Organic Control of Anthracnose Leaf Spot in Gooseberry

Project Overview

FNC21-1290
Project Type: Farmer/Rancher
Funds awarded in 2021: $9,000.00
Projected End Date: 01/31/2023
Grant Recipient: Two Onion Farm
Region: North Central
State: Wisconsin
Project Coordinator:

Commodities

No commodities identified

Practices

No practices identified

Proposal summary:

Although gooseberries are not a common food in our region, they are a promising new crop which produces a flavorful fruit suited for fresh eating and processing.  Along with other organic fruit farmers in the region, we have grown gooseberries but found that the Anthracnose leaf spot disease is extremely devastating: it defoliates plants by mid-late summer in most years, increases over the years as a planting ages, and appears to greatly reduce plant vigor and yield.  We have observed that varieties differ in susceptibility and that trellising the plants may lessen the severity of the disease, but we have not found a truly effective organic control that is environmentally benign and effective.  Over two growing seasons, we propose to measure the effects of several factors on disease severity:

  1. Gooseberry variety
  2. Training method (freestanding bush vs. cordon trellis)
  3. Organic spray regimen (potassium bicarbonate, copper soap plus Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Reynoutria sachalinensis extract plus horticultural oil, and no sprays)

We are studying multiple factors because it is likely that a combination of all three factors may be required for effective control.  We will share results with other growers via conference presentations, an online video, and written reports.

Project objectives from proposal:

1. Measure the susceptibility of four common gooseberry varieties to Anthracnose leaf spot.

2. Measure the effect of training method (cordon trellis or freestanding bush) on Anthracnose incidence.

3. Measure the effect of three organic sprays on Anthracnose incidence, compared to an unsprayed control.

4. Share findings through conference presentations, written reports, and an online video.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE.