• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Search Projects
  • Help
  • Log in

Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education

Grants And Education To Advance Innovations In Sustainable Agriculture
  • Grants
  • Project Reports
    • Search Projects
    • Search Project Coordinators
  • Learning Center
  • Professional Development
  • State Programs
  • Events
  • Newsroom
  • About SARE

Project Overview

GNE10-004
Project Type: Graduate Student
Funds awarded in 2010: $8,700.00
Projected End Date: 12/31/2012
Grant Recipient: University of Maine
Region: Northeast
State: Maine
Graduate Student:
Benjamin Costanzi
Email
Faculty Advisor:
Dr. Eric Gallandt
Email
University of Maine

Improving Weed Control on the Small Farm: Evaluation of Scale-Appropriate Cultivation Tools

View the project final report

Annual Reports

  • 2010 annual report
  • 2011 annual report

Commodities

  • Agronomic: corn
  • Vegetables: carrots

Practices

  • Education and Training: demonstration, on-farm/ranch research, participatory research
  • Pest Management: cultivation, physical control, weed ecology

Proposal abstract:

In this project our aim is to evaluate a wide range of hand weeding tools, including (1) efficacy and working rates; and (2) farmers’ qualitative assessment of ergonomics and ease of use. During the 2009 growing season, Dr. Gallandt’s research group used a NESARE Partnership Grant to conduct on-farm evaluation of hand weeding tools, with a particular focus on the Weed MasterĀ®, an innovative cultivator from Finland (see Attachment 1-1, 1-2). Surprisingly, the efficacy of weed control was generally similar among a wide range of hand and pushed tools (Attachment 1-3, 1-4). Working rates, however, were much greater for the pushed tools– the wheel hoe and Weed Master (Attachment 1-5). While we were encouraged by this potential for greater efficiency in weeding, discussions with these farmers made it clear that their choice of a favorite tool was based on more than efficacy and working rates. Thus, in this project we aim to better understand both the quantitative and qualitative dimensions of farmers’ decisions to use particular hand tools for weeding.

Project objectives from proposal:

1. Conduct qualitative evaluations to compare several familiar, traditional hand tools to newer innovative designs

2. Conduct quantitative evaluations to determine how working rate and efficacy relate to qualitative factors

3. Determine through the interview process which perceptions contribute to tool selection, and how this relates to the adoption of new technology

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE.

Primary Sidebar

Footer

SARE - Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education USDA
1122 Patapsco Building | University of Maryland | College Park, MD 20742-6715

This site is maintained by SARE Outreach for the SARE program and features research projects supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture. SARE Outreach operates under cooperative agreement award No. 2018-38640-28731 with the University of Maryland to develop and disseminate information about sustainable agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Sustainable Agriculture Research & Education © 2019
Help | Contact us