The utility of plant traits to identify range seeding candidates that can achieve multiple management goals

Progress report for SW19-904

Project Type: Research and Education
Funds awarded in 2019: $342,481.00
Projected End Date: 12/31/2022
Host Institution Award ID: G244-19-W7500
Grant Recipient: University of Arizona
Region: Western
State: Arizona
Principal Investigator:
Elise Gornish
University of Arizona
Co-Investigators:
Dr. Albert Barberan
University of Arizona
Dr. Jeffrey Fehmi
University of Arizona
Dr. Mitch McClaran
University of Arizona
George Ruyle
University of Arizona
Expand All

Project Information

Abstract:

Intensifying drought and increasing plant invasions create substantial challenges for ranchers and land managers to balance profitable cattle production and healthy ecosystems on western grasslands. Producer groups across the southwest note the urgent need for financially and ecologically viable approaches to address this challenge by maintaining stable forage production while restoring multiple essential ecosystem functions. Seeding native and non-native forage species based on traits that confer resilience to drying conditions and are also associated with these positive ecosystem functions may provide utility for allowing producers to achieve multiple management goals in the face of changing environmental conditions.

We identified eight management goals (forage production, invasion resistance, drought resilience, carbon sequestration, soil fertility, erosion control, native biodiversity, and pollinator habitat) that producers noted as priorities, based on recent surveys across California and Arizona. Our proposed study is evaluating how plants with specific traits can provide ecosystem services to meet those management goals. We are performing this evaluation through on-ranch experiments in both central California and southern Arizona; regions with extensive productive rangelands that are particularly vulnerable to drought and plant invasion due to the semi-arid climate. Identifying plant trait-ecosystem service relationships will allow ranchers and land managers to select successful reseeding species to meet management goals. We are comparing these relationships between two experimental sites to determine whether a trait-based approach can be applied to regions represented by the climate in central California and southern Arizona. In addition to directly engaging producers throughout the experiment, we are translating project outcomes into science-based recommendations via workshops, field days, and a best-practice manual for ranchers and land managers.

Project Objectives:

Objective 1: Quantify relationships between plant traits and our ability to meet stakeholder-prescribed management goals over three years.

PI Gornish, and Postdoc Trace Martyn is ensuring timely field sample/data collection and sample processing to obtain metrics of plant traits and ecosystem services at the peak biomass. They are also ensuring proper statistical analysis to determine relationship between plant traits and ecosystem services achieved in the reseeding experiment. Based on our pilot field trials, we expect that seeding perennials will enhance forage production and quality while simultaneously supporting multiple ecosystem services.

Objective 2: Evaluate whether the reseeding approach can achieve the targeted management goals in both experimental sites that represent the climate in California and  Arizona.

These two regions differ in precipitation regimes, with central California grasslands dominated by a spring growing season and Arizona grasslands dominated by a summer growing season. Yet both semi-arid regions consist of extensive, productive rangelands that are vulnerable to drought and plant invasion. PI Gornish and Co-PI Leslie Roche have ensured proper selection of plant species suited for each region and proper statistical analysis to compare data acquired from both states over the project period. Producers at both sites were conferred with to choose experimental species based on local management goals. We expect that management goals can be met in both sites when desirable plant species adapted to the precipitation regime in each region are selected.

Objective 3: Develop stakeholder outreach and extension

PI Gornish and co-PIs Roche and Ruyle are developing products that will translate project findings into science-based recommendations for managers throughout the project period. These products include the deployment of one workshop and one field day per year of the project in each state, presentations, and the development of a best practices manual in year 3, which will highlight the identity of plant traits that provide utility for achieving particular management goals.

Timeline:

We are seeking Western SARE funding for the initial start-up phase of the project with immediate deliverables; we intend to leverage this project as a launch pad of a new rangeland restoration program and to seek additional funds to follow the long-term (> 5 years) impacts of reseeded plants to ecosystem services.

May 2019: Project organization meeting – seed mixes discussed, postdoctoral scholar advertisement developed and deployed, key producers to invite to future workshops and field days identified. First advisory group meeting

June – July 2019: Postdoctoral scholar hired; all items for experiment purchased

August – September 2019: Experimental plots deployed

October 2019: Pre-treatment data collected

November 2019: Experimental treatments installed

December 2019 – March 2020: Site maintenance; field day scheduled and organized

April 2020: First field day; second project team meeting

May – October 2020: Data collection. Second advisory committee meeting

November 2020 – January 2021: Data analysis; second field day scheduled and organized

February – March 2021: Presentations of preliminary data deployed; best practices manual draft developed

April 2021: Second field day held; third project team meeting

May – October 2021: Data collection

November 2021 – January 2022: Data analysis completed; final field day scheduled and organized

February – April 2022: Presentations of data deployed; best practices manual draft completed and sent out for review; peer-review articles written

May 2022: Final project team meeting; complete, make available, and publicize best practices manual. Final advisory committee meeting

Cooperators

Click linked name(s) to expand/collapse or show everyone's info
  • Dr. Albert Barberan (Researcher)
  • Andrew Brischke (Educator)
  • Dr. Bradley Butterfield - Technical Advisor
  • Dr. Jeffrey Fehmi (Researcher)
  • Carissa Koopman-Rivers - Producer
  • Dr. Laura Lopez-Hoffman - Technical Advisor
  • Dan Macon - Producer
  • Dr. Mitch McClaran (Researcher)
  • Mary Miller - Producer
  • Dr. Leslie Roche (Educator)
  • Dr. George Ruyle (Educator)

Research

Hypothesis:

Based on our pilot field trials, we expect that seeding perennials will enhance forage production and quality while simultaneously supporting the supply of multiple ecosystem services. In addition, we, expect that seeding of species with functional traits similar to local invasives will be more effective for control, compared to no seeding or reseeding of species with dissimilar functional traits. We also expect that species with high rooting depth and density will have the greatest capacity for soil carbon sequestration and erosion control.

Materials and methods:

In Fall of 2019, we deployed one part of the experiment in both California and Arizona. In collaboration with ranchers, we identified 12 native species in California and 18 native species in Arizona to test. The experimental treatments considered of: (1) application type (naked seed, seedballs, none); (2) tilling (absent and present). All treatments were completely crossed with each species in each state in 1meter squared plots, replicated three times. Germination assessments were conducted in February 2020 and establishment was determined in October 2020 in Arizona and March 2021 in California.

Due to the ongoing drought, almost no plants were found in any of our plots in Arizona. To accommodate for this challenge, we deployed a second study. In this study, we are measuring traits of multiple plants already found on site at each location (10 species in each state) and assessing ecosystem services at the local (plant) level to understand relstionships. This new study was deployed in September 2020 in Arizona and January 2021 in California. Data for this new study was collected at both sites (in Nov 2020 in AZ and in April 2021 in CA).

Research results and discussion:

Data has been entered but not yet analyzed. Very general observational studies suggest that seedballs work better than naked seed in California, but in Arizona, in a drought, neither seedballs nor naked seed are successful. All data for the year has been collected and we are currently analyzing data for outreach and peer review publication materials.

Participation Summary
2 Farmers participating in research

Educational & Outreach Activities

4 Consultations
4 On-farm demonstrations
2 Tours
7 Webinars / talks / presentations
3 Workshop field days

Participation Summary:

78 Farmers
40 Ag professionals participated
Education/outreach description:
  1. We hosted on ranch field tours of the experimental site to local stakeholders just prior to preliminary data collection in February 2020.
  2. Both PIs have also presented the plan for study to local rancher groups in both formal and informal settings (this includes at annual meetings of the Altar Valley Conservation Alliance, the AZ section of SRM annual meeting, and a UT-AZ week workshop).
  3. We have hosted three zoom webinars that focus broadly on range seeding using trait based approaches to achieve particular management goals (e.g. in Jan 2021 the theme was soil health (topics included species to use to enhance soil health on rangelands, methods of rangeland compost and biochar application, and methods for assessing success in soil health restoration - attendance included 35 ranchers and 10 non ranchers) in March 2021 the theme was restoration for forage production (topics included native species to seed for forage, methods of weed control in range seeding, and methods to improve range seeding for forage production - attendance included 30 ranchers and 7 non ranchers).
  4. Two field days in Arizona was hosted (with all COVID safety precautions employed) in August 2020 (4 ranchers attended) and March 2021 (9 ranchers attended).
  5. Presentations of this work have been deployed at the Society for Range Management annual meeting (virtual, Feb 2021) as well as the AZ section of the SRM (August 2020 - 23 non ranchers participated) and multiple county based meetings (Nov 2020 and Jan 2021)
  6. Multiple plans are in place for more webinars, workshops and very soon we will be creating factsheets and peer reviewed manuscripts. We have found that ranchers adapted very well to webinars, although they all noted that they prefer in person workshops. The COVID situation in AZ appears to have abated and most policies across the state have opened up possibilities for in person meetings. Very likely, we will host in person workshops and more field days in AZ in the fall (as requested by ranchers). We need to see how the COVID situation develops in CA before we can decide on in person events.

Learning Outcomes

Key areas taught:
    Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE.