but the farmer panels and discussion were not recorded so that producers could speak freely and questions could be discussed confidentially. All of the content was posted to the New Entry mentoring resource webpage: https://nesfp.nutrition.tufts.edu/agapprenticeship/mentor-training.
During 2022, the NY team (Glynwood Center, Stone Barns, and Groundswell) built on the prior experience of the Maryland and Maine trainings and gained input from their mentors participating in their regional, decentralized Apprenticeship Program to inform the agenda and content for the 3-day in person mentor training held in November 2022 at the Glynwood Center. The Glynwood Mentor Training featured two days of communications and non-violent communications training offered by the New York State Agricultural Mediation program NYSAMP), a half-day of diversity, equity and inclusion resources for farm mentors, and a half-day of training on inclusive workplace culture offered by Rock Steady Farm. Components of the NY mentor training were video recorded, though ultimately were not shared broadly due to confidentiality of information and questions asked and preferences of the presenters.
Partners continued to seek opportunities to provide regional winter conference presentations; mentor discussion / peer groups and individualized training sessions; and resource materials were continually posted on New Entry’s website and the online resource library.
Methods to Plan and Act: A Mentor Training Toolkit and Resource Guide for agriculture service providers was published in November 2020 (through other project funds) and included training agendas, fact sheets, activities, annotated resources, and facilitation guides for supporting peer-to-peer mentor groups through low-cost approaches. The Value of Agricultural Mentorship story map was created in 2021 and published to capture the perspectives and experiences of quality mentorship by farmer trainees. Mentor support networks in each NESARE state were convened by each collaborating partner to help prioritize ongoing educational resource development. Participating mentors received updated resources and materials, were invited to present at conferences and webinars, and shared new on-farm communications/curriculum approaches that improve mentee relationships and beneficial outcomes.
Milestones
100 Northeast farmers and agricultural service providers respond to an apprenticeship survey to prioritize topics important to farm mentors and service providers facilitating mentoring programs. Results are analyzed and shared with members of Project Team to focus research on desired training materials and priorities
20
80
122
242
April 30, 2020
Completed
November 18, 2022
In May 2020, New Entry circulated the National Apprenticeship Annual Survey to the national listservs to collect information on apprenticeship training programs, mentor resources, and professional development training topics desired. We received 25 responses to the National survey, with 11 farmer respondents and 14 service providers responding.
Additionally, in mid-June 2020, we circulated a "topic of interest poll" to our national networks to elicit training and professional development topics for our national FIELD School to be held in November 2020. We had 43 respondents with 10 service providers demonstrating interest in apprenticeship topics, 16 in incubator topics and 17 who selected both. A key priority that surfaced in this poll was service providers asking for more training on diversity, equity, and inclusion and to address racial justice in beginning farmer training programs. We did offer a session on Racial Equity at our National FIELD School which was the most well-attended of the 12 sessions we hosted at the conference (98 people attended the session). NOTE: we partnered with National Farm Viability Conference to host a virtual FIELD School in October 2021, so our process for soliciting topics of interest was a bit different for this co-hosted event].
In 2022, we issued a "topic of interest" poll to inform our national FIELD School held in October 2022 in Seattle, WA and 41 service providers responded, with 24% representing apprenticeship training programs, 34% representing incubator farm programs, 10% University/Extension, 10% Commercial farms or ranches that training beginning farmers, and 22% other. The majority of service providers were interested in sessions that focused on skills and resource sharing, panel discussions (hearing from multiple organizations with ample Q&A), and facilitated open discussions. Some of the challenges expressed that service providers hoped to address in the event included: how to recruit, vet, and train effective farm mentors; how historically majority white organizations can transition to serve more diverse/BIPOC farmers; housing affordability for apprentices; land access for "graduates"; how to attract apprentices/employees and afford higher wages (low wages, minimal benefits, health insurance); evaluation after program completion, among other topics. We hosted 3 days of training including a field trip to The Organic Farm School (an apprenticeship program on Whidbey Island) and an apprenticeship/mentor training "track" featuring 5 workshops (see full program here). The 2022 FIELD School was attended by 82 participants.
In preparation for our 2021 University of Maryland Farm Mentorship Training Program, UMD circulated a needs assessment survey in August 2020 and received 16 responses from farmers who indicated willingness to attend a virtual training in 2021, to indicate days of week, times of day for the training, and to select which training topics were of most interest to participants. The feedback from this survey informed development of the Maryland mentor training topics.
Other program partners were reluctant to circulate additional surveys to their farmers and colleagues during the spring/summer/fall of 2020 or 2021 to solicit more formal feedback on mentor professional development. Due to COVID-19 and the many pivots and stresses that farmers (and service providers) were making it was determined that additional surveys may not be well received. Program staff in ME, NY, and other partners felt that they could incorporate feedback and elicit mentor needs more "organically" through conversations and existing programming through their normal feedback sessions, focus groups, or other ongoing interaction with farm mentors rather than launch a formal survey. Both Glynwood, Groundswell, and MOFGA completed individual mentor/farmer needs assessments and collaborators brainstromed shared questions to "norm" the input and feedback across programs. This approach resulted in less ability to formally "count" the target number of "respondents" we anticipated receiving, but the project team is confident that the input and professional development topics that we have selected for the trainings are relevant, necessary, and are important to mentors. We developed and administered pre-training surveys in Maryland (2020), Maine (2021), and New York (2022) to support content development for those trainings.
Results from the 2021 Maine pre-assessment surveys for the 2022 trainings (responses of 93 out of over 350 registrants) indicated that 78% of respondents considered themselves a farm mentor, though the majority - 54% - had less than five years as a mentor; 29% had mentored between 6-10 years and 16% for over 10 years. On a self-assessment rating scale, the skill areas that mentors had the most variation in feeling skilled or unskilled included: helping mentees develop strategies to meet goals; working with mentees to set farming goals; negotiating a path to farm ownership or careers in agriculture; helping mentees network effectively; helping mentees balance work with professional life; understanding impact as a role model; and helping mentees acquire resources. (120 = 27 + 93; *not clear if all 93 respondents in 2021 are farmers since this was not a question on pre-survey, so we will "count" them as farmers for reporting purposes).
Results from the 2022 New York pre-assessment surveys to prepare for the November 2022 trainings (18 responses out of 24 participants) indicated that 85% of the respondents considered themselves a farm mentor. The majority - 71% - had less than five years experience as a mentor; 21% had mentored between 6-10 years and 7% for over 10 years. On the self-assessment rating scale, the skill areas that mentors felt most confident/skilled in included: active listening; establishing trusting relationships; estimating mentees level of knowledge; building mentees confidence; and acknowledging mentees contributions on the farm. Areas mentors felt less skilled in included: helping mentees acquire resources; helping mentees network effectively; negotiating a path to farm ownership or careers in agriculture; and working with mentees to set clear expectations of the mentor/employer relationship.
Five farmers with experience in mentorship join the Advisory Team which includes Project Team members and team initiates monthly calls to plan Northeast listening sessions in collaboration with service providers, conducts initial educational resource research and assessment, and begins planning Year 1 Workshop in Maryland.
5
15
1
14
May 31, 2023
Completed
November 14, 2023
The project team (collaborators) and project advisors met monthly (second Tuesdays of the month at 3pm EST) since the project launched and continued to meet monthly during 2021, 2022, and intermittently in 2023 as we wrapped up the project. Average monthly attendance at meetings had 8-10 participants. For the Project Advisory team, several were unable to engage regularly in the project due to COVID-19 constraints/overwhelm. They were consulted individually to inform about project progress and several participated in the national FIELD Schools (2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023), attended the Mentor Training Toolkit launch in December 2020, participated in the UMD Mentor Trainings in January 2021 and MOFGA Trainings in January/February 2022, contributed outreach to recruit participants for the StoryMap project, and supported development and input to the Glynwood trainings held in November 2022. We reached out to Advisors to help circulate the follow up evaluation survey in fall 2023. Four of the five proposed Advisory Team members are farmers and their time was limited, though several have been incorporated as speakers to the educational programs offered.
At least 1,000 producers and 60 agricultural service providers become aware of or exposed to at least ten existing mentor resources collected from either the Northeast or other regions featuring mentoring best practices. Resources are shared through posts and targeted outreach by service providers to at least 15 listservs in the Northeast region, along with an advertisement asking for participation of mentors in state listening sessions hosted by project team.
1000
60
350
536
August 31, 2023
Completed
November 30, 2023
New Entry hosted a webinar on the new Mentor Training Toolkit on December 15, 2020. Over 52 people registered for the webinar and received access to the recording; 26 attended the live webinar. The educational resources were promoted at the November 2020, October 2021, October 2022, and October 2023 national FIELD Schools, and an announcement about the Toolkit was emailed to three New Entry listservs (AgALN, NIFTI, and Combined National Programs lists) in 2020 and during the UMD Mentor Trainings in January 2021 reaching an estimated additional 1,100 people, in addition to posting the resource on New Entry's social media accounts. The Toolkit was also emailed to the 350 registrants of the MOFGA Mentor Training/Employment Series, and shared with the 24 participants at the NY Glynwood Mentor Training.
In 2023, New Entry also hosted 12, 1-hour monthly networking sessions as part of the FIELD Network (Incubator and Apprenticeship training programs) and an overview of the Mentor Training resources and Toolkit was presented during each of the introductory sessions, reaching 389 service providers and farmers. (Note: total registrants for 12 networking sessions was 486 and total attendees across the sessions was 389. Attendance averaged 49%-86% between registration and actual attendance. The networking sessions also do not represent a "unique count" of service providers as some may have attended more than one networking session).
31 service providers attended the 2020 FIELD School sessions on Registering Apprenticeship and Mentorship Training topics. For our 2021 FIELD School, we hosted sessions as part of the overall National Farm Viability Conference virtually. It was more difficult to track attendance and participant demographics, but the conference was targeted to services providers and in the registration data, 27% (103/378) of participants that registered said they planned to participate in sessions that are part of the FIELD School track. 158/378 were undecided about this when they registered, so they may have participated. We earmarked at least 8 FIELD School sessions at the conference were largely focused on topics relevant to mentors and trainers. 82 service providers attended the 2022 FIELD School in Seattle, WA and a portion of these providers participated in the 5 apprenticeship/mentor training workshop track. Additional sessions at the FIELD School included break-out sessions with "incubators" and "apprenticeship training programs" discussing key successes and challenges and open space conversations that also included mentor training themes. Unfortunately, we did not track specific numbers of attendees at each of the workshop sessions. In 2023, New Entry hosted the 2023 FIELD School in Kansas City, MO which was attended by 97 service providers and a portion of these providers attended the 5+ apprenticeship/mentor training workshop tracks and engaged in a focused conversation (led by Julie Sullivan from Quivira Coalition's NAP program) on how apprenticeship and mentor programs could be improved and strengthened with additional professional development support.
New Entry also hosted a Mentor Training workshop at the NOFA 2021 Summer Conference on July 31, 2021. This workshop reached 6 participants live and others who may have watched the recording virtually. Concepts of mentorship and an introduction to the Mentor Toolkit was covered.
The Mentor Training webpage received 252 page views between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2021; and an additional 433 page views between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022; and an additional 224 page views between January 1, 2023 and November 30, 2023.
At least 60 mentors participate and provide input on mentor training needs through organized state listening sessions, focus groups, or field days about the benefits and challenges of mentorship and resources they would like developed. Service providers debrief feedback from listening sessions. Listening sessions will also disseminate existing mentor resources.
60
15
128
74
October 31, 2022
Completed
November 18, 2022
University of Maryland issued a survey to mentors in the state to gain input as to a virtual training session in winter 2021 and identify the training topics that most interested them. 17 farmers responded to the survey to inform training topics for the January 2021 training event.
A pre-assessment survey was also issue to participants registering for the Maryland 2021 winter mentor training series and 74 of the 96 participants completed the pre-assessment survey which informed topic areas for the training sessions.
Results from the 2021 Maine pre-assessment surveys for the 2022 trainings captured input and desired training topics from 93 registrants for the training sessions. Unfortunately, the pre-assessment survey did not capture the "role" of participants other than to inquire about mentorship experience, so it is unclear if these respondents are all farmers or service providers or a combination. For purposes of reporting, we will "count" all the respondents as farmers. Feedback and information on learning needs and assessments was shared with speakers/presenters for the January/February 2022 training sessions to support content development and address learning needs.
Glynwood issued a pre-assessment survey to the 24 registrants of the November 2022 Mentor training. 18 of the 24 completed questionnaire prior to the event to inform planning and participants were most interested in giving and receiving feedback and supporting mentees with resources.
Resource Development: Based on input from listening sessions, Project Team and Advisors will prepare multi-day training workshop content, invite speakers, and develop participatory curriculum, and schedule field trip to Terp Farm for a mentor training attended by 40 participants (10 service providers and 30 farm mentors) to be held in Maryland; 40 participants complete the training and agree to incorporate at least three new practices with their trainees in 2021.
30
10
96
22
January 29, 2021
Completed
January 29, 2021
The January 11 - 13, 2021 training was hosted virtually by University of Maryland and had a total of 96 registrants who completed registration forms on the website. Workshops were held from 2 - 5pm each day over three days in an online format (Zoom) and attendance followed as such: 1/11 - 207 minutes duration with 116 participants; 1/12 - 199 minutes duration with 77 participants; and 1/13 - 198 minutes duration with 89 participants. We will issued a pre-survey to registrants and 74 responded to the pre-survey. We also issued a "pre-question survey" for presenters and had 42 responses. A post-survey was issued to all attendees and we received 34 post-survey responses. The workshop registration page, speakers, and agenda can be found at this website: https://iaa.umd.edu/farm-mentorship-training.
A presentation with all of the outcomes and evaluation data for the Maryland training can also be found here. Results of the survey indicate that participants increased their knowledge by 20%. Respondents reported a 27% increase in quality of mentoring as a result of the training;100% of respondents plan to make changes in their mentoring as a result of the training;100% of respondents said that attending the training was a valuable use of their time; and 88% of respondents are interested in further training opportunities. Additionally, for the vast majority of participants (83.3%), this was their first time participating in a formal mentor training program.
Three follow up webinars share content of training topics held in Maryland to at least 45 additional producers and service providers [April 2021]. At least 30 mentors present or attend one of 9 webinars (three per regional training) to share best practices and model use of resources developed via toolkit.
45
9
527
6
December 30, 2022
Completed
November 30, 2023
A conference presentation on Mentor Training and Resources was offered a the NOFA Summer Conference on July 31, 2021. A total of 6 farmers participated and gained skills on mentorship strategies, resources, and learned about the Mentor Training Toolkit for additional support.
Additional webinars have not been coordinated to follow up with specific content from the Maryland trainings to date, though feedback from those sessions informed development of the January 2022 Maine trainings which focused on farm labor management and workplace culture. The MOFGA online trainings were presented as webinars and the portions of the sessions that were recorded were posted on the New Entry YouTube Apprenticeship Playlist/Channel. To date, the recorded sessions from 2022 have achieved a total of 527 views on YouTube (Supporting an Inclusive Workplace Culture - 316 views; Supporting Learning and Empowering Leaders on Staff - 121 views; Centering Workers on Farms - 90 views). Both the Maryland and Maine trainings also informed development of the 3-day agenda for the NY/Glynwood in-person training held in November 2022. Portions of the Glynwood training were also video recorded, however it was determined by the presenters and Glynwood staff that they did not wish to publicly post the videos to YouTube for further viewing as the content was developed specifically for attendees, so unfortunately, this content is not publicly available.
Additionally, as noted above, the annual FIELD Schools also contributed to ongoing sharing of knowledge and topics presented during these trainings. For purposes of reporting, we are counting all views of the MOFGA online recordings as "farmers."
A mentor support group and training facilitation toolkit will be developed and shared with at least 20 ag service providers and producers who provide feedback and suggested revisions.
5
20
September 30, 2023
Completed
November 30, 2023
During our monthly partner calls in 2022, we discussed developing more formal mentor network development tools with project partners. Most of the partners (MOFGA, Glynwood, Quivira, UMaryland IIA, Stone Barns, Groundswell, and others) already have fairly established mentor networks. Most of the partners did not feel like it made sense to formalize a broader regional network as their existing mentors were already tapped to participate in the requirements of the individual programs' mentor training expectations and required trainings. For example, the MOFGA apprenticeship program supports 19 apprentice mentor farmers throughout Maine (2022). They support on average 45 beginning farmer apprentices a year. The mentors meet twice as a group- once at the beginning of the season and once to reflect on the season. MOFGA staff conduct one on one check ins with the mentors throughout the season. As participating host farmers, mentors are required to attend labor management series training to connect with one another and gain skills on topics such as communication, balancing learning and doing on the farm, and how to build an inclusive workplace. Similarly, the Glynwood Center manages the New York Hudson Valley's Regional and Decentralized Apprenticeship program, so already has ongoing mentor training programming and requirements, which included offering the November 2022, 3-day mentor training supported through this project.
The existing Mentor Training Toolkit has an entire chapter (Chapter 1) devoted to "Building Mentor Training Networks" so the group determined that was sufficient in terms of capturing best practices to establish mentor networks if other new programs emerged in the region and this particular objective was not completed or pursued as a result of existing information on the topic.
Based on evaluations from the Maryland training and webinars, Project Team and Advisors will prepare for a Maine multi-day workshop session attended by at least 30 participants and a New York multi-day training with 30 participants, 18 are agricultural service providers and 42 are farm mentors.
42
18
344
January 28, 2023
Completed
November 18, 2022
Based on feedback from the Maryland Mentor Trainings held in January 2021 and from focus groups and input sessions from farm mentors held in Maine in Fall 2021, the focus of the Maine 2022 Mentor Trainings centered around farm labor management and workplace culture. In January and February, 2022, our partner, Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association hosted a virtual, 5-part farm mentor training and labor management series designed for farmers and farm mentors that employ workers or host apprentices. This series centered farm workers' stories and guided farm managers and mentor farmers through crucial aspects of managing and mentoring including communication, building inclusive workplace cultures, and empowering staff and trainees. A keynote presentation by Not Our Farm, a national farm worker visibility project, kicked off the series with a human resources training led by career farmers who spent many years working on farms. Registration was capped at 350 online/virtual attendees and we had 350 registrants. The program agenda for this virtual training series covered the following specific topics (for detailed workshop descriptions see links below):
- January 10th, 2022 from 3 - 6 pm EST: Centering Workers on Farms with Not Your Farm (125 participants). A keynote presentation by Not Our Farm, a national farm worker visibility project, kicked off the series with a human resources training led by career farmers who have spent many years working on farms that are not their own. At this workshop we discussed the absolute necessity of centering workers in all aspects of our farming operations. We approached this through the lens of human resources (interviews, onboarding, working, training) and by hearing conversations and insights from experienced career farmers who have spent many years working on farms not their own. Not Our Farm is a worker visibility and support project that seeks to amplify the voices and experiences of workers on farms not their own.
- January 24th, 2022 from 4 - 6 pm EST: Supporting and Inclusive Workplace Culture with Rock Steady Farm (90 participants). Rock Steady Farm presented on their workplace culture, farm policies, care focused approach, and on how to build an inclusive workplace on your farm, especially for BIPOC and LGBTQ+ workers. There was also a panel of inspiring farmers from across the country who spoke on their best practices and lessons learned on farmer rights and workplace culture building.
- February 7th, 2022 from 4 - 6 pm EST: On Farm Communication with UMaine Extension and Apple Creek Farm (this session was cancelled due to a presenter emergency). The goal for this workshop was for UMaine Extension and Apple Creek Farm to present on improving on-farm communication. The session plan included: communication essentials, practicing skills during break-out groups and how to build a communication plan for your farm.
- February 14th, 2022 from 4 - 6 pm EST: Employee Retention Strategies with South Paw Farm (55 participants). South Paw Farm staff and crew in Freedom Maine shared their experiences of what keeps them coming back to work year after year. The farm workers and farm owner of South Paw covered power dynamics, communication, building shared respect and their culture around conflict. A farmer round table discussion followed. (this session was not recorded)
- February 28th, 2022 from 4 - 6 pm EST: Supporting Learning and Empowering Leaders in your Staff with San Juan Ranch and Groundswell Center for Local Food and Farming (50 participants). Julie Sullivan from San Juan Ranch and staff from Groundswell Center for Local Food and Farming presented about supporting the self-directed learning of your crew and apprentices. They discussed balancing learning and doing while farming, the experiential learning cycle for adult learners, and how to build respect and investment in your worker to create a more supportive workplace.
In the MOFGA post-survey workshop evaluations (N=64), participants were asked to rank their skills in various areas before and after attending the workshop series. Skill areas were ranked from “Not at all skilled” (1) to “Extremely skilled” (5). On average across all areas, the average score increased from before to after by 0.5. Areas that increased the most included: “Working with mentees/farm workers to set clear expectations of the mentoring or employer relationship” and “Employing strategies to improve communication with mentees/farm workers.” When asked if they now identify as a farm mentor after attending the training, nearly every respondent said “yes.” The majority of participants in the training series also reported the facilitators/speakers to be “Very effective” or “Effective.” Zero participants reported that the facilitators were ineffective. The majority of participants had not participated in formal mentor training prior to this series. In fact, only about 25% reported they had received any mentor training. 90% of participants reported that attending the training was a valuable use of their time. 80% responded that they were either “very likely” or “likely” to recommend this training to a colleague.
Over 95% of survey respondents expressed interest in follow-up trainings or sessions. 80% of respondents reported that they made changes in their mentoring or labor management. Some of these changes included: “creating an employee handbook”, “changes in communication”, and “being more intentional about carving out time and space for career planning and goal setting with mentees.” Participants also reported an increased quality of mentoring following the training. Most attendees rated their skills as average before the training and after the training, the reported quality of mentoring was high.
During 2022, the planning team revisited the Maryland and Maine workshop evaluations, feedback from organizers, and post-survey results to inform planning for the New York November 2022 event. Additional roundtable discussions that Glynwood held with their mentors also informed development of the November 2022 training in New York. The agenda for this 3-day session held at the Glynwood Center included a three-day participatory experience designed to help established and developing farm mentors build skills in team communications, cultural competency, and the development of an inclusive workplace culture. Meals were provided and overnight accommodations were available upon request.
A two-day team communications training was led by the New York State Agricultural Mediation Program. Lessons rooted in Non-Violent Communications included lessons and guided practice in skills including listening with presence, understanding the elements of empathy, preparation for difficult conversations, and understanding conflict styles.
A half-day cultural competency session introduced key concepts, ideas, ideologies, and narratives that frame how we understand whiteness, white racialized identity and white supremacy culture. Participants were able to name and analyze the attitudes and behaviors that stem from whiteness and white supremacy and define key concepts such as: social conditioning, race, whiteness, white supremacy, white privilege, white fragility, and white guilt. Furthermore, participants engaged critically in ways in which we are socially conditioned to adopt these concepts/ values as fact, as parts of the self, and as potentially dangerous tools of oppression.
Lastly, Rock Steady Farm presented a half-day "Developing an Inclusive Workplace Culture" session. Maggie Chaney shared about their workplace culture, farm policies, and care focused approach. The session included guidance and discussion on how to build an inclusive workplace on the farm, especially for BIPOC and LGBTQ+ workers.
In the Glynwood (NY) mentor training post-survey workshop evaluations (N=19), participants were asked after the workshop if they identify as mentors, and 66% said yes and 20% said maybe. 86% of attendees had never participated in a formal mentor training before; the two that had participated in the MOFA training offered through this project. Respondents were asked to rank their skills in various areas before and after attending the 3-day training. Skill areas were ranked from “Not at all skilled” (1) to “Extremely skilled” (5). On average across all areas, similar to the MOFGA survey results, the average score increased from before to after by 0.5. Areas that increased the most included: “Active listening”; "considering how personal and professional differences may impact expectations"; and "acknowledging your mentee's contributions to the farm". When asked to rate the quality of their mentoring before the training, on a scale of 1 to 5 (with 1 being very low and 5 being very high), the mean quality was 2.93 (average) BEFORE the training and they reported an average of 3.60 after the training. All participants (100%) reported the facilitators/speakers to be “Very effective” or “Effective.” Zero participants reported that the facilitators were ineffective. The majority of participants had not participated in formal mentor training prior to this series. 92% of participants reported that attending the training was a valuable use of their time. 87% responded that they were either “very likely” or “likely” to recommend this training to a colleague.
Over 93% of survey respondents expressed interest in follow-up trainings or sessions. 100% of respondents reported that they already have or plan to make changes in their mentoring or labor management. Some of these changes included: “trying to practice active listening and be aware of people's social orientations”; "taking the time to fully understand my mentees goals at the beginning of the season and conducting regular check-ins to enhance our structure of work and to ensure they are learning the skills they need to reach their goals"; "creating community guidelines and defining expectations"; and "enhance the onboarding/check-in process."
Again, for reporting purposes, and because MOFGA and Glynwood handled registration for the two sessions directly and it was challenging to capture whether participants were ag service providers or farmers, for reporting, we are counting all attendees for each session as "farmers." There may be duplicates in this count if participants attended more than one MOFGA online training sessions.
At least 25 mentors and 5 agricultural service providers will attend at least one regional conference session that highlights skills and resources featured in the mentor toolkit to improve communications and teaching/learning strategies.
25
5
6
160
December 31, 2022
Completed
October 26, 2023
A conference presentation on Mentor Training and Resources was offered a the NOFA Summer Conference on July 31, 2021. A total of 6 farmers participated and gained skills on mentorship strategies, resources, and learned about the Mentor Training Toolkit for additional support.
We had originally planned to target regional conferences to present highlights from the mentor trainings, however 2020 and 2021 were challenging years to figure out appropriate conference partners given it was the first time many winter agricultural conferences shifted to virtual/online formats. Two conferences that were scheduled to attend by partners and present were canceled due to illness and/or lack of COVID precautions at the in-person venue.
Instead, to share resources more broadly, New Entry focused on sharing resources at our four annual FIELD Schools (2020, 2021, 2022, 2023) which featured information on mentor training, the Mentor Toolkit, and other resources to improve mentor communication, professional development, and supporting improved workplace culture and inclusiveness. It is estimated that at least 160 service providers (40/year) attended the apprenticeship tracks at each of the annual FIELD Schools and benefited from the mentor training resources.
At least 5 agricultural service providers will support at least 75 mentors who will be reached through attendance at trainings and via invitations to continue to network and share resources and feedback regarding existing toolkit and other challenges and opportunities and best practices resources for mentors through regular (quarterly or monthly) state-level peer-to-peer mentor support groups.
75
5
10
December 30, 2022
Completed
November 30, 2023
Program partners continued to facilitate localized mentor support groups through field visits, online, and in-person programming in 2022 and 2023 following the formal mentor trainings. We learned through conversations with our five partners and their mentor feedback sessions on additional professional development support that face-to-face is the preferred method for facilitation of support groups. Each of the project partners continued to utilize mentor-to-mentor support through monthly calls, in-person mentor meetups, and mentor/mentee social events. Specific numbers of events and 1:1 mentor meetings were not captured for purposes of reporting outcomes, however, we did ask our core partners facilitating these mentor learning networks to provide some quotes on the benefits they gained from their participation in our monthly Mentor Training network calls and the following quotes share that benefit:
"The Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association organized 5 labor management workshops as well as hosted peer support spaces for farmers hosting apprentices as part of this project. The labor management series had incredible reach with capping registrants at 350 for the series and a range of 50-125 attending each session. Through centering farm workers in farm manager education, the SARE funding supported MOFGA in shifting our perspectives of labor rights and how we train the next generation of farmer educators. The peer to peer space for farm managers hosting apprentices similarly allowed spaces for farmers to digest their experience with apprentices and share learning with one another." - MOFGA staff organizer
"The SARE-funded Mentor Training project had a positive impact on me professionally as well as on the program that I run at the MD Institute of Applied Agriculture. Especially during the peak isolation of the pandemic, it was extremely helpful to have regular virtual meetings with peers running similar programs across the country. I just felt less alone in trying to maintain a semblance of a program that is vitally hands-on when we had to be literally hands-off. While the Maryland training was the first to operate virtually in January 2021 (meaning we were learning as we went and there were some big lessons learned about delivering a virtual program), I consider it a success for the time." - Maryland Institute for Applied Agriculture program staff
"Glynwood and the farmer mentors in its network greatly benefited from participation in this project. It was valuable to be in dialogue with other farmer training service providers and a delight to host a successful multi-day mentor training. The participants were appreciative for the opportunity and Glynwood emerged with a great blueprint for subsequent mentor training efforts." - Glynwood Apprenticeship Director
75 mentors report improved educational outcomes for 250 mentees through follow up evaluations and interviews conducted by agricultural service providers facilitating mentor networks.
250
75
40
17
May 26, 2023
Completed
November 30, 2023
We developed a follow-up evaluation to distribute to attendees of the three regional trainings at the end of the project (fall 2023) to asses learning outcomes and any changes in practices or adoption of new behaviors as a result of the mentor trainings. This evaluation survey was sent to participants of three regional trainings: University of Maryland IAA/ CASA Future Harvest, Maine Organic Farming Gardening Association (MOFGA), and the Glynwood Center. There were a total of forty-nine respondents across the three trainings (n=49). The full evaluation report with charts and graphs can be accessed here. Respondents were asked how long they have been involved with crop/farm/livestock production or farm-based education. Of the forty-nine participants that responded to this question, 35% or seventeen of them have worked in the sector between 11 to 20 years, 33% or sixteen participants have worked in the sector between 6 to 10 years, 18% or nine participants have worked in the sector less than 5 years, and 14% or seven participants have worked in the sector more than 20 years. We also asked about experience level of mentors and how many people and the experience level of their trainees.
Several participants manage or own a mix of farm operations. The greatest number of participants (35) identified their operation as “sustainable, organic, or regenerative agriculture.” Thirty participants also stated they “market directly to consumers,” twenty-six participants operate a “commercial / for-profit farm,” eighteen participants operate a “non-profit farm training / education program,” and seventeen participants’ operations are “rural.” Respondents operate a wide range of total acres. The greatest number of participants (12) operate between 6 to 10 acres and eleven participants operate 1 to 5 acres. An equal number of participants (6) operate less than 1 acre, 11 to 25 acres, and 51 to 100 acres. The largest area that participants who responded to the survey operate are between 101 to 300 acres.
Since completing the Farm Mentorship Training/Labor Management Series, 35 participants said they identify as a farm mentor, 6 participants said they “Maybe” identify as farm mentors, and 5 said they do not identify as farm mentors. Participants were asked if they made any changes or planned to make any changes to their mentoring/management as a result of the training and 89% or forty-one of forty-six participants that responded to this question said “Yes” and the other five said “No.” Participants who answered “Yes” had the option to describe what changes they had already implemented as a result of the training, or that they planned to do so and we included several quotes in the detailed Evaluation report.
The evaluation asked how many people (workers, employees, interns, apprentices) participants have mentored over the last three years (2020 – 2023). Collectively the forty-nine respondents mentored over 522 mentees over the three-year grant period. Individually, some of the respondents had mentored as many as 50 mentees. One responded that has mentored 50 mentees has worked in the sector for 11 to 20 years and is currently working in a “commercial / for-profit farm” that is between 51 and 100 acres. The other respondent that has mentored 50 mentees has worked in the sector for 11 to 20 years, stated they have 3 years of experience mentoring, and their operation is “non-profit farm training / education” with 1 to 5 acres.
We then asked a series of questions about their: confidence in mentoring trainees and employees; the quality of their communication and attentive listening skills; ability to set expectations; emotional intelligence; and overall additional feedback. Over 96% of respondents were interested in additional trainings and workshops on mentorship across a range of topics listed in the report.
30 farm mentors remain engaged in either formal or informal regional mentor support networks through regular (quarterly or monthly) state-level peer-to-peer mentor support groups beyond the project.
30
5
35
26
May 26, 2023
Completed
November 30, 2023
We deferred a specific follow up for mentors engaged in their respective networks (UMD IAA, MOFGA, Glywood, Quivira, Pasa Sustainable Agriculture) as these organizations are continuing to provide ongoing mentor network engagement and planning to support their professional development. There were two additional activities that were developed during planning sessions in 2023 that resulted in additional mentor training and engagement activities that will continue beyond the project period of this award.
First, we engaged Pasa Sustainable Agriculture who has developed both a state-registered pre-apprenticeship and apprenticeship program called the Diversified Vegetable Apprenticeship Program (DVA). While they were not originally a part of our project team, they have engaged in advancing agricultural apprenticeship in the Northeast by creating one of the only DOL and state-registered formal apprenticeship training programs. Pasa staff have attended all of the scheduled national FIELD Schools and served as expert presenters mentoring other service providers in pursuing formal, registered apprenticeship programs. They have also contributed to monthly FIELD Networking events. To support their need to provide professional development training to continue to enhance their programming, Pasa contracted with agricultural mentors for advisory services to plan and prepare for a mentor training event that will take place at the Pasa Conference in February, 2024. During the Conference, Pasa will offer an in-person 4-hour training session for all current Mentor Farmers who host apprentices in their DVA program (30 mentors) and all current and prospective Training Partners who host pre-apprentices in their Diversified Vegetable Pre-apprenticeship (DVP) program. Currently, Pasa does not require mentor farmers to participate in on-going training when they host pre-apprentices and apprentices; however, Pasa continues to see knowledge gaps in best practices in employee recruitment, onboarding, retention, and management. In order to advance the field of sustainable agriculture, they recognized the need to fill these knowledge and skill gaps and meet the ongoing needs of farming mentors who train the next generation of land, soil, and water stewards. They see this training as a vital next step in empowering Mentor Farmers and Training Partners in improving their employee (apprentice/ pre-apprentice) management. Event trainers will support Pasa by facilitating interactive and inspired conversations about how to offer the best possible training experience to those considering a career in farming. Pasa will conduct pre- and post-training surveys and we will report back to SARE the results of the trainings after the Pasa Conference.
Secondly, to continue the ongoing work of the Anti-Racism in Farmer Training (ARFT) group that formed during this project and largely gathered Northeast Ag Service Providers, we also contracted with Glynwood to provide planning and advisory services to the ARFT working group, an independent collaborative composed of 20 service providers and 5 beginning and advanced farmers. The engaged participants will continue to apply their knowledge gained in the ARFT sessions to advise and train farmer mentors through their respective programs that take place throughout the Northeast. The planned workshops and continued networking were and will continue to be comprised of the following session topics, speakers, and details of how the sessions will be conducted and for whom:
- Safe Rural Spaces (held 9/27/23)
- Facilitators: Claudia Ford and Goeffrey Tam
- Content: The facilitators will hold space and lead conversation through storytelling to examine how service providers can work with mentors and program participants to create safer spaces for trainees in rural agricultural settings.
- Format: Zoom training for the ARFT community
- Ableism and Disability Injustices in Farming and Farmer Training Programs (held 10/24/23)
- Facilitator: Kristie Cabrera
- Content: The facilitator will lead dialog about the challenges in providing an adaptive and accessible learning opportunity for participants with differing abilities.
- Format: Zoom training for the ARFT community
- Restorative Justice (held 12/20/23)
- Facilitator: Jonathan McCray
- Content: The facilitator will engage service providers with lessons on how to examine the harm caused by racism - particularly in agriculture - assess what can be done to repair the harm caused, and how to hold the responsible parties accountable.
- Format: Zoom training for the ARFT community
- Group Reflection (held 1/24/24)
- Facilitator: Elizabeth Gabriel
- Content: The facilitator will lead service providers in a reflective exercise about previous sessions to uncover room for continued learning and growth; responses will be recorded on a Jamboard.
- Format: Zoom training for the ARFT community
- Language Justice (scheduled for 2/28/24)
- Facilitator: wendelin regalado
- Content: The facilitator will help service providers examine the social and political aspects of language and language access while working to dismantle language barriers and equalize power dynamics.
- Format: Zoom training for the ARFT community
- LGBTQAI farmer issues/challenges (scheduled for 3/27/24)
- Facilitator: Elizabeth Gabriel with Bo Dennis and Maggie Cheney
- Content: The facilitator will help service providers examine the challenges and unique needs of the LGBTQIA+ community and how to provide safe spaces, support, and access to resources.
- Format: Zoom training for the ARFT community
- Integrating Racial Equity in Farmer Training Curriculum (2 sessions)
- Facilitators: Elizabeth Gabriel, Rogue Farm Corps and other TBD
- Content: There are varying approaches to integrating racial equity into farmer training curricula, all with variable success levels. There is a need for more accountability in this process and more guidance from BIPOC farmers. These sessions will include a share-out and evaluation of curricula approaches from the service providers in this group, and outside facilitators from farmer training organizations that seem to be more successful in this area of work.
- Format: Zoom training for the ARFT community
- Racial Equity Workshop (to be scheduled)
- Educators: TBD
- Content: Full-day workshop with multiple presenters to be hosted in 2024.
- Format: In-person workshop
Glynwood produced the following resources as part of the ARFT training process:
- ARFT onboarding document including the process for ensuring new members read and agree to abide by community agreements
- ARFT facilitation plan including guidelines for volunteer ARFT facilitation
- Racial equity glossary of key terminology
- Mentor farmer /service provider engagement strategies
- Evaluation and follow up plan
We will continue to provide progress on this effort as it is a valuable resource for service providers supporting mentors and trainees with diversity, equity and inclusion resources and a space to discuss issues, challenges, and strategies with other farmer training programs.
Milestone Activities and Participation Summary
Educational activities and events conducted by the project team:
Participants in the project’s educational activities:
Learning Outcomes
For our mentor-specific trainings in MD, ME, and NY, we issued a pre-training skills assessment and a post-training skills assessment. The assessment asked questions about rating skills BEFORE the training and NOW (after the training) across 25 topics such as: active listening; providing constructive feedback; establishing relationships based on trust; identifying and accommodating different communication styles; employing strategies to improve communications; coordinating effectively with your mentees' other mentors; Working with mentees/workers to set clear expectations of the mentoring relationship; Aligning your expectations with your mentees’; Considering how personal and professional differences may impact expectations; Working with mentees/workers to set farming goals; Helping mentees/workers develop strategies to meet goals; Accurately estimating your mentees’/workers' level of farming knowledge; Accurately estimating your mentees’/workers' ability to execute farm tasks; Employing strategies to enhance your mentees’/workers' knowledge and abilities; Motivating your mentees/workers; Building mentees’/workers' confidence; Stimulating your mentees’/workers' creativity; Acknowledging your mentees’/workers' contributions to the farm; Negotiating a path to self-directed learning with your mentees/workers; Taking into account the biases and prejudices you bring to the mentor/mentee or employer/worker relationship; Working effectively with mentees/workers whose personal background is different from your own (age, race, gender, class, region, culture, religion, family composition etc.); Helping your mentees/workers network effectively; Helping your mentees/workers set career goals; Helping your mentees/workers balance work with their personal life; and Understanding your impact as a role model. We also asked about the overall quality of their mentoring before and after the training, and asked participants to describe any changes they made in their mentoring or plan to make as a result of the training.
After the end of the project (Fall 2023), we also issued an outcome evaluation with attendees of the three regional trainings. Each service provider sent the evaluation survey to participants in each of the three regional trainings: University of Maryland IAA/ CASA Future Harvest, Maine Organic Farming Gardening Association (MOFGA), and Glynwood Center. Each regional service provider held their training at a different date. A total of forty-nine people responded to the evaluation. The evaluation asked participants how long they were involved with farm-based education; their farm size/acreage; how many mentees they have trained and the mentee experience level; and if they made any changes to their mentoring or labor management as a result of the training (89% responded yes). We also asked participants to rate their overall confidence in mentoring; the quality of their communication and attentive listening skills with employees; their ability to set expectations with mentees/employees; and their assessment of their own emotional intelligence. We also asked respondents if they were interested in future trainings (96% responded yes) and they listed the topics of interest they would most like to learn about.
Performance Target Outcomes
Performance Target Outcomes - Service Providers
Target #1
20
20 agricultural service providers provide training to farm mentors through conference sessions, webinars, curriculum development, peer learning groups, and resource toolkit dissemination to 75 farm mentors.
75
150 acres
49
522
1421
Target #2
75
75 farm mentors adopt relational practices and increase competence to communicate, set expectations, facilitate self-directed learning, and effectively mentor at least 250 aspiring and beginning farmers.
250
These represent aspiring or beginning farmers who may or may not be farming independently.
49
522
1421
We did not conduct formal evaluations or pre-/post-training evaluations at our webinars, Toolkit launch, or National FIELD School sessions. We did issue a pre-survey questionnaire completed by 74/94 registrants and a post-training survey of the 2021 Maryland training completed by 34/116 participants which provided data about service providers and farmers who reported intentions to use the materials presented in the trainings and who rated their skills before and after the training across 25 skills areas. We issued a pre-survey questionnaire completed by 106/350 registrants and a post-training survey of the 2022 MOFGA/Maine training completed by 64/320 participants which provided data about service providers and farmers who reported intentions to use the materials presented in the trainings. Similarly, the Glynwood/NY pre-survey questionnaire was completed by 18/24 registrants and a post-training survey of the 2021 Maryland training completed by 19/24 participants which provided data about service providers and farmers who reported intentions to use the materials presented in the trainings. There is currently a feedback form embedded in the online Mentor Toolkit, though we realistically do not expect much input to that form.
At the end of the project, to verify our performance targets, we issued a follow-up survey to all of the participants in each of the three training sessions. Outcomes of that survey are reported in detail in the analysis of the final survey (see report here), with significant and verified results of service providers and mentors taking actions as a result of the trainings. For purposes of reporting, we are including all respondents to this survey as "service providers" as the mentors who identified as farmers were acting as "service providers" through their mentorship. We counted the total number of "trainees" as the aspiring, beginning, and employees they "mentored" or "mentees." We did not specifically ask about specific educational/outreach activities that may have been developed or occurred, so we do not have verifiable numbers to enter into the chart above. Additionally, we asked respondents to complete a "range" of acreage they managed, so unfortunately, the total acres is an average of each of the acreage ranges times the number of respondents to selected that range. The average of a range is an imprecise way to estimate the acreage, but it is what we had; next time we would ask this question in an open-ended format to get the accurate acreage total.
Performance Target Outcomes - Farmers
Target #1
41
improve their mentoring and labor management skills
varies - average across all respondents was 1,421 (imprecise measurement based on survey question)
41
unknown
For the 2021 Maryland training, 100% of respondents to our evaluation/post-session survey responded that attending the training was a valuable use of time. 93% were likely or very likely to recommend the training to a colleague. 88% were interested in follow up sessions and 100% made or plan to make changes to their mentoring as a result of the training. When asked specifically what type of changes you have made in your mentoring, or plan to make as a result of the training, narrative responses included:
- Being encouraged to set goals with mentees for what they want to learn and the tangible steps along the way to measure progress was a huge help for me in creating a healthy relationship
- I want to make a point of taking more time to communicate with the mentor from the get go. Be clearer with expectations.
- be more patient
- Set clear expectations
- Implementing a pre-evaluation to determine current skill level and areas for focus; strategies for eliminating confusion in on farm production
- Listening techniques and response mechanics
- I've become more thoughtful about questions of race and farming. I'm developing a more complex and reasoned approach to goal setting with participants.
- I plan to start trying to think financially ahead, even without being a big part of those decisions. I plan on studying more about conflict resolution in order to contribute as an HR asset, as well as looking into UMD's free and very passionate program. I also plan on further inducing thought processes in mentees and co-workers.
- Make a greater effort to get to know mentee on all levels and be more patient while teaching
- Developing legal structures on the farm around employees, interns, apprentices, etc. Continued development of SOP or signage to help assist in communication. Changes in verbiage when talking with folks (like assertive vs aggressive, etc)
Comments about the Maryland training in general:
- It was a very well run and informative conference. I do think that for me personally, zoom is a very difficult medium to watch, absorb, ie retain information. Covid fatigue. Not your fault.
- Make available on weekends
- I made several long term changes in conflict resolution due to the training. It also made me view disparity in social class and labor very differently.
- I loved the whole meeting, my only thing is that it seemed like the first few topics were almost hard to grasp onto, especially because it felt like something more valuable for farm owners. Though, now I do realize that it's never too early to start thinking about those things. I think the meetings on the last day were more palatable information wise because the presenters were not afraid to use more humor. I think the humor involved was purposeful and put our minds in real life situations that really made us think.
- This training was incredible. Thank you for hosting!
- I would have been happy to learn the accounting steps I need to take to employ someone as a paid mentee.
- Thanks, that was top-notch.
- I thought that there was way too much moral/political exhortation and not enough about specifically farming and ranching mentorships. I guess it's a sign of the times in academia today that any subject matter has to be veneered and overloaded with politically correct jargon and virtue signaling. I had hoped for more about how to train, teach and protect your mentee in specific cropping, irrigating, animal husbandry and farming practices generally.
- Such a great program. I did not know I needed it till listening and learning so much more.
For the 2022 MOFGA/Maine mentor training series, in the post-survey evaluation responses (N=64), participants were asked to rank their skills in various areas before and after attending the workshop series. Skill areas were ranked from “Not at all skilled” (1) to “Extremely skilled” (5). On average across all areas, the average score increased from before to after by 0.5. Areas that increased the most included: “Working with mentees/farm workers to set clear expectations of the mentoring or employer relationship” and “Employing strategies to improve communication with mentees/farm workers.” When asked if they now identify as a farm mentor after attending the training, nearly every respondent said “yes.” The majority of participants in the training series also reported the facilitators/speakers to be “Very effective” or “Effective.” Zero participants reported that the facilitators were ineffective. The majority of participants had not participated in formal mentor training prior to this series. In fact, only about 25% reported they had received any mentor training. 90% of participants reported that attending the training was a valuable use of their time. 80% responded that they were either “very likely” or “likely” to recommend this training to a colleague.
Over 95% of survey respondents expressed interest in follow-up trainings or sessions. 80% of respondents reported that they made changes in their mentoring or labor management. Some of these changes included: “creating an employee handbook”, “changes in communication”, and “being more intentional about carving out time and space for career planning and goal setting with mentees.” Participants also reported an increased quality of mentoring following the training. Most attendees rated their skills as average before the training and after the training, the reported quality of mentoring was high.
In the Glynwood (NY) mentor training post-survey workshop evaluations (N=19), participants were asked after the workshop if they identify as mentors, and 66% said yes and 20% said maybe. 86% of attendees had never participated in a formal mentor training before; the two that had participated in the MOFA training offered through this project. Respondents were asked to rank their skills in various areas before and after attending the 3-day training. Skill areas were ranked from “Not at all skilled” (1) to “Extremely skilled” (5). On average across all areas, similar to the MOFGA survey results, the average score increased from before to after by 0.5. Areas that increased the most included: “Active listening”; "considering how personal and professional differences may impact expectations"; and "acknowledging your mentee's contributions to the farm". When asked to rate the quality of their mentoring before the training, on a scale of 1 to 5 (with 1 being very low and 5 being very high), the mean quality was 2.93 (average) BEFORE the training and they reported an average of 3.60 after the training. All participants (100%) reported the facilitators/speakers to be “Very effective” or “Effective.” Zero participants reported that the facilitators were ineffective. The majority of participants had not participated in formal mentor training prior to this series. 92% of participants reported that attending the training was a valuable use of their time. 87% responded that they were either “very likely” or “likely” to recommend this training to a colleague.
Over 93% of survey respondents expressed interest in follow-up trainings or sessions. 100% of respondents reported that they already have or plan to make changes in their mentoring or labor management. Some of these changes included:
- “trying to practice active listening and be aware of people's social orientations”;
- "taking the time to fully understand my mentees goals at the beginning of the season and conducting regular check-ins to enhance our structure of work and to ensure they are learning the skills they need to reach their goals";
- "creating community guidelines and defining expectations"; and
- "enhance the onboarding/check-in process."
In the final outcome evaluation across all three training attendees, (N=49), participants were asked if they identify as mentors, and 35 said yes, 6 said maybe, and 5 said no, they do not identify as mentors. Over 89% (43 respondents) had made changes to their mentoring and labor management practices, which included actions take such adopting:
- “Weekly in-person meetings with current workers during the season checking in with them about their comprehension of the work, how they are feeling mentally and physically, what the future workload looks like and expectations as well as feedback on how processes they have learned.”
- “Use a more collaborative approach, be more upfront about expectations, more team-building activities.”
- “I (farm manager) am encouraging the farm owner to set up biannual check-ins with employees, and to get a Spanish translator when necessary to ensure successful communication (even though I speak decent Spanish). Additionally, trying to give people the morning off or leave early when we can spare it especially as the season slows down, because it makes people so happy to be gifted with those extra few hours to themselves.”
- “I was in a management position the year following this training that I have since left, but in that year felt much more skilled and prepared to create a positive and respectful work environment for my team. We had more open conversations about individual goals and interests in an effort to support each others' growth as farmers, openly discussed ways to make feedback processes empowering and productive, shifted conversations about challenges to focus on improving on farm systems rather than asking more of bodies.”
- “We involved our employees in choosing organizations to give charitably too, reflecting their values as well as our own, and plan to try to and continue building shared values at the farm.”
- “We created a formal employee handbook, instituted regular feedback sessions (both individual and group), encouraged employees with differing skill to mentor one another, provided off farm learning opportunities and online classes to employees, and encouraged more of a team approach to farm management.”
- “The training showed me that people have different tendencies (i.e. people orientated, action oriented) that affect how they go about in the workplace. It's important to understand that so we know what drives people. This is something I will apply moving forward, even beyond our farm.”
96% of participants reported interest in attending additional mentor trainings and skills workshop and they identified dozens of topics of interest such as:
Tools and skills for emotional intelligence training for employees |
Employee management and development, communication, setting goals and expectations, discipline and compliance, termination |
Compassionate, non-violent communication: strategies for better feedback communication, conflict resolution |
Evaluation / assessment of the program as a whole |
Supporting trainee wellness and thriving |
Mentor the mentor |
How to encourage young people/beginner farmers to stick with the work even though it is so difficult to make farmwork sustainable livelihood in the long term? |
How to build a team in an inclusive/equitable/thoughtful way. |
More on feedback is always appreciated. I would like to learn more about how to make our recruitment/hiring processes as equitable and accessible to people of all abilities |
Specifically mentoring farmers as an advisor |
More in depth metrics for measuring growth and success in farm apprentices. Conflict resolution and mediation. |
Leadership, communication skills |
Creating a positive work culture with a new crew each year |
I'd be glad to hear more people's systems for giving feedback, especially those farmers who don't necessarily work alongside their employees all the time. |
Conflict management, developing a leadership style, confidence training |
writing training manuals/Standard Operating Procedures (sops) |
Facilitating constructive feedback |
Fostering creative contributions and programs to enhance proper physical health of employees performing repetitive tasks. |
Curriculum development for farm mentors that pairs with seasonal activities |
Navigating difficult conversations, understanding/addressing conflict in a healthy and productive way, creating safer spaces for farmers of marginalized identities, mentoring folks of different identities, navigating power/gender/race dynamics at work |
How to write a job description, how to manage disgruntled employees |
Business development |
Communicating with employees/volunteers who are differently-abled and/or on the autism spectrum. |
Improvement of listening, skills and remediation. |
Communication skills |
How to focus on and enhance innate skills in individuals. Conflict resolution/how to handle difficult employees who don’t want to participate |
More ice breaker activities. Simple articles ready to assign and share for staff trainings. |
Conflict resolution |
Working with neurodivergent employees |
Conflict resolution, communication |
How to influence/create joyful and positive team/workplace culture |
Additional Project Outcomes
Each of our project partners continues to apply for resources and funding to sustain and expand their apprenticeship training programs. All of the organizations operating apprentice training programs recognize the ongoing need to support the professional development of farm mentors and have built in programming to help farm mentors (who are often not formally trained educators) improve their skills in employee management, communications, assessing learning, and paying more attention to workplace culture. Many new working collaborations, engagement with speakers, and professional projects were catalyzed through this project.
"I made several long term changes in conflict resolution due to the training. It also made me view disparity in social class and labor very differently."
"Such a great program. I did not know I needed it till listening and learning so much more."
"I'm excited to have attended this training at this moment in time when [our farm] is undergoing significant changes in its structure and working diligently to address the needs of its member farms in relation to building a strong community of farm businesses."
"I will put into practices a lot of the activities and assessments that we did as a group, utilize resources provided, and enhance the onboarding/check-in process."
"I plan to formalize mentee trainings, work on goal setting, performance evaluations, and improving workplace culture."
"This training provided well-grounded, useful strategies for improved communication, delegation, and learning in our farmer training program."
"This training broadened my understanding of what it means to be a farm mentor. It helped me understand the importance of patience and it's importance to self directed learning."
"The workshops provided terrific case studies of what other farms had in terms of both successful and failed scenarios in employee mentoring. It probed a great deal of introspection and provided tools to facilitate better management and mentoring at my farm. "
"Employee management is by far the most challenging part of farming for me. It was really powerful to have this aspect of the job acknowledged and to learn skills that could help me improve."
"There were so many excellent nuggets of information that I can use only farm in mentoring apprentices and employees. In fact, there was so much there that I would like to take the course again to deepen my understanding of the tools and how I can best use them on my farm."
"I enjoyed this workshop on farm mentorship! It was especially relevant as I entered my first year as a farm owner/solo manager."
The project was originally conceived to host mentor trainings in person in each region of the Northeast (MD, ME, and NY). Due to COVID and public health concerns in both 2020 and 2021, we moved both the MD and ME trainings to a virtual environment. The MD training in January 2021 was held over three consecutive days from 1- 4 pm each day (3 hours). This 9-hour session sustained interest and allowed organizers to capture pre-session questions for presenters, pre-assessment surveys of skills and knowledge, and a clear post-assessment survey. The ME training in were conducted virtually, spread out over 5 online sessions (4 executed) focused on farm labor management to capture a broader audience than farm "mentors" and service providers as more and more farms are shifting away from a traditional mentor-apprentice relationship to more of an employer-worker relationship. The virtual environment makes it challenging to develop peer networks who are able to convene in person and build connections and relationships to support ongoing peer networking. We have had challenges getting peer networks formed and getting buy in from mentors during the pandemic. A more localized approach with mentors connected to more established apprenticeship support programs seems the most preferred route for connection and training among mentors. We were able to schedule a 3-day in-person mentor training in fall 2022 for the New York training program, which resulted in attendance by a smaller, but very cohesive group of beneficiaries.