Forest-Cultivated Mushroom Production for Pacific Northwest Diversified Farms and Startups

Progress report for SW22-943

Project Type: Research and Education
Funds awarded in 2022: $174,951.00
Projected End Date: 09/30/2025
Grant Recipients: Washington State University; Oregon State University
Region: Western
State: Washington
Principal Investigator:
Justin O'Dea
Washington State University
Co-Investigators:
Dr. Eric Jones
Oregon State University
Patrick Shults
Washington State University, ANR Extension Unit
Kevin Zobrist
Washington State University
Expand All

Project Information

Summary:

Public research and education programs have been pivotal in adapting traditional Japanese forest-cultivated mushroom (FCM) production systems to the eastern US. Notwithstanding, Pacific Northwest (PNW) researchers are in an incipient stage of generating information to support regional adoption of FCM systems, despite exceptionally high stakeholder demands for Extension programming and a favorable production and market context in the western PNW. These systems are scale-appropriate to diversified farm operations and small-acreage farm startups; equipment, infrastructure, capital, acreage, and input demands are all relatively low for an agricultural enterprise. They are likewise resource-use efficient and do not compete with other crops for existing farmland by producing a food product from PNW forestland. These uncommonly low barriers-to-entry increase potential for grower adoption, and notably also provide important, feasible opportunities for many PNW farms being pushed to diversify and concentrate production as a result of urbanization.

In 2019, WSU Extension began the first University-based research on the commercial viability of FCM systems in the PNW. Results to-date indicate that shiitake mushrooms produced in appropriately-managed PNW FCM systems may yield on-par or greater than those reported from other regions where these systems have become established as feasible enterprise options for diversified farms and startups. This project proposes objectives that 1) further refine PNW FCM systems for commercial production via trials of management innovations and production options, 2) bolster FCM production innovation via network-building with contemporary FCM production information in Japan, and 3) poise the project to precipitate direct impacts on small and diversified farm businesses via. direct mentorship of FCM system establishment, training of peer-mentors, and inciting a grower network in the western PNW.

The proposed project takes a unique approach to facilitating rapid regional adoption diffusion, and to jumpstarting research-based FCM management innovations and region-specific course-corrections through insights gained from FCM system advancements in Japan that have become increasingly obscure to domestic FCM producers over the last 30-40 years. Successful refinement of these systems could incite a cascade of yet-untapped production and market opportunity for farms, local food systems, and attendant mushroom production supply and value-added processor businesses in the PNW.

Project Objectives:

R1) Assess longer-term estimates of shiitake mushroom yield with Pacific Northwest (PNW)-refined management approaches to inform yield expectations and enterprise budgets.
R2) Assess interactions between shiitake strains and PNW-sourced substrates to inform annual expectations from full-season yields.
R3) Assess two shiitake inoculation rates, forced-fruiting patterns, and log moisture management for effects on spawn run and yield to inform labor budgets.
R4) Establish screening trials for assessing 5 strains of oyster mushrooms and 7 other promising species mushrooms for their potential to be grown commercially within PNW forest-cultivated mushroom (FCM) system.
E1) Mentor ten PNW farmers in FCM production for direct project impact and to support their development as peer mentors supporting further PNW FCM business development.
E2) Establish a Mushroom Growers Network as a base supporting future grower adoption and new FCM business opportunities.
E3) Train a team of researchers in contemporary FCM research and production system management to support FCM growth and production viability.
E4) Connect PNW growers with advancements in commercial FCM production in Japan to help incite regional FCM innovation.
E5) Disseminate advancements in the FCM system knowledge base at educational events to incite grower adoption in the PNW.
E6) Produce Extension materials on commercial FCM as a resource supporting future grower adoption.

Timeline:

Project Timeline Gantt Chart: WSARE Mushroom timeline 2.2023

Cooperators

Click linked name(s) to expand/collapse or show everyone's info
  • Sean Alexander (Educator and Researcher)
  • Amber Baker - Producer
  • Liz Crain - Producer
  • Steve Inzalaco - Producer
  • Shinji Kawai - Technical Advisor
  • Laura Kennedy - Producer
  • Ben Larson - Producer
  • Will McClatchey - Producer
  • Stacy Munson - Producer
  • Justin O'Dea (Educator and Researcher)
  • Rowan Steele
  • Jake Stewart - Producer
  • Caroline Swansey - Producer
  • Brian Thompson - Producer
  • Rachel Feston - Producer
  • Stacey Miller - Producer
  • Nick Kleeman - Producer
  • Trish Haggerty - Producer
  • Jeremy & RuthAnne Bennett - Producer
  • Kelly & Patrick Peters/Dorris - Producer
  • Tricia Schimpp - Producer

Research

Materials and methods:

Original proposed research objectives- 

THE FIGURES AND TABLES ATTACHMENTS FROM THE PROPOSAL ARE INTENDED TO PROVIDE KEY ILLUSTRATIONS OF ELEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE RESEARCH PROPOSED OBJECTIVES. 

Research trial locations:
The majority proposed field research trials in Objectives R1-4 will take place at a pre-established FCM trial site in southwest Washington (78th St Heritage Farm, Vancouver, WA). These trials currently consist of four blocks of treatment replications containing a total of ~500 logs inoculated with shiitake in 2019 and 2020. Additionally, a three truncated versions of proposed field research trials will help accomplish address Objectives 1-3. Trials at a satellite site in the south Puget Sound (Myers Point Environmental Field Station, Olympia, WA) currently hosting a replicated trial containing ~200 shiitake logs inoculated in 2019 will contribute to Objective R1 and R2. Two other truncated trials contributing to Objective R2 will take place at a satellite on-farm site in the south Willamette Valley (Woodland Valley Meadows Farm, Eugene, OR), and in northeast WA (WSU Vetter Extension and Research Forest, Deer Park, WA). 

Objective R1:
A subset of 128 logs from the current southwest WA trials will be used as sample units to help estimate of the perennial productivity period of shiitake mushroom logs in the PNW. An additional subset of 94 logs from the current south Puget Sound trials will also be used to help achieve this objective. Up to two years of shiitake yield data will already be collected from the trials by the time proposed project begins; this project would allow for three additional years of yield data collection. Based on estimates from other regions, we anticipate that 5 years of data will suffice to begin to approximate the average age when PNW-sourced logs begin to cease producing in the PNW environment under the different log moisture management treatments we applied in the existing trials (see attached table and figure). This trial includes the treatment that will be used in all new trials established within this project (see Objective R2). All yield data collection protocols will be consistent those which were used for the past two years (15) by recording fresh shiitake weights and mushroom counts from individual logs after each of three forced-fruitings timed at ~8 weeks apart, annually beginning in late spring through early fall.

Objective R2:
New trials established during the project will use identical protocols used to establish the aforementioned trials used for Objective 1 (R1) and will be sited in an adjacent location within each trial treatment block. All trials use individual logs as a sample unit within a spatially-balanced complete block design with split-plots. Blocks were used stratify replications and to expand the scope of inference, but a minimum of 4 sample units per treatment level are included within each treatment block in all shiitake trials to allow for data analysis at finer scales, and allow for inference within the smaller-scale satellite trials. All sites and blocks will be equipped with a weather station for recording ambient wind, temperature, relative humidity and light intensity data as potential covariates affecting mushroom productivity. Logs will be cut from trees harvested during winter dormancy in 2023. The southwest WA trials will include red alder, wild cherry, and garry oak substrates (species with relatively high natural abundance, and previously determined to be viable for shiitake production) and add new comparisons with paper birch, beaked hazelnut, and Oregon ash substrates. Red alder will be used as a standard across all trial sites in the western PNW, with the south Puget Sound trials including Oregon ash as a comparison and the south Willamette Valley trials including garry oak as a regional comparison. Paper birch will be used as a common substrate between the southwest WA trials and northeast WA satellite trials, with the latter will including quaking aspen as a regional comparison. All substrates will be inoculated with commercial shiitake sawdust spawn in spring 2023 using standardized rates, techniques, and timings across all sites (~30d after timber harvest). All western PNW sites will include 6 different strains of shiitake, whereas the northeast WA trials will include only two strains. All shiitake strains tested are commercially available, and were selected for short spawn run times, versatility, and ability to be force-fruited. All inoculated logs will be soaked for 24 hours before being placed within crib stacks under spun polyester fabric covers by early summer of the spawn run year to help assure that log moisture is adequate for spawn run throughout dry summer and fall conditions in 2023. A temperature and relative humidity data logger will be placed under the covers to account for differences from ambient site conditions. All covers will be removed by October 2023, and then reinstalled after the first shiitake harvest in late spring of 2024. All harvest and yield measurement protocols will be consistent with those detailed in Objective 1.

Objective R3:
Inoculation procedures where holes are drilled in logs and filled with mushroom spawn constitute the vast majority of the labor demanded from these systems, and are the largest constraint on scaling-up production because the process is not easily mechanized. Currently recommendations for inoculation rates uses rows 2-3” apart; this 1” of range is equals a difference of ~8-10 hours of labor per 100 logs. The second largest labor (and water resource) demand is soaking logs for forced fruiting. Trials thus far in Southwest WA suggest that the 7-8 week resting period between fruitings may not be sub-optimal for producing a third flush of shiitake in one season that is worthwhile. It is also unknown if this observed trend may partly be attributed to strain-specific characteristics. Trials in Vancouver also indicated that a rapid, vigorous spawn run is important for assuring that the shiitake fungus is resilient to dry spells after the spawn run period, and that logs begin producing returns for growers as soon as possible to avoid wasted time on forced-fruiting efforts that do not yield mushrooms. Trials in southwest WA will also include 3 subset trials that use two substrates and two strains from the main strain x substrate evaluation trials as a control, and compare those two three identical strain/substrate subsets of logs with 3 differing treatments: 1) a set inoculated with shiitake at a lower rate, 2) a set where wide range strains are force-fruited once in late spring and early fall only, and warm weather strains are force-fruited once in early summer and late summer only, and 3) a set where logs are soaked twice during the first spawn-run year. All harvest and yield measurement protocols otherwise will be consistent with those detailed in Objective beginning in late spring of 2024.

Objective R4:
The novel mushroom species screening trial at the southwest WA will use the same experimental design and procedures as the shiitake trials, but the number of sample units will truncated to only include a single log per combination of mushroom species/strain/substrate within each treatment block. Mushroom yield across all substrates will be analyzed for indices of general potential to produce in the PNW within systems otherwise set up for commercial shiitake production using forced-fruiting practices. These include: response to forced-fruiting, seasonal yield timing, total yield and yield uniformity, time needed for spawn run, and incidence of non-producing logs. Other observations concerning commercial viability such as relative shelf-life, and harvest efficiency will be noted and recorded to inform future trials. Yield measurements from trials established in 2023 will begin take place beginning at the same time as for R2 and R3.

Research course-correction protocol:
If information garnered from the visiting scholar trip to Japan indicates that a component of a Research Objective 3 or 4 has either 1) already been determined to be a clear dead-end, or 2) if there are key aspects of shiitake production discovered that would be more highly applicable to the PNW context than the original plan, plans will be proposed course-correct accordingly if within the means of existing personnel and funding capacities. In formulating a course-correction, the vacancy from omissions to the original trial plan will be proposed to be re-allocated in accordance with the relative magnitude of the vacancy (trial labor, spaces, and funds). If potential improvements are either beyond the current means, or insights from Japan do not inspire a clear, feasible alternative to the original plans, three tangible default plans are pre-proposed: 1) increasing the number of sample units for species/strains with the greatest potential for commercial production within the novel species screening trial, 2) a shift to focus on simple, low-investment system adaptations that may allow these species to produce and allow for mushroom quality control within the existing shiitake system (hypothetical example: a simple misting system that induces fruiting), or 3) a shift towards expanding the shiitake trials to include another subset trial with a third variation on forced-fruiting patterns, inclusion of two more substrates (paper birch and wild cherry) within the existing subset trials, and/or addition of two additional shiitake strains for evaluation. Any proposed research course-corrections will be vetted through the project team and collaborating producers, and proposed to WSARE for approval. The same protocol will be applied if collaborating producers likewise elucidate a potential course correction that has greater relevance for the PNW context than the original research plan. 

Data analysis:
In the shiitake strain x substrate evaluation trials, strain will be established as a main-plot treatment, substrate species as a split-plot treatment. Comparisons between treatments will be primarily analyzed as a randomized complete block design with split-plots. A mixed-model analysis will be used with treatments to be considered fixed effects (with split-plot treatments accounted for as nested effects within main-plot treatments), and replications be considered random effects. The same approach will be used to compare overall shiitake yield (regardless of treatment) between different locations and/or treatment blocks to determine the magnitude of potential effects of environmental conditions. The regional satellite trials will be analyzed for 1) within-site inferences regarding strain and strain x substrate interactions and 2) for shiitake strain yield responses to red alder substrates across both the south Puget Sound and south Willamette Valley sites.

Research results and discussion:
Photos of shiitake mushrooms growing on logs from trials initially established in 2019 and 2020.
Figure. We continued to collect data on long-term shiitake yield parameters (R1) from trials that were established before the current WSARE project began. These earlier trials include logs from multiple PNW-sourced species of broadleaf trees harvested in 2019, 2020 and 2022, and up to three different shiitake strains.

R1, R2, and R3) Under R1, we continued to collect data on the long-term yields of shiitake from the pre-established trials beginning in 2019 and 2020 in Vancouver and the south Puget Sound locations. The proposed trials for R2 and R3 research objectives in Southwest WA, South Puget Sound, WA and Lower Willamette Valley, OR were all successfully implemented by May, 2023 and the first year of yield data was collected. Additionally, a smaller trial of ~60 logs added in spring of 2022 to the Vancouver site was be incorporated under objective R1 (examining long-term shiitake yields of logs in the PNW); this was a truncated trial initiated after WSARE funding for this project was was initially not chosen for funding. This trial consequently ended up adding an unanticipated research workload to objective R1 after the project was later chosen for funding. This truncated trial is partly focused on the performance of logs with smaller-than-average diameters (~2.5-4.5”) and  incorporates 5 log species (red alder, common hazelnut, western beaked hazelnut, Oregon ash, and gray birch) and three shiitake strains (‘Night velvet’, ‘West wind’, and ‘Son’) as split-plot sub-treatments. We also opted to add some minor sub-trials to R2 and R3, including the addition of a truncated subset of vine maple and cascara timber substrates to to R2 in Southwest WA, a truncated subset of Oregon ash and bigleaf maple to the south Willamette Valley satellite trial, and a truncated low inoculation rate subset to R3 in the south Puget Sound satellite trial.

A photo of paper birch logs harvested for shiitake trials, and a photo of logs recently inoculated with shiitake and placed within a trial site in the forest.
Figure. We established new trials in 2023 for R2 and R3; a total of ~500 logs were inoculated between the three trial locations included in these research objectives. The photo shows a subset of logs freshly harvested in February 2023 (left), and a subset of shiitake-inoculated logs placed into one of the forested trial sites in June 2023 (right).

The largest deviation from the research objectives was the loss of the satellite trial proposed for in northeastern Washington (under R2 and R3), due to WSU collaborator Sean Alexander leaving the project following a career change. Alexander's departure within the project timeline did not allow for sufficient time to find a replacement collaborator that would have been capable of implementing and carrying out the satellite trial in northeastern WA.

By fall of 2023, we were able to complete a multiyear dataset via R1 and R2 to summarize the effects of wood species, wood density, and bolt diameter (girth) on shiitake bolt moisture content. These assessments illustrated that wood density plays a role in retaining moisture, but that other aspects of the wood species also influence whether moisture content levels are remain satisfactory for shiitake fungal growth. These other factors are most notably the initial moisture content level of the wood, and another non-quantifiable aspect, bark integrity. Results of this analysis helped substantiate that the most common species which have been advisable for shiitake production to date (based on early yield data), garry oak and red alder, remained advisable from a wood moisture content standpoint. Most bolts of these species retained moisture levels above critical levels for shiitake growth (24%) after exposure to summer weather. Garry oak appears to retain moisture sufficiently due to its high wood density and thick bark, whereas red alder benefits from a high initial moisture content. The latter species loses moisture rather readily due to low wood density and rather porous bark, but this is offset by the sheer amount of moisture that is initially present in the wood at the time of inoculation. The analysis also indicated that bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), vine maple (Acer circinatum),  western beaked hazelnut (Corylus cornuta varcalifornica), and Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia) were relatively risky for shiitake production due to high incidence of moisture contents falling below critical levels for shiitake growth. Conversely, birches (Betula papyrifera and populifolia), common hazel (Corylus avellana), and sweet cherry (Prunus avium) were relatively low risk due to ample moisture retention. The latter species are likely aided by notably favorable bark integrity. 

Two graphs showing moisture content differences of shiitake bolts by species in spring and then again later in fall.
Figure. Two graphs showing the wood moisture content of different PNW-sourced species both in the spring, before inoculation (left), and then later in fall of the same year after inoculation and exposure to a full season of summer weather (right). Bars show the mean moisture content (%), whereas the overlaid boxplots show the median, range, and patterns of spread in the datasets (quartile and interquartile ranges); species with fewer than four data points are preliminary/observational. The red-yellow-green-blue color overlay illustrates the general effect of a given moisture content level on shiitake growth within the wood of a shiitake bolt.
Two draphs illustrating the relationship between wood density and moisture content wit data points colored overlaid to indicate the variability attributed to the species of wood.
Figure. Two graphs illustrating the relationship between wood density and shiitake bolt moisture content initially in spring before inoculation (left), and then the relative proportion of moisture content remaining (% of the full initial moisture content level) later in fall of the same year of inoculation, after exposure to summer weather (right). The data point colors illustrate variability in the dataset that can otherwise be attributed to other effects of wood species on bolt moisture content and consequent retention after exposure to summer weather.

Overall, the diameter of the bolt also influences moisture retention, although only below a critical girth of 4", especially for certain wood species that are likely to be more vulnerable to excessive moisture loss anyway (aforementioned). In PNW-sourced species, bolts under 4" were more generally prone to falling to below critical levels of moisture content needed for shiitake fungal growth. For all red alder and garry oak bolts ≥ 4" from which moisture content measurements were taken from 2020-2023 (79 bolts total), we were also able to ascertain that when our advised bolt moisture management protocols were implemented (a 24 hour soaking of bolts in early summer of the spawn run year, followed by covering throughout summer) only 2.5% of bolts (2 bolts total) dropped below the critical moisture content level of 24%. This protocol was originally informed by comparisons within the 2020 bolt dataset where 20.6% of red alder and garry oak bolts (6 of 29) that went through summer weather without soaking and covering during the spawn run year fell below the critical moisture content level of 24%, compared to 0% of bolts that were soaked and covered. 

Two graphs showing the relationship between shiitake bolt diameter and bolt moisture retention.
Figure. Two graphs showing the relationship between shiitake bolt diameter and bolt moisture retention. The relationship is shown here as the proportion of moisture content (MC) remaining in a bolt relative to its initial level before inoculation in spring (right), and the actual moisture content (%) remaining in a bolt after exposure to a full season of summer weather (left). The color of the data points illustrate patterns and variability associated with a given species of shiitake bolt wood on moisture retention. The red dotted line helps illustrate which bolts retained a critical MC level for shiitake growth (≥ 24%) through the summer season (below the line), vs. those that did not (above the line).

In addition to the first year of yield data being collected on the newest trials initiated in 2023, the 2024 growing season marked the final year of data collection on the 2019 trials, were had their 5th year of shiitake production. While some of these bolts were still producing shiitake, many bolts were ceasing to produce and/or starting to disintegrate from decay, and yield declines were overt enough in production year 4 and/or 5 to justify their retirement as economically viable bolts. Data was collected on our our 2020 initiated trials which had their 4th year of production in 2024, and on or 2022-initiated trials which had their second year of production in 2024. Because yield data is still being analyzed and some datasets remain incomplete, results will be included in the final report. Preliminary screenings of the 2019 datasets though indicated that red alder was a favorable species, and when appropriately managed, produced 0.37 lbs per bolt harvest, on average, if kept in production for four years adding up to a cumulative total yield of 4.44 lbs. of shiitake mushrooms worth ~$53-88 in retail value depending on market price. From the 2023 trials, the wide range strains 'WR46', 'Beltane' and 'Double Jewel' had comparable spawn run rates and also produced comparably to the wide range control strain 'West Wind' in the first year of production. The wide range strain '#1 Son' conversely produced variably and unreliably, although '#1 Son' mushrooms produced were often high quality compared to the other wide range strains trialed. The warm weather strain 'Bulochka' appeared to have a slower spawn run than its respective warm weather control strain 'Night Velvet', with many 'Bulochka' bolts not producing any yield in 2024, compared to 'Night Velvet'. Regarding substrate species, common hazel (Corylus avellana) is emerging as a favorable species facilitating a fast spawn run and strong early yields. Conversely Oregon ash appears to be emerging as of the most unfavorable species, having not produced a single shiitake mushroom in either the 2022 or 2023-initiated trials to date. 

R4) A decision was made to table the proposed R4 screening trial in Southwest WA (assessing 5 strains of oyster mushrooms and 7 other mushroom species for their potential to be grown commercially within PNW forest-cultivated mushroom system). This was partly due to aforementioned research capacity constraints, and partly due to knowing this objective would be substantially better-informed by information gained from the visiting scholar tour of Japan (objective E4). Throughout our tour of Japan, shiitake constituted the vast majority of mushrooms grown on logs. Only one other minor species was mentioned as being commonly produced on logs- nameko mushrooms (Pholiota microspora), which are produced on cherry logs (Prunus avium). Hiratake mushrooms (AKA oyster, Pleurotus species) were also mentioned but it was unclear what species of log it was grown on, and it did not appear to be a common practice. Since cherry (Prunus avium) is a common broadleaf tree species in the PNW, nameko will be considered for R4 when research capacity constraints allow. A second research question that was informed by our tour of Japan was the use of hoophouse type structures for enhancing aspects of shiitake production. A subset trial using fall-cut, early-inoculated shiitake logs and a high tunnel to accelerate shiitake spawn run is of interest once research capacity constraints allow. In Japan, shaded hoophouses are also commonly used for fruiting shiitake bolts, and although we currently lack infrastructure for trialing this practice, it is of interest for future trials. This approach may be particularly useful for producing mushrooms that do not respond to forced fruiting via soaking bolts in water (cold weather shiitake strains, oyster, nameko, and lion's mane) but otherwise fruit naturally during the rainy parts of the year in the PNW (late fall, early spring). Shaded indoor structures like this could help prevent mushroom quality compromise and difficulty of harvest that occurs when fruiting and harvesting occurs during rainy weather. 

In 2024 project connections built in Japan and with US-based spawn supplier Field & Forest Products presented an opportunity to trial a new Japanese warm weather strain from Fujishukin spawn company. A small subset trial including this new strain will be implemented in 2025. 

Participation Summary

Research Outcomes

Recommendations for sustainable agricultural production and future research:

Research results to date have indicated that shiitake bolts from PNW-sourced tree species should not be smaller than 4" for adequate moisture retention through the initial spawn run year after inoculation; this general guideline is especially important for red alder (or any other species that more readily loses moisture). To reduce risk of excessive moisture losses from bolts, growers should fundamentally consider sourcing bolts from tree species that have favorable attributes for adequate moisture retention. Species chosen should have either bark qualities or wood densities that are conducive to moisture retention (garry oak, birches, sweet cherry), and/or exceptionally initial high moisture content (red alder, common hazel, and tentatively, Scouler's willow) to mitigate this risk. Species to avoid are those that generally have poor bark integrity and/or have wood that is notably prone to end-splitting as it dries (bigleaf maple, vine maple, cascara, western beaked hazelnut), or an exceptionally low initial moisture content (Oregon ash). In addition to wood species and bolt size, the current advisable method developed for mitigating excessive bolt moisture loss throughout PNW summers is soaking bolts for 24 hours in early summer of the spawn run year (~mid-June to Early July) followed by covering with a breathable fabric throughout the remainder of the dry summer season. From 2020-2023, this method was substantiated by effectively helping to assure that 98.6% of bolts (142 of 144) retained adequate moisture levels for spawn run (≥ 24% MC) in properly sized bolts (≥ 4") from tree PNW-sourced species that have otherwise proven to be favorable for shiitake production (red alder, garry oak, common hazel, birches, and sweet cherry).

3 New working collaborations

Education and Outreach

47 Consultations
14 Curricula, factsheets or educational tools
13 On-farm demonstrations
4 Webinars / talks / presentations
13 Workshop field days
2,250 Other educational activities: Website visits, video views, podcast listens

Participation Summary:

564 Farmers participated
369 Ag professionals participated
Education and outreach methods and analyses:

Objective E1)
A minimum of four growers in the Portland-metro area, two growers in the south Puget Sound region of WA, two growers in northwest WA, and two growers in the south Willamette Valley region of OR will participate in the project as new FCM producers. Mentorship will be focused on shiitake production and systems, with each grower agreeing to focus on shiitake as the most reliable FCM species for commercial production. Collaborating growers will get introduced to FCM systems and current research through a tour and training at the Vancouver trial site in June 2023 and 2024. Producers will otherwise have full sovereignty to add other mushrooms to their operation/enterprise, choose their scale, and markets. Direct mentorship will begin in Fall of 2023 and continue throughout; the project team will use on-site visits, research-based information, experiential knowledge, and general commercial mushroom production system knowledge to work with each collaborating producer in formulating business and production plans, including labor budgeting, equipment, substrate selection, timber sourcing and harvest, log cutting, shiitake strain choice, inoculation methods and logistics, production site selection, and infrastructure logistics, market options, and post-harvest considerations. 

Objective E2)
An incipient PNW FCM grower network will be incited by the with the project team with collaborating producers constituting the initial network. A network website will be developed throughout the project to feature listings for FCM-related events, meetings, production, marketing and value-added processing resources, a grower forum, and an interactive map for helping to connect growers, buyers, and suppliers.

Objective E3)
Training of a new regional team of university-based educators/researchers will be accomplished through 1) team meetings and critical review of educational materials developed by the PI throughout 2022, 2) getting all members up to speed with current PNW FCM research via the two aforementioned tours and hands-on trainings in Vancouver, 3) experiential knowledge gain through research and interaction with collaborating producers and 4) information and network connections gained via the visiting scholar tour of Japanese FCM production systems (E4).

Objective E4)
Researchers and PNW growers will be connected to contemporary advancements in FCM production systems through network-building with key researchers and key centers of FCM production in Japan. A 10-day visiting scholar tour of select locations and meetings with key researchers in Japan in Year 1 is a key component to E4's success with assistance from a Japanese translator and tour guide familiar with shiitake production (Shinji Kawai, see stakeholder letters). The tour will be documented and targeted for use in educational Extension products and presentations (Objective E6).Information will be shared directly with collaborating growers, and to other FCM stakeholders through live educational events and with researchers via presentations ata regional and a national agroforestry conference (Objective E5).

Objective E5)
Advancements in FCM system knowledge will be disseminated to community stakeholders through 1) two hands-on, public workshops in each region in years 2 and 3 including participating producers as co-speakers, 2) a webinar in fall of each project year, and 3). One workshop in fall of 2023 will focus on on shiitake harvest, and a second in spring 2024 will be focused inoculation procedures. Workshops will be located at each trial site. Two additional workshops at Headwaters Farm Incubator in Gresham, OR (see Steele stakeholder letter of support), and two different farm incubators in northwest WA (Viva Farms and Black Farmers Collective) will target disseminating project knowledge to underserved farmer communities in Year 3. 

Objective E6)
Written educational material development will be initially drafted by the project PI, critically reviewed by the project team in year 1 and 2, and vetted by the collaborating producers throughout Objective 5’s mentoring process. Video footage will be taken throughout the project and edited by the PI and program support staff into instructional-videos for upload to YouTube, the Network website, and an online shiitake production course launched in winter of 2024-2025. 

All educational objectives will be assessed through post-program surveys, website use data, network growth, collaborating producer feedback and successful shiitake business development.

Education and outreach results:

E1) At least 17 PNW growers initiated shiitake production systems on their farms since this project began; 16 of these growers are or have been directly involved in the project as of April 2025: 

2023:

  • 12 growers initiated a shiitake production system, 11 involved directly in the project
  • 5 farms opted to attend a full-day training in Vancouver, WA in January 2023
  • 1 farm attended a partial day training in June 2023
  • 2 farms delayed implementation

2024:

  • 2 growers initiated a shiitake production system, both directly involved in the project
  • 1 grower from 2023 opted out of the project, 1 farm opted to delay initiation again
  • 3 growers from 2023 ultimately did not follow through on communication with the Extension mentor team (TBD)
  • 3 growers attended full-day trainings in Vancouver, WA (4 individuals)

2025:

  • 3 growers initiated a shiitake production system, all directly involved in the project
  • 4 farms attended full day trainings in Vancouver in March 2025 (6 individuals)
  • 1 farm from 2023 is choosing to restart in a different location in 2026
  • 6 other farms expressed that they were taking steps towards initiating a shiitake production systems in 2025, but have not followed through on communication reporting whether they followed through on initiation. 

At least 13 other PNW farms to-date have reached out to the mentor team with serious interest in starting a shiitake production system, but have not yet reported whether they also followed through on initiation.

To date, the project mentors together have made at least 30 individual visits to participating and prospective farms for consulting and mentorship on shiitake FCM systems, and periodically check-in with participating growers via email, text, or phone in the meantime.

Photos of people participating in hands-on workshops.

Figure. Twelve of 17 collaborating farms have received hands-on training in Vancouver (left) to help prepare them for establishing their shiitake production systems. A total of 564 other individuals interested in producing shiitake for market have attended our workshops or other shiitake program offerings as part of this project.

Producer interviews were conducted throughout winter-spring of 2024 and 2025. In general growers chose to begin with 25-100 logs as a starting size for their production system, with most opting for a target of around 50 logs. Growers largely chose to keep their systems limited to shiitake and strains that had be previously tested by WSU Extension. One farm chose to experiment with oyster mushrooms, and another is trying a cold weather shiitake strain in a high tunnel. Most chose advisable substrate (tree/wood) species per WSU research, with most choosing red alder. At least one farm chose to add common hazel (advisable), garry oak (advisable), and wild sweet cherry (moderately advisable) and another choosing to add some bigleaf maple (largely unadvisable) and Oregon ash (unadvisable). They also largely chose to adhere to the production practices developed by Extension. A few growers chose to improvise alternatives from some of the advised standard production equipment, mostly to avert financial burdens. To date, the most common aversion to the WSU-advised production components as reported by growers has been the purchase of tanks used to soak the logs, as this is the largest single financial investment into a forest-cultivated shiitake production system. Another notable report from some growers was difficulty with timber quality control when others sourced logs for them. These growers reported delivery of logs that were either oversized, had bark damage, were the wrong species, or were dead. This was similar to some past experiences that some of the Extension team experienced as well. A tendency to over-size logs was reported by other growers that had cut their own timber as well. There was also some “reality check” moments reported by some growers regarding whether they would be able to meet their start-up production size goals with respect to labor burden, learning curve, balanced with real-time life circumstances, including physical health and fitness. Several growers accordingly lowered their target size from their initial goals.

Most growers so far considered their first year as successful; two growers considered their first year as compromised in some way. One of these growers felt overcommitted to winter projects which compromised their time and energy, while the other experienced several challenges including having to move their production site due to a land rental agreement change, trouble sourcing timber, being short of capital for equipment, and had animal damage to their shiitake bolts. Growers that generally felt successful in year one largely were farms that didn't have significant overwinter farm projects or extended-season production that conflicted with the labor demand timing for setting up a forest-cultivated shiitake production system. Several of these growers stressed that getting the shiitake work done earlier was favorable to keeping it from conflicting with other farm work in spring. Many growers also recruited family members or community volunteers to help out with the inoculation process (or wished they did), which inadvertently became an educational experience for those helping out; a few growers mentioned wanting hold workshops in the future as part of their business model. There was general anxiety expressed by many of the growers about the spawn run year and the delayed reward of having to wait for the first year of shiitake production. Growers also largely expressed that their shiitake production system was not only focused on the sheer profit margin of the mushrooms, but also that there was other value including increasing the diversity of crops they could offer to their markets (perceived extra market draw for a unique product), and being able to utilize their woodlands to increase overall farm income and business satisfaction. 

For year two, growers that followed through with Extension-advised protocols well in both year one and two considered year two to be successful with their first season of shiitake production and sales. The few farms that reported not following through on some protocols and/or had circumstantial disruptions to their process considered their second year to be unsuccessful. One of these farms from ultimately opted to indefinitely discontinue shiitake production, while two other farms decided to “reboot” for 2026 with a fresh set of logs and new production location. One farm that considered year two to be successful reported needing to pause their production in 2026 though due to a unrelated back injury. 

Most growers were risk-averse in regard to adding more shiitake bolts until they saw results from their first set of bolts; several of these growers later reported in year two that they wished they’d added more bolts to the system in year 2 in retrospect. These farms all added new bolts to their systems in 2025. Growers that were shiitake startups (i.e. didn’t already have a diversified farm business) reported gaining perspective on the economy-of-scale needed if they were to continue as a business focused mainly (or completely) on shiitake. One of these shiitake-only growers found direct-marketing their shiitake to be burdensome for them, but they were also unsure of the viability of being a wholesale shiitake grower without something like a cooperative. Conversely, growers that were adding shiitake to their pre-existing diversified farm largely reported that it integrated smoothly into their whole farm system, including marketing and overall business satisfaction, and reported that market demand appeared to be plentiful. Most of these farms reported trying value added processing with dried shiitake, and kept any extra mushrooms for personal consumption. Farms widely reported enjoying the nature of the work in year two also with regard to the system overall, being able to produce income from forests, ease of integration in their whole farm system, and working in the forest. Some who had family involved reported that their family members enjoyed it as well, with some reporting that their children took an active interest in growing shiitake as a result.

E2) The concept of a PNW forest-cultivated mushroom grower’s network was introduced to the participating producers via the January training in Vancouver and otherwise through email communication. This includes development of a network website (www.pnwforestmushroomgrowers.net; also part of E6), and a shared google drive folder for sharing resources as they are developed. A Network YouTube channel was also developed in 2024 (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCp9itTwNDltlNvcFghlmTKQ/) for hosting how-to videos and facilitating additional Network outreach. A contact list was also shared with each of the growers to encourage peer-to-peer community support.

Network activity has been variable, with some growers actively taking the opportunity, and others not. There was a degree of resource-sharing amongst some producers to reduce financial burden and support one another. This was mostly via bulk-purchasing of supplies, equipment sharing, and information sharing. A few growers suggested that a Network “equipment library” of sorts would be a useful way for them to try out a given piece of equipment for a given season, and decide if they want to invest further. Growers generally found it difficult to coordinate and remain connected with other growers, though some still maintained that there may still be benefits. The Network website has facilitated several inquiries into shiitake production connection with local shiitake mentors, and has also allowed for emails to be collected from individuals wishing to be kept informed of shiitake educational events and other Network activity.

 E3) All Extension team members and Key Collaborator Kawai attended a full-day orientation and training in Vancouver on January 2022. The day included orientation to the past and current WSU Extension FCM research, and to Extension’s PNW-oriented production practices developed to date. PI O’Dea also participated in site visits with growers in Co-PI Jones and Co-PI Shults respective regions in spring of 2023. This co-mentoring process was used to calibrate a common Extension approach to mentoring growers utilizing the set of draft production guidance materials on forest-cultivated shiitake production systems. This also provided the Extension team with an opportunity to review the production materials in a real-time context. The materials were also used to outline a set of uniform practices for Co-PIs Jones and Shults to use in establishment of their respective regional trials, giving them a first-hand user opportunity to review the draft guidance materials.

In 2023 PI-Shults also presented on the project at the River Restoration Northwest Conference in Skamania, WA (~350 attendees) to a mixed array of stakeholders including a significant number of forestry researchers, educators, and other technical service providers. In 2023 Co-PI Shults also facilitated new connections regarding strain development (via connections made in Japan, see E4) with Field and Forest Products, the largest North American producer and retailer of spawn and equipment for forest-cultivated shiitake production. In 2025 this led to an opportunity to trial a new shiitake strain that originated in Japan. Similarly, in 2023 Co-PI Jones facilitated new connections and potential collaborations with the only other US producer retailing multiple strains of spawn for forest-cultivated shiitake production, Northwest Mycological Consultants. In 2025 Co-PI Jones also built connections with two other Oregon-based Extension agents and with Hopkins Demonstration Forest (HDF) in Oregon City, OR. This resulted in Co-PI Jones conducting a training on shiitake production with 10 Extension and HDF staff participants in 2025, in order to help facilitate further dissemination of shiitake production information and potentiate HDF as a future research and demonstration site for Oregon.

E4) A 10-day visiting scholar tour of select shiitake production, processing, and research sites in Japan was organized through critical efforts made by key collaborator Kawai throughout the first half of 2023. The tour occurred between July 27th- August 6th, 2023 and occurred in several locations in Oita, Miyazaki, Kumamoto (on the southerly island of Kyushu), and Hokkaido (on the northerly island of Hokkaido) prefectures in Japan. In addition to Key Collaborator Kawai, PI O'Dea and Co-PIs Shults and Jones participated in the tour. Co-PI Zobrist was unable to attend the tour due to unanticipated time constraints. The team documented the tour through video and photography for future dissemination throughout the remainder of the project and thereafter. The tour consisted of meetings with researchers at three different government-run research stations (Oita, Miyazaki, and Hokkaido), meetings with three different industry groups (Kumamoto, Miyazaki, Tokyo), and seven farm visits with shiitake growers (2 in Oita, 3 in Miyazaki, 1 in Kumamoto, and 1 in Hokkaido). The tour of Japan provided the researcher/mentor team with novel insights (some mentioned in R5) on shiitake production and forest-cultivated mushrooms in general. It also importantly provided affirm that our research and methods developed for the PNW were generally on-point and appropriately innovative.

Although Japan is the pre-eminent country producing shiitake on logs at commodity-scale levels, the vast majority of shiitake mushrooms (and other mushroom species) are nonetheless produced in indoor climate-controlled facilities on sawdust substrates. Partly due to this shift in production method and a declining population of individuals going into farming, log-grown shiitake is generally declining. The remaining log-grown shiitake industry is dominated by long-term/lifelong growers, and/or growers that simply prefer the process of producing shiitake this way. There are initiatives from both industry and Japanese government (often local) to bolster log-grown shiitake production culturally, and by touting the distinct qualities and heritage of log-grown shiitake vs. those grown indoors on sawdust. Drying and processing equipment and facilities are also often bolstered by government programs or may be cooperatively owned. Wood used for log-grown shiitake is almost exclusively on two species of oak (Quercus acutissima and serrata), and it is not uncommon for trees to be planted with shiitake production as the intended end-use, and for timber to be provided by a third party service rather than by the shiitake grower.

Japan has also developed "hybrid" systems for producing shiitake on logs, which makes use of open or indoor shaded hoophouse type structures instead of outdoor spaces under forest canopy. The majority of shiitake produced outdoors on logs under forest canopy (i.e. forest-cultivated) is being grown for dried shiitake markets. Forest-cultivated shiitake for dried shiitake markets is somewhat of a lower-input system that generally makes use of lower inoculation rates and plug spawn (which facilitates a slower spawn run rate), and colder weather strains (which fruit more spontaneously, in accordance with seasonal shifts in temperature). Fruiting in these systems may be sometimes assisted by overhead irrigation and/or physically striking the bolts instead of soaking bolts (forced-fruiting). Colder weather strains are used in outdoor shiitake production because the natural shiitake growing season is more oriented towards late fall and early spring, which tends to be the drier part of the year in Japan. This production season timing is notably different than the PNW, where the shiitake production season needs to be oriented towards late spring/early summer through late summer/early fall due to the PNW having the opposite precipitation pattern.

Alternatively, log-grown shiitake for fresh markets in Japan though tends to have more in common with PNW shiitake production. Japanese fresh market shiitake growers tend to use of sawdust spawn, wide range and warm weather strains, and higher inoculation rates- practices that are similar to the PNW. Sometimes midsummer weather in Japan is more prohibitively hot (partially due to nights remaining warm) for producing shiitake though compared to the PNW. Fresh market log-grown shiitake production in Japan also often uses shaded hoophouse structures for 1) quality control and 2) season extension; use of these structures is often bolstered by government purchase assistance programs. This approach is somewhat similar to the PNW; while shaded hoophouses are not a standard practice in PNW log-grown shiitake production, the "fruiting tent" approach that we've developed for outdoor production in the PNW (where sets of ~25 bolts are completely wrapped in breathable fabric during fruiting) serves a similar purpose regarding quality control, but is a far lower-input/financial investment than a hoophouse-type setup. Innovative fresh-market shiitake growers in Japan also may make use of hoophouses as an environmental control accelerating spawn run; these growers and may often also rely more heavily on direct marketing in urban centers to overcome low prices that they would otherwise receive from wholesale commodity markets. The latter context is also similar to what would be encountered in the PNW by new and beginning forest-cultivated shiitake growers.

Our tour also exposed the team different production approaches and specialized equipment that is currently not accessible to US growers. In addition, it also allowed us to develop an important connection with one of the major innovative spawn companies in Japan, Fujishukin (Fuji Spawn). PI-Shults and Key Collaborator Kawai were able to meet with a company representative just before returning to the US, during which they learned that Fujishukin also had pre-established connections with Field and Forest Products in the US. In January of 2024, PI-Shults convened a meeting between the research team, Fujishukin, and Field and Forest Products in order to discuss shiitake resources that may be useful to PNW growers and possibilities for accessing strains with potential to perform well for PNW growers. In 2025 this connection let to an opportunity to trial a Fuji strain via Field and Forest Products.An collage of images taken throughout the shiitake visiting scholar tour of Japan.Figure. Images taken throughout the visiting scholar tour of Japan. Japan is the only country where shiitake is still produced on logs on a large scale, either traditionally under forest canopy (A), under open shaded structures (B) or inside shaded structures such as hoophouses/high tunnels (C,E). The project research team gathered information on specialized production equipment that is not available in the US (D), and novel, innovative production approaches used by Japanese growers (E), such as the pictured grower's space-efficient indoor fruiting racks and burning of spent shiitake bolts as a heating source to help produce shiitake into the winter months. The team also built connections and exchanged information with Japanese researchers in public institutions (F,G) and private industry (H) in order to better inform shiitake production developments in the PNW.

E5) Adaptations to the original E5 objectives were driven by logistical and circumstantial constraints related to where and when it was most feasible to hold educational events, or when alternative opportunities arose. Hands-on workshops in particular needed to be well-timed and occur at a venue that that had adequate shelter, electric service, parking, and could accommodate logs, the noise of holes being drilled, and wood chips and wax drippings getting on the floor. The venue also otherwise needed to have space for giving a presentation or have an educational backdrop that could help facilitate learning about other aspects of shiitake production. Because the Vancouver site (The 78th St Heritage Farm) had all of these aspects, it was used as the primary venue for working towards educational objectives. Spaces available to each regional Co-PI were more restricted with the exception of Co-PI Shults’ location (Meyer’s Point Environmental Field Station). Hands-on workshops held in spring were found to be the most feasible timing because it is when farmers were less busy, and allowed participants to try inoculating logs with shiitake. Summer workshops focused on shiitake harvest were phased out due to difficulty in synchronizing dates where shiitake mushrooms were optimal for viewing and demonstrating harvest, plus general poor grower turnout at that timing.

Eight hands-on trainings for participating growers have been held to date in Vancouver (2x in 2023, 4x in 2024, 2x in 2025). A total of 125 participants have taken advantage of six hands-on public workshop offerings in Vancouver (1x in 2022, 1x in 2023, 2x in 2024, and 1x in 2025) or at nearby Headwaters Farm Incubator (1x 2024, in Gresham, OR) to date. Another 42 participants attended a field day in Vancouver in 2023 that included a shiitake demonstration. In the South Puget Sound region, 97 participants have taken advantage of four public hands-on workshops (1x in 2023, 1x in 2024, and 2x in 2025) to date. Ten other participants took advantage of a hands-on public workshop in northwest WA in 2024, and 30 participants attended a field day demonstration in 2024 as well in northwestern WA. Currently, three more hands-on public workshops are scheduled for late April 2025 (2x more in Vancouver, 1x more in northwest WA).

In 2023, A conference session on shiitake production was given at the OSU Small Farms School to 29 attendees. In 2025, a webinar was given to 147 participants, and a presentation/demonstration was also given to 40 participants in at the 2025 Western WA Forest Owners Winter School.

The vast majority of participants that attended our public shiitake events were interested in learning how to grow shiitake for market, although many indicated that they wanted to try growing shiitake for personal use first. Post-event evaluations thus far have indicated significant knowledge gains, and intent to put knowledge gains to use. This includes intent to pursue shiitake enterprise development, but also includes indications that workshops have informed some attendees decisions not to start an enterprise- an important, but under-appreciated outcome that saves would-be new growers the considerable expense of a potential business failure or dissatisfaction.

For general project outreach and indirect education, a CO-PI Jones hosted a shiitake mushroom tabling event at the Maple Conference in Portland, OR in 2023 reaching approximately 350 people, and at a forestry field day in 2024 to another 75 individuals. To date, the www.pnwforestmushroomgrowers.net website has accumulated 1649 visits (1242 unique, and 407 repeat visitors) with 2299 total page views. Two shiitake podcast episodes were also produced in 2024, with at least 478 listens to date. Two how-to videos were produced in late 2024 as well that have received 78 views to date. The project also received press coverage in 2023 through articles by WSU Insider and the Capital Press about the project and the visiting scholar tour of Japan:

The team has also been invited to contribute an article about the project to Northwest Woodlands magazine’s fall 2025 issue.

E6) Multiple educational materials on forest-cultivated shiitake production have been drafted since 2023. These include 1) a 20-page illustrated production guide, 2) a shiitake production enterprise budget worksheet/calculator, 3) a table of PNW-sourced log substrates for shiitake production, 4) a visual two-year production timeline, 5) a quick-reference “to-do” production startup checklist, 6) an inoculation rate table and row-spacing pattern guide, and 7) three draft how-to videos. Most of these materials are not in a final, publicly-accessible form yet, but have been provided to all collaborating growers and participants from each shiitake program. The information contained in them is also incrementally being reformatted and made public through the Network website (discussed below). Two other how-to videos were produced in 2025 and made public in a finalized form on a new Network YouTube channel established for hosting videos and facilitating further outreach. A guide intended for non-commercial shiitake growers (home gardeners, hobbyists etc.) was published in February of 2025, after recognizing a need for a discrete forest-cultivated shiitake growing guide specifically tailored to this sector of the community. Co-PI Jones also developed a shiitake production poster in 2025 to be used in Oregon forestry outreach events.

The PNW Forest-Cultivated Mushroom Growers Network website (www.pnwforestmushroomgrowers.net) was initiated in 2022, with nine pages published throughout 2023. In 2024 six other pages completed in to get the site to a comprehensive state and incorporated 1) additional video and visual media and 2) links to select printable guidance materials. Ongoing improvements and additions will continue to be made, and the website will ultimately contain all the information provided through the draft guidance materials along with shiitake research summaries, and other resources for growers.

All participating growers are being solicited for feedback on the materials during year-end interviews throughout the project. To date, participating growers largely found that the production guidance materials provided by Extension to be helpful and thorough, although a few growers suggested improving clarity on the timeline of production activities and on strain selection, and to add more information to help with navigating marketing. A majority of growers remarked that instructional videos were the most effective educational product as they offered the closest alternative to a hands-on, individualized educational experience. Several growers remarked that they felt the shiitake production system developed by Extension provided a low-risk, clear path to successful production if growers were willing to refrain from deviating from guidance at least throughout the establishment process and first harvest year.

An image showing various screenshot from the Pacific Northwest Forest Cultivated Mushroom growers website.
Figure. Screenshots of the of the PNW forest-cultivated mushroom growers network website illustrating content main home page (top left) and several of the resource information pages that have been published. The website allows for ongoing updates, and more illustrative media to be integrated into the production guidance material information through educational imagery and instructional video.
220 Farmers intend/plan to change their practice(s)
17 Farmers changed or adopted a practice

Education and Outreach Outcomes

Recommendations for education and outreach:

A retrospective survey of past shiitake program participants (which included several events from this project) indicated that that the majority of attendees who wanted to produce shiitake for market but had not yet ventured into commercial production cited a lack of time and energy as the principal barrier to initiation. Anecdotally, this result had also been evident throughout the mentoring experience to date, highlighting that grower adoption of a new enterprise seemed to require both individual fortitude and favorable circumstances, regardless of the informational empowerment mentorship could provide.

Most collaborating growers started out with considerable initiative and enthusiasm to begin producing shiitake, but not all found that they ultimately had the bandwidth to follow through on establishment. Alternatively, feedback from collaborating growers that were successful at establishing shiitake enterprises suggested that the mentorship approach used in this project was an effective in facilitating assured follow-through to positive impact. The mentorship approach appeared to be particularly effective for growers who 1) were already on the precipice of adoption, 2) lacked significant compromising circumstances, and 3) were willing to actively engage with the mentorship opportunity. All producers interviewed in year one and two indicated that the mentorship opportunity presented through this project either 1) directly incited them to begin growing shiitake for market, or 2) incited them to expand what they were doing on a non-commercial scale into an enterprise producing for market. Growers that actively engaged with mentorship opportunities presented through the project largely reported that mentorship helped them make key decisions, avert costly mistakes, budget their production economy, maintain appropriate production expectations, and quell anxieties about whether they were proceeding correctly/successfully or not. Multiple growers also remarked that email reminders from Extension sent at key, time-sensitive points in the production process were very helpful to helping them remain accountable to their investment, and to keep on track with the production timeline before it had become ingrained into memory as part of their annual routine. Producer interviews and site visits were very informative in real-time as well, allowing more opportunity to course-correct Extension program efforts in response to grower needs, and for growers to course-correct when production misunderstandings, errors, or overlooked protocols came to light.

For growers that attended hands-on trainings, there was ubiquitous agreement that this component was the most powerful single educational approach used. Several of these growers remarked that instructional videos would be the next most effective method to invest further in, as these would be the closest alternative to mentorship and experiential learning if it was otherwise not available.

Although growers largely found the production guidance materials provided by Extension to be helpful and appreciated the thoroughness of detail provided, there were differing preferences on forms of information delivery. Some growers expressed preference for quick reference materials (such as the checklist, how-to videos, etc.), others preferred the level of detail provided in the longer-form materials (such as the written draft guide, and website resource page narratives). This appeared to be independent of grower success and more about individual learning style, highlighting the need for multiple modalities of information delivery.

Growers had a mixed response to how helpful it was to be networked to other new growers. While some growers used the network to share resources, they also remarked that it was difficult to coordinate with each other, and that the opportunity to share information as a community in a meaningful way was not well-met via email or text. This was Extension’s experience as well in trying to help facilitate a peer grower community, communication would break down notably after the growing season began. Some growers expressed that if there was a convenient platform to share field notes, media, updates, and questions (such as a social media group), this might be a more efficient approach to developing meaningful network interactions.

A number of growers also mentioned needs which were not appropriate for Extension to provide, and would be more appropriately met by a different entity; these included equipment loan services (conservation districts, grower interest groups, or private businesses), startup capital grants (granting agencies/foundations), timber acquisition services (private businesses), supplier business recommendations, equipment recommendations, and marketing advice (other growers, private consultants or grower interest groups). Peer mentoring is under consideration for some growers as part of their business model, indicating a value-added innovation with potential to meet a wider array of educational needs to help the incipient PNW shiitake production economy and community grow.

370 Producers reported gaining knowledge, attitude, skills and/or awareness as a result of the project
Non-producer stakeholders reported changes in knowledge, attitudes, skills and/or awareness as a result of project outreach
17 Ag Service Providers
Key areas taught:
  • New enterprise development
  • Best management practices
Key changes:
  • New enterprise development

  • Best management practices

Information Products

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.