Reuniting the Three Sisters: Native American Intercropping and Soil Health

Project Overview

LNC19-422
Project Type: Research and Education
Funds awarded in 2019: $200,000.00
Projected End Date: 12/31/2022
Grant Recipient: Iowa State University
Region: North Central
State: Iowa
Project Coordinator:
Dr. Christina Gish Hill
Email
Iowa State University

Information Products

Returning the ‘three sisters’ – corn, beans and squash – to Native American farms nourishes people, land and cultures (Article/Newsletter/Blog)
CAN TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE BE INTEGRATED INTO MODERN CROPPING SYSTEMS TO ENHANCE SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION? (Article/Newsletter/Blog)
Reuniting the Three Sisters: collaborative science with Native growers to improve soil and community health (Article/Newsletter/Blog)
Collaborative science with Native farmers can overcome barriers to Improve soil and community health (Conference/Presentation Material)
Reuniting the Three Sisters: Using Indigenous Methodologies to Learn More About Three Sisters Intercropping (Webinar)
Three Sisters Reunited: Gardening as Indigenous Resurgence (Conference/Presentation Material)
Reuniting the Three Sisters: Native American Intercropping, Seed Saving, and Plant Health (Fact Sheet)
Indigenous Foodways of the Midwest: The Impacts of Contact and the Importance of Revitalization (Conference/Presentation Material)
Seed Sovereignty, Rematriation, and Three Sisters Intercropping in Native American Communities (Thesis)
Indigenous Food Sovereignty in the American Corn Belt: Resurgence in the Face of Disruption (Conference Proceeding)
Appropriation of Land and Seeds: Settler Colonialism's Impact on Native American Agriculturalists in the Midwestern U.S.” (Conference/Presentation Material)
Seeing the Seeds Home: Increasing Opportunities and Responsibilities of Non-Native Seed-Holding Institutions within the Seed Rematriation Movement (Conference/Presentation Material)
Reuniting the Three Sisters: Native American Intercropping and Plant Health (Conference/Presentation Material)
Reuniting the three sisters: enhancing community and soil health in Native American communities (Conference/Presentation Material)
Growing Together With the Three Sisters: Indigenous Gardening for Cultural Resurgence (Training Agenda)
Three sisters offer lessons of sustainability today (Article/Newsletter/Blog)
Three Sisters Gardening Project (Article/Newsletter/Blog)
Three Sisters Project (Website)
Native intercropping of 'three sisters' — corn, beans and squash — benefits land, ISU research shows (Article/Newsletter/Blog)
Christina Gish Hill on the Three Sisters and Native Agriculture (Article/Newsletter/Blog)
Recovering Indigenous Agriculture (Article/Newsletter/Blog)
Native agriculture never went away. Now it is on the rise. (Article/Newsletter/Blog)
Cultural connections to soil and agronomic impacts of the maize, bean, squash polyculture methods in 5 Indigenous Communities of the Upper US Midwest (Thesis)

Commodities

  • Agronomic: corn, sunflower
  • Vegetables: beans, cucurbits
  • Additional Plants: native plants

Practices

  • Crop Production: intercropping, seed saving
  • Education and Training: extension, on-farm/ranch research, participatory research, workshop
  • Natural Resources/Environment: carbon sequestration, soil stabilization
  • Soil Management: soil quality/health
  • Sustainable Communities: ethnic differences/cultural and demographic change, local and regional food systems, food sovereignty

    Abstract:

    This project documented cultural and agronomic underpinnings of Three Sisters intercropping (3SI), with the overall objective of collaborating with Native gardeners to begin a 3SI research and education plot at Iowa State University’s Horticulture Research Station. Our central hypothesis was that working in collaboration with Native people to use their cultural knowledge of 3SI to design current gardening systems would result in improved yields and soil heath. Our rationale was that by working collaboratively with Native gardeners, our research would provide evidence for the socio-cultural, nutritional, and agroecological benefits of rejuvenating Native agriculture. Our specific objectives were to:

    1) Assess the cultural, nutritional, and agricultural importance of 3SI among 5 Native American communities. To accomplish this objective, we used interviews, community surveys, and evaluations of geographic food availability to explore the impacts of revitalizing the practice.

    2) Engage Native gardeners/farmers through citizen science. To accomplish this objective, we advanced our current collaborations with Native gardeners to collect soil and crop data from their own Three Sisters gardens.

    3) Evaluate the effects of 3SI on crop yield and soil health. To accomplish this objective, we used citizen science data collected in Objective 2 and establish a collaborative long-term 3SI research and education plot at Iowa State University, designed with direct input from Native gardeners. 

    Learning outcomes included increased awareness of the cultural, nutritional and agroecological value of 3SI to Native communities.  Native participants gained deeper knowledge of soil health and the skills to test their soil. Action outcomes included improved agroecological practices for soil health. Participants took soil tests and implemented new practices based on the results.

    Project objectives:

    Learning outcomes included:

    1) increased awareness of the practice of 3SI and its historical, cultural, and nutritional value to the community.

    2) deepened knowledge of soil health, the connection to nutrition, and the acquisition of skills to test their soil.

    Action outcomes included:

    1) broadened and deepened community engagement with personal and community gardening (via learning outcome 1).

    2) improved agroecological practices that promote soil health through learning outcome

    3). Long term action outcomes of our collaborations included developing improved strategies for 3SI to increase the sustainability of Native communities and greater cooperation among ISU and Native communities and partners.

    Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or SARE.