Participatory Training in Small-scale Anaerobic Digestion of Agricultural Residues

Progress report for WRGR21-006

Project Type: Research to Grass Roots
Funds awarded in 2021: $95,000.00
Projected End Date: 06/30/2023
Host Institution Award ID: N/A MSU Internal (4W9151)
Grant Recipients: Montana State University; Washington State University
Region: Western
State: Montana
Principal Investigator:
Dr. Roland Ebel
Montana State University
Selena Ahmed
Montana State University
Mac Burgess
Montana State University
Dr. Jed Eberly
Montana State University
Timothy Seipel
Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University
Expand All

Project Information


Anaerobic digestion (AD) of organic residues is a globally expanding sustainable technology. In the US, commercial AD systems are increasingly used on large dairy and hog farms for generating biogas from manure. These high-tech systems are neither affordable nor technically viable for smaller farms, including diversified grain, horticultural, and mixed farms. In contrast, small AD systems have the potential to help small farmers become energy-resilient and decrease their greenhouse gas emissions as demonstrated by two SARE projects in Washington and Florida. Furthermore, most large-scale AD systems do not make use of biofertilizers which can be obtained from the digestate and applied as organic fertilizers to increase the soil microflora and organic matter content. Biofertilizers can also be sold to diversify a farm’s portfolio. The goal of the present project by researchers, extension agents, and collaborating farmers in Montana is to build on the experience gained in Washington and Florida and to disseminate this sustainable technology in the Western US, as most small farmers in the region are not familiar with AD. We will facilitate professional development and create an open dialog on AD using a participatory farmer-to-farmer approach, enriched by technological information provided by participating farmers, extension agents, and researchers. We will develop three instructional videos where a farmer experienced in using AD explains the technology first-hand on his farm. The videos will cover digester types, the installation and operation of digesters, the right feedstock choices, and the usability of biogas and biofertilizers. In addition, we will generate hands-on online manuals for the use of AD on small farms. We will also conduct a webinar for extension agents and agricultural educators. Finally, we will organize two field demonstrations on biofertilizers, where local producers and extension agents will exchange information about how to use AD systems and biofertilizers.

Project Objectives:

Overall Objective:  Generate professional development activities that will increase the energetic resilience of small farms in the Western region and decrease their greenhouse gas emissions by introducing ag educators, agricultural professional, and farmers to the operation of inexpensive and reliable small-scale anaerobic digesters as well as to possible uses of their core products, biogas and biofertilizers.

Specific Objective 1 (O1): Inform ag educators, agricultural professionals, and farmers in the Western region on the installation, functionality, and operation of small-scale anaerobic digesters for processing agricultural residues as well as on the usability of products generated by anaerobic digestion.

Specific Objective 2 (O2): Highlight the potential of producing biofertilizers using small-scale anaerobic digesters to diversify the product portfolio of small farms in the Western region and to increase their soil health by applying these biofertilizers to their crops.


Anaerobic digestion (AD) of organic residues is a globally expanding sustainable technology for generating biogas with a high methane content [1].  In the US, the number of municipal AD plants has almost doubled since 2010, and currently, over 8,000 large dairy and hog farms use AD to produce biogas from their manure, generating renewable energy [2].

Small-scale, low-tech AD systems for processing food and agricultural waste, often applied at the household scale and frequently using co-digestion of plant and animal residues, are becoming increasingly common in Asia [3-5], Africa [6], and Latin America [7, 8]. In contrast, commercial AD technologies used in most US farms are designed for large-scale livestock operations. Thus, the adaptation of low-tech AD technologies in the US would benefit small farms by making them economically resilient to volatile energy prices, while contributing to reducing their net methane emissions [9] and enhancing their soil nutrient management. For example, large-scale AD systems commonly do not use the digestate as biofertilizer. Biofertilizers are fermented animal and plant residues with elevated micro-nutrient content. They enhance the soil microflora and increase the soil organic matter content [8, 10]. Apart from using biofertilizers for their crops, there are also reports of small farms successfully selling this product.

A Western SARE on-farm biogas technology project completed by Washington State University demonstrated that AD is a technically and economically viable option for smaller farms. It involved the development of three easy-to-operate AD units at small farms in Washington which served as effective biogas reactors [9]. Also, a Southern SARE project in Florida focused on AD biofertilizer production on small farms. This effort emphasized the analysis of feedstock on small farms and the design of a biodigester [11]. Both SARE projects (Table 1) generated first-hand experience on the usability, benefits, and limitations of AD.

At Montana State University (MSU), members of the project team are currently collaborating with extension specialists in an EPA-funded project dedicated to the use of small-scale biodigesters for processing household food waste [12]. 

The present project by MSU researchers and collaborating farmers and extension agents builds on the experience gained in Washington and Florida and aims at generating professional development activities to enhance the proper adoption of AD technologies. We will develop a series of instructional videos where an experienced Montana farmer facilitates small-scale, on-farm AD solutions for farms in the Western region. We will generate a manual and organize a webinar for extension agents across the Western region. We will also conduct field demonstrations to facilitate the use of AD digestate as a biofertilizer, combining the results of the previously funded SARE project with experience from our EPA project. We expect that the successful implementation of our project will benefit from the currently favorable interest regarding AD [12] and enhance the environmental, social, and economic sustainability of small-scale farms. We do not expect natural or regulative limitations for generating and distributing our outreach material.



Click linked name(s) to expand/collapse or show everyone's info
  • Dr. Shulin Chen (Researcher)
  • Daniel Glick (Educator)
  • Dan Huls - Producer
  • Patrick Mangan (Educator)
  • Katrina Mendrey (Educator)
  • Abiya Saeed (Educator)
  • Fred Stewart - Producer
  • Mat Walter (Educator)
  • Dr. Ann C. Wilkie (Researcher)

Educational & Outreach Activities

4 Consultations
1 Other educational activities: Creation of a library of "AD on small farms" peer-reviewed, extension, and professional publications.

Participation Summary:

2 Extension
3 Researchers
1 Agency
2 Farmers/ranchers
Education/outreach description:

Preliminary activities for project outputs (videos, manual, field day).

Creation of an extensive library of publications on anaerobic digestion (AD) on small farms (baseline for videos and manual), COMPLETED

Systematic literature review and indexing of respective publications, COMPLETED

Development of video scripts, COMPLETED

Assignment of area for field demonstration & preliminary area preparation, COMPLETED

Training of one undergraduate research assistant on AD and conducting a literature review, COMPLETED

Online meetings with  farmers (2 meetings) and filmmaker (1). COMPLETED

Correspondence (email, phone) with agency and extension collaborators. COMPLETED

Farmer and advisor feedback COMPLETED

Outreach video cutting and compilationCOMPLETED

Outreach video dissemination COMPLETED


Processing of systematic literature review findings in NVivo COMPLETED

Draft manual COMPLETED

Draft figures COMPLETED

Internal review of manual draft 90%

External (experts, producers) of draft manual PENDING

Final manual version PENDING

Manual dissemination PENDING

Learning Outcomes

8 Service providers reported changes in knowledge, attitudes, skills and/or awareness as a result of project outreach
5 Ag professionals intend to use knowledge, attitudes, skills and/or awareness learned

Project Outcomes

1 Grant received that built upon this project
2 New working collaborations
Project outcomes:

The outcomes of this project are expected to be primarily triggered by our outreach materials (videos, manual). The videos were released in November 2022 and the manual is still about to be completed. In both cases, it is, therefore, too early to assess specific learning and action outcomes at this point. What we do know is that our videos have been watched +500 times and that our work on anaerobic digestion has attracted the interest of several community members across the Western region who have contacted us via email and phone. Our work was also covered in at least five local newspapers of the region, for example, the Bozeman Daily Chronicle. Finally, we were contacted by two companies in this field who are interested in further collaboration. We are positive that, by the end of the project, we will be able to report more specifically on the outcomes generated by our outreach materials. Similar to the outreach material, our field day has generated a lot of interest among Montana producers and extension and research faculty at Montana State University. For example, a PhD student decided to work on anaerobic digestion in her doctoral project.

Information Products

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE.