Impact of including sprouted grains in the ration of beef cattle relative to animal performance, quality and nutritive value of meat, and economic via

Progress report for SW23-950

Project Type: Research and Education
Funds awarded in 2023: $349,974.00
Projected End Date: 07/31/2026
Host Institution Award ID: G105-24-W9981
Grant Recipient: Utah State University
Region: Western
State: Utah
Principal Investigator:
Dr. Kara Thornton
Utah State University
Co-Investigators:
Brady Blackett
Blackett Cattle Company
Kelly Crozier
Raise'm Right Ranch
Dr. Matthew Garcia
Utah State University
Dr. Korry Hintze, PhD
Utah State University
Dr. Clay Isom
Utah State University, Dept. of Animal, Dairy, and Veterinary Sc
Dr. Ryan Larsen
Utah State University, Dept. of Applied Economics
Jason Morgan
Morgan Ranching Company
Dr. Stephan van Vliet
Utah State University
Expand All

Project Information

Summary:

One of the many challenges Western US beef producers face is climate change and drought conditions that negatively impact animal performance and economic viability. Drought conditions result in increasing price, decreasing yield and variability in nutrient density of feedstuffs. This is relevant because feed costs account for approximately 70% of the total costs of raising beef. In addition, rural areas are becoming more urban and producers are being forced to either move their operations to more rural areas, or transport their feedstuffs a greater distance. These are several of the largest challenges that beef producers currently face and will continue to face in the future. Feeding sprouted grains (fodder) is one method to alleviate some of the issues producers face. Hydroponic fodder systems are used to sprout cereal grains for approximately 6-10 days and are then fed to livestock. Hydroponic growing does not require as much soil, land, fertilizer or water as conventional farming systems and is not affected by changes in the climate, such as temperature or precipitation levels. This is advantageous as fodder can be produced year-round, results in a feed with higher nutrient density than traditional forages, and has a relatively low amount of inputs, which ultimately improves sustainability of beef production. However, to date, little research has been done to understand how including fodder in the ration impacts beef cattle production. As such, the proposed research will analyze the effects of including barley fodder in the ration of beef cattle on live cattle performance, carcass quality, rumen characteristics, nutritive value of the meat, and economic viability. Two different trials will be completed to determine the impacts of providing barley fodder to growing and finishing beef steers, as well as in developing heifers. Completion of these two different trials will provide important insight into two very different, yet important nutritional periods, for beef producers in the Western region of the US. Additionally, this research team believes that it is not only of the utmost importance that this research be conducted, but that this research be disseminated through different outlets. As such, the results of these two research trials will be disseminated to producers, county extension agents and other professionals through more traditional venues such as publication of fact sheets and peer reviewed journal articles and presentations at local, state, and nationwide producer meetings. Results will also be disseminated though less traditional methods such as recorded podcasts and presentations and social media. Furthermore, two different field days will be hosted to provide hands-on experience with including fodder in the ration of livestock. These opportunities will provide individuals with the appropriate knowledge to utilize this resource, as well as learn how to produce fodder and include it in their rations. Being able to provide a high-quality feed produced with less inputs (land, water, fertilizer, etc.) and an increased output (more forage with an improved nutrient density) will impact both economic viability of producers and sustainability of the whole beef industry.

Project Objectives:

Research Objectives:

  1. Understand how including sprouted barley in the ration of beef cattle impacts live animal performance of both growing steers and developing heifers, as well as carcass quality.
  2. Determine how including sprouted barley in the ration of beef cattle impacts rumen fermentation characteristics.
  3. Use novel metabolomic approaches to assess animal health and nutritional quality of meat.
  4. Determine whether including hydroponic barley fodder in the ration of beef cattle is economically viable and impacts water usage of producers.

Extension Objectives:

  1. Host two field days to show producers, extension agents and other professionals in the field how sprouted grains are produced and how they can be fed to cattle in order to give them hands-on experience with this technology.
  2. Present the results of the research trials at local, regional and national meetings.
  3. Publish the results of the research trials as extension facts sheets and peer reviewed publications.
  4. Develop and host training sessions and materials to share with county extension agents across the Western region of the US.
  5. Discuss and present the results of the research trials through several social media outlets including Facebook, Instagram and podcasts.

Cooperators

Click linked name(s) to expand/collapse or show everyone's info
  • Dr. Kara Thornton, PhD (Researcher)
  • Dr. Korry Hintze (Researcher)
  • Dr. Clay Isom (Researcher)
  • Dr. Stephan van Vliet (Researcher)
  • Dr. Ryan Larsen (Educator and Researcher)
  • Brady Blackett - Producer
  • Jason Morgan - Producer
  • Kelly Crozier - Producer

Research

Materials and methods:

The research objectives will be completed by conducting two different research trials at the Utah State University South Farm. In the first trial, 60 commercial Angus steers weighing approximately 700 pounds from the Utah State University beef herd will be stratified by weight into one of four different treatment groups: (1) inclusion of 40% (as-fed basis) sprouted barley in the ration, n=15; (2) inclusion of 60% (as-fed basis) sprouted barley in the ration, n=15; (3) inclusion of 80% (dry matter basis) sprouted barley in the ration n=15; and (4) conventional total mixed ration with a grain concentration of 85% (dry matter basis) in the final ration. The authors acknowledge that it is unorthodox to present rations on an as-fed basis, however preliminary research from our group as well as anecdotal information from producers leads us to hypothesize that when cattle are fed a feed that is as nutrient dense and has a high level of nutrient availability, such as sprouted barley, that the animals will not be required to consume as much dry matter and have similar or improved production parameters. As stated previously in the narrative, a recent research trial that was conducted at Utah State University investigated the effects of providing either feeder quality alfalfa hay or a diet that was half feeder quality hay and half sprouted barley (as-fed) to 20 cow-calf pairs (n=10 per treatment). The cows received their respective diets for a period of 90 days. Our research group is still in the final stages of analyzing the data, but preliminary results show that there was no difference (P=0.96) in cow weight throughout the trial. Nor was there a difference in calf weight (P=0.32). However, we believe it is important to note that the calves that were in the treatment group that received sprouted barley did have a numerically increased average daily gain (1.6 vs. 1.4 pounds). This preliminary data provides compelling evidence that the proposed research needs to be conducted to better understand the effects of including sprouted barley in the ration of beef cattle. These different treatments were chosen so that we would have a better idea of how three different inclusion levels of sprouted grain could be compared to a conventional total mixed ration to help produce a feeding guide for sprouted grains that can be shared with producers. Each of the treatment diets will be balanced to be isocaloric and isonitrogenous. In addition, we will balance for the animals on each diet to receive similar amount of feed on an as-fed basis. However, all animals will be fed ad libitum. All animals will be housed in pens that are each equipped with two GrowSafe bunks allowing for collection of individual animal intakes and feeding behavior. In this system, an RFID tag is placed in the ear of each animal and each time they place their head through the bars of the bunk, the GrowSafe unit records who that animal is and how long they are there, allowing for animals to be group housed while collecting individual feeding and feed behavior data. The trial will last approximately 120 days. Animals will be weighed on day 0 and every 30 days after. Additionally, ultrasound measurements and blood and rumen fluid will be collected by trained personnel at each weight date. Animals will remain on trial until they reach an industry standard average of 0.5 inches of backfat as measured by ultrasound, at which time they will be harvested at a commercial harvest facility. Commercial carcass data will be obtained for each animal as well as a sample from the aged steak of each loin to determine nutritive quality of the meat.

Research results and discussion:

We are in the process of conducting the first research trial and do not yet have any final results to share. 

However, the first research trial (the feedlot trial) began in January 2025. Prior to beginning this trial, and before receiving funding from WSARE, we completed a backgrounding trial to test out the four different diets proposed in the research trial. We did not observe any differences between the different diets, but noted that a 20% inclusion (DM basis) of sprouted barley in the diet resulted in numerically increased gain and feed efficiency. As such, we decided to look at just two different diets in the finishing trial (typical feedlot diet; CON vs. a 20% inclusion of sprouted barley (DM); SB) nad utilize an n=30 for each treatment to increase our statistical power. To date, we have collected data for weights, hip height, rumen fluid pH, and ribeye fat thickness via ultrasound on days 0, 30, 60, and 90. Based off of these measurements, we anticipate that the steers will go to harvest middle to end of May. However, we are collecting samples and weights again the end of April and will have a better idea of weight and backfat thickness at that point. 

As we have already completed a cow-calf trial and a backgrounding trial, we are pretty adept at producing, mixing and delivering the sprouted barley diets to the steers. We have not had any issues in growing or feeding these diets to the cattle. 

Although we do not have a complete data set yet, and have not yet run the final statistics - our preliminary data shows that the steers receiving the SB diet have gained more weight, have a slightly lower (but within normal range) rumen pH, have similar hip heights, and the steers fed SB have an increased ribeyefat thickness compared to the CON steers. 

We will continue analyzing the samples that have been collected (blood, rumen fluid, intake data) through the rest of the summer of 2024 and should have results complete for the finishing trial around the end of 2024. We will also get carcass data and meat quality data this summer as well. In late fall (November ish depending on the weather) of 2024 we will begin feeding animals for our second trial, the heifer development trial. 

Participation Summary
3 Producers participating in research

Research Outcomes

Recommendations for sustainable agricultural production and future research:

We are in the process of conducting the research and do not yet have any results to share that might help producers make informed decisions related to sustainability. 

3 New working collaborations

Education and Outreach

3 Consultations
1 On-farm demonstrations
3 Tours
1 Webinars / talks / presentations

Participation Summary:

150 Farmers participated
10 Ag professionals participated
Education and outreach results:

We have not yet conducted any of the outreach activities associated with this project as we are still in the process of collecting research data from the first trial. However, Utah State University hosted the Utah Beef Field Day in February 2024 and the rationale behind the research was shared and producers seemed excited to get the results over the next year. 

Education and Outreach Outcomes

Recommendations for education and outreach:

To date, we have just shared the concept and rationale with producers. Besides producers being interested in the research, we do not have any recommendations for education/outreach to report yet. 

Key areas taught:
    Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.