Women for the Land: Helping Women Farmers Advance Soil Health in Pennsylvania

Progress report for LNE22-442

Project Type: Research and Education
Funds awarded in 2022: $106,847.00
Projected End Date: 02/28/2025
Grant Recipient: American Farmland Trust
Region: Northeast
State: Pennsylvania
Project Leader:
Jamie Mierau
American Farmland Trust
Expand All

Project Information

Summary:

Opportunity and Justification: As one of six states comprising the 64,000-square-mile Chesapeake Bay watershed, Pennsylvania has an enormous responsibility for ensuring that pollution and excess nutrients from cities, industries, and farms are stored and filtered before entering local waterways.

Women, a historically underserved population in conservation agriculture, are entering the field as new farmers, widows, and inheritors of farmland in unprecedented numbers and thus are poised to play a significant role in agriculture in the years ahead.

Despite their growing numbers, women are underserved by technical and financial resources that help them manage their land for long-term sustainability. This under representation is due to a lack of knowledge by women farmers about the resources available to them and how to access them.

Solution and Approach: Intentional education of and engagement with women in agriculture is critical to achieve broader adoption of soil health and other conservation practices on America’s farmland. This project will ensure women farmers in Pennsylvania have the knowledge, skills, and access to technical and financial assistance they need to adopt soil health practices on their farmland.

AFT will recruit and train 10-15 women farmers in priority counties within the Susquehanna River Watershed in Pennsylvania to participate in virtual and in-person training and farm field days over eight months. Through Learning Circles, women farmers will receive substantive technical assistance on soil health practices that promote long-term sustainability, including residue and tillage management, cover crops, nutrient management, and use and operation of key soil health management equipment. Curriculum will be created and delivered by AFT and its advisory group made up of women farmers and service providers.

To increase impact, AFT will provide stipends to 8 Learning Circle participants to cover some or all of the cost of adopting soil health practices on their farmland. Practices could include cover crops, compost application, planting to attract beneficial insects and pollinators, and prescribed grazing. See below for more information about stipend eligibility.

Additionally, AFT will create a compelling case study that quantifies the economic, water quality, and climate outcomes of a women farmer in Pennsylvania who has successfully adopted at least one soil health practice for at least four years. AFT has published nine such AFT-NRCS co-branded economic case studies (https://farmlandinfo.org/publications/soil-health-case-studies/) and seeks SARE’s support for the first such case study featuring a woman farmer.

While many farmers believe the scientific evidence that soil health practices improve soil and water quality, they are reluctant to change management techniques without knowing how much the soil health practices will cost or benefit them. The case study will educate participants about the benefits of soil health practices, reduce uncertainty, and result in women farmers’ adoption of soil health practices.

Performance Target:

Eight women will adopt soil health practices (residue and tillage management, cover crops, nutrient management, prescribed grazing, etc.) on 1,000 acres of farmland resulting in 10,000 pounds of nitrogen loss reductions, 3,000 pounds of phosphorus loss reductions, and 550 tons of sediment loss reductions, on average, per year.

EPA’s STEPL Tool in the Muddy Run-Mill Creek HUC12 in Lancaster County, PA was used to create this estimate assuming:

  • 500 acres of cropland adopted early planted cover crops, conservation tillage with 60% residue, and nutrient management
  • 500 acres of pastureland adopted prescribed grazing, pasture, and hayland planting and livestock exclusion fencing
Introduction:

As one of the six states comprising the 64,000-square-mile Chesapeake Bay watershed, Pennsylvania has an enormous responsibility for ensuring that pollution and excess nutrients from cities, industries, and farms are stored and filtered before entering local waterways. Pennsylvania farmers know that healthy soil is the foundation for clean water and productive land for people and nature. Significant investments have been made to improve soil health and reduce the impact of nutrients and sediment in Pennsylvania’s waterways and ultimately the Chesapeake Bay, As such, Pennsylvania has become a national leader in no-till planting (67 percent of acreage) and cover crops (37.2 percent of commodity acreage). Women, a historically underserved population in conservation agriculture, are entering the field as new farmers, widows, and inheritors of farmland in unprecedented numbers and thus are poised to play a significant role in agriculture in the years ahead. Pennsylvania mirrors these national trends with 32,000 women farming and 2.3 million acres of farmland owned and farmed by women in Pennsylvania.

In the next two decades, approximately 371 million acres of US farmland are expected to change owners. Much of this land will likely transfer to women (one report predicts that women may own 75 percent of this transferred farmland). In Pennsylvania, 28 percent of farmers are over 65, illustrating the significant potential for an unprecedented increase in women agricultural landowners. Despite their growing numbers, women are severely underserved by technical and financial resources that help them manage their land for long-term sustainability. In Pennsylvania, this is evident in the amount of financial agricultural assistance received: 25 percent of principal producers were female. Only 6.64 percent of federal government payments went to female farmers and the average payment to female farmers was 30.5 percent less than to male farmers receiving assistance. This under representation is due in part to a lack of knowledge by women farmers about the resources available to them and how to access them.

 Solution and Approach: For nearly a decade, AFT has worked to close the education gap and help thousands of women access conservation programs and adopt environmentally sound farming practices. AFT uses Learning Circles, dedicated networking and learning sessions aimed at helping women be better stewards of their farmland and support their access to resources at the local, state, and federal levels. This model has proved effective.

A 2019 peer-reviewed study of a subset of AFT’s Learning Circle participants from Indiana and Illinois founds that 73 percent of participants took subsequent farm conservation actions including talking with family and renters about implementing conservation practices as well as implementation of conservation actions on their farmland. Intentional education of and engagement with women in agriculture is critical to achieve broader adoption of soil health and other conservation practices on America’s farmland. This project will ensure women farmers in Pennsylvania have the knowledge, skills, and access to technical and financial assistance they need to adopt soil health practices on their farmland.

AFT and its advisory group will recruit and train 10-15 women farmers in priority counties within the Susquehanna River Watershed in Pennsylvania to participate in virtual and in-person training and farm field days over eight months. Through Learning Circles, women farmers will receive substantive technical assistance on soil health practices that promote long-term sustainability, including residue and tillage management, cover crops, nutrient management, and use and operation of key soil health management equipment. Curriculum will be created and delivered by AFT and its advisory group made up of women farmers and service providers.

To increase impact, AFT will provide stipends to 8 Learning Circle participants to cover some or all of the cost of adopting soil health practices on their farmland. Practices could include cover crops, compost application, planting to attract beneficial insects and pollinators, and prescribed grazing. See below for more information about stipend eligibility.

Additionally, AFT will create a compelling case study that quantifies the economic, water quality, and climate outcomes of a women farmer in Pennsylvania who has successfully adopted at least one soil health practice for at least four years. AFT has published nine such AFT-NRCS co-branded economic case studies (https://farmlandinfo.org/publications/soil-health-case-studies/) and seeks SARE’s support for the first such case study featuring a woman farmer.

While many farmers believe the scientific evidence that soil health practices improve soil and water quality, they are reluctant to change management techniques without knowing how much the soil health practices will cost or benefit them. The case study will educate participants about the benefits of soil health practices, reduce uncertainty, and result in women farmers’ adoption of soil health practices.

As a result, eight women will adopt soil health practices that could include residue and tillage management, cover crops, nutrient management, prescribed grazing, etc. on 1,000 acres of farmland. These practices will result in 10,000 pounds of nitrogen loss reductions, 3,000 pounds of phosphorus loss reductions, and 550 tons of sediment loss reductions, on average, per year into the Chesapeake Bay.

Currently, women own or co-own more than 300 million acres (about one-third of US farmland). Many additional acres are in the hands of women who are “non-operators” but lease their land to neighboring farmers. In fact, roughly two million non-operating landowners own about 38 percent of all farmland in the US, and 37 percent of non-operating landowners are women.

Cooperators

Click linked name(s) to expand/collapse or show everyone's info

Research

Involves research:
No
Participation Summary

Education

Educational approach:

Engagement: AFT and its advisory group will harness its deep networks to identify and recruit 10-15 women farmers from priority counties in the Susquehanna River Watershed in Pennsylvania and offer multiple in-person and virtual learning opportunities over eight months.

AFT will recruit women who are decisionmakers on their farm, curious about implementing soil health practices, and committed to participating in the cohort. AFT will offer participation stipends to cover their travel, childcare, and other expenses to incentivize full participation.

Additionally, AFT will provide stipends to eight women to implement new soil health practices and technical assistance. Implementation stipends will be a maximum of $2,000 annually per farmer for two years.

Participants receiving implementation stipends will commit to two years of practice implementation on the same field. Stipends will be made to participants with livestock and crop (grain, forage, fruit, and vegetable) farms. Approved practices will include:

  • Conservation tillage and residue management
  • Multi-species cover crop mixtures
  • Extended season cover crops
  • Prescribed grazing
  • Precision nutrient management
  • Compost
  • Planting to attract beneficial insects and pollinators

Learning: Educational topics and experiences will include:  

#1: Welcome, introduction, and farm field day (in-person)

  • Farmers and service providers are paired up to jumpstart technical and financial assistance to farmers
  • Soil health basics
  • Farm visit that showcases NRCS conservation practice standards

#2: Cover crops (virtual)

  • Benefits of cover crops
  • Getting started with cover crops
  • Types of cover crops
  • Cover crop demonstration

#3: Water quality (virtual)

  • How farming impacts water quality
  • How nutrients move in water
  • Water quality demonstration

#4: Nutrient Management (virtual)

  • Benefits (4Rs) of soil health
  • How to implement the 4Rs of soil health

#5: Communicating with your landowners (virtual)

  • How to communicate with their non-operating landowners about soil health benefits
  • What questions farmers should ask landowners as they explore implementing soil health practices on leased lands

#6: Farmers and non-operating landowners meet and discuss soil health, visit farm to see practices in action (in-person)

  • Taking data from AFT’s 2020 survey of non-operating landowners in Pennsylvania, AFT will develop content and facilitate conversation between farmers and their non-operating landowners
  • Farmers and non-operating landowners visit a farm implementing practices to explore and build support for implementing practices

AFT will create a case study of a woman farmer in Pennsylvania (separate of the cohort participants) who has successfully implemented soil health practices. The case study will include:

  • Economic outcomes the farmer has witnessed from the adoption of the soil health practices; develop a partial budget analysis of the benefits and costs associated with each adopted practice.
  • Water quality outcomes the farmer has witnessed from the adoption of the practices; use USDA’s Nutrient Tracking Tool to quantify reductions in nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment from the adoption of the practices.
  • Greenhouse gas outcomes associated with the adoption of the practices; use USDA’s COMET-Planner tool to calculate an estimate of the soil carbon sequestered, nitrous oxide gas reduced, and methane gas reduced from the practices.

The case study will be shared and discussed with the Learning Circle participants and service providers. AFT has published nine such case studies which can be found at https://farmlandinfo.org/publications/soil-health-case-studies. To date, AFT has not produced a case study of a female farmer.

Evaluation: AFT will conduct a needs assessment in September 2022 to identify, understand, and prioritize the needs of participants so that the advisory group can adapt the curriculum and training delivery accordingly.

AFT will collect two forms of evaluation data as part of this project. First, Learning Circle participants and service providers will provide feedback via exit surveys to give a quantitative assessment of impacts. These exit surveys will be sent after each Learning Circle.

AFT will also collect primary data during the end of year two, in the form of qualitative interviews with a subset of Learning Circle participants and service providers. Additionally, we will track the work of the women farmers implementing soil health practices.

AFT will quantify the following results based on their completion in the project timeframe:

  • Two farm field days for the Learning Circle participants, non-operating landowners, and agricultural service providers.
  • Cohort of 10-15 trained women farmers and landowners ready to take soil health action on their farm and a new network of support among. women in agriculture and service providers.
  • Eight women adopting new soil health practices on their farmland.
  • Creation of case study of a Pennsylvania women farmer successfully implementing soil health management systems on her farmland.

Milestones

Milestones:

Milestone 1: Establish advisory group; adapt Learning Circle curriculum for cohort (Engagement)

  1. 6-8 advisory group members (four farmers and five service providers):
    • Our advisory group was established in early 2022 and has provided support for curriculum development and learning circle coordination. One of the farmers identified in our original application (also a service provider working for NRCS) determined that the work of the project was too close for her to work as a grazing specialist for NRCS and was concerned about a conflict of interest; she declined to participate as an advisory group members. In general, our advisory group has been active in supporting the project. Mary Barbercheck of WaGN and Penn State replaces Kathy Braiser on the advisory group. 
    • Update 1/2024: For 2024, we are working on reconstituting our advisory group due to non-participation from the original farmer members. For the second year of implementation, advisory group members will not be involved in curriculum development, so their main role will be to assist with continued participant engagement and connections to other programs and resources.

  2. Farmers will engage with the curriculum to learn why soil is important in farming operations, soil health terminology, general soil health, and how to implement soil health practices, including cover crops, water quality, nutrient management, and how to communicate with landowners about soil health practices
    • 3/21/22 update:
    • Status 1/31/24: Complete, except for rebuild of advisory group

    • Accomplishments 1/31/24:
      • The Women for the Land model focuses on preparing discussion leaders – often highly skilled resource professionals -- to engage with participants in a unique way. During a learning circle, participants and discussion leaders are encouraged to introduce themselves personally, and to interact with one another as peers. While discussion leaders bring technical expertise and knowledge of available resources, participants bring lived experience and wisdom to a conversation on any conservation topic. In addition, while learning circles may focus on conveying specific information, they also emphasize sharing experiences, intensive question-and-answer periods, and connecting farmers to resources and to one another. The curriculum that was developed through this project was driven largely by the participants’ needs and interests, as identified in the needs assessments they completed prior to the beginning of the cohort. Each learning circle, whether virtual or in-person, included similar components and structure, including extensive introductions and check-ins, a focused presentation and discussion with a knowledgeable resource professional on a particular topic identified by the cohort, and next steps/ homework that kept participants engaged until the next learning circle session. 
      • Creating an adaptable, responsive curriculum focused on participant needs and peer-to-peer support, including ample time for co-learning and skill building, enabled cohort participants to “live into” soil health assessments, principles, and practices. Participants increased their fluency in the language and practice of soil health, enabling them to communicate more effectively with technical service providers and consultants about their farm’s specific soil health needs and goals. Discussion leaders became trusted advisors, and several expressed that the learning circle cohort was a rewarding professional experience for them as technical assistance providers in addition to a valuable teaching tool for participants.
      • Our final surveys and interviews with cohort participants demonstrate the effectiveness of the curriculum One hundred percent of survey respondents rated their knowledge of soil health principles and practices as “better” or “much better” than before the learning circle series. Eighty-three percent said that they were “much more interested” in trying new soil health practices on their farms, and the same percentage responded that they felt “much more connected” with other women farmers working to improve their soil health. One hundred percent said that they were either “more aware” or “much more aware” of financial and technical assistance resources available to support them in improving the health of their soils, and every respondent rated the learning circle approach as “excellent” compared with other types of farmer education in which they had taken part.
      • Attachments: Aug 29, 2023, Twilight Learning Circle @ Hill Creek Farm April 11 Participant Agenda March 15 Participant Agenda February 15 Participant Agenda January 6 Participant Agenda

Milestone 2: Identify and recruit participants for Learning Circle cohort (Engagement) 

  1. 10-15 women farmers
  2. Through recruitment, women will become aware of the Learning Circle cohort and the new skills and resources that they will learn; interested women will sign up for the Learning Circle cohort
    • 6/30/22 update:
      • See attached recruitment materials, developed in consultation with our advisory group. Recruitment began in June of 2022 and extended through the summer. Advisory group members and cooperators assisted with outreach in targeted counties. 
      • The cohort structure was a new model for our Women for the Land work in Pennsylvania, so we experimented with a slightly different internal recruitment mechanism whereby women who used our WFL website link to express interest then went through a simple screening process to determine commitment to the cohort model and appropriateness for the project. See attached needs assessment survey, which helped identify level of familiarity with materials and commitment to soil health goals in participating farmers. We continued to cast a wide net for cohort participants until late October, when we hosted our first in-person soil health learning circle. 
      • Attachments: Milestone 2 Soil Health Social Milestone 2 WFL Soil Health Flyer MIF080~1
    • Status 1/31/24: Complete
    • Accomplishments 1/31/24:
      • In all, we ended up with a cohort of nine women farmers: two diversified vegetable and livestock farmers; two pastured livestock farmers; one vegetable farmer; one dairy, crop, and flower farmer; one beginning farmer with a focus on vegetable production and farm-based education; one small-scale organic grain producer; and one small-scale flower farmer. Participation was very high at the in-person and virtual learning circle events, and engagement was significant among cohort members on their own social media feeds outside of ‘official’ project communications channels. The needs assessment survey was useful both to help shape the curriculum to the experience and educational goals of the participants and also to ensure that registrants were engaged with the project from the beginning.
      • During the proposal writing process, we anticipated that our recruitment would result in a cohort of women who represented the largest commodity groups in Pennsylvania, including grains, poultry, dairy, and nursery crops and floriculture. However, our final cohort included only one small but groundbreaking organic grain operation and two small-scale flower growers. Our outreach focused on finding a soil health successful woman grain farmer (see Milestone 3) further illuminated the fact that female farmers, and likely particularly those who are seeking community and support, tend to be concentrated in less traditional production systems. According to a 2024 AFT report, The State of Gender Equity in U.S. Agriculture, “[W]omen tend not to be in primary leadership roles on larger-scale commodity-oriented farms and ranches....[W]omen-led operations...tend to be producing poultry, equines, small livestock, bees, and specialty crops and are less represented in leading commodity-oriented operations such as in dairy, cattle, pork, and row crops.” Further, according to the report, “[w]omen are more likely to lead small and medium-sized farms with lower farm sales. Among female owner-operators, the average farm size is about half that of their male counterparts. This has implications for the types of government programs, which often have a per acre incentive rate and may or may not be economically feasible for their operations, among other challenges related to economies of scale and access to markets. Research suggests that women are more likely to engage in less subsidized forms of agriculture on smaller farms that require less mechanization. These patterns may be because commodity crops typically require more mechanization, along with land and capital, and women have been historically excluded from spaces where farmers learn mechanical skills and machine operation, contributing to the coding of tractors and machinery as masculine realms. In addition, women have long experienced discrimination in land access and capital acquisition, especially through inheritance contributing to women-operated farms’ smaller on average size than those operated by men. These dynamics are exacerbated for women of color.”
      • The fact that the women in our cohort are faithful reflections of this national dynamic is not surprising. Their commitment to the learning circles and to one another, noted in their connections online and frequent “likes” and comments on one another’s social media posts (see Milestone 12 for details), was unexpected but speaks both to the desire of many women farmers for peer-led, nontraditional technical assistance and to their yearning for connection to each other. As we recruit for a new cohort of women farmers in Virginia, we are experiencing many of the same dynamics – women are not sure what to expect, they are excited for the connection to others but want to make sure the commitment is worth their time, and they are eager for access to specific resources (one PA cohort participant revealed that she was “just here to get some money for cover crop seed” early on, but has since become one of the most engaged and committed participants for reasons other than funding). Cohort participants in PA, however, are now asking whether there will be an additional opportunity for themselves or friends to participate in a learning circle cohort again, proving that these women can serve as effective recruiters themselves should we secure funding to continue this type of farmer-led co-learning in the region.

Milestone 3: Identify a soil health successful woman farmer for economic case study; conduct farmer interview; analyze data for soil health economic case study; finalize case and share with women farmers in cohort (Learning)

  1. One woman farmer
  2. Cohort of farmers will learn about the economic, water quality, and climate outcomes of a woman farmer in Pennsylvania who has successfully adopted soil health practices
    • 12/31/22; 3/31/23; 6/30/23; 9/30/23 update:
      • We began recruitment for a soil health successful woman farmer in early 2022, particularly working through our advisory group and other project partners. AFT's Soil Health Economic Case Studies model requires that the subject be a row crop farmer who has been implementing one or more soil health practices for between 4 and 15 years and has a positive soil health and economic story to tell. We were surprised by the challenge of finding a female row crop farmer who met the requirements of the case study. As of January 2023, we have done extensive interviews with a small-scale organic grain producer, Teena Bailey of Red Cat Farm. While Teena's operation ultimately does not appear to be a good candidate for a retrospective case study due to her ongoing experimentation and very small-scale, we are excited to create a simple profile on her operation as a part of the project. In the meantime, outreach is ongoing for a female row crop farmer. Because AFT's Soil Health Economic Case Study team has significantly expanded thanks to a recent NRCS cooperative agreement, we now have the assistance of Lia Raz, AFT Conservation Agronomist, who will co-lead our outreach and facilitate the development of the case study once an appropriate subject is found. See attached recruitment materials. Our timeline for development of the case study remains on track.
      • The NRCS Cooperative Agreement will also fund the time originally budgeted for the Soil Health Economic Case Study team on this project, including Michelle Perez, Ben Wiercinski, Ellen Yeatman, and Agronomist 1. As a result, while we will continue to report on the milestones and targets associated with this portion of the project, we are submitting a budget amendment request in conjunction with this annual report to shift a portion of the requested funding from the case stud team to provide individualized technical assistance for cohort participants. (see "Assessment of project approach / areas of further study needed", below). We will report on this portion of the project under Milestone 7.  
      • Attachments: Milestone 3 Recruitment Materials
    • 1/2024 status: Complete
    • 1/2024 accomplishments:
      • As discussed in both last year’s project progress report and AFT’s 2024 Gender Equity in U.S. Agriculture (see quote in Milestone 2, above), women farmers are significantly underrepresented in row crop commodity agriculture. In addition, the requirements of AFT’s Retrospective Soil Health Economic Calculator (R-SHEC) tool limit the pool of eligible farmers even further with specific parameters around the types of qualified soil health practices and the number of years in particular practices. As a result,despite extensive outreach to nearly two hundred farmers and farm service providers in PA and seven in-depth interviews with female farmers, we were ultimately unable to locate a female farmer who qualified for the R-SHEC analysis. Instead, AFT’s Soil Health Economic Case Study team completed a case study on William Thiele, a crop and dairy farmer from Butler County, PA (linked in attachments), while our Mid-Atlantic team created two soil health profiles focused on participants in the cohort. These soil health profiles are the first exclusively featuring women producers on the AFT Farmland Information Center (FIC), and while they were not subject to the same rigorous economic analysis and review as the official economic case studies, they are powerful inspirational and educational tools for women farmers in the Mid-Atlantic region interested in adopting soil health practices. They illustrate the stories of women farmers characteristic of the region in terms of scale, production system, and selected soil health practices, and also demonstrate the breadth of available technical and financial assistance available for soil health, from Pasa’s Soil Health Benchmark Study to NRCS conservation plans and cost-share. We proposed a session focused on the Teena Bailey profile at the 2024 Pasa conference, but unfortunately it was not selected in a highly competitive year for sessions. We hope to try again with a proposal for the 2025 conference and possibly other local farmer-focused conferences.
      • Attachments: Outreach Tracker PA_ThieleDairyFarm_Soil_Health_Case_Study_AFT_NRCS AFT_Mid-Atlantic_Soil-Health-Farmer-Profile_Miller AFT_Mid-Atlantic_Soil-Health-Farmer-Profile_Bailey-1

Milestone 4: Host six Learning Circles and two farm field days (Learning)

  1. 10-15 women farmers
  2. Farmers will attend Learning Circles and farm field days and learn about the benefits of soil health practices and how to implement them on their farmland
    • 10/1/22-6/3/23 update:
      • Our first on-farm field day took place October 26th at Hameau Farm in the Big Valley, hosted by advisory group member and dairy farmer Gay Rodgers. Women farmers were able to learn from service provider discussion leaders including advisory group member Lisa Blazure, who presented on the principles and essential practices of soil health, NRCS staff member Melissa Erdman, who led discussions on the NRCS Soil Health Card and Pasture Assessment, and Penn State graduate students Madeline Luthard and Zoelie Rivera-Ocasio and undergraduate Heer Patel, who led hands-on demonstrations of additional soil health assessments including aggregate stability, active carbon, and microbial respiration. Women participants shared their overall goals for their farm operations and for the health of their soils. Host Gay Rodgers discussed her participation in the Pasa Soil Health Benchmark Study and her approach to building soil health in the context of her pastured dairy operation. Additional NRCS staff shared resources available to producers to assist with business development and soil health management and expressed their appreciation for opportunities to connect with female farmers and to learn about soil health basics and soil health assessment.  See attached evaluation results.
      • The first virtual Learning Circle was held December 1, and featured advisory group member Mary Barbercheck leading a discussion on soil health practices. The second included advisory group member Sarah Bay Nawa of Pasa Sustainable Agriculture sharing the results of the soil health benchmark study, in particular the ways in which particular practices contributed to soil health outcomes. She focused on row crops, vegetable operations, and pastured livestock producers since our participating farms include all of these production systems. Practices covered included tillage reduction, cover crops, nutrient management, and more. See attached evaluation results for the first two virtual learning circles.
      • Attachments: MI9675~1 Milestone 4 Hameau Farm Learning Circle Evaluations
    • 1/2024 Status: Complete
    • 1/2024 Accomplishments:
      • The third virtual learning circle was held February 15, 2023, with discussion leader Lisa Garfield from Future Harvest walking participants through the soil health management planning process using the template she developed for the Million Acre Challenge.
      • The fourth virtual learning circle was held March 15, 2023, with peers and advisors helping cohort participants workshop and refine their soil health management plans.
      • The second on-farm learning circle was held on April 11, 2023 at Rowantree Farm, a woman-run diversified vegetable and livestock farm in Mechanicsburg. Host and cohort participant Rowan Miller, who recently purchased a 100+ acre farm and is in the process of converting it from conventional commodity crops to rotationally grazed pasture, was also the subject of one of our soil health profiles and a ‘soil health champion’ video funded by the PA-CIG award that supported the learning circles themselves. Rowan led cohort participants on a farm tour during which Lisa Blazure from the Stroud Water Research Center and PA Soil Health Coalition sampled individual fields, comparing them with soil test results and nearby hedgerows. Cohort participants also had the opportunity to present their soil health management plans to the group and received feedback from advisory group members and partners as well as guests from NRCS and Capital RC&D.
      • By popular demand, we were able to organize a ‘bonus’ on-farm twilight learning circle at Dorene Pasekoff’s Hill Creek Farm in Pottstown on August 29. This learning circle focused on discussions of the ways cohort participants were experiencing climate impacts on their farms, and the specific ways that they saw their soil health practice implementation helping them adapt to these impacts. Cohort participants also toured Hill Creek Farm, a highly successful specialty vegetable, herb, and seed operation that Dorene has carefully right-sized to her interests, available labor, and financial goals.
      • Our final surveys and interviews with cohort participants demonstrate the effectiveness of the learning circle cohort model. One participant commented, “This learning circle truly brought a group of women together and kept us together and held us accountable! Other learning circles have been great as far as content but then you are left on your own.” Another responded, “being able to see other women farmer’s operations and having the chance to hear other’s stories and just talk has helped alleviate the sense that I am alone as a farmer. I have learned from what I’ve seen and heard at the Learning Circles.” A third farmer noted that she appreciated "the initial instruction, continued follow through and continued follow through,” while a fourth put it succinctly: “The learning circle model works. Interested in seeing what else AFT comes up with.” This participant applied and was accepted to an AFT Climate Adaptation and Mitigation Fellowship program for women and non-binary vegetable and small fruit producers, and we are excited to see what she will do with her fellowship! 
      • Attachments: Learning circle photos

Milestone 5: Eight Learning Circle participants create plan to implement soil health practices; AFT and advisory group review and approve plans (Learning)

  1. Eight women farmers
  2. Farmers will create a plan for implementing soil health practices on their farmland with support from the advisory group
    • 3/31/23 update:
      • This milestone is in process as of January 2023. Cohort participants have used an online “homework” assignment to create generalized soil health goals for their operations and to outline their assessment methods. In February, Lisa Garfield from Future Harvest will present her template for a producer-focused soil health management plan, enabling cohort participants to create a draft management plan for their operations. Essential elements of these plans will include soil health constraints or challenges as identified through the assessment methods selected by participants, reasonable, attainable goals to address these challenges, and specific practices that can be implemented on participant operations to meet these goals. AFT staff and advisory group members will review plans and offer support for revisions. One-on-one meetings between AFT staff and cohort participants in January 2023 are also supporting the development of soil health management plans. See attached “homework” results for level of engagement and sample participant goals. See also attached soil health management plan template developed by the Million Acre Challenge. 
    • 1/2024 Status: Complete
    • 1/2024 Accomplishments:
      • Cohort participants completed soil health management plans during Learning Circles #3 and #4, and presented them to one another and service providers at the in-person Learning Circle at Rowantree Farm in April. After Lisa Garfield presented the framework for the SHMP during Learning Circle #3, and AFT staff met one-on-one with cohort members to answer questions and help them set goals for their soil health management during the 2023 growing season. Participants were able to workshop their draft plans with their peers and advisory group members during the next Learning Circle in March. At Rowantree Farm, each cohort participant presented her soil health management plan, including her methods of soil health assessment, which soil health principles she was focusing on, what practices she wanted to implement and what resource concerns, if any, she was planning to address with her SHMP. Participants were highly invested in and inspired by their peers’ successes and very supportive of their challenges. The soil health management plan proved to be an effective framework for incorporating soil health priorities into a whole-farm perspective. 

      • Attachments: Soil Health Management Plan - Amanda Lee-Milner & Highfield Hollow Farm

Milestone 6: Eight Learning Circle participants are awarded implementation stipends (Engagement)

  1. Eight women farmers
  2. Farmers receive stipends
    • Year 1: 6/30/23; Year 2: 6/30/24
    • 1/2024 Status: In progress
    • 1/2024 Accomplishments:
      • We are pleased to have awarded stipends to seven cohort participants in 2023 to implement soil health practices. They are as follows:
        • Suzanne Shea, Old Sword Farm. Soil Food Web approach for integrated pest management (IPM); application of biologically complete compost and/or compost extract; and managed grazing integration
        • Caitlin Gabers, Herb & Sprouts Homestead. Soil testing; refining compost production through purchase of bagger for mower; crop rotation; addition of biological amendments
        • Lelayna Yarnell, Amity Springs Farm. Soil testing and assessment; additional infrastructure to improve rotational grazing practice; compost extract preparation and application.
        • Christine Williams, Little Swatara Creek Flowers. Soil health evaluation on multiple areas; soil sampling for nutrient management; addition of organic amendments and compost tea; nutrient analysis on compost and compost tea; implementation of no-till on row crops and pasture seeding; interseeding of legumes and grasses; no-till seeding of wildflower/ pollinator mix.
        • Amanda Lee-Milner, Highfield Hollow Farm. No-till seeding of soil health mixes with specific goals into hay fields and pastures.
        • Dorene Pasekoff, Hill Creek Farm. Soil health testing and assessment; goal-driven cover crop seeding.
        • Teena Bailey, Red Cat Farm. Tillage reduction; goal-driven cover cropping; compost application.

Milestone 7: Learning Circle participants implement soil health practices; receive technical assistance as necessary (Engagement/Learning)

  1. Eight women farmers
  2. Farmers sample soil to collect baseline for comparison; farmers implement soil health practices on their farmland; farmers sample soil after two years to compare soil health after practice implementation
    • Year 1: 9/30/23; Year 2: 9/30/24
    • 1/2024 Status: In progress
    • 1/2024 Accomplishments: 
      • AFT staff are currently meeting with cohort participants one-on-one to discuss soil health assessment and soil testing results from fall 2023 and assess participant interest in the Pasa Soil Health Benchmark Study. During these one-on-one meetings, we are also evaluating the successes and challenges of soil health practice implementation on cohort farms in 2023. Cohort participants appreciate the follow-up and opportunity to connect one-on-one. We have experienced some attrition in project participation following the completion of the learning circles and are currently considering ways to re-engage our farmers. Following the completion of our winter one-on-one check-ins, and based on the information we gather from surveys and in-depth interviews and potential budget revision requests, we will initiate one or more strategies to encourage re-investment on the part of our producers, including offering to fund their participation in the Benchmark Study, connecting them with additional funding through the Pasa Climate-Smart Agriculture project, highlighting one or more of them as the subject of a blog post or additional soil health profile, or something we have not yet determined. Based on the results of our interviews and reflections, we hope to propose a budget revision for 2024-25 that will enable us to most effectively meet our deliverables while remaining responsive to changing conditions in the region (see Areas for Further Study for more on this). We are finding that maintaining producer attention and engagement over the course of more than two years is both labor intensive and deeply rewarding.

Milestone 11: AFT measures nitrogen and phosphorus reduction resulting from soil health practices

  1. Eight women farmers
  2. Using EPA’s STEPL Tool, AFT will measure load reductions from eight farmers’ fields (Evaluation)
  3. 2/28/25

Milestone 12: AFT assesses impact of curriculum and training for women farmers (Evaluation)

  1. 10-15 women farmers
  2. Farmers complete a needs assessment before the training to identify, understand, and prioritize the needs of participants so that the advisory group can adapt the curriculum; women farmers complete exit surveys and follow-up interviews to track progress more purposefully on program impact
    • Year 1: 9/30/22; Year 2: 9/30/23
    • 1/2024 Status: In progress
    • 1/2024 Accomplishments:
      • As mentioned above, we are in the process of completing follow-up interviews with program participants. Needs assessment and exit survey results are included in attachments, and reflect the positive impact of the learning circle cohort model and the curriculum on participants’ experience. The following unsolicited social media posts and emails speak to the qualitative impact of the project:
          • Cohort participant, social media post 2023:
            • “Over the past few months, I have been participating in Women for the Land learning circles... these seven sessions have been an amazing learning tool, to help me understand better how to manage the soil at our new farm, using sustainable management, livestock rotational grazing, soil testing, etc. Not to mention the connections made with some amazing women farmers, PASA, NRCS, and SARE, etc.
            • If you are a woman farmer or have a connection to land you are trying to manage in a more sustainable way, come and join us April the 11th at my new farm, in the afternoon.” 
          • Cohort participant, social media post 2023:
            • “OMG tomorrow is TOMORROW!
            • I have been in this soil learning circle since the fall and I’m thoroughly looking forward to seeing my soil women again in person tomorrow. Also it’s the culmination of a lot of work for all of us – excited to present soil management plans! And over the top pumped to nose around Rowan’s new farm!”
          • Cohort participant, social media post 2023:
            • “I was excited about today in advance and would’ve been even if the weather were dull. But wow we had the bright sun shining down on us all day. And an amazing location at Rowantree Farm. 
            • Soil Health led by women. 9 of us did the learning circle and presented our soil management plans today. I’m so engaged with this group that I truly look forward to updates from each FarmHer on their various projects. Full steam ahead ladies! Let’s do this! 
            • So many thanks to the American Farmland Trust and to each of my soil homegirls.”
          • Cohort participant, social media post 2023:
            • “Final in-person session for the Soil Health for Women Farmers sponsored by American Farmland Trust. It is inspiring to hear what the other women are doing on their farms to promote soil health and spend time with these conservation minded women.”  
          • Cohort participant, social media post 2023:
            • “I’ve been part of the Soil Health for Women Farmers learning circle since last year and had a great day seeing the rest of the crew today at Rowantree Farm in Mechanicsburg. 
            • I’m grateful for the support, training, and cohort camaraderie as we all work towards improving soil health on our farms!”
          • Service provider/partner email, 2023
            • “I had so much fun at the RowanTree Farm learning circle.  That is an amazing group of women!  I learned a lot from them. I wish all of my extension activities were so pleasant -  I really can't think of a much better way to have spent the day!” 
          • Service provider/ partner email, 2023:
            • “Thank you SO much for inviting me to be part of this project. It's only my second women's group in my career and it reminded me that it is a much more holistic and authentic experience than when I interact with the men.  It is really inspiring and powerful....  
            • You have done a fantastic job spearheading this project and I'm sure I speak for all of us involved, that it was a lovely experience.”

Milestone Activities and Participation Summary

Educational activities:

15 Consultations
4 Curricula, factsheets or educational tools
3 On-farm demonstrations
5 Online trainings
3 Workshop field days

Participation Summary:

15 Farmers participated
15 Number of agricultural educator or service providers reached through education and outreach activities

Learning Outcomes

6 Farmers reported changes in knowledge, attitudes, skills and/or awareness as a result of their participation

Performance Target Outcomes

Target #1

Target: number of farmers:

8

Target: change/adoption:

Adopt soil health practices (residue and tillage management, cover crops, nutrient management, prescribed grazing, etc.)

Target: amount of production affected:

1,000 acres of farmland

Target: quantified benefit(s):

10,000 pounds of nitrogen loss reductions; 3,000 pounds of phosphorus loss reduction; 550 tons of sediment loss reductions per year

Actual: change/adoption:

Still in progress

Actual: amount of production affected:

Still in progress

Actual: quantified benefit(s):

still in progress

Performance Target Outcome Narrative:

The farmers participating in the soil health learning circle cohort are, in general, relatively small scale. The largest operation is just over 100 acres, while the smallest is only around ½ acre. While this information shows the need for financial and technical assistance for small and mid-scale female producers to help them adopt soil health management practices, it also may impact the acreage on which our target outcomes are adopted. Because of the relatively small scale of the farms ultimately engaged in the cohort, it is likely that our acreage target will not be met. If useful, we can provide an updated target acreage and benefit estimate related to the total acreage managed by cohort participants. 

Farmers and service providers report improved knowledge and connections following both in-person and virtual learning circles (see evaluations under Milestone 4, above.  Unsolicited feedback from service providers included the following: “Love seeing conservation hit the ground! And it was incredibly rejuvenating to see people get excited about stuff and not have to feel like a used car salesman trying to convince producers this is a good idea for their property! People left hungry to go home yesterday and get their hands dirty and it was awesome!” “I just wanted to reach out and let you know how much I enjoyed the training that you and your colleagues brought to Mifflin County. It was truly great to meet such wonderful women, and I know there are going to be some soil health warriors after the training! Please let me know about any future events and if there is anything I or any of my fellow NRCS compadres can do to help the cause. We are always here to offer help either through technical assistance, financial incentives, or just answering questions!” Unsolicited feedback from farmers (see evaluations for additional feedback) includes: ” I love this group so much!!  I’m learning a ton and the personalities of the women are so enjoyable to be around!” “Farming can be a very lonely business when one is solely responsible for the learning, the decisions, the physical work, and the consequences of the aforementioned, and to have some interaction with other women farmers, is really uplifting and inspiring. The learning circle was an encouraging view into other's lives, and I was awed by the undertakings of some of the farmers.”

7 Farmers changed or adopted a practice

Additional Project Outcomes

2 Grants applied for that built upon this project
1 Grant received that built upon this project
$57,000.00 Dollar amount of grant received that built upon this project
6 New working collaborations
Additional Outcomes:

A notable impact of the project, which was to some extent anticipated but is more pronounced than expected, is the appreciation of both farmers and service providers for the learning circle model, which emphasizes both content and connection among participants. A very successful in-person learning circle kicked off a connection among the farmers and between farmers and service providers which has persisted even in the virtual space. Taking time for individual introductions and for farmers to express their own goals, struggles, and progress, even when this takes up fully a quarter of a two-hour virtual session, has proven to be very important for the participants. The virtual nature of many of our learning circles does limit individualized conversations among participants, but one-on-one phone calls with each farmer in January have helped create additional connections. As a deliverable of our related PA-CIG grant, we plan to offer a series of train-the-trainer workshops for service providers focused on the learning circle model, both as it relates specifically to soil health education and as a general education and outreach tool for women producers. The positive response of participants to this model has reaffirmed our belief in the effectiveness of farmer networks to support both business viability and conservation practice adoption.

This project has also informed a NFWF-funded farmer network project being established in Maryland as part of the Million Acre Challenge, of which AFT is a core member organization. The Million Acre Challenge aims to bring soil health and regenerative practice adoption to one million acres of Maryland agricultural land by 2030. In part based on the success of the combination of learning circle networking and implementation funding piloted in this project, project partners on the NFWF grant hope to engage producers in a similar way, creating production system-specific learning circles in targeted regions of the state and making implementation funds available for participants for innovative practice adoption.  

Success stories:

A farmer from near Gettysburg, PA, wrote: “I love this group so much!!  I’m learning a ton and the personalities of the women are so enjoyable to be around!”

A small-scale organic grain farmer in her seventies from southern PA wrote: “Farming can be a very lonely business when one is solely responsible for the learning, the decisions, the physical work, and the consequences of the aforementioned, and to have some interaction with other women farmers, is really uplifting and inspiring. The learning circle was an encouraging view into other's lives, and I was awed by the undertakings of some of the farmers.”

AFT staff partnered with Natalie Wallace and her team at Wonderscope to create an excellent video and short social media clips focused on Rowantree Farm’s soil health journey. We are excited to use both the profiles and the videos widely to encourage increased soil health practice adoption and demonstrate the impact and diversity of women farmers in Pennsylvania. In addition to their places online at www.farmlandinfo.org, we also plan to share them in print at regional events and to make them available to diverse audiences through mainstream media, social media, and partner organization distribution.  

As a result of the PA CIG funding we received to complement the work of this project, AFT and our partners were proud to offer two virtual training sessions for conservation professionals focused on innovative strategies for soil health technology transfer in September 2023. These training sessions were recorded and are posted on AFT’s YouTube channel and links were emailed to registrants following the sessions. In all, 45 individuals registered for the first session focused on Soil Health for Vegetable and Cut Flower Systems; 65 individuals registered for the second session on Engaging Farmers in Soil Health Education. These numbers, at a busy time of year for farmers and service providers, show the strength of interest in this topic from service providers and the energy around the specific topics selected by AFT’s staff and partners.  

YouTube link to Soil Health for Vegetable and Cut Flower Systems 

YouTube link to Engaging Farmers in Soil Health Education: Effective Strategies 

Assessment of Project Approach and Areas of Further Study:

The need for individualized technical assistance is very clear among participants in our learning circle cohort. We are fortunate to have highly knowledgeable service providers as members of our advisory group, but additional technical assistance, particularly for small- and mid-scale producers who may be operating with limited equipment or using sustainable small-scale methods, is a very real need.

We are grateful for the opportunity to offer cohort participants an additional stipend to support a technical assistance consultant. Individualized TA consulting is a practice that is working well in our region for a range of production types, including Future Harvest’s PYO consultant program and the 4R Alliance Voucher program, and fits with the desire of the participants for one-on-one TA and consulting.

Our partners at Pasa are in the process of launching a Climate-Smart Commodities project aimed at providing technical and financial support for some of these small- and mid-scale farmers, and it will be instructive to see how effective these projects can be for producers of this size, given the intense USDA reporting requirements they carry.

One emerging challenge for our project is the intense competition for producer engagement that is becoming apparent in the region due to increased investment from the federal government, a new PA state cost-share program, other important water quality programs, and the Climate-Smart Commodities Partnerships projects. Our goal for the next year is therefore to maintain connection with the producers we’ve engaged so effectively through the learning circle cohort, ensure that they have access to any financial and technical resources that may be available to them as a result of this new investment, and try to use our relatively small implementation stipends as leverage to enable their participation in other programs. We have at least two producers in the cohort who, despite a strong environmental stewardship ethic, are adamantly opposed to fencing animals out of on-farm waterways, meaning that they are automatically ineligible for most NRCS and state cost-share programs focused on water quality. Part of our messaging to these producers over the course of the next year will be on the many co-benefits of healthy soils for water quality, learning their holistic goals for their operations, and how stream exclusion might support those holistic goals in the long run.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE.