Farm-Scale Application of Concentrated Urine-Derived Fertilizer: Evaluation of a Roller Pump for Precise and Consistent Side Dressing of Sweet Corn

Project Overview

ONE24-455
Project Type: Partnership
Funds awarded in 2024: $15,467.00
Projected End Date: 06/30/2026
Grant Recipient: Rich Earth Institute
Region: Northeast
State: Vermont
Project Leader:
Abraham Noe-Hays
Rich Earth Institute

Commodities

  • Vegetables: sweet corn

Practices

  • Crop Production: application rate management, nutrient cycling
  • Sustainable Communities: local and regional food systems

    Proposal abstract:

    This project builds upon two
    previous SARE Partnership projects with John Janiszyn, who
    operates Pete's Stand in Walpole, NH, with field sites in
    Vermont.  In these previous projects, we designed a
    gravity-fed method for applying sanitized urine fertilizer to his
    sweet corn, followed by successful experiments using a urine
    concentrate to increase application efficiency. This project will
    give further attention to the method of dosing the urine onto the
    field, addressing needs for both consistent dosing rates and
    minimal ammonia volatilization. We will design a ground-driven
    peristaltic (or "roller”) pump system to dispense urine
    concentrate into crop rows, and we will evaluate its efficacy
    through quantitative testing, farmer feedback, and leaf tissue
    analysis of fertilized crops. The roller pump system design will
    be documented in a short video and made accessible to farmers
    interested in adopting urine-fertilization
    technology. 

    Project objectives from proposal:

    This project will evaluate the
    ease of use, effectiveness, and consistency of a customized
    fertilizer applicator using a ground-driven "roller pump" for
    applying a sanitized, concentrated urine-derived fertilizer to
    sweet corn. We will purchase a multi-tube roller pump and the
    necessary auxiliary component parts to assemble a complete system
    that can 1) consistently deliver the desired amount of urine
    fertilizer per acre (adjustable by the farmer), 2) cover the
    urine fertilizer with soil immediately upon application to
    prevent ammonia loss, and 3) be easy to operate and maintain.
    Furthermore, we will test the practical limits of the system’s
    dosing rates and discover any mechanical weaknesses. We will
    monitor urine-fertilized crops for signs of healthy development
    (visually and through tissue analysis), and note any differences
    in health from synthetically-fertilized crops. From this
    assessment, we hope to determine the potential for this
    applicator to be used for other crops and application contexts.
    Desired outcomes of the roller pump system testing
    include:

     

    Deliver a consistent and correct
    urine fertilizer volume per acre 

    1. There is no variation in the
      quantity of fertilizer dispensed over a set distance when the
      tractor is driving at different speeds
    2. The drive wheel consistently
      powers the pump as the tractor moves over the ground, even when
      encountering bumps, divots, etc.
    3. The pump provides a practical
      flow rate for urine concentrate and delivers urine at the
      correct depth and location relative to row crops
    4. There are no differences in
      plant development and overall health during the growing season
      between plants receiving urine fertilizer or synthetic
      fertilizer
       

     

    Ammonia volatilization is limited
    during application

    1. The urine fertilizer is
      immediately buried in soil upon application to the
      ground
    2. Little to no ammonia odor is
      present following application

     

    The roller pump system is easy to
    operate and maintain and contexts for its potential use are
    understood

    1. The farmer-partner reports an
      easy-to-operate user experience with minimal challenges
    2. There are no mechanical
      failures or signs of wear/weakness in any system
      components
    3. The system is expected to be
      useful for other crops and application contexts besides sweet
      corn
    4. The system limits are
      understood through a determination of the maximum and minimum
      practical dosing rates possible
    Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE.