Colorado 2018-20 PDP project

Final report for WSP18-005

Project Type: PDP State Program
Funds awarded in 2018: $28,636.00
Projected End Date: 03/31/2021
Host Institution Award ID: G172-19-W7506
Grant Recipient: Colorado State University Extension
Region: Western
State: Colorado
State Coordinators:
Dr. Ioannis Minas
Colorado State University
Co-Coordinators:
Adrian Card
Colorado State University
Expand All

Project Information

Abstract:

Colorado PDP goals during the next year (2019) are to: 1) assess the knowledge level and educational needs of professionals associated with sustainable agriculture, 2) provide sustainable agriculture in-depth training for agricultural educators and producers across the state through mini-grants and training, 3) provide support promoting and potentially hosting educational workshops, 4) and facilitate proposal development in response to grant opportunities. Specific topics that will be covered include, but are not limited to, food and cropping system diversification, energy efficiency, farmer networks, and range and livestock integrated resource management.

Project Objectives:

Objective 1) Enhancement of the knowledge-base and skills of Colorado agricultural professionals interested in sustainable agricultural practices: In 2019, provide a competitive-mini grants program in sustainable agriculture. We expect to support six competitive mini-grants to conduct demonstrations projects, workshops, and/or farm tours. Provide five travel scholarships to regional and national conferences/workshops related to sustainable agriculture.

Objective 2) Increase clientele’s understanding of sustainable agriculture practices through educational methods: A comprehensive review of the knowledge gaps existing among the Colorado’s sustainable community will help design approaches to develop and deliver information related to alternative management practices. This will be accomplished through workshops, training, and interaction with professionals and producers by, a sustainable conference focusing on the effects climate variability on range, livestock and crop production.

  • Meat Summit work to advance market opportunities, build connections, and support collective skills development and learning across many segments and scales of Colorado and the Western U.S.’s agricultural and food system. Western U.S. Meat Summit: 1.5 day event in December 2020.
  • Programs developed to present sustainable management principles & long-term ranch management to both local and state government, NGOs, agency personnel, and ranchers.

Objective 3) Promote awareness of WSARE grant opportunities: To increase the level of involvement of agricultural professional across Colorado we will distribute materials and promote activities related to sustainable agriculture through the CO-WSARE web page which will require extensive updating. The Colorado Fruit and Vegetable Growers Association Conference and educational conferences by providing information about SARE.

 

Advisors

Click linked name(s) to expand/collapse or show everyone's info
  • Adrian Card (Educator)
  • Kara Harders - Technical Advisor (Educator)
  • Kara Harders - Technical Advisor (Educator)
  • Dr. Rebecca Jablonski (Educator and Researcher)
  • Dr. Rebecca Jablonski (Educator and Researcher)
  • Brian Kailey (Educator)

Education

Educational approach:

 *Enhancement of the knowledge-base and skills of Colorado agricultural professionals interested in sustainable agricultural practices: In 2019, provide a competitive-mini grants program in sustainable agriculture. We expect to support six competitive mini-grants to conduct demonstrations projects, workshops, and/or farm tours. Provide up to five travel scholarships to regional and national conferences/workshops related to sustainable agriculture.

 *Increase clientele’s understanding of sustainable agriculture practices through educational methods: A comprehensive review of the knowledge gaps existing among the Colorado’s sustainable community will help design approaches to develop and deliver information related to alternative management practices. This will be accomplished through workshops, training, and interaction with professionals and producers by, a sustainable conference focusing on the effects climate variability on range, livestock and crop production.

 *Promote awareness of WSARE grant opportunities: To increase the level of involvement of agricultural professional across Colorado we will distribute materials and promote activities related to sustainable agriculture through the CO-WSARE web page which will require extensive updating.

Inputs. Financially, funding will support: 1) mini-grant program, 2) travel for extension educators to attend conferences and training 3) Program coordinator’s travel to WSARE PDP meetings, and 4) provide support promoting and potentially hosting educational workshops. Additional funding will come from state and federal grants, partnering states and local The state PDP coordinators, Extension, stakeholders, and agency staff will provide human resources to participate in meetings, grants, and workshops. Facilities and equipment for events will be provided by county extension offices when possible.

Target audience. Extension agents and faculty (30), PDP coordinators (2), other professionals (8), as well as producers, stakeholders and NGOs.

Activities and methods. Participants will submit proposals for projects that provide education about and/or demonstrate sustainable agricultural practices. An Agriculture Conference is proposed to examine changes, explore approaches and methods of sustainable agriculture, the environment and food systems production, water and climate change. An evaluation will be conducted to assess audience’s knowledge gained.

Products. Attendees for the agents training will improve understanding of SARE principles. Agent and participant information, knowledge gained, partnerships, and behavioral change will be evaluated and shared with the SARE reporting system.

 

Education & Outreach Initiatives

Colorado Meat School
Objective:

Starting in October 2019, CSU Extension will offer its first ever Meat School, designed to expose producers to the skills and resources required to access new markets for improved profitability, including understanding and building relationships in the meat supply chain. We will offer facilitated sessions of the Meat School in several areas: Routt County, San Luis Valley and La Plata County, and hope that this pilot course can then be adapted to other regions of the state.
List partners and/or collaborators:
National Meat Processor Assistance Network (NMPAN), Colorado Association of Meat Processors (CAMP), Oregon State University Extension, CSU Dept. of Animal Sciences, Fort Lewis College, San Luis Valley Local Foods Coalition, CSU Dept. of Ag and Resource Economics, CSU Extension.

Description:

Our target audience is new and beginning livestock producers, or experienced livestock producers, both of whom are interested in accessing and developing the supply chain for specialty and differentiated livestock products sold primarily through direct to consumer markets. In the first year we expect to work with 25 participants over the course of 6 weeks.

We have multiple channels for promoting this class series: 1) our website foodsystems.edu; 2) our Food Systems newsletter; 3) through our community and state partners such as San Luis Valley Local Foods Coalition, Community Ag Alliance, Colorado Farmers Market Association, Colorado Department of Agriculture, CAMP, NMPAN; 4) social media such as partner Facebook pages; 5) direct communication with livestock producers on CSU Extension email lists.

We are developing a 6-week class that, during its pilot period, will be held in 3 different locations: Routt County; San Luis Valley (near Alamosa); and La Plata County. The class covers the following six modules to provide producers with production, processing and marketing information designed to build the skills and connections they need to be successful in direct to consumer markets.

Module Learning Objectives

Marketing #1: Understanding and developing new markets for meat • Understand the range of market opportunities for meat and value-added meat products

  • Learn about consumer tastes and preferences for meats
  • Develop a competitive advantage in marketing your products

Production #1: Breed selection, range/pasture management and animal nutrition for sustainable meat production • Understand how breed influences rates of gain, meat quality and profitability

  • Learn the basics of animal nutrition
  • Understand how forage quality influences meat production and quality
  • Learn about tools to develop a grazing plan

Production #2: Meat quality and safety • Understand carcass quality on the hoof

  • Learn how finishing influences final meat quality
  • Learn about disease prevention and biosecurity

Processing #1: Basics of meat processing • Understand how to identify and work with a processor

  • Understand processing costs
  • List the information a processor needs to deliver the product you will be selling
  • Calculate yield of packaged product

Processing #2: Processing for specific markets • Understand meat cutting requirements for different market channels

  • Learn how to provide specific cutting instructions to meet your customers’ needs

Marketing #2: Pricing and selling to your target markets • Develop pricing strategies for your meat products, by market channel

  • Learn how to educate your customers on meat cuts, handling and preparation
  • Understand state and federal regulations around meat sales

The 6-week course will focus on increasing the awareness and knowledge of livestock producers to help them better understand market conditions around the state and the changing demand for differentiated products in direct-to-consumer markets. Based on this knowledge, the course will teach producers specific production attributes that will help them raise more consistent, high-quality products that will yield cuts desired by different types of buyers (individual consumers, restaurant buyers, retail grocers). The course will also help course participants understand how to work with their meat processors in order to ensure that the animals they deliver to be slaughtered and processed always yield the desired packaged products.

Based on knowledge gained in this class series, producers will make the following changes in decision-making with resulting actions: 1) know how to adjust feeding, grazing and handling of their animals to positively impact meat quality and yield during processing; 2) establish differential pricing for different cuts of meat and meat products, based on their market outlets and their costs of production; and 3) select markets that offer the highest and most consistent return to their business.

This course will emphasize the benefits of land and water management of livestock production, some of which will be entirely grass-based systems. Stewardship of the resource base is essential for continued production of high-quality meat products. In addition, we will focus on the costs and returns of direct to consumer markets for differentiated meat products, and discuss strategies for accessing these markets such as developing processor and buyer relationships.

To evaluate outcomes resulting from course participation, livestock producers will: 1) complete assessments of their knowledge of production, processing, marketing and other business topics, both before and after the course; and 2) characterize community resources, connections and new market opportunities they have identified since beginning the course and that they hope to build upon following completion of the course. These evaluations results will then be used to help us plan the next round of courses in other parts of Colorado, and help other states replicate this model should they wish to.

Outcomes and impacts:

CSU Extension’s first Meat School had 49 total participants, of whom 39 were meat/livestock producers and 10 were ag professionals interested in hosting a similar class for stakeholders in their geographic area. The Meat School was offered online via webinar and in facilitated sessions at three Colorado locations (Routt County, Alamosa and Durango). The online attendees were either ag professionals from out of state or from a region where we were not offering an in-person class, or they were ranchers who preferred to access the educational content online due to their respective distance from an in-person class. Overall the Meat School drew in participants from 7 states (Colorado, Oregon, New York, Minnesota, Montana, Virginia and Maryland), and the District of Columbia. Forty participants were from Colorado, 33 of whom were producers and 7 of whom were Extension staff.

Of the participating meat/livestock producers, 36 completed an intake questionnaire to help us better plan the curriculum and resources to support the course. Of those producers, 61% raised beef cattle, 17% raised swine, 17% raised sheep, 6% raised goats and 6% raised other species such as poultry (these percentages sum to greater than 100% since 9 producers raised multiple livestock species). Thirty-three percent had no meat production at the time of the class. Of those selling meat (and some through multiple channels):

  • 88% were selling directly to consumers
  • 59% were selling directly to other end buyers
  • 12% were selling to wholesale buyers
  • 18% were selling in other channels

When asked what resources they used to evaluate a new market opportunity, most responded that they talked to other producers, or they tried to figure it out on their own. Other pre-course evaluation questions included:

  • If they had a system to track the costs and returns of their livestock business (18% said they did not, 42% said they had a system in place, and 21% said they used this system effectively);
  • If they knew their costs of production (only 18% said they did); and
  • How they developed their meat product pricing (most said they priced their products similarly to the competition’s products, some said they based their prices on their costs of production, and a few said they negotiated their prices with their buyers).

This general lack of data from which to make business decisions motivated CSU Extension to design the class to help producers reduce risk in three specific areas: production (animal nutrition and health); processing (maximizing carcass value and obtaining marketable cuts); and marketing (understanding how to identify and engage customers). The course was developed and conducted as follows:

Module Speakers Learning Objectives

Marketing #1: Identifying and developing new markets for meat (Start with the market in mind)

October 30, 2019 • Dawn Thilmany, Colorado State University Department of Ag and Resource Economics

  • Understand trends in niche meats and the role of certifications
  • Learn about consumer tastes and preferences for meats
  • Conduct and integrate market research into marketing plans
  • Adrienne Larrew, Corner Post Meats • Understand the range of market opportunities for meat and value-added meat products

Production #1: Breed selection, range/pasture management and animal nutrition for sustainable meat production

November 6, 2019 • Beth LaShell, Fort Lewis College • Learn about appropriate breed selection for your resources and markets and the basics of animal nutrition

  • Jim Gerrish, American Grazing Lands Services, LLC • Understand how forage quality influences meat production and quality
  • Learn about tools to develop a grazing plan, given your resource base

Production #2: Meat quality and safety

November 13, 2019

  • Jennifer Marting, Colorado State University Animal Sciences Department • Understand carcass quality on the hoof
  • Learn how finishing practices/methods influences final meat quality
  • Michele Pfannensteil, Dirigo Food Safety • Learn about disease prevention and biosecurity in livestock operations

Processing #1: Basics of meat processing

November 20, 2019 • Rebecca Thistlethwaite, Niche Meat Processors Assistance Network • Understand how to identify and work with a processor

  • Understand state and federal regulations around meat sales
  • Holly Zink, Sunnyside Meats Colorado Meat Processor • Understand processing costs
  • List the information a processor needs to deliver the product you will be selling
  • Calculate yield of packaged product

Processing #2: Processing for specific markets

December 4, 2019 • Bob Delmore, Colorado State University Animal Sciences Department • Understand meat cutting considerations for different market channels

  • Learn how to provide specific cutting instructions to meet your customers’ needs

Marketing #2: Pricing and selling to your target markets

December 11, 2019 • Shannon Hayes, Grassfed Gourmet • Learn how to educate your customers on meat cuts, handling and preparation

  • Matt LeRoux, Cornell University • Develop pricing strategies for your meat products, by market channel

 

Following six class sessions and 11 separate modules covering the primary areas of risk, producer participants reported the following:

  • 50% increase in understanding consumer tastes and preferences for meat products;
  • 43% increase in understanding the steps that go into conducting and integrating market research into their marketing plans;
  • 50% increase in ability to identify the factors that determine their animals’ meat quality at harvest;
  • 29% increase in understanding how to safely deliver animals to the processor;
  • 50% increase in understanding how to effectively work with a processor;
  • 57% increase in understanding how to clearly communicate types of cuts, labeling, and packaging needs to a processor; and
  • 57% increase in understanding how to price meat products for different market channels.

 

Overall, on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is strongly disagree and 5 is strongly agree, producer participants agreed they gained the following level of understanding on:

Indicator of knowledge gained: Average understanding gained from the course

how to engage customers who buy their meat 4.21

how to maximize the carcass value of their animals for the markets where they sell meat 4.09

how they can influence pasture quality to improve animal nutrition and meat quality 4.08

the process for selecting the species and breed of animal for their operations and markets 3.78

balancing an animal’s nutritional needs with the feedstuff available 3.77

 

This pilot course helped CSU Extension:

  • develop initial content for its online Meat School;
  • build out a website to serve as a reference for meat producers (https://foodsystems.colostate.edu/educational-impacts/meat-supply-chains/);
  • illustrate to other Extension staff and to funders how a dual online and in-person course can be conducted;
  • identify additional courses that can be offered to support producer learning in the spring/summer of 2020; and
  • begin initial planning for a 2021 Rocky Mountain Meat Summit to bring together meat producers and processors with the goal of enhancing communication and business transactions along the meat supply chain.

 

2020 Colorado Fruit and Vegetable Growers Association Conference
Objective:

CFVGA provides educational outreach to growers and ag professionals through an annual conference in Denver. Ag professionals will learn the latest related to food safety, worker health, risk management, farm succession, business development and ag tech aspects of fruit and vegetable production. The February 24-25, 2020 conference is anticipated to attract more than 300 growers, ag professionals, produce buyers and input suppliers to Denver. New in 2020, we will a closing plenary session exploring the Risks and Returns of the Colorado Hemp Industry, featuring both public and private sector panelists. Also in 2020, to meet the increasing risks of an unpredictable labor supply, this conference will feature 5 different breakout session for labor supply and management for large and small growers. Continuing from the 2019, this conference will also feature Specialty Crops Block Grant recipient reports, allowing participants to learn from the outcomes of this grant program. See more at https://cfvga.org

List partners and/or collaborators:
CSU Extension, CSU Ag Experiment Station, CSU College of Ag Sciences, FFA, Colorado Dept of Ag, Western Growers Association, LiveWell Colorado, Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, Food Bank of the Rockies, Rocky Ford Growers Association, Colorado Onion Growers, Colorado Potato Admin Committee

Description:

The target audience? Specifically, identify the group or groups that will be targeted for participation in your project.

Commercial fruit and vegetable growers are the primary audience

Ag professionals are the secondary audience

How will you promote the event to insure reaching this audience?

Email listservs from CFVGA, agencies, producer groups, etc.Flyers, Website https://cfvga.org

 

Describe briefly what you’re going to do, such as hold an educational event, produce educational materials, etc.We will offer a two day educational conference with networking and breakout sessions.

  • Ag producers and professionals will increase knowledge regarding the challenges and opportunities facing the fruit and vegetable industry in Colorado.
  • Ag producers and professionals will show intention to implement or create programs for growers to implement best practices for food safety, labor, production and business development.
  • Ag producers will increase farm resiliency and realize business goals through improved access to appropriate resources and best practices.

Paper evaluation at the conference to all attendees.

Outcomes and impacts:
Bee Curious-Introductory Course for Beekeepers
Objective:

This 2-day course is designed for new and novice beekeepers. In this class participants will learn how to prepare and manage bee colonies in order to help insure the health and sustainability of pollinators.

List partners and/or collaborators: CSU Extension and Pueblo County Beekeepers Association

Description:

In this inaugural year we will be targeting beginning and novice beekeepers. Included in this group are current backyard beekeepers who are relatively new and have a desire to learn more as well as those that have not raised bees in the past but would like to.

An aggressive social media advertising campaign has been designed to reach an audience that includes gardeners and those interested in pollinator issues. Print media will also be utilized including flyers in home and garden stores. Finally, the word will be spread to regional Bee Clubs to expand the audience to their friends, neighbors and contacts that may have expressed an interest in beekeeping.

A 2-day course covering topics in which an aspiring beekeeper would need to know to be successful and sustainable has been designed. Local, experienced beekeepers as well as Extension professionals will be leading these classes. A course book for participants will be designed and printed to provide participants with reference material to review as they need. By having both the classroom and book the desire is that the information presented will be remembered and utilized as attendees begin or continue in their beekeeping endeavor.

The expectation is that participants in this course will leave with the knowledge and resources to become successful beekeepers. They will be more aware of management practices and health issues that currently affect the sustainability of bees. As we create more awareness and successful beekeepers we hope to also increase the population of pollinators in the area.

Our desire is to show that with the proper knowledge and management, bees can be successfully kept by those willing to put forth the effort. The hope is that those with intentions of raising bees would become more aware of what is required and make more educated decisions when it comes to managing their hives.

Pollinator’s and the honey bee in particular have been a hot topic the last several years. The struggle to maintain the population and importance in food production has been well documented. This has led to many people having a desire to do their part and not only keep bees but to also improve their practices in order to provide better habitat and better health of bees. The education and mentoring that will take place as a result of this school will help to insure the future sustainability of pollinator’s in the area. Those in attendance will learn from local beekeepers and experts about management and health of bees therefor better equipping them to begin or continue in their beekeeping aspirations.

Surveys will be administered at the conclusion of the class to assess the knowledge gained and intentions of use of this knowledge by participants. By utilizing a digitally based survey system we hope to be able to track knowledge and intentions with demographic data in order to assist instructor’s in targeting future educational needs and marketing.

Outcomes and impacts:

Bee Curious Final Report 2020 Tom Laca, Pueblo County Ag and Natural Resources Extension Agent has been instructing prospective beekeepers in best management practices of keeping bees for the past 5 years. This class has been met with high demand every year. As the popularity of this class and beekeeping in general has risen, the need for an organization to support local beekeepers came about. Tom, along with several class graduates, that went on to keep bees, formed the Pueblo County Beekeepers Association (PCBA.) The goal of this group is to educate the general public about bees as well as other beekeepers on all aspects of beekeeping. In keeping with the goals of the PCBA it was their desire to expand the Beginning Beekeeping class and provide more advanced educational opportunities for both club members and others.
Response:
In the summer of 2019 Tom Laca and the executive committee of the PCBA began meeting to plan a school for beginning beekeepers to be held in February of 2020. Topics for the school were discussed and assigned to committee members for presentation. One of the main goals of the group was to produce a course book that participants would be able to reference as they started their beekeeping experience. In all eleven topics were chosen to be presented over a 16-hour course. The topics presented were: Honey Bee Biology, Locating Your Hives (and Other Considerations), Equipment, How to Obtain and Install Your Bees, Seasonal Management of Bees, Hive Inspections and Note Taking, Integrated Pest Management (IPM), Diseases and Treatments, Making Honey, Gardening for Your Honey Bees and Pesticide Use and Your Bees. Committee members not only taught the courses, they also wrote a 95-page course book with in depth information on each topic.

Another goal of the group was to host an educational event for those that had experience keeping bees. This involved bringing in well-known beekeepers from across the state to discuss more advanced topics. Three speakers attended and presented on: “So You Want to be a Swarm Catcher,” “How I Built This,” “Diagnosing a Dead Hive,” “All About the Queen” and “How to Produce Your Own Bees.” This event also included vendors for participants to purchase equipment, supplies, bee related goods and educational booths. 

With the help of Western SARE and Pueblo County Extension, PCBA was able to put on an outstanding set of educational opportunities. Funds were utilized to help with the production of the course book as well as advertise the events. In all 123 people from 2 states attended and learned more about the sustainable production of bees. The Bee Curious Bee School had 26 participants while the Bee Curious: Adventures in Beekeeping had 97 in attendance. The support of Western SARE and Extension made it possible to host a quality set of events at an affordable price.

Evaluations of the courses were made using an online platform that allowed participants to text their answers while the question was displayed on the screen. Questions were asked both before and after the courses to determine if changes would be made because of the education received. A paper survey was also presented to allow for short answer questions. The following are results from the survey that assessed current situation, knowledge gained and likelihood of change.

The evaluation data shows that there was a good mix of beginning and experienced beekeepers in attendance. 100% of attendees reported that they had a better understanding of the topics that were covered. Even better than that, over 90% stated that they would change the way they take care of bees due to what they learned. Finally, 100% of the participants reported that what they learned would make them a better and more sustainable beekeeper.
Western SARE Funds Utilized.
The classes were awarded $2000 in funding to cover speaker costs, advertising and the production of the course book. The total of these expenses was $1,540.78. The remainder of the cost for food was paid for by registration fees and the PCBA. The planning committee is grateful for Western SARE and its support. We would not have been able to put on an event of this caliber without the financial assistance. This assistance has also made it possible to continue this program into the future. The committee is already making plans for next year.

Travel Scholarship to attend Organic Seed Growers Conference
Objective:

This will be my 3rd time to attend this conference. Extension Agent hopes to continue to learn creative ways to teach on this subject and to support regional seed efforts. The thing that has always stood out about this conference are the examples of effective collaborations between University Plant breeders, Extension professionals, farmers, local seed companies, chefs, consumers.

Description:

Agent have been teaching Seed Saving Classes for the past 4 years in our region (Norwood, Ridgway, and Montrose (More than a dozen). The plan is to continue. Some of these classes are in support of regional seed libraries (Norwood, Ridgway and now maybe Telluride).

  • Agent will collaborate with a fellow seed saving teacher (we attended a teacher training together several years ago) and a local small produce/seed farmer and seed company (High Desert Seed) to offer classes in support of regional seed libraries.
  • With High Desert Seed, and Agent hopes to do an advanced class for farmers in Montrose area.
  • Agent is starting Grower Meetings in the area and will share on regional seed systems, seed saving, small farm breeding, etc. at least one of those meetings this year. I think farming seeds is something that has potential in our area.
Outcomes and impacts:

The funds I received to attend the 2020 Organic Seed Alliance Organic Seed Growers Conference in Corvallis, Oregon were so appreciated! 

This was my 3rd time to attend this conference—it occurs every other year.  It is by far the most rewarding thing that I have been able to participate in for my own professional development and my educational outreach as an Extension Agent.  This conference incorporates so many levels of seed work – home gardener seed savers, seed libraries, seed companies, university and commercial plants breeders, farmers, chefs, eaters... There are preconference intensives & tours, many educational sessions and hands-on breakout work sessions, and wonderful meals with many opportunities for networking.   It is also one of the most expensive conferences I attend because it is a long conference and is in Oregon, 4 states away.   This scholarship made it so much more financially feasible for me to go to this conference to continue my learning and outreach around Seed work.

Yvette Henson

San Miguel Basin Colorado State University, Extension

Videos for Educating Colorado Ranchers about Wolf Management in Northern Rockies
Objective:

We will create nonpolitical, educational videos by filming interviews of ranchers, agency managers, and conservation personnel in MT and WY about strategies to manage wolf predation of livestock. Ranchers in these states have been managing in the presence of wolves for over 20 years. Their experiences, with additional interviews of agency personnel and conservationists that are assisting these ranchers, will give Colorado producers the knowledge that other ranchers like themselves have learned to exist with wolves and more specifically, they will learn about management techniques that work in a real world setting.

List partners and/or collaborators: Mark Rose, Videographer, CSU Extension,
Stewart Breck, Predator Researcher, Dept of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, CSU

Description:

2) Project description – answer the following questions:

  1. Who is the target audience? Specifically, identify the group or groups that will be targeted for participation in your project. Practicing ranchers throughout Colorado who are most likely to encounter wolves in the next few years. i.e., Ranchers in Western Colorado

 

  1. How will you promote the event to ensure reaching this audience? It will be posted on the CSU Extension website and on the website for the new Center for Human-Carnivore Coexistence.  It will be marketed to livestock organizations like Colorado Cattlemen's, Colorado Woolgrowers, Agricultural Extension Agents in Western Colorado and local livestock associations.

 

 

  1. Describe briefly what you are going to do, such as hold an educational event, produce educational materials, etc. We will create 8-15 individual video interviews of ranchers and wolf experts in MT and WY. Once these videos are created, we will edit them and place them all on a Colorado State University webpage, individually or as a package.

 

  1. What changes in awareness, knowledge or attitudes are expected to occur as a result of the target audience participating in the project? (Be specific) Wolves have been absent from the sate since the mid 1900's. Contemporary ranchers in Colorado have never had to operate with this predator and it's well documented that wolves prey on domestic livestock, principally cattle and sheep. Current Colorado ranchers have little to no practical knowledge operating with wolves. These videos will raise their awareness about wolf and livestock management tools and practices used by ranchers in the Northern Rockies states who have been dealing with this predator for 20-40 years. The attitudinal changes include learning about wolf management tools so ranchers can see they can manage wolves and still have a sustainable agriculture business.

 

  1. What changes in decision-making, intentions or action do you hope will take place among the target audience? Tools and strategies that can be implemented by Colorado ranchers will enable them to minimize wolf predation and sustain their ranches. These tools are greater than just lethal means, and that's specifically important since killing an introduced grey wolf in Colorado is a federal crime. Non-lethal means are less known than lethal management methods by Colorado ranchers. These educational videos will show other ranchers using nonlethal tools to manage wolves.

 

  1. What is the intended benefit from these changes (e.g. improved stewardship, economics, market access)? Livestock production in Colorado will have to incorporate practices for the management of wolves. If ranchers in other Northern Rockies states can manage them, Colorado ranchers can learn to manage wolves too and thus sustain the Western American tradition of raising livestock and food production in Colorado.

 

  1. Evaluation plan – How will you determine if your educational outcomes have been achieved? (Describe the methods) We will be able to track visitors to the CSU video webpages, and create a post-viewing test to determine how effective the information was and exactly what was learned from the videos.

 

3) Budget Narrative: Explain the expenses listed. Eligible expenses include reasonable speaker and project travel expenses, notebooks, publications used at meeting or event, plot or project inputs (like seed or fertilizer), postage, promotional expenses, photocopies, laboratory analysis expense and equipment rental.

Ineligible expenses include salaries, equipment and food, including food service items such as plates and cups. The exceptions to this "food rule" are if participants must travel more than 50 miles to an event or if the continuity of the event will be broken up by meals being served off-site.  Our estimated expenses are:

  • Lodging - 11 nights at $100 per night for 2 rooms ($2,200)
  • Mileage - 3000 miles; Rent from commercial source, $850 + gas $400 (3000/20 x $2.5/gal) = 1250
  • Meals - 12 days for 2 people (average meal per diem/day $66 x 12 days x 2 is $1584)
  • Miscellaneous video production expenses ($500)
  • The total project budget estimate is $5,534. Amount requested due to COVID $6500. This does not include the salaries of participating individuals.
Outcomes and impacts:

Videos will be available by the end of 2020.

Funding from SARE was used to conduct nine in-person interviews with ranchers and wolf biologists from Wyoming and Colorado. I don’t believe this type of project has ever been done before.  Our goal was to interview ranchers and biologists who have a track record of managing wolves predating on livestock showing how they have handled this. The purpose is to educate Colorado ranchers on predator management options that can sustain ranchers in western Colorado, even with the addition of a new predator. We have about nine total hours of video, which we edited down to about 40 minutes for previewing purposes. We intend to have CSU faculty and Extension Agents preview the video before releasing it to the public. IT potential impact is every rancher in western Colorado that grazes rangeland.

There is no substitute for hearing from people who have had to manage the wolves. We learned of the added costs associated with predation, including poor weight gain of calvers, lower pregnancy percentages, and handling challenges of predated livestock. The documentation of the losses will help Colorado create a fair compensation program for the affected ranchers and ensure sustainability.

Colorado Section of the Society for Rangeland Management (CSSRM) Common Ground Series
Objective:

The project will be focused on a November virtual conference hosted by the Colorado Section of the Society for Rangeland Management (CSSRM) developed to present sustainable management principles & long-term ranch management to both local and state government, NGOs, agency personnel, and ranchers.
Presenters will be a balanced mix of active producers and researchers/agencies.

List partners and/or collaborators:
Annie Overlin – Regional Extension Specialist (Range) – Peaks and Plains Region
Emmett Jordan – Rancher Greeley, CO
Josh Tashiro – NRCS Canon City, CO
Kandee Nourse - District Manager, West Greeley Conservation District
Ray Tschillard - Executive Director, Poudre Learning Center
Matt Pollart - Regional Manager, Colorado State Land Board
Tip Hudson – Associate Professor, Rangeland & Livestock Management, Washington State University
David Augustine – USDA ARS Fort Collins, CO
Justin Derner – USDA ARS, Cheyenne, WY
Don Hijar – Pawnee Butte Seed Inc. Greeley, CO
Clare Hydock – USFS Delta, CO
Josh Saunders – NRCS Ft. Morgan, CO
Ben Berlinger – NRCS Rocky Ford, CO
Dan Nosal – NRCS Franktown, CO
Kim Diller – NRCS Pueblo, CO
Lana Pearson – NRCS Rocky Ford, CO
Baili Foster – NRCS Steamboat Springs, CO

Description:
  • Who is the target audience? Specifically, identify the group or groups that will be targeted for participation in your project.

1) Ranchers

2) Land managers (both public & private)

3) NRCS employees

4) Forest Service employees

5) BLM employees

6) CSU Extension employees

7) Soil Conservation District employees

8) Colorado Section of Society for Range Management members

9) CSU Range students

10) Open Space managers

We hope to have between 100 & 150 people in attendance.

  • How will you promote the event to insure reaching this audience?

The CSSRM will distribute conference information in a variety of newsletters, social media, and email list serves that committee members have access to. The section will also look for promotional assistance through partners such as the Colorado Department of Agriculture’s monthly statewide newsletter.

Additionally, the section will provide an electronic flyer via the CSSRM list serve. In addition to these methods, Barn Media may be willing to provide an announcement on their website and we might be able to get it onto their radio broadcast around the state.

  • Describe briefly what you’re going to do, such as hold an educational event, produce educational materials, etc.

An educational conference will be hosted to discuss topics such as animal health, land health, grazing management, family communication, ranching enterprise diversity, and other critical issues and topics facing ranchers and land managers today. The key focus of this year’s conference will be breaking down communication barriers on the range and encouraging conversation on tough social topics. This will encourage all stakeholders to focus on collaborative land management for the betterment of our resources. Presenters will be a mix of communication experts in the field of natural resources and specialists throughout the field of range. Additional topics will include a tour of the Poudre Learning Center short grass prairie restoration, agricultural leasing opportunities, a young professional focused session, native seeding for reclamation with Don Hijar, interviews with Maria Fernandez-Giminez (CSU) and Nick Trainor (Trainor Cattle Co), and presentations on the Rangeland Assessment Platform presentation and the CARM Grazing Calculator.

  • What changes in awareness, knowledge or attitudes are expected to occur as a result of the target audience participating in the project? 

1) The audience will become familiar with restoration practices available to practitioners on the short grass prairie.

2) The audience should gain knowledge in animal health, range science, & animal

behavior principles which can help improve productivity and keep a ranching operation both sustainable and environmentally sound.

3) The audience should increase their awareness in social relationships and build a stronger knowledge base in how communications can impact the ranching operation. This information should be valuable both within the family and for interconnected relationships working towards improving and building upon current range practices.

4) The audience will become familiar with new tools available to them to improve range-related practices.

  • What changes in decision-making, intentions or action do you hope will take place among the target audience?

1) It is hoped that as a result of this conference the audience members will be better equipped to engage in communication with family members and partnering entities in their ranching operation. We also hope that they will seek to understand differences and find common ground when communicating.

2) As a result of attending this conference the audience should better understand animal health and range management principles that can allow them to make smart decisions for animal/land interaction.

3) As a result of attending this conference, it is hoped that the audience will be more informed on best available science and tools to understand grazing threshold and rangeland health.

4) It is hoped that audience members will utilize knowledge gained from this conference to apply some principles of short grass prairie restoration in their land management techniques and utilize native seeds in restoration efforts.

  • What is the intended benefit from these changes (e.g. improved stewardship, economics, market access)?

1) Better stewardship of both the land & the livestock.

2) Greater potential for profitability and/or efficiencies through use of new tolls in rangeland management.

3) A foundation for starting conversations with people from different backgrounds and differing opinions to better create relationships to benefit rangeland management

  • Evaluation plan – How will you determine if your educational outcomes have been achieved? 

Audience members will be asked to evaluate the program at the end of each of the three days. This way we do not miss feedback from participants who only attended one or two days of the conference. The program evaluation will be conducted either in a paper form or else using clicker technology.

Outcomes and impacts:

Evaluation and Documentation is attached:

CSSRM Video Series Common Ground Evaluation

2020 CSSRM Common Ground Series

Reported we have more than 170 unique registrations and that each session, except for the business meeting, has more than 130 retired participants.

Project Title: Enhancing Canada Thistle control methods in Custer County.
Objective:

In Custer County, there are over 250 acres of Canada Thistle and many landowners are reluctant to use chemical controls. The proposed project will enhance control for Canada Thistle by increasing the presence of Rust Fungus in the county, support the CDA insectary’s work to disburse the fungus, and provide an alternative to chemical control to interested landowners.

List partners and/or collaborators: Custer County Extension Office, Custer County landowners, and the Colorado Department of Agriculture (CDA).

Description:

Project description – answer the following questions:
a. Who is the target audience? Specifically, identify the group or groups that will be targeted for participation in your project.
The primary target audience of this grant is the landowners who wish to refrain from using chemical to control Canada Thistle on their properties. The project will be open to private landowners who are interested in the program, this will include landholding organizations, local governments, and businesses.

An additional target audience is the Colorado Department of Agriculture (CDA) who is interested in this partnership because it informs their insectary staff about the efficacy of rust fungus control on Canada Thistle at the high elevation of Custer County and the relatively dry climate.

b. How will you promote the event to insure reaching this audience?
On file in the Extension Office is a list of landowners who have called seeking alternatives to chemical control of Canada Thistle. This list will be contacted as well as the local High Altitude Gardening Club, the Custer County Weed Advisory Board, and our partners at the San Isabel Land Trust for promotion of the program. The program will also be promoted through social media, newspaper, and radio press releases. This request will purchase 20 releases (each release is about 75 grams of the rust fungus) and so participation will be limited.

To engage the CDA, we will purchase a subscription that will provide 20 releases and will support their staff returning in future years to monitor and collect spores.

c. Describe briefly what you are going to do, such as hold an educational event, produce educational materials, etc.
The Extension Office will order the releases, purchase spray bottles for each landowner, create educational materials, and advertise the program. The Extension Office will also oversee the application of the spores to the Canada Thistle and work with the landowner to make sure

Community members will be recruited for this program through promotional strategies including word of mouth, direct contact, social media, newspaper, and radio press releases. Site visits of all interested landowners will be conducted to identify the best properties to release the fungus. The owners of selected properties will receive a required training on Integrated Pest Management Strategies and how to apply the rust fungus.

Landowner education will teach participants how to inoculate the thistle plants, how to nurture the growth of the fungus for maximum success, and how to mark them for monitoring. Another component of the education will include the access expectations for state and extension staff.

In following years, this project will provide information to the CDA about growing conditions for this fungus in Custer County. For example, was it more successful near water? Was it successful in a grazed or mowed area? The CDA staff will also work with the Extension Office to collect future supplies of the fungus for local and statewide application.

d. What changes in awareness, knowledge or attitudes are expected to occur as a result of the target audience participating in the project? (Be specific)

The primary change is to have landowners manage their Canada Thistle in a way that suppresses the infestations. Because some people do not wish to use chemicals, they are hand pulling or doing nothing to control the infestations.

This project will increase awareness about the safety of host specific biocontrol use, as often people misunderstand how bio-controls are developed. The Rust Fungus is already present on the plant and therefore in the state and county. This project aims to increase the abundance of the fungus for systemic control of thistle patches. In future years, successful marketing of the program, and the success of this specific project on patches will increase interest and help control local and statewide Canada Thistle infestations.

e. What changes in decision-making, intentions or action do you hope will take place among the target audience? (Be specific)
The intent of the inaugural Rust Fungus program is to create a demand for future purchase and release of this fungus in the county. CDA currently lists over 250 acres infested with Canada Thistle in the county and it is the goal of this program that this program continues in future years and using this inaugural year as a catalyst for future participation.

f. What is the intended benefit from these changes (e.g. improved stewardship, economics, market access)?
The benefit of these changes is to improve the control of Canada Thistle in the county on properties that will not receive chemical controls. The other benefit will be the supply of rust fungus for the CDA Insectary for distribution in similar climates across the state.

 

 

Outcomes and impacts:

Evaluation plan – How will you determine if your educational outcomes have been achieved? (Describe the methods)
This project seeks to educate landowners on non-chemical control of Canada Thistle. To evaluate this a pre project survey and post project survey will be created to determine if the stated educational goal is met.

The Enhancing Canada Thistle control methods in Custer County project funded by the Colorado SARE Program is underway.  In September of 2020, we were able to release rust fungus on 8 properties across the county. Participants gained knowledge about the life cycle of Canada Thistle and the Canada Thistle Rust Fungus, with the materials provided by the CDA.  Other materials were provided to educate landowners on the need for noxious weed control in agricultural, natural, and built landscapes. In one instance, volunteers from the HOA where two releases of the fungus were applied assisted in inoculating the thistle.  This strategy of engagement encouraged the idea of stewardship to the participants, who were eager to look out for the spores next growing season, identified future sites for rust fungus release, and contacted other landowners for future years. 

Overall the outcome of the project is right on track and are excited to continue the applied learning in the spring.

Project Title: Nicole Masters, Author of For the Love of Soil Workshop
Objective:

The workshop will be focused on a two-day conference hosted by rancher Steve Oswald and CSU range extension specialist Annie Overlin with Nicole Masters. Nicole Masters, a world-renowned agroecologist will lead ranchers and land managers through soil biology, carbon levels, nutrient cycling, regenerative grazing, & soil health benefits. This workshop will be filmed and available to the public.

List partners and/or collaborators:
Annie Overlin – Regional Extension Specialist (Range) – Peaks and Plains Region
Josh Tashiro – NRCS Canon City, CO
Steve Oswald- Rancher Cotopaxi, CO
Mark Rose—CSU Extension videographer
Colorado Collaborative for Healthy Soils

Description:

Project description – answer the following questions:
a. Who is the target audience? Specifically, identify the group or groups that will be targeted for participation in your project.

1) Ranchers
2) Land managers (both public & private)
3) NRCS employees
4) Forest Service employees
5) BLM employees
6) CSU Extension employees
7) Soil Conservation District employees
8) Colorado Section of Society for Range Management members
9) CSU Range students
10) Open Space managers
11) Rocky Mountain Farmers Union

We hope to have between 70 people in attendance COVID dependent depending on COVID restrictions. The event will be filmed and edited for a short webinar style film.

b. How will you promote the event to insure reaching this audience?

We will promote through CSU Extension small acreage and Range Management websites and facebook pages. We will also invite all ranchers and farmers who have participated in high fungal compost studies with CSU and Mosca-Hooper conservation district and local ranchers. Nicole is a world-renowned regenerative soil scientist capable of drawing an audience. If we cannot hole a live workshop due to COVID, we will video soil pits and fields with Nicole and discuss in a webinar format.

c. Describe briefly what you’re going to do, such as hold an educational event, produce educational materials, etc.

An educational two-day workshop will include a field component on the ranch digging soil pits, analyzing soil tests as a group, and discussing problems with fallow field regeneration. We think this group will share similar issues and will be excited to brainstorm on solutions with Nicole. If we have to video Nicole in the field due to COVID, we will use precautions with just Nicole and likely produce a live webinar the second day so ranchers and ask her specific questions.

d. What changes in awareness, knowledge or attitudes are expected to occur as a result of the target audience participating in the project? (Be specific)

1) The audience will become familiar with restoration practices available to practitioners world-wide.
2) The audience should gain knowledge keeping a ranching operation both sustainable and environmental sound through new emerging soil building techniques.
3) The audience should increase their social circles and connections interested in building soil health.
4) Participants will learn how to interpret soil tests that highlight deficiencies in micronutrients.
4) The audience will become familiar with new tools available to them to improve soil deficiencies such as the use of humic acid, high fungal compost, fish emulsion, and fertilizers to improve soil and plant biology.
5) The audience will collectively discover solutions for similar issues related to pasture renovations. For example, many ranchers have problems with foxtail barley or low organic matter in kochia dominated fields. Nicole’s book explains the micronutrients missing in kochia dominated fields.

e. What changes in decision-making, intentions or actions do you hope will take place among the target audience? (Be specific)

1) It is hoped that as a result of this conference ranchers will do a soil test prior to trying to renovate a pasture and grapple with new emerging science of soil biology. It is also a hope that the community of ranchers engaged will experiment with different techniques and share results.

f. What is the intended benefit from these changes (e.g. improved stewardship, economics, market access)?

1) Better stewardship of both the land & the livestock.
2) Greater potential for profitability and/or efficiencies through use of new tools in rangeland management related to soil health.
3) A foundation for starting conversations with people from different backgrounds and differing opinions to better create relationships to benefit rangeland management.
4) Empower ranchers to enter into different markets including ecosystem services and the potential carbon market.

Outcomes and impacts:

Audience members will be asked to evaluate the program at the end of each of the two
days. This way we do not miss feedback from participants who only attended one or two
days of the conference. The program evaluation will be conducted either in a paper form
or else using clicker technology.

 

CSU Extension and the Western Meat School Webinar Series
Objective:

CSU Extension is partnering with Oregon State, Montana State, New Mexico and University of Wyoming on a Western Meat School (https://westernmeatschool.com/) for cattle, hog, sheep and other (non-poultry) livestock producers interested in building new production, processing and marketing strategies.

We are working on offering a few in-person, socially-distanced class locations (depending on state and local health department regs and the comfort levels of all participants). Otherwise, all 6 weeks of content will be available via webinar with plenty of opportunity for online interaction with speakers and fellow participants. Classes start November 4th and run weekly until December 16th. The cost is $120 per participant and we are applying for funding to establish a scholarship program.

List partners and/or collaborators: Oregon State, Montana State, New Mexico and University of Wyoming

Description:

Project description – answer the following questions:
a. Who is the target audience? Specifically, identify the group or groups that will be targeted for participation in your project.

Cattle, hog, sheep and other (non-poultry) livestock producers in Colorado interested in building new production, processing and marketing strategies.

b. How will you promote the event to insure reaching this audience?

Through CSU Extension, our website (https://foodsystems.colostate.edu/educational-impacts/meat-supply-chains/), and our e-newsletter than includes >1,000 people.

c. Describe briefly what you’re going to do, such as hold an educational event, produce educational materials, etc.

The Western Meat School is an innovative learning experience where farmers, ranchers, butchers, & others will learn how to direct market meat. This 6 week long course will cover key topics in production, processing, & marketing to produce high-quality meat and sell to diverse market channels.

d. What changes in awareness, knowledge or attitudes are expected to occur as a result of the target audience participating in the project? (Be specific)

The meat school covers all of the essential for direct marketing meat from experts in production, marketing, processing and pricing, and includes six interactives classes, two optional classes, textbook, handouts, and a private student forum. Module topics include marketing (identifying and developing new markets for meat), production (finishing ruminants for optimal gains and quality meat), production 2 (animal handling, meat quality, and evaluating a live animal), processing (basics of meat processing, carcass quality, meat science, fabrication, regulations ,and working with your processor), processing 2 (processing for specific markets, maximizing carcass value, packaging and labeling), marketing 2 (selling meat, attracting customers, building loyalty).

e. What changes in decision-making, intentions or action do you hope will take place among the target audience? (Be specific)

As a result of participation in the Western Meat School, Colorado ranchers will better understand the entire meat supply chain, therein producing higher quality meat, understanding how to better communicate with processors and customers, and getting a premium for their product through diverse, loyal markets.

f. What is the intended benefit from these changes (e.g. improved stewardship, economics, market access)?

Participants should become more profitable, in part through gaining access to new and expanded markets as a result of the course.

Outcomes and impacts:

g. Evaluation plan – How will you determine if your educational outcomes have been achieved? (Describe the methods)

Scholarship recipients will participant in pre and post-surveys to understand changes in their business, including marketing, processing, distribution, production, and profitability, as a result of participation in the Western Meat School.

SARE PDP State Plan Evaluation Report Form

Mini-Grants

State: Colorado

Grantee: Becca Jablonski and Martha Sullins

Year: 2020

 

Funding Recipient:

Agent/Educator

Activity/ Resource for which funds were used

Amount used

Date of event(s)

Changes in knowledge and intention that were achieved (pre-course evaluation data)

 

Martha Sullins

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Martha Sullins

 

 

 

 

40 half-price scholarships were awarded to Colorado livestock producers located in 25 counties throughout the state.

 

 

 

Course promotion

 

$60 each x 40 participants=$2400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$800 to Matt LeRoux to ensure participant access to the course and its materials

 

Nov 4-Dec 16, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nov 4-Dec 16, 2020

 

CSU Extension received overview of participant tools used to mitigate risk across livestock businesses. This information will help us continue to design events that help producers meet the challenges they face (see below).

 

The scholarships were awarded to 40 producers throughout the state to facilitate their participation in the course by lowering the costs to access it. Participants raise:

 

Species

Number of producers raising this speacies

% of total

Cattle

28

70.0%

Sheep

6

15.0%

Goats

5

12.5%

Hogs

11

27.5%

Bison

3

7.5%

 

*Note some producers are raising multiple species.

 

  • Verifiable production practices/claims: Of the 33 Colorado producers who responded to this question, they listed the following practices. On average each producer listed 4 separate claims or programs in which they participated or to which they adhered:

 

 

Production practice/claim/program

Number of producers using

% using

Rotational grazing

27

82%

Holistic management

15

45%

Pasture-based

13

39%

100% Grassfed ad Finished

12

36%

Never Ever

11

33%

Non-GMO

10

30%

Beef Quality Assurance

7

21%

Small feedlot

6

18%

Use only local feeds

5

15%

Upcycle waste feeds

4

12%

Certified Organic

3

9%

Certified Humane or AWA

2

6%

Audubon Certified - Grazed on Bird Friendly Land

2

6%

GAP 4

1

3%

 

 

  • Sales channels: 28 producers receiving scholarships noted they already used multiple sales channels for their livestock or livestock products, while 6 used only one channel—either sale barn or auction or raising for breeding stock. The remaining 6 provided no sales outlet information.

 

  • Risk management strategies: Most risk management strategies focused on land management and enterprise diversification. Market diversification represented 8% of all strategies used by Colorado producers to reduce risk exposure.

 

Risk management strategy employed

% using each

Improving soil health and land productivity

18%

Diversification with multiple agricultural enterprises (ex. cattle, hay, small grains, eggs)

17%

Diverse market outlets of three or more channels

8%

Partnerships with other producers

8%

Keep backup supplies of feed and/or hay/silage/etc.

8%

Keep off farm job

8%

Animal Health Plan/Relationship with veterinarian

7%

Proper insurance coverage

7%

Non-ag investments

7%

Geographic diversification

5%

Ownership transition plan/Will

3%

Agritourism venture

2%

Vertical integration of some sort (own feed mill, own processing, own retail, etc.)

2%

Water storage options/diverse water supplies

1%

 

  • Written plans to manage risk: 26 had at least one written plan; 3 had no written plans at all; and 11 did not respond to this question. Of the 26 with written management plans, they covered the following areas, with grazing plan being the most common type and transition plan the least commonly written risk management plan:

 

Plan type

Number with plan

% with plan

Grazing Plan

15

56%

Animal Health Plan

13

48%

Business Plan

11

41%

Production Plan

10

37%

Marketing Plan

5

19%

Transition Plan (for transfer of ownership)

2

7%

 

Total Ranch Analysis for Colorado (TRAC)
Objective:

Total Ranch Analysis for Colorado was developed as a statewide collaborative partnership in extension program involving campus faculty, extension personnel, cattlemen’s associations, and beef producers. Participant ranches are provided an in-depth financial, production, and management analysis of the ranch, using a standardized methodology.

List partners and/or collaborators:
CSU Faculty: Frank Garry; Dan Mooney; Jason Ahola; Jasmine Dillon
Extension: Logan Hoffman; Kevin Jablonski; Bruce Fickenscher
Industry: Colorado Cattlemen’s Association

Description:

Project description:
a. Who is the target audience? Specifically, identify the group or groups that will be targeted for participation in your project.
Colorado beef cattle ranches (cow-calf operations). Any size and location.

b. How will you promote the event to insure reaching this audience?
TRAC works with local extension and cattlemen’s groups to identify and recruit participating ranches. We currently have a waiting list of 15-20 interested ranches.

c. Describe briefly what you’re going to do, such as hold an educational event, produce educational materials, etc.
TRAC team members make on-site ranch visits to meet with producers, listen to their unique successes and challenges, and collect an array of production and financial data. To gain better insight into the ranch involved, a pre and post survey is sent to each producer who participates. Data collected is analyzed to determine critical production, financial and integrated measures. Producers receive a custom report that details performance measures specific to their operations, with only an aggregate summary of results reported to the public for benchmarking purposes.

d. What changes in awareness, knowledge or attitudes are expected to occur as a result of the target audience participating in the project?
Results will strengthen producer and educator knowledge of production and financial targets and increase the value of cow-calf management recommendations in Colorado.

e. What changes in decision-making, intentions or action do you hope will take place among the target audience?
An individual TRAC report is then given to the ranch which provides a unique opportunity for each ranch to identify areas to reduce cost of production and improve production and marketing efficiency. We hope that through the TRAC process each producer will acquire a more accurate record keeping system and utilize performance measures/trends to make improved decisions for their operations.

f. What is the intended benefit from these changes (e.g. improved stewardship, economics, market access)?
To improve ranch family livelihoods through a dedicated partnership around continual analysis and integration of animal-, human-, and resource-oriented program pillars.

Funds ($4,000) are being requested for the TRAC team members (2-3 travelers) to travel and conduct (8) ranch visits to collect producer data and present previous benchmark results. The locations are unknown at this time, but costs include reasonable estimates for mileage reimbursement, 1 day lodging and per diem. We are estimating mileage at an average of 500 miles round trip. 8 ranch visits (500 miles, .52/mile, $260/trip; lodging 1 night X 1 rooms, $120/trip; per diem for 2 travelers, $120/trip).

Outcomes and impacts:

Evaluation plan – How will you determine if your educational outcomes have been achieved?
Post surveys (following completion of a report) are being sent to each producer to assess the effectiveness of the TRAC program. Additionally, a set of 4-5 semi-structured qualitative interviews will be conducted with producers to target change in knowledge development related to financial risk as well as explanation of concerns with new production strategies. Ideally, follow-up surveys will indicate a change in strategy due to the knowledge gained through program attendance. Feedback provided will be used to improve future benchmarking efforts.

na
Objective:

na

Description:

na

Outcomes and impacts:

na

Educational & Outreach Activities

65 Consultations
2 Curricula, factsheets or educational tools
6 Minigrants
2 On-farm demonstrations
10 Online trainings
1 Study circle/focus groups
15 Tours
1 Travel Scholarships
12 Webinars / talks / presentations
8 Workshop field days

Participation Summary:

75 Extension
45 NRCS
40 Researchers
54 Nonprofit
44 Agency
425 Farmers/ranchers

Learning Outcomes

425 Participants gained or increased knowledge, skills and/or attitudes about sustainable agriculture topics, practices, strategies, approaches
75 Ag professionals intend to use knowledge, attitudes, skills and/or awareness learned

Project Outcomes

4 Grants received that built upon this project
10 New working collaborations
30 Agricultural service provider participants who used knowledge and skills learned through this project (or incorporated project materials) in their educational activities, services, information products and/or tools for farmers

Face of SARE

Face of SARE:

Colorado Sustainable agriculture, research and education values diversity and diverse farming/ranching systems that incorporate a variety of basic concepts around culture, plants, animals, water, and our soils. Such diversity leads to greater resiliency in the face of drought, diseases, pests, and economic issues. SARE provides principles to maintain the health of the planet, and sustain livelihoods of local communities. Outreach and promotion of our programs are accomplished through:

  • one on one contacts,
  • face to face programming,
  • web pages
  • government agencies,
  • non governmental organizations,
  • university systems,
  • Extension,
  • and associations.
310 Farmers received information about SARE grant programs and information resources
85 Ag professionals received information about SARE grant programs and information resources
Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE.